E-commerce imaging

PixelLift

Make Listings Irresistible Instantly

PixelLift automatically enhances and styles e-commerce product photos for independent online sellers and boutique owners who batch-upload catalogs, delivering studio-quality, brand-consistent images in minutes; its AI retouches, removes backgrounds, applies one-click style-presets to batch-process hundreds of photos, cutting editing time up to 80% and boosting listing conversions 10–20%.

Subscribe to get amazing product ideas like this one delivered daily to your inbox!

PixelLift

Product Details

Explore this AI-generated product idea in detail. Each aspect has been thoughtfully created to inspire your next venture.

Vision & Mission

Vision
Empower independent sellers to instantly showcase studio-quality, brand-consistent product photos that boost buyer trust and sales.
Long Term Goal
Within 4 years, empower 100,000 independent sellers to increase listing conversions by 15% and process one billion product images annually to standardize brand visuals.
Impact
Cuts image-editing time by up to 80% and photo costs 50–70% for independent online sellers and boutique owners, processing 200–500 images per hour to standardize brand visuals and increase listing conversion rates 10–20%, accelerating catalog updates by 30%.

Problem & Solution

Problem Statement
Independent online sellers and boutique owners who batch-upload catalogs struggle with inconsistent, amateur product photos and costly, time-consuming manual edits; templates fail to enforce brand-consistent visuals and hiring photographers is prohibitively expensive.
Solution Overview
PixelLift uses AI-driven retouching to remove backgrounds, correct lighting, and align composition, combined with one-click brand style-presets to batch-process hundreds of product photos into studio-quality, brand-consistent listings in minutes per upload.

Details & Audience

Description
PixelLift automatically enhances and styles e-commerce product photos to deliver studio-quality imagery. It serves independent online sellers and boutique owners who upload catalogs frequently. PixelLift reduces editing time by up to 80%, standardizes visuals across SKUs, and increases listing conversions. Its signature AI style-presets preserve brand identity and batch-process hundreds of images with one click.
Target Audience
Independent online sellers and boutique owners (20–45) needing fast, affordable brand-consistent photos who batch-upload.
Inspiration
At a crowded weekend market I watched a solo jewelry maker perch her phone on a mug, angle two desk lamps, and use blue painter's tape to hide harsh shadows. She uploaded dozens of imperfect photos that afternoon and watched customers pass by. Seeing exhaustion and lost sales in that tiny setup sparked PixelLift: an automated, brand-safe photo tool that creates studio-quality, consistent images in minutes.

User Personas

Detailed profiles of the target users who would benefit most from this product.

A

Automation Architect Avery

- 29–37, US/EU tech hubs - Ecommerce ops/automation lead at high-SKU DTC or marketplace brand - CS/IS degree; 5–8 years scripting and integrations - Manages tooling budgets up to $1.5k/month

Background

Started as a support analyst scripting scrapers, moved into DTC ops. Maintaining brittle Photoshop actions and RPA for images pushed them to find an API-first alternative.

Needs & Pain Points

Needs

1. Reliable API for large batch image processing 2. Webhooks and logs for end-to-end observability 3. Fine-grained presets manageable via version control

Pain Points

1. Brittle scripts break on edge-case images 2. Slow, manual approvals bottleneck daily listings 3. Vendor rate limits derail launch timelines

Psychographics

- Automates repeatable tasks on principle - Values reliability, observability, and clear SLAs - Prefers APIs over GUIs whenever possible - Experiments, but demands rollback safety

Channels

1. GitHub — sample repos 2. Stack Overflow — API fixes 3. LinkedIn — ops community 4. YouTube — automation tutorials 5. Reddit r/ecommerce — tooling chatter

R

Recommerce Refiner Riley

- 26–42, urban US/UK; 5–10 staff recommerce shop - 200–600 listings/week across apparel, electronics, home goods - Warehouse photo corner; smartphones, light tents, rolling racks - Lean budget; prefers predictable SaaS under $500/month

Background

Started on Poshmark, grew into a brick-and-click consignment store. Learned inconsistent photos tank sell-through and trigger returns, demanding faster, cleaner intake imagery.

Needs & Pain Points

Needs

1. One-tap cleanup for chaotic backgrounds 2. Presets for common used-goods defects 3. Bulk processing tied to SKU barcodes

Pain Points

1. Inconsistent lighting across stations ruins cohesion 2. Background clutter triggers listing rejections 3. Manual edits choke intake volume

Psychographics

- Pragmatic speed over perfection - Cares about trustworthy, honest visuals - Obsessed with throughput and rejection rates - Values tools staff learn instantly

Channels

1. Facebook Groups — reseller tips 2. YouTube — reseller workflows 3. Instagram — shop updates 4. TikTok — sourcing content 5. Reddit r/Flipping — operations advice

T

Test-and-Tune Taylor

- 27–35, DTC brand growth lead - Manages Shopify storefront and Meta/Google ads - Owns CAC/ROAS and PDP conversion goals - Tooling budget: $1k–$3k/month

Background

Came from performance media buying; learned creative impacts results more than bids. Built a weekly habit of iterating PDP image assets.

Needs & Pain Points

Needs

1. Rapid variant generation from master shots 2. UTM mapping to A/B test frameworks 3. Preset libraries for seasonal campaigns

Pain Points

1. Designers backlogged, slowing experiments 2. Hard attributing wins to image changes 3. Manual re-uploads across channels

Psychographics

- Data-first, yet aesthetics-savvy - Loves rapid experiments and clear winners - Values brand consistency across variants - Rejects tools lacking built-in analytics

Channels

1. Google Analytics — performance dashboards 2. Meta Ads Manager — creative testing 3. LinkedIn — growth threads 4. Twitter/X — performance tips 5. YouTube — CRO case studies

S

Studio-Streamliner Sam

- 32–48, studio owner/manager - Serves SMB and mid-market ecommerce clients - 500–2,000 images/week; 3–8 staff photographers - Uses Capture One, Lightroom, tethered setups

Background

Started as a retoucher burning nights on clipping paths. Scaling exposed post-production and client approval bottlenecks, demanding reliable batch automation.

Needs & Pain Points

Needs

1. Batch presets matching studio lighting profiles 2. Client review links with auto-approvals 3. Non-destructive edits exportable to PSD

Pain Points

1. Manual clipping eats margin and morale 2. Client revisions stall delivery timelines 3. Inconsistent crops across shooters

Psychographics

- Craftsman mindset, production pragmatism - Protects visual quality and client trust - Seeks predictable timelines and margins - Embraces automation that respects artistry

Channels

1. Instagram — portfolio sharing 2. YouTube — studio workflows 3. Fstoppers — technique articles 4. LinkedIn — client acquisition 5. Photo District News — industry news

L

Line-Sheet Lila

- 30–45, wholesale/merchandising lead at fashion or home brands - Publishes quarterly catalogs; 300–800 SKUs - Works in Airtable, InDesign, NuORDER/Faire - Coordinates factories, studios, and sales reps

Background

Rose from merchandising assistant to owning the wholesale calendar. Missed orders due to sloppy, inconsistent catalog imagery, pushing a systematized image pipeline.

Needs & Pain Points

Needs

1. Consistent crops/aspect ratios for PDFs 2. Color-preserving background removal 3. Bulk renaming to SKU conventions

Pain Points

1. Crops misalign across pages 2. Colors shift after export 3. Last-minute reshoots wreck schedules

Psychographics

- Deadline-driven, detail-obsessed - Values color accuracy and sizing consistency - Prefers templates and reusable systems - Avoids risky last-minute changes

Channels

1. LinkedIn — wholesale groups 2. Email — vendor updates 3. NuORDER — buyer portal tips 4. YouTube — InDesign tutorials 5. Faire Community — best practices

P

Private-Label Polisher Priya

- 28–40, manages 3–6 private-label lines - Sells on Amazon, Walmart, and Shopify - Coordinates with overseas suppliers; variable asset quality - Flexible budget when ROI is clear

Background

Began in sourcing, learned design basics to compensate for bad assets. Now prioritizes repeatable styling that elevates commodity products across channels.

Needs & Pain Points

Needs

1. Supplier-specific preset bundles 2. Compliance modes for Amazon/Walmart simultaneously 3. Auto-crop to each channel’s template

Pain Points

1. Mixed lighting, glare, and resolution issues 2. Rejections from conflicting marketplace standards 3. Costly reshoots for minor fixes

Psychographics

- Brand-first pragmatist - Hates visual inconsistency across listings - Chooses scalable, repeatable processes - Tracks conversion and returns closely

Channels

1. Amazon Seller Forums — policy changes 2. LinkedIn — private-label groups 3. YouTube — listing optimization 4. Helium 10 — research community 5. WhatsApp — supplier coordination

Product Features

Key capabilities that make this product valuable to its target users.

Role Matrix

A visual, brand-scoped permission builder that lets admins define who can view, apply, edit, approve, or publish presets per brand or collection. Simulate a user’s access before saving to prevent misconfigurations, speed onboarding, and protect brand integrity.

Requirements

Brand & Collection-Scoped Permission Model
"As a brand admin, I want to assign permissions by brand and collection so that each team member only sees and acts on relevant presets."
Description

Establish a granular, brand- and collection-scoped permission model that defines allowed actions—view, apply, edit, approve, publish—on resources like Style Presets, Collections, and Batch Jobs. Support role-based assignment with scoped overrides, brand isolation (multi-tenant), and inheritance rules (brand → collection). Provide an efficient evaluation engine with caching and indexing to resolve effective permissions at request time across the app and API. Include default system roles and migration of existing users into the new model.

Acceptance Criteria
Assign brand-level role with collection override
Given User U has role "Preset Editor" at Brand B And Collection C belongs to Brand B And a collection-level override on C grants "approve" and denies "publish" for U When U requests effective permissions for Preset P in Collection C via API Then the response includes allows: ["view","apply","edit","approve"] and denies: ["publish"] And POST /presets/{id}/publish returns 403 for Preset P in Collection C And POST /presets/{id}/approve returns 200 for Preset P in Collection C And for Preset Q in Collection D (same brand, no override), allows: ["view","apply","edit"] and denies: ["approve","publish"] And app UI buttons reflect the same permissions (approve enabled, publish disabled in C; approve/publish disabled in D)
Default system roles and permissions matrix
Rule: The following default roles exist and are assignable at brand scope with optional collection overrides - Brand Admin: allow {view, apply, edit, approve, publish} on {Style Presets, Collections, Batch Jobs} within brand; allow manage role assignments within brand - Preset Editor: allow {view, apply, edit} on {Style Presets, Batch Jobs}; view-only on Collections; deny {approve, publish} - Approver: allow {view, apply, approve} on {Style Presets, Batch Jobs}; view-only on Collections; deny {edit, publish} - Publisher: allow {view, apply, publish} on {Style Presets, Batch Jobs}; view-only on Collections; deny {edit, approve} - Operator: allow {view, apply} on {Batch Jobs using only approved presets}; view-only on {Style Presets, Collections}; deny {edit, approve, publish} - Viewer: allow {view} only on all resources in scope; deny {apply, edit, approve, publish} Validation: - An Operator creating a Batch Job with any unapproved preset returns 403 - A Publisher cannot approve a preset (returns 403) but can publish an approved preset (200) - A Viewer cannot access POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE endpoints for any resource (403), and UI shows no action controls
Brand isolation across tenants
Given User U has assignments only within Brand A and none in Brand B When U calls GET /brands/B/style-presets or GET /style-presets?brand=B Then the API returns 403 Forbidden When U calls GET /style-presets without brand filter Then only Brand A presets are returned and total/count reflect Brand A data only And direct access to any resource by ID that belongs to Brand B returns 403 And cross-brand aggregation endpoints exclude Brand B data for U
Permission evaluation engine performance and cache invalidation
Given a steady-state load of ≥500 permission checks/second across ≥1,000 users and ≥5 brands When the system warms up Then p95 evaluation latency ≤25 ms and p99 ≤50 ms for cached checks And on cold cache (first check after deploy) p95 ≤150 ms And steady-state cache hit ratio ≥85% When an admin changes a user’s role or override Then all affected effective-permission cache entries are invalidated within 2 seconds across nodes And the very next check reflects the change (no stale allows beyond 2 seconds) And error rate from permission evaluation <0.1% over a 30-minute soak test
Resource-level enforcement across app and API
Given a user lacking a required action on a specific resource When they attempt that action via UI or API Then UI control is disabled/hidden and API responds 403 with error_code "ERR_FORBIDDEN" and reason "missing_permission:<action>" Validation matrix: - Style Presets: view | apply | edit | approve | publish enforced per effective permissions - Collections: view enforced for all roles with scope; edit restricted to Brand Admin; approve/publish not exposed for Collections unless explicitly permitted by role (default deny) - Batch Jobs: view | apply | publish enforced per effective permissions; edit limited to job owner with edit permission or Brand Admin And list endpoints exclude resources the user cannot view; counts reflect only viewable resources
Permission precedence and inheritance resolution
Rules: - Default: no assignment implies no access - Same-scope multiple roles: effective allows = union(allows); effective denies = union(denies); any deny overrides corresponding allow - Cross-scope precedence: collection overrides take precedence over brand assignments; effective permissions at collection = (brand allows ∪ collection allows) − (brand denies ∪ collection denies); any explicit deny wins - Cross-brand isolation: roles from one brand never apply to another - Mixed outcomes are consistent across UI and API for the same user/resource/action
Migration of existing users into new model
Given a pre-migration snapshot of each user’s effective permissions by brand and collection And default system roles are available When the migration script executes on staging against production-like data Then 100% of users retain identical effective permissions post-migration (no loss, no escalation) And 0 users gain access to new brands/collections they did not previously access And 0 users are left unmapped; otherwise migration fails with a report And the migration is idempotent: re-running produces no changes And a production run completes within the maintenance window and logs success for 100% of assignments
Visual Role Matrix Builder UI
"As an admin, I want a clear matrix UI to manage role permissions so that I can configure access quickly and confidently."
Description

Deliver a visual matrix builder that lets admins assign actions to roles across brands and collections through a grid UI. Include bulk select, drag-to-fill, search/filter by user, role, brand, collection, and resource type, plus keyboard accessibility and WCAG AA compliance. Show immediate visual cues for inherited vs. explicit permissions and pending changes. Support draft mode with reversible changes and clear save/cancel, and integrate with the simulator for instant previews.

Acceptance Criteria
Grid-based assignment of actions to roles per brand/collection
Given an admin opens the Role Matrix for a selected scope (All Brands/Specific Brand/Specific Collection) When the matrix loads Then the grid displays roles as rows and actions (View, Apply, Edit, Approve, Publish) across the selected resources with current effective states visible And empty/error states are not shown when data is available Given roles, brands, and collections exist When the admin toggles a permission cell Then the cell reflects the new state immediately in the UI as a pending explicit change without persisting to the server And a pending-changes counter increments Given at least one pending change exists When the admin clicks Save Then all pending changes are persisted and the UI updates to show them as explicit (not pending) And a success toast appears within 2 seconds Given a save attempt is made When the server responds with an error Then an error message is displayed with retry And no changes are persisted and pending indicators remain Given up to 50 roles and 200 resources When the matrix first renders Then time to interactive is under 2 seconds on a standard laptop (i5+, 8GB RAM, latest Chrome)
Bulk select and drag-to-fill permissions
Given the matrix is visible When the admin clicks a row header (role) or column header (action) Then all visible cells in that row/column are selected for bulk edit Given multiple cells are selected via mouse drag or Shift+Arrow keys When the admin presses Space/Enter or uses the bulk toggle control Then the selected cells all change to the chosen state and are marked as pending And a confirmation chip shows the number of cells affected Given some selected cells are already explicitly set When a bulk operation is applied Then existing explicit states are overwritten to the new explicit state And inherited states become explicit with the new value Given a bulk operation was just applied When the admin presses Ctrl+Z or clicks Undo Then the last bulk change is reverted without persisting Given very large selections (≥1000 cells) When a bulk operation is applied Then the UI remains responsive and completes the update within 1 second
Search and filter by user, role, brand, collection, and resource type
Given the admin enters text in the search box When the query matches roles, users, brands, collections, or actions Then the matrix filters to matching entities and highlights the match Given filters are applied for Role, Brand, Collection, and Resource Type When multiple filters are combined Then the result set reflects the intersection of all filters And a visible chip list shows active filters with one-click clear Given a specific user is selected in the User filter When the matrix updates Then only roles/resources relevant to that user are shown And effective permissions for that user are highlighted distinct from global role defaults Given a dataset of up to 5,000 visible cells post-filter When typing or changing filters Then results update within 300 ms on a standard laptop Given no results match When filters are applied Then an empty state appears with a clear-filters action
Keyboard navigation and WCAG AA compliance
Given the matrix is focused When the admin uses Tab/Shift+Tab Then focus moves through interactive controls in a logical order with a visible focus indicator Given a cell has focus When the admin presses Arrow keys Then focus moves to the adjacent cell; Space/Enter toggles the cell state; Shift+Arrow extends selection for range edit Given a screen reader is active When a cell receives focus Then it announces role, action, resource, current state (checked/unchecked), and source (explicit/inherited/pending) Given the UI is rendered When evaluated for contrast Then all text and interactive elements meet WCAG 2.2 AA contrast (≥4.5:1; large text ≥3:1) Given all interactive elements When tested with keyboard only Then there are no keyboard traps; skip links are available to jump to the matrix and filters; all controls have accessible names and roles Given ARIA attributes are required When cells and controls are rendered Then proper semantics (aria-checked, aria-pressed, aria-describedby) are present and valid
Visual indicators for inherited, explicit, and pending states
Given the matrix is visible When permissions are displayed Then inherited, explicit, and pending states are visually distinct using both color and iconography And a legend explains the indicators Given a cell is inherited When the admin hovers or focuses the cell Then a tooltip reveals the inheritance source (e.g., Brand default, Role policy) without obscuring the cell Given a cell is toggled during the session When the state changes Then a pending badge appears on the cell and a global pending count updates in the header Given multiple pending changes exist When the admin clicks the Pending filter Then only cells with pending status are shown And clearing the filter restores the full view
Draft mode with reversible changes and clear save/cancel
Given no changes have been made When the admin interacts with the matrix Then Save and Cancel are disabled until the first change occurs Given at least one change is made When the draft banner appears Then Save and Cancel become enabled and show the number of pending changes Given pending changes exist When the admin clicks Cancel Then a confirmation dialog appears to discard or keep changes And choosing Discard reverts all cells to their prior effective state and clears the draft Given pending changes exist When the admin navigates away or attempts to close the page Then an unsaved-changes prompt appears preventing accidental loss Given a single cell was changed When the admin uses Revert on that cell Then the cell returns to its prior effective (inherited/explicit) state without affecting others
Simulator integration for instant previews before save
Given the simulator panel is open When the admin selects a user and scope (Brand or Collection) Then the simulator shows the user’s effective permissions for presets and related actions before any new changes are saved Given the admin toggles permissions in the matrix When the simulator is visible Then the simulator updates within 300 ms to reflect the predicted effective access under the draft changes and is clearly labeled as Preview Given incompatible or conflicting changes are made When the simulator evaluates the draft Then conflicts are highlighted with guidance on which role/resource causes the conflict Given Save is clicked When persistence succeeds Then the simulator switches from Preview to Live and matches the post-save matrix state
Access Simulator (What‑If) Preview
"As an admin, I want to simulate a user’s access before saving so that I can catch and prevent misconfigurations."
Description

Provide a what-if access simulator that previews a specific user’s effective permissions before saving changes. Allow testing by selecting a user and/or a set of roles, brands, and collections, and display allowed/denied actions with explanations (source role, inheritance, conflicting rules). Generate warnings for risky configurations and show the impact delta compared to current production settings.

Acceptance Criteria
Simulate Existing User’s Effective Permissions
Given I am an Admin on the Role Matrix And I open the Access Simulator When I select an existing user Then the simulator preloads the user’s current roles and scoped brands/collections And the current production effective permissions are captured as the baseline for delta And the Simulate action becomes available
Simulate Ad Hoc Roles/Brands/Collections (No User)
Given I am on the Access Simulator When I do not select a user but select one or more roles and at least one brand or collection Then the simulator calculates effective permissions for the hypothetical identity And if no role is selected, the Simulate action remains disabled with a validation message
Show Allowed/Denied With Explanations Per Scope
Given a simulation has been run Then for each brand/collection scope the actions View, Apply, Edit, Approve, Publish are displayed with Allowed or Denied And each action provides a Why explanation including source role(s), rule type (allow/deny), scope, and inheritance details And if multiple roles contribute, all contributors are listed with the applied precedence noted
Highlight Conflicts and Resolution Rationale
Given at least one conflicting rule exists across roles or scopes for the simulated identity When the simulation is run Then the UI flags the conflict on the affected action and scope And the simulator explicitly states which rule prevails and the resolution rationale (e.g., precedence, specificity) And the explanation references the originating role and scope for the prevailing and losing rules
Risky Configuration Warnings
Given simulation results differ from production When the simulated identity would gain any new Approve or Publish permission in any brand or collection Then a High-risk change warning is displayed listing affected brands/collections and actions And when any existing Approve or Publish permission would be removed Then a Potentially disruptive change warning is displayed listing affected brands/collections and actions And when the scope of any action expands from one brand/collection to more than one Then a Scope expansion warning is displayed with before/after counts
Delta vs Production Summary and Details
Given a baseline of current production permissions exists When the simulation results differ from production Then a Delta panel shows counts of Added, Removed, and Changed permissions by action and by brand/collection And a detailed list of deltas is displayed with before → after state per action and scope And each delta item links to its corresponding Why explanation
Simulation Is Non-Destructive and Resettable
Given I have staged selections and run a simulation Then no role, scope, or permission changes are persisted to production And when I click Reset, the simulator clears staged selections and results back to the baseline And when I navigate away or refresh, no permission changes are applied to production
Approval & Publish Gate Enforcement
"As a brand owner, I want publishing gated by approval so that only vetted presets go live and protect brand integrity."
Description

Enforce approval and publishing rules across PixelLift. Only users with Approve can transition presets to Approved; Publish requires Approved status and the Publish permission within the same scope. Apply these gates to batch operations, API endpoints, and integrations, with clear error messages and UI indicators. Support configurable review requirements (e.g., dual-approval) per brand, and block cross-brand publishes.

Acceptance Criteria
Approval Gate: Only Approvers Can Set Preset to Approved
Given a user without Approve permission in Brand A and a preset within Brand A in Review When the user attempts to approve via the UI Then the Approve control is disabled and a tooltip states "Requires Approve permission in Brand A" Given the same user and preset When the user calls the approve API endpoint Then the request is rejected with HTTP 403 and error code PERMISSION_DENIED including fields action=approve, requiredPermission=Approve, scopeType=brand, scopeId=Brand A, entityType=preset, entityId=<presetId>; and the preset status remains unchanged Given a user with Approve permission in Brand A and the preset in Review When the user approves Then the preset status transitions to Approved and an audit log records approver userId, timestamp, scopeId, previousStatus, newStatus=Approved
Publish Gate: Requires Approved Status and Publish Permission in Same Scope
Given a preset in Approved within Brand A and a user with Publish permission in Brand A When the user publishes via UI or API Then the operation succeeds (HTTP 200), the preset status becomes Published, and an audit log records publisher userId, timestamp, scopeId, previousStatus=Approved, newStatus=Published Given a preset not in Approved within Brand A and any user When the user attempts to publish Then the request is rejected with HTTP 409 PRECONDITION_FAILED and message "Preset must be Approved before publish"; no status change occurs Given a preset in Approved within Brand A and a user without Publish in Brand A When the user attempts to publish Then the request is rejected with HTTP 403 PERMISSION_DENIED including requiredPermission=Publish and scopeId=Brand A; no status change occurs
Dual-Approval: Configurable Review Requirements Per Brand
Given Brand B has dual-approval requirement set to 2 and a preset in Review within Brand B When the first eligible approver approves Then the preset is not yet Approved, approvalCount=1, and the approver is recorded; the same user cannot approve again (HTTP 409 DUPLICATE_APPROVAL) Given the same preset and a second distinct user with Approve in Brand B When the second user approves Then the preset status becomes Approved and both approvals are recorded with userId and timestamps Given Brand C has dual-approval disabled (or set to 1) When a user with Approve in Brand C approves a preset in Review Then the preset immediately becomes Approved with a single approval recorded
Batch Operations: Per-Item Gate Enforcement and Result Summary
Given a batch request to approve or publish multiple presets with mixed states and permissions When the batch operation is executed via UI or API Then each item is evaluated independently against approval/publish gates; successful items are processed, and failed items return itemized errors with HTTP status per item (e.g., 403 PERMISSION_DENIED, 409 PRECONDITION_FAILED) including action, requiredPermission (if applicable), and scope And the batch response includes a per-item results array and aggregate counts (total, succeeded, failed); processing continues despite failures in other items; each item update is atomic
API and Integrations: Consistent Gate Enforcement and Error Schema
Given any API or integration endpoint that changes preset status (approvePreset, publishPreset, partner integrations) When a caller without required permission in the preset’s scope attempts the action Then the endpoint responds with HTTP 403 PERMISSION_DENIED and a standardized error body containing fields: code, message, action, requiredPermission, scopeType, scopeId, entityType, entityId, correlationId Given the preset state does not meet preconditions (e.g., publish on non-Approved) When the action is requested Then the endpoint responds with HTTP 409 PRECONDITION_FAILED and the standardized error body; no side effects occur Given the same action is attempted via different channels (UI, REST API, integration) When gates are violated Then the error codes and messages are consistent across channels
Cross-Brand Publish Block
Given a preset scoped to Brand A and a user with Publish permission only in Brand B (or in both A and B) When the user attempts to publish the Brand A preset into Brand B (e.g., targetBrandId=Brand B) Then the request is rejected with HTTP 403 SCOPE_MISMATCH and message "Cross-brand publish is blocked"; no change occurs to the preset or Brand B assets; an audit log records the denied attempt with sourceBrandId and targetBrandId Given a publish attempt without an explicit target brand where the preset scope is Brand A When processed Then the publish only targets Brand A; any attempt to route output to another brand is blocked with the same error
UI Indicators and Messaging for Gate States
Given a user views a preset details page When the user lacks Approve or Publish permissions or the preset is not in the required state Then the Approve/Publish controls are disabled with tooltips that explicitly state the unmet requirement (e.g., "Requires Publish permission in Brand A" or "Preset must be Approved to publish") Given dual-approval is required and exactly one approval has been recorded When the page loads Then the UI displays an approval progress indicator (e.g., 1/2 approvals) and the Approve button is disabled for the user who already approved Given an action fails due to gate enforcement When the UI shows an error banner/toast Then the message text matches the API error (code and reason) and includes the scope; the user is provided a link or CTA to request access or contact an admin
Conflict Detection & Safe‑Guard Validation
"As an admin, I want automated validation of role changes so that I avoid breaking access or exposing sensitive presets."
Description

Add pre-save validation and conflict detection that scans role matrices for contradictory, over-broad, or unsafe policies. Detect cases like publish without approve, approve without view, dangling roles without members, no remaining admin for a brand, or cross-brand exposures. Provide inline warnings, remediation suggestions, and hard blocks for critical violations.

Acceptance Criteria
Hard Block: Publish Without Approve
Given an admin edits the Brand X role matrix And a role grants Publish on any preset scope within Brand X And the same role’s effective permissions (including inherited roles) do not grant Approve on the same scopes When the admin attempts to save Then the save is blocked and no changes persist And an inline error is shown at each offending permission with severity=Critical and code=PUB_NO_APPROVE And the error lists the affected role(s) and scope(s) count And a remediation suggestion is available to add Approve to the matching scopes or remove Publish And the Save action is disabled until all PUB_NO_APPROVE conflicts are resolved And an audit log entry is recorded with action=validation_blocked, code=PUB_NO_APPROVE, brand=Brand X, count >= 1
Warning: Approve Without View
Given an admin edits the Brand X role matrix And a role grants Approve on any preset scope within Brand X And the same role’s effective permissions do not grant View on the same scopes When validation runs (on change, simulate, or pre-save) Then an inline warning appears with severity=Warning and code=APP_NO_VIEW for each affected scope And a “Add View for affected scopes” quick-fix is available And saving is allowed without blocking And an audit log entry is recorded with action=validation_warning, code=APP_NO_VIEW, count >= 1
Warning: Dangling Roles Without Members
Given the role matrix contains one or more roles with zero assigned members or groups When validation runs Then a warning appears with severity=Warning and code=DANGLING_ROLE for each such role And a remediation suggestion is available to assign members or archive the role And saving is allowed And the warning summary displays total dangling roles count
Hard Block: No Remaining Brand Admin
Given changes would remove or demote the last user/group with Admin capability for Brand X When the admin attempts to save Then the save is blocked and no changes persist And an inline error appears with severity=Critical and code=NO_BRAND_ADMIN And the error lists current candidates who meet Admin criteria before the change (=0 after change) And a remediation suggestion is available to assign Admin to at least one user/group for Brand X And Save is disabled until NO_BRAND_ADMIN is resolved And an audit log entry is recorded with action=validation_blocked, code=NO_BRAND_ADMIN, brand=Brand X
Hard Block: Cross-Brand Exposure
Given a permission grants View/Apply/Edit/Approve/Publish on Brand B to a principal whose brand membership excludes Brand B When validation runs or on save Then the change is blocked with severity=Critical and code=CROSS_BRAND_EXPOSURE And the error lists the principal(s), source brand membership, and target brand(s) exposed And a remediation suggestion is available to restrict scope to allowed brands or update membership And Save is disabled until all CROSS_BRAND_EXPOSURE conflicts are resolved And an audit log entry is recorded with action=validation_blocked, code=CROSS_BRAND_EXPOSURE, count >= 1
Consistency: Simulation Mirrors Save Validation
Given the admin runs “Simulate access as User U” for Brand X before saving And conflicts exist per PUB_NO_APPROVE, APP_NO_VIEW, DANGLING_ROLE, NO_BRAND_ADMIN, or CROSS_BRAND_EXPOSURE When simulation is executed Then the simulation pane displays the same validation items with identical codes, severities, counts, and affected entities as pre-save validation And resolving a conflict in the matrix updates the simulation validation list in real time (<300 ms p95) And running pre-save validation after simulation yields identical results
Performance: Validation at Scale
Given a role matrix up to 200 roles, 10 brands, 500 presets/collections, and up to 10,000 permission edges When the user edits any single permission Then inline validation feedback appears within 200 ms p95 and 400 ms p99 And running “Simulate access” completes within 500 ms p95 and 1000 ms p99 And “Save” pre-commit validation completes within 1000 ms p95 and 2000 ms p99 And validation does not freeze the UI thread (>55 FPS) during feedback rendering
Audit Trail & Versioned Policy History
"As a compliance officer, I want versioned audit history of permission changes so that I can trace decisions and restore previous states."
Description

Implement end-to-end audit logging and versioned history for all permission-related changes, including who changed what, when, and the before/after diff. Support per-brand filtering, CSV/JSON export, immutable logs for compliance, and one-click rollback to a prior version with dependency checks. Surface recent changes within the Role Matrix UI and via API.

Acceptance Criteria
Audit Event on Role Matrix Permission Change
Given an admin with manage-permissions privileges edits a preset permission within the Role Matrix for brand X When they change a user's ability and click Save Then the system records an audit event with fields: event_id, tenant_id, brand_id, actor_id, actor_email, action='permission.update', resource_type='preset_permission', resource_id, timestamp (UTC ISO 8601), request_id, ip, user_agent, before_state, after_state, diff (JSON Patch) And the event persists successfully before the save response is returned And the policy version for brand X increments by 1
Versioned Policy History Retrieval and Diff
Given there are at least two saved versions of the brand X permission policy When a reviewer opens the policy history and selects versions N and N-1 Then the UI shows a human-readable before/after summary and a machine-readable diff (JSON Patch) And selecting View raw returns the exact stored before_state and after_state JSON for both versions And the API returns versions with version number, created_at, actor_id, actor_email, and optional changelog message
Per-Brand Audit Filtering and Isolation (UI and API)
Given audit events exist for brands X and Y When a compliance user applies filters brand_id=X and a date range Then only events for brand X within the date range are returned And no events from brand Y are included And results are paginated (default page size 50) and sortable by timestamp desc And the API endpoint for audit retrieval with the same filters enforces RBAC so users without audit:view for brand X receive 403
CSV and JSON Export of Filtered Audit Logs
Given a user has applied filters to the audit log for brand X When they export to CSV Then the downloaded file contains only the filtered result set up to the export limit of 50,000 records and includes headers: event_id, tenant_id, brand_id, timestamp, actor_email, action, resource_type, resource_id And initiating a JSON export yields newline-delimited JSON (NDJSON) with the same records and field names And the API supports equivalent exports and returns 202 with job_id for async exports exceeding 5,000 records, followed by a downloadable URL when complete
Immutable Audit Log Enforcement and Tamper Evidence
Given an audit event exists When any user attempts to modify or delete the event via UI or API Then the operation is rejected with 405 or 403 and the message 'Audit logs are immutable' And there is no supported API to update or delete audit events And a proof endpoint returns a valid tamper-evident hash (e.g., chain or Merkle proof) for the event upon request
One-Click Policy Rollback with Dependency Checks
Given a policy history for brand X with current version N and a prior version N-1 When an admin selects Rollback to version N-1 and confirms Then the system runs dependency checks for referenced presets, roles, and collections and lists any blockers by ID and reason And if no blockers exist, the system creates version N+1 identical to N-1, marks it current, and records an audit event action='policy.rollback' linking versions And if blockers exist, the rollback is aborted with no state changes and a clear error summary
Surface Recent Changes in Role Matrix UI and via API
Given a user opens the Role Matrix for brand X When the page loads Then a Recent Changes panel displays the 20 most recent permission-related events for brand X with actor, relative time, and a short summary And clicking an item opens a detailed diff view for that event And GET /audit/recent?brand_id=X&limit=20 returns the same events in the same order
Permissions API & Webhook Notifications
"As a platform integrator, I want APIs and webhooks for permission management so that I can sync PixelLift with our identity provider."
Description

Expose secured REST/GraphQL endpoints and SDK helpers for managing roles, assignments, scopes, and permission checks. Include a lightweight authorize endpoint to verify an action on a resource, and webhooks for permission changes to allow external cache invalidation and downstream sync. Enforce OAuth scopes and rate limits, and document endpoints with examples and error codes.

Acceptance Criteria
OAuth Scope Enforcement Across REST and GraphQL
- Given a valid OAuth 2.0 access token containing the required scopes for an endpoint/field, when the client calls that REST endpoint or GraphQL field, then the server authorizes the call and returns a 2xx response with only data allowed by the scopes. - Given a token missing a required scope, when calling a REST endpoint, then the server returns 403 with body { error: { code: "insufficient_scope", requiredScopes: [..], providedScopes: [..], requestId } }. - Given a token missing a required scope, when calling a GraphQL field, then HTTP status is 200 and the response contains errors[0].extensions.code = "INSUFFICIENT_SCOPE" and extensions.requiredScopes listing missing scopes; no unauthorized data is returned. - Given an invalid or expired token, when calling any endpoint, then the server returns 401, includes WWW-Authenticate header, and body error.code = "invalid_token" (REST) or a top-level 401 (GraphQL HTTP) with the same error shape in extensions. - Given a token scoped to a specific brand/collection, when the request targets a different brand/collection, then the server returns 403 with error.code = "scope_mismatch". - For every REST route and GraphQL field, the required scopes and applicable brand/collection constraints are machine-readable (e.g., OpenAPI x-required-scopes / GraphQL directive) and validated in contract tests.
Lightweight Authorize Endpoint Decision Semantics and Performance
- Given POST /v1/authorize with subjectId, action, resourceType, resourceId, and optional context { brandId, collectionId }, when the subject is permitted, then the server returns 200 with { allow: true, reasons: ["ALLOWED"], decisionId, evaluatedAt } (ISO-8601). - Given the same inputs when not permitted, then the server returns 200 with { allow: false, reasons: ["insufficient_scope" | "no_matching_role" | "assignment_expired" | "resource_not_found"], decisionId, evaluatedAt }. - Given an unknown action/resourceType or malformed payload, then the server returns 400 with error.code = "validation_error" and field-level details. - Given repeated identical authorize requests under consistent state, then allow is deterministic and decisionId is traceable in audit logs. - Performance: p95 latency for /v1/authorize <= 100ms and p99 <= 250ms under documented reference load; SLIs and test harness validate targets.
Roles, Assignments, and Scopes Management CRUD with Audit
- POST /v1/roles creates a role within a brand scope; unique name per brand is enforced; success returns 201 with role.id; duplicates return 409 with error.code = "duplicate_role". - PATCH/PUT /v1/roles/{id} requires If-Match ETag; stale ETag returns 412; success returns 200 and a new ETag. - DELETE /v1/roles/{id} on a role with active assignments returns 409 with error.code = "role_in_use"; deleting an unassigned role returns 204. - POST /v1/assignments creates a user→role assignment with optional collection scope and optional expiration; duplicates return 409 with error.code = "duplicate_assignment"; expired assignments are not considered in authorize decisions. - Scope validation: unknown brandId/collectionId returns 404 with error.code = "scope_not_found". - All write operations (create/update/delete) generate audit records with actorId (from token), action, targetType, targetId, scope, requestId, and timestamp; GET /v1/audit supports filtering by actorId, targetId, and time range.
Webhook Notifications for Permission Changes
- Events emitted: role.created, role.updated, role.deleted, assignment.created, assignment.updated, assignment.deleted, scope.updated; each event payload includes id, type, occurredAt (ISO-8601), brandId, collectionId (if any), actorId, requestId, and data.{...}. - Delivery timeliness: 99% of events are delivered to subscribed endpoints within 30 seconds of the committing API write. - Each webhook request includes X-PixelLift-Signature with HMAC-SHA256 over timestamp + body and X-Event-ID; receivers can validate using a shared secret; replays older than 5 minutes (by signature timestamp) are rejected by the platform. - Retry policy: non-2xx responses trigger exponential backoff retries for up to 24 hours; delivery stops after a 2xx; 410 disables the endpoint; 3xx is treated as failure and retried. - Idempotency: the same X-Event-ID is never reused; receiving the same event twice must be safe; platform deduplicates per endpoint. - Endpoint management: a webhook endpoint must be verified before activation via a verification event; a test event can be sent on demand from the dashboard/API.
SDK Helpers Parity and Local Decision Caching
- Official SDK provides helpers: authorize(subjectId, action, resourceType, resourceId, context?), createRole, updateRole, deleteRole, createAssignment, deleteAssignment, listRoles, listAssignments; all helpers map 1:1 to API endpoints and shapes. - The SDK exposes a verifyWebhookSignature(payload, headers, secret) utility that validates X-PixelLift-Signature and timestamp window. - The SDK’s authorize helper supports in-memory caching keyed by { subjectId, action, resourceType, resourceId, brandId, collectionId }; default TTL = 60s, negative TTL = 15s; cache can be disabled; tests verify correctness and TTL behavior. - Error handling parity: API error codes are surfaced as typed exceptions with code, message, details, requestId; TypeScript types are provided for all inputs/outputs. - Retries and backoff for transient 5xx/429 are implemented with jitter; maximum retry duration and attempts are configurable and documented.
Rate Limiting and Quotas Visibility
- All REST and GraphQL requests are subject to per-client rate limits; the /v1/authorize endpoint uses a separate higher-capacity bucket; limits are configurable per plan and environment. - When a limit is exceeded, REST responses return 429 with headers: X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining, X-RateLimit-Reset, and Retry-After; GraphQL returns HTTP 429 with the same headers. - Successful responses include X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining, and X-RateLimit-Reset to inform consumption. - Contract tests validate correct header presence and decrement behavior, and that exceeding limits produces 429 within the same window.
API Documentation, Examples, and Error Codes
- OpenAPI 3.1 spec for REST is published at /docs/openapi.json and includes endpoint descriptions, parameters, request/response schemas, required OAuth scopes, and error models; GraphQL SDL is published at /graphql/schema and includes field-level authorization directives. - Developer docs include runnable examples (cURL, JavaScript/TypeScript, Python) for: creating a role, assigning a role, checking authorization, and handling webhooks; examples execute successfully against a sandbox. - Error format is standardized across REST ({ error: { code, message, details?, requestId } }) and GraphQL (errors[].extensions.code, errors[].extensions.requestId); error code catalog is documented with remediation guidance. - Versioning and deprecation: new versions are announced with changelog entries; deprecated endpoints emit Sunset and Deprecation headers and are documented with end-of-life dates.

Draft Sandbox

A safe workspace to iterate on preset changes without touching live outputs. Batch-test drafts on sample images, compare side-by-side with current presets, and promote with one click when results meet standards—enabling confident experimentation with zero production risk.

Requirements

Draft Preset Versioning
"As a brand manager, I want to create draft versions of style presets without affecting live outputs so that I can experiment safely and refine styles before rollout."
Description

Enable creation of draft versions of existing style presets that are fully isolated from production. Each draft carries a unique version ID, metadata (author, timestamp, change notes), and a non-production flag. Drafts support granular edits (retouch intensity, background settings, crop rules) and a change-diff view against the current live preset. Draft artifacts are stored separately and never applied to live jobs until promotion. Provide APIs and UI to create, edit, clone, archive, and delete drafts, with audit logging for compliance. This ensures safe experimentation and repeatability while integrating with the existing preset library and project structure.

Acceptance Criteria
Create Draft from Live Preset (UI)
Given an Editor is viewing a live preset When the user clicks "Create Draft" and provides optional change notes (0–500 chars) Then a draft version is created with a unique versionId (UUIDv4), linked to the parent presetId, and nonProduction=true And metadata is recorded: authorId=current user, createdAt=server UTC ISO-8601 timestamp, changeNotes as provided And the draft appears in the Preset Library under the parent preset with label "Draft" And no live jobs reference the draft and it is excluded from production preset selectors
Draft CRUD via API with Auth and Validation
Given a client with scope presets.drafts.write When the client calls POST /presets/{presetId}/drafts with a valid payload Then the API returns 201 with the new draft resource including versionId and nonProduction=true And invalid inputs (unknown presetId, missing required fields, invalid values) return 404/400 with error codes Given a client with scope presets.drafts.read When the client calls GET /presets/{presetId}/drafts?status=active&limit=50 Then the API returns 200 with paginated results, totalCount, and filters applied When the client calls PATCH /presets/{presetId}/drafts/{versionId} with If-Match=ETag and valid changes Then the API returns 200 and updates only the draft fields; concurrent edits without matching ETag return 412 When the client calls POST /presets/{presetId}/drafts/{versionId}:clone Then the API returns 201 with a new draft version carrying over fields and a new versionId and authorId=current user When the client calls POST /presets/{presetId}/drafts/{versionId}:archive Then the draft status becomes archived, editable=false, and archivedAt is set; repeated archive requests are idempotent (200) When the client calls DELETE /presets/{presetId}/drafts/{versionId} Then the draft is soft-deleted (recoverable for 30 days) and deletes are blocked if the draft has active sandbox runs (409)
Granular Draft Editing (Retouch, Background, Crop)
Given a draft is open in the editor When the user sets retouchIntensity to a value between 0 and 100 inclusive Then validation passes and the value is saved; values outside this range are rejected with inline error When the user sets background.mode to one of [remove, solid, transparent, scene] and background.color to a valid hex when required Then the draft saves successfully and previews update using draft values When the user edits cropRules (aspectRatios, focalPoint, padding) Then changes are persisted to the draft only, not the live preset, and appear in the draft JSON And saving the draft returns success within 500 ms under normal load
Draft vs Live Change-Diff View
Given a draft exists for a live preset When the user opens Compare with Live Then the UI displays only fields that differ, with before (live) and after (draft) values side-by-side And nested changes (arrays/objects) are diffed by path and highlighted And unchanged fields are hidden by default with an option to Show All And the diff can be exported as JSON containing only changed paths And the view loads within 1 second for presets up to 50 KB
Draft Isolation and Storage of Artifacts
Given the user runs a sandbox render using a draft When processing completes Then all generated artifacts are stored under /drafts/{presetId}/{versionId}/ and are not listed in any production bucket or CDN path And artifacts are tagged with nonProduction=true metadata And draft outputs are watermarked "DRAFT" in the UI preview And live job pickers and automations do not offer draft versions
Audit Logging for Draft Lifecycle Actions
Given a user performs create, edit, clone, archive, or delete on a draft When the action completes Then an audit log entry is created with actorId, presetId, draftVersionId, action, timestamp (UTC ISO-8601), requestId, and before/after snapshot hashes And audit entries are immutable and retrievable via GET /audit?entity=draft&draftVersionId={id} And delete and archive require a non-empty change note; otherwise the action is rejected with 400
UI Safeguards and Permissions
Given a Viewer role opens a live preset Then the Create Draft and Edit actions are hidden Given an Editor role opens a live preset When attempting to delete a draft Then the UI requires type-to-confirm of the draft versionId and shows impact summary (active sandbox runs, last edited) before enabling Delete And permission checks are enforced server-side; unauthorized actions return 403 And within the Preset Library, Drafts are visually labeled and sortable by createdAt and author
Sample Set Selector
"As a content lead, I want to build a representative sample set for draft testing so that results reflect real catalog diversity and edge cases."
Description

Provide tools to define and persist representative sample image sets used for testing drafts. Users can pick images manually or by rules (recent uploads, product tags, collections, SKU coverage, image aspect ratios, lighting conditions). Support randomization with a fixed seed for repeatability, caps on sample size, and dataset pinning per workspace or preset. Integrate with the media library for fast filtering and ensure privacy controls (exclude customer images, respect folder permissions). The outcome is a consistent, realistic test bed that surfaces edge cases and reduces bias in evaluations.

Acceptance Criteria
Manual Sample Set Selection and Persistence
Given I have access to the Media Library in Workspace W within the Draft Sandbox And I can view only images I have permission to access When I manually select N images and save the sample set named "Summer Shoes Draft Set" Then the system persists the set with exactly N unique image IDs And the saved set is listed under Workspace W > Sample Sets with the correct name and count And reopening the selector shows the same N images marked as selected And an audit record is created capturing user, timestamp, selection method = manual, and image count
Rule-Based Selection for Tags, Collections, SKU Coverage, Aspect Ratio, and Lighting
Given I open the Rule Builder for Sample Set Selector When I configure rules including: - Uploaded within last 30 days - Product tags include any of ["summer","sandals"] - Collections include any of ["Shoes","Sale"] - SKU coverage requires at least one image per SKU in [S1,S2,S3] - Aspect ratio in {1:1, 4:5} - Lighting condition in {studio, low_light} And I set a sample size cap K Then the preview shows an eligible pool that matches all rules and is deduplicated And generating the sample returns exactly min(K, pool size) images And each SKU in [S1,S2,S3] is represented by at least one image unless no eligible images exist for that SKU, in which case a warning lists the missing SKUs And saving the rules persists them and regenerates the same results upon reopen if the underlying library has not changed and randomization is disabled
Seeded Randomization for Repeatable Samples
Given I enable Randomize with seed ABC123 and set cap K And the eligible pool size M is at least K When I generate a sample set Then the selected image ID list is deterministic for seed ABC123 And regenerating with the same seed and unchanged pool returns an identical ID list And changing the seed to DEF456 returns a non-identical ID list And the saved sample set metadata includes the seed and pool criteria
Sample Size Cap Enforcement and Validation
Given the eligible pool size is M When I set the sample size cap to K and generate a sample Then the resulting sample contains exactly min(M, K, SystemMax) images And if K exceeds SystemMax, the UI informs me the cap was reduced to SystemMax and displays the final count And if K is not a positive integer, form validation blocks saving and shows an inline error message
Dataset Pinning per Workspace and Preset
Given a saved sample set S exists When I pin S to Workspace W and to Preset P Then opening Draft Sandbox in Workspace W with Preset P preselects S as the default dataset And switching to a different preset P2 preselects the dataset pinned to P2 or none if unpinned And users without access to Workspace W cannot view or use S And unpinning S removes it as the default while keeping it available in the sample set list if permissions allow
Privacy Controls and Folder Permission Enforcement
Given some images are flagged CustomerContent = true or are located in folders I do not have permission to access When I search, filter, or build a sample set manually or by rules Then images flagged CustomerContent = true or in unauthorized folders do not appear in results And attempts to add such images by direct ID return a permission error and do not modify the sample set And previews, comparisons, and exports exclude such images And an audit entry records each blocked attempt with user, timestamp, and reason
Media Library Integration and Performance
Given a media library with up to 50,000 images When I apply filters (recent uploads, tags, collections) and paginate through results Then initial filter results render within 2 seconds at the 95th percentile And subsequent page loads render within 1 second at the 95th percentile And selected images remain selected across pagination and when filters change but still include those images And the UI displays the eligible pool count and current selected count in real time
Batch Draft Processing
"As a studio operator, I want to batch-run drafts on sample images so that I can evaluate results at scale quickly and reliably."
Description

Execute draft presets on selected sample sets via a scalable batch engine with queuing, concurrency controls, and progress tracking. Support resumable jobs, per-workspace quotas, GPU utilization, and cost guardrails. Outputs are stored as ephemeral draft results with TTL and content-addressed caching to avoid reprocessing identical inputs. Provide job telemetry (ETA, throughput, failures), structured logs, and deterministic settings for fair comparisons. This enables rapid, controlled experimentation across hundreds of images without impacting production resources.

Acceptance Criteria
Queueing and Concurrency for Batch Drafts
Given a sample set of 500 images and a draft preset and concurrency_limit=8 When the job is submitted Then no more than 8 images are processed concurrently at any time And remaining images are queued And queue_depth and active_worker_count are observable via the job status API Given concurrency_limit is updated from 8 to 4 while a job is running When the update is applied Then active_worker_count converges to 4 within 10 seconds without aborting in-flight tasks Given two jobs from the same workspace with FIFO scheduling enabled When both are submitted Then tasks are scheduled in FIFO order per workspace And cross-workspace fairness is maintained per global scheduler policy
Progress, ETA, Throughput, and Failure Telemetry
Given a running job When requesting status via API Then the response includes total, processed, succeeded, failed, queued counts; throughput_images_per_min; estimated_time_remaining_seconds; started_at; updated_at Given progress changes during execution When 10 seconds pass Then updated_at and estimated_time_remaining_seconds are refreshed at least every 10 seconds Given at least one task fails When status is requested Then failures[] contains image_id, error_code, error_message, retry_count, last_attempt_at Given logging is enabled When inspecting job logs Then each log entry includes job_id, image_id, event_type, timestamp_iso8601, duration_ms (when applicable), severity, and error_code (when applicable) Given a job completes When status is requested Then completion_state is one of {succeeded, completed_with_failures, failed} And final throughput_images_per_min is reported
Resumable Jobs and Deterministic Re-runs
Given a running job is interrupted (e.g., worker crash or network loss) When it is restarted within 24 hours Then already-succeeded images are not reprocessed And pending images resume processing from the last completed checkpoint Given identical inputs (image content hash), draft preset version, and deterministic settings (random_seed and operator_versions) When the job is re-run Then produced outputs are bitwise-identical and share the same content hash Given an image fails with a transient error When automatic retry policy max_retries=3 with exponential backoff is configured Then the system retries up to 3 times and records each attempt in logs and job status And the image is marked failed only after all retries are exhausted
Per-Workspace Quotas and Throttling
Given daily_draft_image_quota=10000 and 9800 images already processed today for a workspace When a job for 500 images is submitted Then only 200 images are scheduled And 300 images are rejected with error_code=quota_exceeded and a remediation message including remaining_quota Given active_concurrent_jobs_quota=2 for a workspace When a third job is submitted Then the job is accepted in queued state if queueing_allowed=true Otherwise it is rejected with error_code=quota_exceeded Given quotas are increased for a workspace When the new limits are applied Then queued jobs transition to running automatically if capacity permits And status changes are emitted to the event stream
GPU Utilization and Scheduling
Given 2 provisioned GPUs and per-task gpu_requirement=1 and concurrency_limit=8 When the job runs Then at most 2 GPU tasks run concurrently and remaining tasks wait in queue Given a GPU becomes unhealthy mid-run When health checks fail for that GPU Then tasks on that GPU are rescheduled to healthy GPUs And job status reflects a rescheduling event with affected image_ids Given GPU metrics collection is enabled When job status is requested Then the API reports gpu_utilization_percent per GPU and avg_gpu_memory_used_mb during the last sampling window
Cost Guardrails and Budget Enforcement
Given monthly_draft_budget_usd=200 for a workspace and estimated_cost_usd for a new job=250 When submission is attempted Then the job is blocked with error_code=budget_exceeded And the response includes estimated_cost_usd and remaining_budget_usd Given a job starts with remaining_budget_usd=50 and estimated_cost_usd=40 When actual_cost_usd reaches 50 Then the job is auto-paused And remaining tasks are not started And status=paused_budget_reached Given a paused_budget_reached job receives an additional budget of 100 When resumed by an authorized user Then processing continues without reprocessing previously completed images
Ephemeral Draft Storage, TTL, and Content-Addressed Caching
Given draft outputs have ttl_hours=168 When 168 hours elapse after an output's created_at timestamp Then the output is auto-deleted and no longer retrievable via the draft asset API And a deletion event is recorded in logs Given an image+preset combination previously produced an output with content_hash=H within TTL When the same combination is re-run Then processing is skipped And cached output with content_hash=H is returned And job status marks the item as cache_hit=true Given the same image with a modified preset version When re-run Then processing occurs And cache_hit=false And a new content_hash is produced
Side-by-Side Compare Viewer
"As a visual merchandiser, I want to compare draft outputs side-by-side with current results so that I can quickly spot quality differences and approve changes with confidence."
Description

Deliver an interactive viewer to compare draft outputs against current live preset results and original images. Include split-view and two-up layouts, synchronized zoom/pan, before/after toggles, and keyboard navigation. Display key metadata (preset version, parameters) and visual aids (histogram, clipping warnings, edge masks for background removal). Allow per-image annotations and reviewer comments, and support shareable review links with expiry. Color-manage the display (sRGB) and respect watermark/download restrictions for drafts. This accelerates review cycles and raises confidence in visual quality.

Acceptance Criteria
Split-View and Two-Up with Synchronized Zoom/Pan
Given Draft, Live, and Original variants are available and the viewer is open in split-view or two-up When the user zooms via UI controls, mouse wheel/trackpad, or +/- keys Then both panes update to the same magnification within 1% and remain position-aligned within ≤2px at 100% zoom And switching between split-view and two-up preserves the current zoom level and focal point And initial load renders a fit-to-screen view in ≤500 ms for a 24MP image on target browsers And pan operations respond in ≤100 ms and do not exceed ≤2px desync between panes over a 4K canvas And the split divider is draggable and snaps with no more than 16 ms input latency
Before/After Toggle and Side Swap
Given Draft and a chosen baseline (Live or Original) are loaded When the user presses B or clicks the Before/After toggle Then the viewer toggles between Draft and baseline in both split-view and two-up within ≤100 ms and shows clear side labels (Draft, Live, Original) And holding B shows the alternate state only while pressed (press-and-hold) And pressing S swaps left/right assignment within ≤100 ms without changing zoom or focal point And the selected baseline persists across image changes within the current review session
Metadata and Visual Aids Display Accuracy
Given an image pair is selected When the metadata panel is opened Then it displays preset name, version (e.g., vX.Y.Z), and the parameter set applied to each variant, matching processing job records exactly (0 mismatches) And the histogram matches an offline reference histogram within ±1% per 256-bin channel bucket And enabling clipping warnings overlays red for pixels clipped at 255 in any channel and blue for pixels at 0, with pixel-accurate alignment And enabling edge mask shows the background removal mask aligned within ≤1px of the processed edges and supports opacity control from 0–100% in 10% increments
Keyboard Navigation and Accessibility
Given the viewer has keyboard focus When Arrow keys are pressed Then the image pans by 10% viewport per keypress (Shift+Arrow = 25%) And +/- zooms in/out by 20% increments; 0 sets Fit, 1 sets 100% And Tab/Shift+Tab cycles through actionable controls without focus traps, with visible focus indicators And pressing ? opens a keyboard shortcut overlay that lists all shortcuts and is dismissible with Esc And all functions are operable without a mouse and meet WCAG 2.1 AA keyboard requirements
Per-Image Annotations and Reviewer Comments
Given a user with Editor or Reviewer role opens an image in the viewer When the user adds a pin or box annotation at a location Then the annotation anchors to image coordinates and remains correctly positioned under any zoom/pan And each annotation supports a threaded comment stream with timestamps; authors can edit/delete their own comments within 15 minutes And annotations/comments are saved per image and variant (Draft/Live) and display user, time, and status (open/resolved) And View-only users (including via share links) can see but cannot create, edit, or resolve annotations/comments
Shareable Review Links with Expiry and Revocation
Given a project member generates a review link When an expiry is set between 1 hour and 30 days (default 7 days) Then the link grants view-only access to the specified images and viewer features, with watermarking and download restrictions enforced for drafts And accessing an expired or revoked link returns 410 Gone and blocks further viewing within 60 seconds of revocation And the link token is unguessable (≥128-bit entropy) and audit logs record creation, access times, and revocations And owners can revoke links at any time from the share panel
Color Management (sRGB) and Draft Watermark/Download Restrictions
Given images with embedded color profiles (e.g., Adobe RGB, ProPhoto) are loaded When rendered in the viewer Then they are converted and displayed in sRGB with ΔE00 ≤ 2 versus a reference conversion for a standard test chart on color-managed devices And draft outputs display a semi-transparent watermark and have downloads disabled: no download button, right-click save blocked, and unauthenticated direct asset requests return 403 And users with only view permissions cannot obtain an unwatermarked draft via any viewer control or URL And admins with explicit override can download, and the action is logged
One-Click Promote & Rollback
"As a product owner, I want to promote an approved draft to live with one click and a rollback option so that I can deploy improvements safely and quickly."
Description

Provide a guarded promotion flow that atomically sets a draft preset as the live version with optional scheduling and canary validation on a small set. Enforce pre-promotion checks (required approvals, passing quality gates, no active edits) and generate an audit trail with version notes. Support immediate rollback to the previous live version and notify stakeholders via in-app alerts and webhooks. Promotion is safe, reversible, and observable, ensuring zero production risk while streamlining deployment of approved styles.

Acceptance Criteria
Immediate Promotion - Pre-checks and Atomic Swap
Given a draft preset D exists with all required approvals completed, all configured quality gates passing, and no active edits on D And the user has Promote permissions for the workspace And there is an existing live preset version L When the user clicks Promote Now for D and confirms Then the system atomically sets D as the new live version L+1 with no partial/visible intermediate state And the previous live version is recorded as Previous Live And the promotion request returns success with the new live version identifier And no other presets are modified And the Draft Sandbox marks D as Promoted and locks further edits until a new draft is created
Scheduled Promotion - Execution and Failure Handling
Given a draft preset D is scheduled for promotion at a future UTC timestamp T with optional freeze window checks enabled And at scheduling time, D satisfies all pre-promotion checks When the system clock reaches T Then the system re-evaluates all pre-promotion checks at execution time And if all checks pass, D is promoted atomically to live (L+1) and the schedule is cleared And if any check fails (e.g., new edit detected, approval revoked, quality gate fail), the promotion is not executed, the schedule is canceled, and stakeholders are notified with the failure reason And if the user cancels the schedule before T, no promotion occurs and no state changes are applied
Canary Validation - Sample Guard and Gates
Given a draft preset D has a defined canary sample set S (by percentage or explicit list) within allowed bounds (e.g., 1–5% of catalog or 50–500 images) And quality gate thresholds are configured for the canary (e.g., background accuracy, defect rate, color variance) When the user starts a canary run for D Then the system applies D only to S and leaves the current live version for all non-S items And the system generates a canary report with metrics, pass/fail per gate, and side-by-side thumbnails for S And if Auto-abort on fail is enabled and any gate fails, the promotion action is blocked and live remains unchanged And if all gates pass, the user can finalize promotion in one click without reprocessing S
One-Click Rollback - Atomic Restore
Given a promotion from L to L+1 has occurred and the prior live version L is retained When the user clicks Rollback and confirms Then the system atomically restores L as the live version and marks L+1 as Rolled Back And any pending schedules tied to L+1 are canceled And an audit entry is recorded with actor, reason, and correlated promotion id And stakeholders are notified via in-app alert and webhook of the rollback outcome
Audit Trail & Version Notes - Complete and Immutable
Given a promotion or rollback action is initiated When the action completes (success or failure) Then an immutable audit record is created containing: actor, action type (promote/rollback), draft id, from_version, to_version, timestamps (started/completed), pre-check results, canary metrics snapshot (if any), outcome, and webhook delivery summary And promotion requires non-empty version notes (minimum 5 characters) which are stored in the audit record And audit records are queryable by time range, actor, preset id, and outcome And audit records cannot be edited or deleted by end users
Stakeholder Notifications - In-App and Webhooks
Given notification subscriptions exist for promotion and rollback events When a promotion or rollback succeeds or fails Then targeted stakeholders receive in-app alerts containing version ids, action, outcome, and links to audit and diffs And configured webhooks are sent with a signed payload schema including event type, preset id, from_version, to_version, actor, outcome, and timestamps And webhook delivery uses retry with exponential backoff for transient failures and records final delivery status And no notifications are sent for scheduled attempts that are canceled before execution
Concurrency & Idempotency - Safe, Single-Action Semantics
Given two users attempt to promote the same draft D concurrently When both requests are submitted within a short window Then only one promotion succeeds and the other receives a conflict response with no state change And if a client retries the same promotion using the same idempotency key, the server processes it at most once and returns the original result And if any active edit session exists on D at the moment of execution, the promotion is blocked with a clear error referencing the active editor/session And promote/rollback endpoints are linearizable: read-after-write returns the new live version immediately after success
Access Control & Approvals
"As an admin, I want role-based permissions and approvals for drafts so that only authorized changes move to production."
Description

Implement role-based access control for draft creation, editing, viewing, and promotion. Configure approval workflows with required reviewers, minimum approvals, and optional policy checks by workspace. Provide audit logs of all actions, reviewer comments, and decisions, plus secure share links for external reviewers with expiration and watermarking. Integrate with SSO/SCIM roles and existing organization permissions. This ensures proper governance without slowing small teams, balancing control and velocity.

Acceptance Criteria
RBAC: Draft Create/Edit/View/Promote Enforcement
Given a user authenticates via SSO and is assigned one of: Admin, Draft Editor, Reviewer, Viewer And the workspace has default permissions applied When the user attempts each action on drafts via UI and API: create, edit, view, submit for review, approve/decline, promote Then access is allowed only per role policy: - Admin: all actions - Draft Editor: create, edit, view, submit for review; cannot approve or promote - Reviewer: view, comment, approve/decline; cannot create, edit, or promote - Viewer: view only; cannot create, edit, approve/decline, or promote And disallowed actions return HTTP 403 on API and disabled controls with tooltip "Insufficient permissions" in UI And each denied attempt is recorded in the audit log with actor, action, timestamp, and reason "permission_denied"
Approval Workflow: Required Reviewers and Minimum Approvals
Given a workspace admin configures an approval workflow with required reviewers [A, B] and minimum approvals = 2 And "allow substitutes" is disabled When a draft is submitted for review Then only listed required reviewers may approve And promotion eligibility requires approvals >= 2 and approvals include both A and B And if a required reviewer declines, the draft enters "Changes Requested" until resubmitted And the system prevents marking the review complete if any required reviewer has not approved
Gatekeeping: Promotion Blocked Until Approvals and Policy Checks Satisfied
Given a draft has at least the configured minimum approvals and all required reviewers have approved And all configured policy checks (e.g., background removal verification, resolution >= 2000px) have passed When a user with Promote permission clicks Promote or calls POST /drafts/{id}/promote Then the draft is promoted and a new preset version is created and timestamped And if any precondition is unmet, the promotion is blocked with a consolidated error message listing unmet items And a promotion event (success or blocked) is written to the audit log including approver list and policy check results
Audit Log: Complete, Immutable, and Exportable Records
Given any action on drafts or workflows occurs (create, edit, submit, approve, decline, comment, share link create/revoke, promote, permission denied) When viewing the audit log for a draft or workspace Then each event includes: actor id and display name, actor role, action type, object id and version, ISO-8601 UTC timestamp (UTC), IP address, result (success/denied), and optional comment text or reason And log entries are append-only (no update/delete APIs) and have a monotonically increasing sequence id And logs can be exported by Admin as CSV and JSON for a specified date range And logs are retained for at least 365 days
External Review: Expiring Watermarked Share Links
Given a Draft Owner generates an external review link scoped to a specific draft with expiry = 7 days and comment-only permission When an external reviewer opens the link Then the reviewer can view watermarked images and leave comments but cannot download originals or promote And every image is overlaid with the workspace watermark text and draft id And the link becomes unusable after expiry or immediate revocation, returning HTTP 410 via API and an "Link expired" page in UI And all views and comments via the link are attributed to "External Reviewer" with per-link token id in the audit log
SSO/SCIM: Role Mapping and Permission Inheritance
Given organization SSO is configured and SCIM is enabled with group-to-role mappings (e.g., okta_group_editors -> Draft Editor) When a user is added to or removed from a mapped IdP group Then their PixelLift role updates within 5 minutes and access reflects the new role on next request And deprovisioned users lose all access within 60 seconds of SCIM delete and active sessions are revoked And local role changes in PixelLift are overridden by SCIM-sourced mappings on next sync and recorded in the audit log
Small Team Fast-Path: Streamlined Workflow Without Governance Loss
Given a workspace sets Minimum Approvals = 0 and has no Required Reviewers configured When a Draft Editor submits and then promotes their own draft Then promotion is allowed without reviewer approvals, provided all policy checks pass And the promotion is fully audited (including actor, policy results, and before/after preset version) And if Required Reviewers or Minimum Approvals > 0 are later configured, subsequent promotions require the new approvals
Quality & Impact Summary
"As a QA reviewer, I want a quality summary and pass/fail gates for draft runs so that promotion decisions are data-driven and consistent with brand standards."
Description

After each batch run, generate a summary report with visual and quantitative indicators: background removal confidence, color delta, exposure and white balance shifts, sharpness and noise metrics, crop/size conformance, processing time, error rates, and estimated cost. Highlight outliers and failures, show per-image thumbnails, and compute pass/fail against configurable thresholds. Provide export (CSV/JSON) and link the report to promotion gates. This gives data-backed evidence to judge whether a draft meets brand standards and operational constraints.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Generated Batch Quality Summary
Given a Draft Sandbox batch run with up to 500 images completes processing When the run finishes Then a Quality & Impact Summary is generated within 60 seconds and attached to the run And the summary includes per-image fields: image_id, background_removal_confidence (0.00–1.00, 2 decimals), color_delta_E00, exposure_shift_EV, white_balance_shift_K, sharpness_variance, noise_SNR_dB, crop_size_conformance (true/false), processing_time_ms, error_code, estimated_cost_cents And the summary includes batch aggregates: total_images, failed_images, error_rate_percent (2 decimals), total_processing_time_ms, total_estimated_cost_cents, mean/median/min/max for each numeric metric And missing per-image metrics are recorded as null without failing summary generation
Outlier Detection and Highlighting
Given a threshold profile is configured for the draft's preset When the summary is generated Then any metric outside its threshold is flagged per image with outlier=true and reason_codes And the batch shows outlier_count equal to the number of images with ≥1 violation And toggling "Show Outliers" lists only outlier images sorted by severity within 1 second And updating thresholds recalculates outlier flags within 5 seconds without reprocessing images
Per-Image Thumbnails in Report
Given the summary is viewed in the Draft Sandbox When per-image rows render Then each row displays a processed-image thumbnail with max dimension 200 px, WebP format, and file size ≤ 50 KB And thumbnails lazy-load and render above-the-fold rows within 500 ms on a 3G fast network And clicking a thumbnail opens the full-size processed image in a new tab with the image_id in the URL
Threshold-Based Pass/Fail Computation
Given a threshold profile T is active When the summary is generated or thresholds change Then image_status is Pass if all thresholded metrics are within bounds and error_code is null; otherwise Fail with reason_codes populated And batch_status is Pass if at least 95% of images pass and error_rate_percent ≤ the configured limit (default 2%); otherwise Fail And the header displays pass_count, fail_count, and pass_percent with two decimals And status recalculates within 5 seconds of a threshold change without reprocessing images
CSV and JSON Export of Summary
Given a user clicks Export CSV or Export JSON on a completed summary with up to 1,000 images When the export is requested Then the file downloads within 10 seconds and contains one row/object per image plus batch-level metadata And CSV is UTF-8, comma-delimited, includes a header row, and row count equals total_images + 1 And JSON validates against schema id "pixellift.qualitySummary.v1" with top-level fields batch and images[] And exported numeric fields preserve at least the precision shown in the UI
Cost and Processing Time Accuracy
Given pricing rules and operation counts used in the batch are known When estimated_cost_cents and processing_time_ms are computed Then per-image estimated_cost_cents matches the pricing table within ±2% and rounds to the nearest cent And batch total_estimated_cost_cents equals the sum of per-image estimates And per-image processing_time_ms equals the sum of stage times within ±5% and batch total equals the sum of per-image times
Promotion Gate Enforcement via Summary
Given a user attempts to Promote a draft to Live When the Quality & Impact Summary batch_status is Pass Then the Promote action is enabled and requires the summary_id to be linked to the promotion record And when batch_status is Fail, the Promote action is disabled unless the user has OverridePromotion permission and enters an override_reason (≥10 characters) And all promotion attempts are audit-logged with user_id, timestamp, batch_status, outlier_count, and total_estimated_cost_cents

Smart Approvals

Configurable approval chains with SLAs, change diffs, and auto-escalation. Approvers get concise visual summaries and can approve from email or Slack, keeping launches on schedule while ensuring significant edits receive proper oversight.

Requirements

Dynamic Approval Chains & Rules Engine
"As a brand operations manager, I want to configure conditional approval chains for batches so that significant edits get proper oversight without slowing routine work."
Description

Provide configurable, multi-step approval workflows for PixelLift projects and batches, supporting sequential and parallel stages, conditional routing based on asset metadata (product category, brand, risk score, change magnitude), and policy templates. Includes per-step SLAs, required approver roles, minimum quorum, and thresholds that define significant edits (e.g., background replaced, retouch intensity above a set level). Integrates with PixelLift job orchestration so batch processing pauses at approval gates and resumes automatically upon approval. Offers UI for creating, cloning, and simulating workflows, with versioning and safe rollout by workspace.

Acceptance Criteria
Sequential and Parallel Approval with Role Quorum
Given a workflow "PL-Workflow-1" with Stage 1 (sequential) requiring role=Brand Manager and quorum=2 of 3 And Stage 2 (parallel) contains "Legal Review" (role=Legal Counsel, quorum=1) and "QA Review" (role=QA Lead, quorum=1) And a batch job "B-1001" enters Stage 1 When two distinct users with role=Brand Manager approve within Stage 1 Then the job advances to Stage 2 and both "Legal Review" and "QA Review" open concurrently And additional approvals for Stage 1 after quorum are ignored and logged When one Legal Counsel and one QA Lead approve their respective parallel steps Then the job exits Stage 2 and continues processing And the audit log records approver IDs, timestamps, and stage outcomes
Conditional Routing by Metadata and Significant Edit Thresholds
Given a policy with rule: if product_category in ["Beauty","Skincare"] OR risk_score >= 70 OR significant_edit=true then route to "Compliance Review" else route to "Standard Review" And significant_edit is defined as (background_replaced=true OR retouch_intensity >= 60) And batch "B-2002" has asset metadata: product_category="Beauty", retouch_intensity=72, background_replaced=true, risk_score=65 When the workflow evaluates routing for the batch Then the batch is routed to "Compliance Review" And the evaluation report lists matched conditions ["product_category","significant_edit"] and non-matched ["risk_score"] When asset metadata is product_category="Shoes", retouch_intensity=40, background_replaced=false, risk_score=20 Then the batch is routed to "Standard Review"
Per-Step SLA, Reminders, and Auto-Escalation
Given Stage "Brand Approval" has SLA=24h, reminder cadence=6h, and escalation target="Brand Director" group after SLA breach And batch "B-3003" enters the stage at T0 When no quorum is achieved by T0+24h Then the system marks the stage "Overdue" and sends an escalation notification to the "Brand Director" group And reminders were sent at T0+6h, T0+12h, and T0+18h to pending approvers And an escalation approver's approval satisfies quorum When quorum is met before SLA breach Then no escalation is sent and stage status is "Completed on time"
Email and Slack One-Click Approvals with Secure Tokens
Given approver Alice is assigned to Stage "Legal Review" And the system sends an email and Slack message with Approve/Reject buttons embedding a single-use token that expires in 24h When Alice clicks Approve in Slack within 24h Then the approval is recorded, the token is invalidated, and the stage updates in under 3 seconds And the Slack message updates to show the decision and an audit link When the same token is used again or after expiry Then the action is rejected with "Token invalid or expired" and no state change occurs And the audit log captures channel, user ID, IP, timestamp, and comment (if provided)
Pause and Auto-Resume at Approval Gates in Job Orchestration
Given batch "B-4004" has an approval gate after the "Background Removal" step When the gate opens Then the pipeline pauses downstream tasks for that batch and releases compute resources for the paused job When approval quorum is reached Then the pipeline resumes automatically within 10 seconds and continues at the next step When the stage is rejected Then remaining downstream steps are canceled and the batch status is set to "Changes Requested" with notifications sent to the submitter
Workflow Builder: Create, Clone, Simulate, and Versioned Rollout
Given a user with role "Workflow Admin" opens Workflow Builder When they create workflow v1.0 with three stages and save Then the workflow is versioned as 1.0 and set to Draft until rolled out to Workspace A When they clone v1.0 to v1.1, edit rules, and run simulation against sample assets A1 and A2 Then the simulator shows per-asset routes, matched rules, and SLAs without executing jobs When v1.1 is rolled out to Workspace A with rollout mode="Gradual 25%" Then new jobs are assigned v1.1 in 25% of cases and in-flight jobs remain on their original version When rollout is promoted to 100% and then v1.1 is reverted Then new jobs return to the previous stable version and a change log entry is created
Concise Visual Summaries and Change Diffs for Approvers
Given an approval stage is opened for batch "B-5005" When approvers open the summary in email or Slack Then they see per-asset before/after thumbnails, detected edits (e.g., "Background replaced", "Retouch intensity: 72"), risk score, and SLA remaining time And the summary loads in under 2 seconds for up to 100 assets with total payload under 5 MB And all images include alt-text and the content is keyboard and screen-reader accessible When approvers click "View full diff" Then a web view shows side-by-side large previews with annotations and a downloadable change report (PDF) linked in the audit trail
Visual Diff Summaries for Batches
"As an approver, I want concise visual diffs and batch rollups so that I can review hundreds of images quickly and catch high-impact changes."
Description

Generate concise, visual summaries per asset and per batch that include before/after sliders, annotated lists of transformations, change heatmaps, and a significance score for quick triage. Provide batch-level rollups showing counts of high-significance edits, outliers, and flagged items. Enable quick filters and sampling tools for fast review (e.g., review a 10% sample or all items over a threshold). Embed bandwidth-friendly thumbnails in notifications and deep link to full-resolution proofing in PixelLift.

Acceptance Criteria
Per-Asset Before/After Slider
- Given an approver opens an asset summary from a processed batch, When the page loads, Then a before/after slider is displayed above the fold showing Original vs Enhanced. - Given the user drags the slider, When sliding from 0% to 100%, Then the two images remain pixel-aligned (≤1px deviation) and no layout reflow occurs. - Given standard network conditions (5 Mbps, 100 ms RTT), When the asset summary loads cold, Then both images are visible and draggable within 1.5 seconds. - Given the user drags the slider, Then interaction latency stays under 200 ms and frame rate ≥ 50 FPS on a mid-tier laptop and a modern mobile device. - Given the user clicks "Zoom 100%", When zoom is active, Then the slider continues to function on the zoomed image without loss of alignment.
Annotated Transformation List Accuracy
- Given a processed asset, When viewing the Transformations panel, Then a chronological, human-readable list of applied operations is shown with parameters (e.g., Background removed; Exposure +0.7 EV; Crop 4:5). - Given the pipeline metadata, When compared to the UI list, Then 100% of applied operations are present, ordered correctly, and parameter values match within ±1% for numeric values. - Given a transformation in the list, When the user hovers or clicks it, Then the affected region(s) highlight on the visual and the panel focuses the selected item. - Given an asset with no edits, When viewing the panel, Then the UI displays "No changes applied" and hides irrelevant controls.
Pixel Change Heatmap Visualization
- Given a processed asset, When the user toggles Change Heatmap, Then a heatmap overlay appears with a legend and adjustable sensitivity from 0–100%. - Given a known test pair with synthetic differences, When generating the heatmap, Then ≥95% of modified pixels are detected and ≥95% precision is achieved for unchanged pixels. - Given the user downloads the heatmap, When clicking Export, Then a PNG of the overlay at asset resolution downloads within 3 seconds for assets up to 24 MP. - Given the user toggles off the heatmap, Then the base image returns to normal with no residual overlay.
Significance Score and Threshold Filtering
- Given an asset summary, When displayed, Then a significance score between 0 and 100 is shown with a badge (Low/Medium/High) mapped to configurable thresholds (default: Low 0–39, Medium 40–69, High 70–100). - Given a batch, When applying a filter Score ≥ T, Then 100% of assets with score ≥ T are included and 0% with score < T are included. - Given thresholds are updated by an admin, When filters and badges refresh, Then counts and badges update within 1 second without a full page reload. - Given identical inputs and model version, When the same asset is scored twice, Then the score difference is ≤ ±2 points.
Batch-Level Rollups and Outlier Detection
- Given a batch of N assets, When viewing the batch summary, Then rollups display: total assets, counts of High/Medium/Low significance, Outliers, and Flagged. - Given rollup counts, When cross-checked via corresponding filters, Then counts exactly match the items returned. - Given default outlier detection (z-score > 2.5 on batch significance distribution), When enabled, Then qualifying assets are labeled Outlier; if method is switched to IQR, rollups recompute within 2 seconds for up to 5,000 assets. - Given a batch up to 5,000 assets, When opening the batch summary, Then rollups compute and render within 3 seconds on first load and within 1 second on subsequent loads (cached).
Sampling Tools: Percentage and Seeded Randomization
- Given a batch, When the user selects Sample 10%, Then the system returns a random subset of ceil(0.10 × N) unique assets. - Given a seed value S, When the user sets Seed = S and applies the same sampling percentage again, Then the returned subset is identical across sessions and devices. - Given combined filters, When the user applies Score ≥ T and then Sample 10%, Then sampling operates only on the filtered set. - Given sampling is active, When viewing the grid, Then the UI displays the sample size and provides a control to Review All to exit sampling.
Notifications: Thumbnails and Deep Links to Proofing
- Given email and Slack notifications are enabled, When a batch completes, Then notifications include per-asset thumbnails and a batch-level summary; each thumbnail is ≤150 KB and ≤800 px on the longest edge. - Given a user clicks a thumbnail or Open in PixelLift, When the link opens, Then the full-resolution proofing view loads with the corresponding batch/asset and any filter context applied. - Given standard network conditions (5 Mbps, 100 ms RTT), When opening a deep link, Then the first full-resolution image is visible within 2 seconds and remaining assets stream progressively. - Given clients that block external images, When viewing the notification, Then alt text is present and links remain functional with readable layout.
SLA Timers with Auto-Reminders & Escalation
"As a project lead, I want SLA timers with auto-escalation so that approvals stay on schedule and delays are handled proactively."
Description

Track SLA per approval step with business-hours calendars and time-zone awareness. Send proactive reminders before due times and follow-ups after breaches, escalating to backup approvers or managers as configured. Support escalation trees, snooze options, OOO auto-reassignment, and pause/resume for holidays. Surface SLA status in dashboards and provide metrics (average approval time, breach rate) for operational reporting. Log all reminders and escalations in the audit trail.

Acceptance Criteria
Business-Hours & Time-Zone SLA Computation
- Given an approval step with an 8-business-hour SLA and an approver in America/Los_Angeles with business hours 09:00–17:00 Mon–Fri, when the request is submitted Friday at 16:30 local time, then the due time is Monday 12:30 local time and only business hours are counted. - Given the requester is in Europe/Berlin, when viewing the same step, then the due timestamp is displayed localized to the viewer without changing the underlying due moment. - Given a DST transition (spring forward) occurs during the SLA window, when computing remaining time, then the lost hour is not counted as business time and the due time reflects correct business-hour math. - Given business hours exclude weekends, when a step is submitted Saturday, then the SLA countdown begins at 09:00 Monday in the approver’s time zone.
Pre-Due Reminders with Snooze
- Given a step with reminders configured for T-24h and T-2h, when those thresholds are reached within the approver’s business hours, then reminders are sent via the configured channels (email and/or Slack) with remaining time shown in the message. - Given a reminder threshold occurs outside business hours, when the next business hour window opens, then exactly one queued reminder is sent and no duplicates are produced. - Given the approver clicks Snooze for 2 hours in a reminder, when the snooze window is active, then no additional reminders are sent for that step and reminders resume after snooze expires. - Given a per-step max reminder count of 3, when more than 3 reminders would be triggered, then additional reminders are suppressed and the suppression is recorded.
Breach Follow-Up and First-Level Auto-Escalation
- Given a step breaches its SLA, when breach is detected, then a follow-up notification is sent immediately to the current approver and the step status is marked Breached in UI and API. - Given an escalation rule with a 1-business-hour grace period to Backup Approver A, when the breach remains unresolved for 1 business hour, then the step is escalated to A per configuration (reassign or parallel) and A is notified via configured channels. - Given the original approver approves during the grace period, when the step becomes approved, then the scheduled escalation is canceled and the status updates to Approved without an escalation event.
Multi-Level Escalation Trees with Skip/Stop Conditions
- Given an escalation tree [Primary -> Backup -> Manager Group -> Director], when each escalation interval elapses without approval, then the step escalates to the next node and notifications are sent at each level. - Given a node in the tree is ineligible (OOO or already approved), when escalation reaches that node, then the node is skipped and escalation proceeds to the next eligible node. - Given any user in the current node approves, when approval is recorded, then all pending downstream escalations are canceled and the escalation chain stops at that level. - Given the final node is reached and no approval occurs within its SLA, when the final interval elapses, then no further escalation occurs and the step is flagged for manual intervention in UI and API.
OOO Auto-Reassignment to Delegates
- Given the primary approver has an active OOO window with delegate D, when a step is assigned to the primary, then it is auto-reassigned to D, notifications are sent to D, and the due time is recalculated using D’s business-hours calendar and time zone. - Given the primary becomes OOO after assignment, when OOO activates, then any currently assigned, unapproved steps are reassigned to the delegate per policy and both users are notified. - Given no delegate is configured, when the primary is OOO at assignment time, then the step escalates to the configured backup path per the escalation rules and this action is recorded.
Holiday Pause and Resume
- Given the approver’s holiday calendar marks a day as a holiday, when an SLA window spans that day, then the SLA countdown pauses at the start of the holiday and resumes at the next business day start, extending the due time accordingly. - Given a step is submitted during a holiday, when computing the SLA start, then the countdown begins at the next business day start in the approver’s time zone. - Given multiple consecutive holidays or weekends, when computing due time, then all non-business days are excluded from the SLA calculation and the remaining time is accurate to the hour. - Given an SLA is paused for a holiday, when viewing the step, then the UI displays Paused with reason Holiday and shows paused duration not counted toward SLA.
SLA Visibility, Reporting & Audit Trail
- Given an approval request, when viewed in the dashboard, then each step displays status (On Track, At Risk ≤20% SLA remaining, or Breached), remaining/elapsed business hours, due timestamp, and current escalation level. - Given filters for date range, team, and status are applied, when metrics load, then average approval time (business hours), breach rate, and p50/p90 are computed from the filtered set and match values derived from raw events. - Given an export is requested, when the CSV is generated, then it includes per-step fields (IDs, assignees, due times, statuses, SLA durations, escalation levels) with timestamps in UTC and the viewer’s local offset. - Given any reminder, snooze, reassignment, or escalation event occurs, when inspecting the audit trail, then an entry exists with timestamp, actor=system, recipients, channel(s), template ID or subject, outcome (queued/sent/delivered if available), and related step IDs.
Actionable Email & Slack Approvals
"As a busy approver, I want to approve from email or Slack with clear context so that I can keep launches moving without logging into the app."
Description

Deliver actionable approval requests via email and Slack with secure, one-click Approve, Request Changes, and Reject actions. Include batched thumbnails, key metrics, and top diffs in the message for context. Use signed, expiring tokens and SSO handoff to allow secure actions without full login. Support bulk decisions, inline comments, and quick filters within Slack modals, with reliable fallback deep links to the web app if interactivity is blocked.

Acceptance Criteria
One-Click Email Approval with Secure Token
Given an approver receives an approval email with Approve, Request Changes, and Reject CTAs When the approver clicks a CTA within the token TTL Then the action is executed without full login via SSO handoff and a confirmation screen shows decision, item count, and reference ID And the token is single-use; subsequent clicks return an "Expired or Used" page and do not change state And clicks after TTL return an "Expired" page with a deep link to the web app approval view And the decision, channel=email, user, timestamp, and IP are audit logged
Slack Modal Quick Filters and Actions
Given an approver opens a Slack approval modal from a PixelLift notification or shortcut When they apply quick filters (e.g., submitter, brand preset, priority, due soon) and select a subset of items Then the list updates in-modal and selection persists across filters And Approve/Reject/Request Changes actions are available for single or multiple selected items And an ephemeral Slack confirmation summarizes outcomes with links to details
Bulk Decisions with Per-Item Outcomes
Rule: Up to 200 items can be actioned in a single bulk operation from Slack or email deep link Rule: Bulk operations return per-item outcomes; successes are committed, failures remain pending with reasons Rule: For 100 items, 95th percentile server processing time is ≤ 8 seconds; UI shows progress/spinner until completion Rule: If any item requires a comment for Request Changes, the modal enforces a comment before submission
Context-Rich Visual Summaries in Messages
Rule: Email and Slack messages include batched thumbnails (up to 6) with alt text, key metrics (item count, presets applied, background type), and top diffs (e.g., background removed, retouch strength, style preset) Rule: A "View all" link opens the approval page with the same selection pre-applied Rule: Diffs link to a side-by-side before/after view in the web app
Inline Comment Capture on Request Changes
Given an approver chooses Request Changes for one or more items When they submit the action Then a comment is required (minimum 3 characters) and supports @mentions And the comment is stored on each affected item’s thread, visible in the web app within 5 seconds And submitters receive a notification with the comment and item links
Secure Tokens, SSO Handoff, and Authorization
Rule: Action links/buttons use signed, single-use, expiring tokens bound to approval ID and recipient user; configurable TTL (5–60 min), default 15 min Rule: Only assigned approvers with permission can complete the action; unauthorized attempts return 403 and do not change item state Rule: SSO handoff allows the action to complete without full login; no persistent session is created unless the user explicitly continues to the app Rule: All token validations and decisions are audit logged with channel, user, decision, item IDs, and timestamp
Fallback Deep Links When Interactivity Is Blocked
Given Slack interactivity is disabled or times out, or an email client blocks action buttons When the approver uses the fallback deep link Then the web app opens to the approval view with the same context (pre-filtered selection) and offers Approve/Request Changes/Reject and bulk actions And SSO redirect signs the user in if needed without losing context And the fallback path is tracked as channel=web_fallback in audit logs
Audit Trail & Compliance Exports
"As a compliance officer, I want an immutable audit trail and exports so that we can prove proper oversight during audits."
Description

Maintain immutable, tamper-evident logs of every approval decision, timestamp, approver identity, content viewed (diffs, summaries), and justification notes. Link decisions to exact asset versions and the workflow version used at the time. Provide exports to CSV/JSON and webhook delivery to external DAM, QA, or governance systems. Include e-discovery search, configurable retention policies, and data residency controls aligned to workspace regions.

Acceptance Criteria
Immutable Tamper-Evident Approval Log
Given an approval event is recorded When any user attempts to modify or delete a prior log entry through UI or API Then the system rejects the operation with HTTP 403 and records an audit-violation event Given the audit log integrity check is executed When hashes are recomputed Then each record contains a hash and previous_hash that form an unbroken chain without gaps Given an export with integrity manifest is generated When the manifest checksum is validated Then recomputed checksums match the published manifest and the export is marked valid Given a simulated storage crash and recovery When the service restarts Then all committed log records persist and sequence numbers remain strictly increasing without duplicates
Complete Event Data Capture
Given an approval decision is submitted via any channel (Web, Email, Slack, API) When the event is persisted Then the record includes event_id, event_type, decision, timestamp (ISO 8601 UTC), approver_id, approver_email, auth_method, ip_address, user_agent, requester_id, request_id, asset_id, asset_version_id, workflow_id, workflow_version, viewed_artifacts (diff_id, summary_id), justification_text (nullable), sla_at_decision, source_channel And required fields are non-null and validated against allowed enumerations; optional fields are null when not applicable And timestamps are monotonic per request_id and include millisecond precision
Decision Linkage to Exact Versions
Given an approval is made on asset version Vn under workflow version Wm When the audit record is created Then it stores asset_id, asset_version_id=Vn, asset_content_hash, workflow_id, workflow_version=Wm, and diff_version_id used at decision time And when the asset or workflow is later updated, the historical record continues to resolve to Vn and Wm without ambiguity And when replaying the event, the system retrieves the exact versions referenced by the record
CSV/JSON Export with Filtering and Scale
Given a workspace admin requests an export with date range, event types, approvers, and field selection When the export is generated Then the system produces a ZIP containing NDJSON (.jsonl) and CSV files matching the selected schema and a data dictionary And CSV conforms to RFC 4180 with UTF-8 encoding and header row; JSON is one event per line; timestamps are ISO 8601 UTC And exports up to 1,000,000 events complete within 30 minutes and are chunked into files of <= 100 MB with deterministic filenames And the export includes an integrity manifest with SHA-256 checksums for each file
Webhook Delivery with Idempotency and Security
Given a subscriber registers a webhook with endpoint URL and HMAC secret When new audit events occur Then the system sends POST requests within 30 seconds containing the event payload, a unique delivery_id, and an Idempotency-Key header And each request includes an X-Signature header with SHA-256 HMAC of the body and a timestamp so receivers can verify authenticity and freshness And on non-2xx responses or timeouts, deliveries are retried with exponential backoff for up to 24 hours, then marked failed and an alert is emitted And deliveries for the same request_id preserve order, and duplicate processing is prevented via Idempotency-Key reuse
E-Discovery Search Query and Export
Given a compliance user with e-discovery permission accesses audit search When they query by keyword phrase, approver, decision type, date range, asset_id, workflow_version, and justification_text Then results return within 2 seconds for datasets up to 50,000 records and within 10 seconds for up to 1,000,000 records And queries support exact phrase (quoted), boolean AND/OR, and field filters; results include total count and are paginated And selected results can be exported to CSV/JSON with the same schema as standard audit exports
Retention Policies and Data Residency Enforcement
Given a workspace in region EU sets a 7-year retention policy and a legal hold on request_id=XYZ When the nightly purge job runs Then records older than 7 years without legal holds are irreversibly deleted and a signed purge report is added to the audit log And records under legal hold are retained until the hold is removed And all audit data, exports, and backups are stored and processed exclusively in the configured region and never leave it And when retention settings are shortened, the system requires explicit confirmation and enforces a 7-day grace period before deletions execute
Role-Based Access, Delegation, and Overrides
"As a workspace admin, I want role-based permissions and delegation so that only authorized people can approve and we have coverage when someone is out."
Description

Enforce role- and scope-based permissions for creating workflows, approving steps, and overriding decisions. Support temporary delegation for out-of-office coverage, approver alternates, and emergency overrides requiring a reason, multi-factor confirmation, and automatic notifications. Highlight overrides in dashboards and the audit log, and restrict high-risk approvals to designated roles or multi-approver quorum as configured.

Acceptance Criteria
Role- & Scope-Based Permissions Enforcement
Given a user with role "Workflow Creator" scoped to Brand=A, when they create a workflow under Brand=A, then the API returns 201 and the workflow scope is set to Brand=A. Given the same user attempts to create a workflow under Brand=B, when they submit, then the API returns 403 and no workflow is created. Given a user without the "Approver" role views a pending approval, when the approval screen loads, then Approve and Override actions are hidden/disabled and any direct API calls are blocked with 403. Given a user with role "Approver" scoped to Catalog=Shoes, when they approve an item in Catalog=Shoes, then the approval succeeds (200) and is recorded; when they attempt outside their scope, then the action is blocked (403) and logged. Given any permission-denied attempt occurs, when the system blocks the action, then an audit entry is created with user ID, action, resource ID, scope, and timestamp.
Time-Bound Delegation for Out-of-Office Coverage
Given a delegator configures delegation to a delegatee with start/end timestamps and scope, when the delegatee accepts, then the delegation activates at the start time and deactivates at the end time automatically. Given the delegation is active, when an approval assigned to the delegator arrives within the delegated scope, then the delegatee receives notifications and can approve or decline it. Given the delegatee takes action under delegation, when the audit log records the event, then it attributes "delegatee on behalf of delegator" and stores the delegation ID. Given the delegation has ended or is outside scope, when the delegatee attempts action, then the system returns 403 and no state change occurs. Given a delegation is created, then it cannot grant access beyond the delegator's own role and scopes; attempts to exceed are rejected (400) at save-time. Given delegation activation or deactivation occurs, then email/Slack notifications are sent to both delegator and delegatee within 1 minute.
Auto-Routing to Alternates on OOO or SLA Breach
Given a step has a primary approver and alternates [A,B] with SLA=24h, when the primary is marked Out-of-Office or the SLA expires without action, then the approval is reassigned to the first eligible alternate and both primary and alternate are notified. Given alternates are evaluated, when an alternate lacks required role/scope, then they are skipped and the next is evaluated until an eligible alternate is found or none exist. Given an alternate approves, then the step completes and further responses from other alternates are ignored; duplicate approvals are prevented at the API (409). Given any reassignment occurs, then the audit log records original assignee, reason (OOO/SLA), new assignee, and timestamp.
Emergency Override with Reason and MFA
Given a user with the "Override" permission initiates an override, when prompted, then they must supply a reason of at least 10 characters and complete MFA within 60 seconds or the attempt fails (401/422) with no state change. Given MFA succeeds and the user is within scope, when they confirm the override, then the system advances the workflow, records the action as an override, and tags the record with reason, MFA method, and actor. Given an override completes, then notifications are sent immediately to workflow owner, security/admin group, and the bypassed approver(s) via email/Slack. Given an override is attempted by a delegate without explicit "Override" permission, then it is blocked (403) and logged.
Override Visibility in Dashboards and Audit Log
Given an approval was completed via override, when dashboards load, then the item displays a visible "Override" badge/icon and can be filtered using a "Show Overrides Only" control. Given the audit log is queried for that item, then the entry includes override flag, actor, original approver(s), reason text, MFA status/method, step ID, and timestamps. Given exports are generated (CSV/JSON), then override-specific fields are included. Given a normal (non-override) approval occurs, then no override badge appears and no override fields are populated.
High-Risk Approval Quorum and Role Restrictions
Given a High-Risk step is configured with allowed roles {Owner, Senior Approver} and quorum=2, when approvals are collected, then the step completes only after approvals from two distinct eligible users are recorded. Given an ineligible user attempts to approve a High-Risk step, then the attempt is blocked (403) and logged with reason "role/scope not permitted". Given fewer than quorum approvals are recorded, when the SLA expires, then escalation rules trigger and the step remains incomplete. Given overrides are allowed for High-Risk steps with configured override quorum=2, when only one override actor confirms, then the override does not complete; when two distinct override actors confirm within the allowed window, then the override completes and is logged as High-Risk Override.

Release Scheduler

Time-lock when new preset versions go live. Pin versions to specific batches, freeze changes during drops, and roll back instantly if needed—keeping imagery consistent mid-campaign and avoiding surprises during high-velocity launches.

Requirements

Versioned Preset Store
"As a brand manager, I want to create immutable versions of style presets so that I can release changes without affecting in-flight campaigns."
Description

Introduce immutable, versioned style presets with semantic versioning and metadata (creator, createdAt, changelog). Past versions are read-only; new versions are created via clone-and-edit to preserve auditability and reproducibility. Ensure all processing services can resolve a preset by stable version identifier and that rendering behavior is deterministic across versions. Include validation for backward compatibility, diff view between versions, and referential integrity so batches and jobs always resolve to a valid version. Integrate with PixelLift’s preset editor, batch processor, and permissions model.

Acceptance Criteria
Publish Immutable Preset Version (SemVer + Metadata)
Given a user with "Preset Editor" permission has created a new preset draft When they set the version to "1.0.0", provide a non-empty changelog, and click Publish Then the system validates semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH), stamps createdAt (UTC), and records creator metadata And the version state becomes read-only; any update attempt to preset fields returns 409 "Preset version is immutable" And using "Clone" from 1.0.0 creates a new draft prepopulated with identical settings and cleared version field And the system suggests the next version (1.0.1 by default) and requires a new changelog on publish
Stable Version Resolution and Deterministic Rendering
Given a preset reference in the form presetId@1.2.0 is provided to the editor, batch processor, and renderer services When each service resolves the reference Then all services retrieve an identical configuration payload (byte hash equality) And processing the same source image twice with presetId@1.2.0 yields byte-identical outputs (checksum match) across runs and environments And resolving a preset without a version (presetId) returns the current default version id And requesting a non-existent version returns 404 with a machine-readable error code PRESET_VERSION_NOT_FOUND
Backward Compatibility Validation on Publish
Given a draft cloned from presetId@1.2.0 is prepared for release as 1.2.1 (patch) When only non-breaking fields are modified (e.g., numeric parameter adjustments within allowed ranges) Then Publish succeeds and the changelog is stored Given a draft includes breaking changes (e.g., removal of a field or algorithm type change) When the target version is a patch or minor bump Then Publish is blocked with error code INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION_BUMP and a list of detected breaking changes And setting the target version to 2.0.0 (major) for the same changes allows Publish to proceed
Version Diff View with Previews and Changelog
Given a user selects two versions of the same preset (e.g., 1.0.0 vs 1.1.0) When the diff view is opened Then the UI displays field-by-field differences categorized as added/removed/changed with counts And a side-by-side preview renders on three sample images using each version within 5 seconds total And the changelog for the newer version is displayed alongside the diff And the user can export the diff as JSON via a Download action, producing a file that includes before/after values
Referential Integrity for Batches and Jobs
Given existing batches and jobs reference presetId@1.0.0 When version 1.0.0 is deprecated or a newer default is published Then all existing references continue to resolve successfully without mutation And attempts to delete version 1.0.0 are blocked with 409 "Version in use" while references exist And integrity checks report zero dangling references after migrations or cleanup operations And if a referenced version is forcibly removed in a test environment, dependent jobs fail fast with 404 and include remediation guidance in the error payload
Permissions and Audit Logging for Versioned Presets
Given roles Admin, Preset Editor, and Viewer exist Then Admin and Preset Editor can create, clone, and publish versions; only Admin can deprecate or delete versions; Viewer has read-only access And unauthorized actions return 403 with error code INSUFFICIENT_PERMISSIONS and are recorded And every create/clone/publish/deprecate/delete action writes an immutable audit record including actor id, action, version id, timestamp (UTC), and a diff hash And audit records are queryable by version id and actor
Release Scheduling, Pinning, Freeze, and Rollback
Given version 1.1.0 is scheduled to go live at 2025-10-01T10:00:00Z When the current time is before the go-live Then the default version remains on the previous version When the go-live time is reached Then the default version for new batches flips to 1.1.0 automatically and a VERSION_WENT_LIVE event is emitted And batches pinned to 1.0.0 continue to use 1.0.0 regardless of default changes And a freeze window on an active drop blocks changes to pinned versions and schedules; attempts return 423 Locked And a one-click rollback sets the default back to the prior version within 60 seconds and emits a VERSION_ROLLED_BACK event without altering existing pinned batches
Batch Version Pinning
"As a seller uploading a new catalog batch, I want to pin the exact preset version used so that reprocessing later yields the same look."
Description

Enable explicit pinning of a specific preset version to each batch at creation and during reprocessing. Persist the mapping batchId → presetVersion so all renders, retries, and regenerations use the pinned version for consistent visual output. Provide UI and API options to select a version, prevent accidental drift, and display pinned status in batch details. Handle edge cases such as archived versions, deleted presets, and cross-workspace moves by enforcing safe fallbacks and warnings.

Acceptance Criteria
Pin Preset Version During Batch Creation (UI)
Given I am on Create Batch UI with a selected preset that has multiple versions And I select a specific preset version from the version picker When I create the batch Then the batch is saved with pinned=true and presetVersionId set to the selected version And all initial renders use that presetVersionId And changing the preset’s default version after creation does not alter the batch’s pinned version And Batch Details displays the pinned version label, ID, and a "Pinned" badge
Pin Preset Version via API on Batch Create/Update
Given a POST /batches request includes presetId and a valid presetVersionId belonging to that preset When the request is submitted with valid authentication Then the response is 201 and the body includes pinned=true and the same presetVersionId And a subsequent GET /batches/{id} returns the same pinned fields Given a POST /batches includes presetId but omits presetVersionId Then the system pins to the latest active version at creation time and returns its presetVersionId Given the provided presetVersionId does not belong to the preset Then the response is 422 with error code PinnedVersionInvalid Given a PATCH /batches/{id} with presetVersionId to re-pin and the user has Editor role and the batch is not currently processing Then the response is 200 and future renders use the new presetVersionId Given a PATCH occurs while the batch is processing Then the response is 409 Conflict with error code BatchBusy
Use Pinned Version for All Renders, Retries, and Regenerations
Given a batch is pinned to preset version V1 And the preset’s default version is later updated to V2 When I retry failed items, regenerate outputs, or reprocess the batch Then all processing jobs use V1 And each render job’s metadata includes presetVersionId=V1 And API GET /renders for the batch returns presetVersionId=V1 for the associated renders
Behavior with Archived or Deleted Preset Versions
Given a batch is pinned to a preset version that becomes Archived When I view Batch Details Then the pinned version shows an "Archived" badge with a non-blocking warning And reprocessing is allowed using the archived version Given a batch is pinned to a preset version that is Deleted When I attempt to reprocess or render Then processing is blocked and the UI shows a blocking banner requiring re-pin And API operations return 410 Gone with error code PinnedVersionDeleted And the UI offers a one-click re-pin to the latest active version with explicit confirmation And upon confirmation, the batch is re-pinned to the selected version and an audit entry is created
Display and Communicate Pinned Status in Batch Details and Lists
Given a batch with a pinned version When I open Batch Details Then I see pinned=true, preset name, version label, version ID, release date, and a link to release notes And the batch list shows a "Pinned" indicator and supports filtering by pinned status And API GET /batches includes pinned, presetVersionId, pinnedAt, and pinnedBy fields
Cross-Workspace Batch Move with Pinned Versions
Given I initiate moving a batch to another workspace And the target workspace contains the same preset and preset version Then the move completes and the batch retains the same presetVersionId Given the target workspace lacks the preset or the pinned version Then the move is blocked and a mapping dialog requires selecting an available preset version in the target workspace And the move cannot complete until a valid version is selected or the move is canceled And upon completion with a selection, the batch is re-pinned to the chosen version and an audit entry is recorded
Controlled Re-Pinning and Audit Trail
Given I have Editor or higher permissions When I change the batch’s pinned version in the UI Then a confirmation modal summarizes oldVersionId -> newVersionId and requires explicit confirmation And upon confirmation, the pinned version updates, future renders use the new version, and an audit log entry is recorded with actor, timestamp, oldVersionId, and newVersionId Given I lack sufficient permissions Then the re-pin control is disabled in the UI and API PATCH /batches/{id} returns 403 Forbidden with error code InsufficientPermissions
Timed Release & Timezone Control
"As a marketing lead, I want to schedule when a new preset version becomes active in my timezone so that launches switch over consistently at the planned moment."
Description

Allow scheduling of a new preset version to become active at a specific date/time with explicit timezone selection and DST awareness. The scheduler performs an atomic pointer switch for the preset’s active version and guarantees idempotency and retry on transient failures. Provide conflict detection (e.g., overlapping schedules, frozen windows), preflight validation, and a countdown/status view. Ensure safe handling of in-progress jobs (finish with old version) and new jobs (start with new version) with clear cutover semantics. Integrate with the job orchestrator and system clock service for accuracy and reliability.

Acceptance Criteria
DST-Aware Timezone Scheduling
Given I select timezone "America/Los_Angeles" and choose 2025-03-09 02:30 local time When I attempt to save the schedule Then the system rejects the save with error code TIME_INVALID_DST and suggests the nearest valid local times (e.g., 03:00), and the UTC preview for 03:00 local displays 2025-03-09T10:00:00Z Given I select timezone "America/Los_Angeles" and choose 2025-11-02 01:30 local time When I attempt to save the schedule without disambiguating offset Then the system requires me to choose either "UTC-07 (before fallback)" or "UTC-08 (after fallback)", and the saved schedule stores the resolved absolute UTC instant accordingly Given a schedule is saved with a selected timezone When I view the schedule details Then I see both the local wall time with offset and the canonical UTC time, and the cutover executes at the stored UTC instant per the system clock service
Atomic Cutover and Job Routing
Given preset P has active version v1 and a scheduled switch to v2 at time T (UTC) And job J1 began processing at time t1 < T And job J2 is submitted at time t2 >= T When time reaches T Then the active pointer switches from v1 to v2 atomically within 1 second And J1 completes using v1 exclusively And J2 starts using v2 exclusively And no job processes a mix of v1 and v2 within a single job And an audit event preset_version_activated for v2 is recorded exactly once with event_time >= T
Idempotent Switch with Retry on Transient Failure
Given a transient network error occurs after issuing the cutover command for preset P to version v2 at time T When the scheduler retries the cutover using the same idempotency key Then the final active version is v2, only one audit/event record exists for the cutover, and duplicate notifications are not sent Given duplicate cutover events are received within 60 seconds for the same preset and target version When the second event is processed Then it results in a no-op with a 200 response indicating idempotency, and no additional side effects occur Given the scheduler process crashes mid-cutover When a standby instance resumes and retries within 60 seconds Then the cutover completes successfully without manual intervention and without leaving stale locks
Conflict Detection: Overlaps and Freeze Windows
Given a preset has a freeze window from Fstart to Fend When a user schedules an activation at time T where Fstart <= T <= Fend Then the system blocks the action with error code SCHEDULE_BLOCKED_FROZEN and displays the freeze window details Given a preset already has a pending scheduled activation at T1 When a user attempts to create a second scheduled activation for the same preset Then the system blocks the action with error code SCHEDULE_CONFLICT and shows the existing schedule details; no new schedule is created Given preset P has version vX pinned to Batch B When a new activation of version vY is scheduled Then the preflight informs "Batch B will continue using its pinned version" and the scheduler excludes Batch B from cutover without blocking the schedule
Preflight Validation and Confirmation Gate
Given I click Schedule for preset P to activate version v2 at T with timezone Z When preflight runs Then it validates: v2 exists and is published (not archived), user has Schedule permission for P, job orchestrator is reachable, and system clock service health indicates skew < 100 ms; any failed check is shown with specific error codes and the schedule is not created Given all preflight checks pass When I proceed to confirmation Then I am shown a summary including preset, current version, new version, activation time in local (with offset) and UTC, cutover semantics, and affected scope; I must confirm explicitly before the schedule is created Given the schedule is created When I inspect the record via API Then it includes fields: preset_id, target_version_id, activation_utc, timezone, local_time_display, created_by, idempotency_key, and status=Scheduled
Countdown and Status Visibility
Given a future activation is scheduled for preset P at time T (UTC) When I view the schedule detail page Then I see a live countdown to T updating at least once per second, showing both local time (with offset) and UTC; if detected client clock skew > 5 seconds relative to server time, a warning is displayed Given the activation is approaching When time reaches T Then status transitions are reflected as: Scheduled -> Cutting Over (for up to 60 seconds) -> Live upon success, or Failed if not completed by T+60s; the same states are returned by the status API Given I cancel the schedule before T When I confirm cancellation Then the countdown stops, status becomes Canceled, and no cutover occurs at T
Change Freeze Windows
"As a campaign owner, I want to freeze preset changes during a drop window so that no accidental edits alter live imagery."
Description

Introduce configurable freeze windows to block preset edits and releases during critical campaign periods. Support per-workspace and per-preset scopes, recurring and one-off windows, and admin override with justification. Provide UI indicators, API enforcement, and pre-schedule validation that prevents creating releases inside frozen periods. Log all override attempts and enforce granular permissions to reduce risk of accidental changes mid-drop.

Acceptance Criteria
Block Edits and Releases During Active Freeze
Given an active freeze window applies to the target preset or workspace When a user with Editor role attempts to save preset parameter changes via UI Then the Save action is prevented, controls remain disabled, and the UI displays a reason indicating the freeze end timestamp in the workspace timezone And no changes are persisted to the preset version Given an active freeze window applies to the target preset or workspace When a client calls the API to publish a new preset version or attach a preset version to a batch Then the request fails with HTTP 403 and error code FREEZE_WINDOW_BLOCKED including windowId and endsAt fields And zero publish jobs are enqueued and no side effects occur Given no active freeze window applies When the same edit or release actions are performed Then the actions succeed with standard response codes and persisted changes
Pre-Schedule Validation Blocks Releases in Frozen Periods
Given a freeze window covers 2025-11-25 09:00–12:00 in the workspace timezone When a user selects 2025-11-25 10:00 for a preset release in the Release Scheduler and clicks Save Then the client shows an inline validation error stating the selection is within a freeze window and prevents saving And the UI suggests the nearest available datetime after the freeze ends Given the same request is attempted via API When POST /v1/releases is called with a scheduledAt inside a freeze window Then the API responds HTTP 422 with error code FREEZE_WINDOW_VIOLATION and includes fields nearestAvailableAt and conflictingWindowId And the release is not created
Scope: Workspace vs Preset Freeze Precedence
Given a workspace-level freeze window is active and a preset-level freeze window is not configured for Preset A When a user attempts to edit or release Preset A Then the action is blocked due to the workspace freeze Given a preset-level freeze window is active for Preset B while the workspace has no active freeze When a user attempts to edit or release Preset B Then the action is blocked due to the preset-level freeze only Given both workspace and preset-level freeze windows overlap for Preset C When a user views allowed times in the scheduler for Preset C Then the blocked intervals reflect the union of both freezes And read-only operations (e.g., viewing preset details) remain available
Recurring and One-Off Freeze Windows with Timezone & DST Handling
Given a recurring weekly freeze is configured for Fridays 08:00–20:00 in America/Los_Angeles When the calendar transitions across DST changes Then enforcement occurs at 08:00–20:00 local wall-clock time each Friday regardless of DST shift Given a one-off freeze is configured on 2025-12-01 06:00–14:00 local time When both the recurring Friday freeze and the one-off window overlap a date Then the system enforces the union of blocked intervals for that date And UI calendars shade the full union as unavailable Given overlapping freeze windows are configured via API When GET /v1/freeze-windows is called Then the API returns all configured windows with timezone, recurrence, and effective intervals, and clearly identifies overlaps via overlappingWindowIds
Admin Override Requires Justification and Scoped Duration
Given an active freeze window applies When a Workspace Admin initiates an override Then they must provide a justification of at least 20 characters and select a scope of either Single Operation or Time-bound (max 30 minutes) And the override cannot be activated without meeting both requirements Given a valid override is active and scoped to Single Operation When the admin performs one blocked action (e.g., publishing a preset version) Then the action succeeds and the override automatically expires immediately after Given a non-admin attempts to activate an override When they submit the override form or call the API endpoint Then the request is rejected with HTTP 403 and error code INSUFFICIENT_ROLE Given any override is activated When the action completes Then an audit record is created including actorId, role, targetId, action, windowId, justification, scope, startedAt, endedAt, and outcome
UI Indicators and Disabled Controls During Freeze
Given an active freeze window applies to a preset or workspace When the user opens the Preset List, Preset Editor, or Release Scheduler Then a visible Frozen badge appears for affected presets and a banner displays next available edit time And edit/publish controls are disabled with a tooltip explaining the freeze and end time And the indicators are accessible (ARIA labels provided, tooltip content reachable by keyboard) Given no active freeze window applies When the same pages are opened Then no Frozen indicators are shown and all controls are enabled
Granular Permissions and Change Logging for Freeze Windows
Given role-based access control is configured When a Workspace Owner or Admin attempts to create, update, or delete a freeze window via UI or API Then the action succeeds with HTTP 200/201 and the window is persisted Given an Editor or Viewer attempts the same When they submit the request Then the action is rejected with HTTP 403 and error code INSUFFICIENT_ROLE Given any freeze window is created, updated, or deleted When the operation completes Then an immutable audit log entry is recorded with actorId, role, operation, windowId, scope (workspace/preset), recurrence, timezone, previousValues, newValues, timestamp, and ipAddress And GET /v1/audit-logs?eventType=freeze-window returns the entry within 5 seconds of the operation
One-click Rollback & Restore
"As an operations manager, I want to roll back to a prior preset version with one click so that I can quickly recover from unexpected visual issues."
Description

Provide an atomic rollback action that instantly reassigns the active version pointer to the prior stable version, with optional selection of a specific historical version. Ensure rollbacks are idempotent, logged, permission-gated, and include safety checks (e.g., cannot roll back to deleted or incompatible versions). Offer UI confirmation with impact summary and an API endpoint for automated recovery. Handle job routing so new jobs use the restored version while in-flight jobs complete with the previously active version.

Acceptance Criteria
Atomic One-Click Rollback Switch
Given a preset P with active version V3 and prior stable version V2, and at least one in-flight job using V3 When an authorized user triggers the one-click rollback to the prior stable version Then the active version pointer for P updates atomically to V2 within 2 seconds and is immediately reflected in both UI and API reads And no intermediate state is observable (reads return either V3 before commit or V2 after commit) And in-flight jobs continue and complete on V3 without restart or version reassignment And all new jobs submitted after the commit route to V2 100% of the time And repeating the same rollback within 5 minutes results in a no-op with 200 OK and no additional side effects (idempotent)
Historical Version Selection and Safety Checks
Given a preset P with versions V1, V2, V3 where V1 and V2 are compatible, V0 is deleted, and V4 is incompatible When a user selects "Rollback to…" and chooses V1 Then the system validates the target exists, is not deleted/archived, is enabled, and is schema-compatible with P And on pass, the active pointer updates to V1; on fail, the rollback is blocked without side effects And attempting rollback to a deleted version returns 400 with code VERSION_NOT_FOUND and a human-readable message And attempting rollback to an incompatible version returns 409 with code VERSION_INCOMPATIBLE and includes the incompatibility reason And if organizational policy blocks rollback, the call returns 423 with code ROLLBACK_BLOCKED and a remediation hint
Permission-Gated Rollback with Audit Logging
Given a user without the "Preset:Rollback" permission attempts a rollback via UI or API When the action is executed Then the system denies with 403 FORBIDDEN and code FORBIDDEN_OPERATION, without changing the active version And for an authorized user, a rollback (attempted or successful) writes an immutable audit log entry containing: presetId, previousVersionId, newVersionId (if any), actorId, actorRole, source (UI/API), timestamp, requestId, idempotencyKey (if provided), rationale (if provided), outcome (SUCCESS/FAILURE), and affectedScopes (e.g., pinned batches count) And audit entries are queryable by admins by presetId/date range and exportable as CSV/JSON
UI Confirmation Modal with Impact Summary
Given an authorized user initiates rollback from the preset detail page When the confirmation modal opens Then it displays: current active version, proposed target version, count of in-flight jobs on current version, count of queued jobs impacted, note that in-flight jobs will not be switched, note that pinned batches remain on their pinned versions, and any active freeze windows affecting scope And the Confirm button remains disabled until pre-checks load (<= 2 seconds) and the user explicitly confirms (e.g., checkbox or typing "ROLLBACK") And if pre-checks fail (e.g., target incompatible or policy freeze without override), the modal shows an actionable error and prevents submission And on confirm, the modal closes only after the rollback commits and shows a success toast summarizing the change
API Rollback Endpoint with Idempotency and Concurrency Control
Given a client calls POST /presets/{presetId}/rollback with an optional targetVersionId and Idempotency-Key header When the request is valid and authorized Then the server performs the rollback and returns 200 with body { presetId, previousVersionId, newVersionId, committedAt, routerEpoch } And duplicate requests with the same Idempotency-Key within 24 hours return the original result without re-executing side effects And concurrent rollback attempts on the same preset result in exactly one success; losers receive 409 with code CONFLICT_ACTIVE_CHANGE And p95 latency is <= 800 ms under nominal load; the version pointer is globally consistent within 2 seconds of commit
Job Routing Consistency with Pins and Freeze Windows
Given some batches are pinned to version V3 and a global drop freeze window may be active When a rollback to V2 is executed Then the job router sends all new unpinned jobs to V2 within 2 seconds of commit And pinned batches continue on their pinned versions unaffected by the rollback And scheduled future releases retain their configured go-live times and target versions and are not altered by the rollback And if a freeze window blocks version changes, rollback is prevented unless the actor has "Preset:OverrideFreeze"; on override, a rationale is required and recorded in audit logs And no in-flight jobs are re-routed; queue health metrics (enqueue/dequeue rates, failure rate) remain within baseline ±5% over 10 minutes post-rollback
Audit Log & Alerts
"As a team admin, I want a clear audit trail and alerts for releases and rollbacks so that I can monitor changes and respond to failures."
Description

Record all release-related events—version creation, scheduling, activation, freeze/override, pin changes, and rollback—with actor, timestamp, and affected entities. Provide searchable UI, export, and retention policies. Emit real-time notifications to email and Slack on successes, failures, and upcoming cutovers, with configurable recipients per workspace. Surface failure reasons and remediation tips inline to speed incident response.

Acceptance Criteria
Event Logging Coverage & Fidelity
Given a workspace with Release Scheduler enabled When any of the following events occur: preset version created; schedule created or updated; activation started or completed; freeze window applied or removed; override applied or removed; batch pin added, changed, or removed; rollback initiated or completed Then an audit log entry is persisted for each event with fields: event_type, actor_id, actor_name, actor_type (user|service), occurred_at (UTC ISO-8601), workspace_id, preset_id, from_version_id (nullable), to_version_id (nullable), batch_ids (array), schedule_id (nullable), reason (nullable), outcome (success|failure), correlation_id, entry_id And the log entry is immutable; any correction results in a new entry that references the prior entry via prior_entry_id And the entry becomes queryable within 5 seconds of the event time
Audit Log Search & Filter
Given an audit log with at least 5,000 events in the last 30 days When a user opens the Audit Log UI and applies any combination of filters: date range, event_type, actor (name or ID), preset_id, version_id, batch_id, outcome, text search (reason) Then results include all and only records matching the filters within the current workspace And the first page of 50 results returns in ≤ 2 seconds for up to 10,000 matching records And results are sortable by occurred_at (asc|desc), actor_name, event_type And the UI displays total count and supports pagination (configurable page size: 25/50/100) And clearing filters resets the view to the default last 7 days
Audit Log Export & Retention Enforcement
Given the workspace retention policy is set to 180 days When a user requests an export (CSV or JSON) for a selected date range Then the system validates the range is within retention and the estimated size ≤ 500,000 rows; otherwise prompts to narrow the range And upon confirmation an export job is created and recorded in the audit log with correlation_id And for exports ≤ 500,000 rows a downloadable file is produced within 10 minutes, with a 24-hour expiring link And the exported file includes header fields and all logged fields in UTC And records older than 180 days are neither searchable nor exportable And when an admin updates retention to a new value (e.g., 365 days), subsequent searches and exports honor the new policy and the change is logged (old→new)
Real-time Email & Slack Notifications
Given notification recipients are configured for the workspace When a scheduled activation is 15 minutes away Then an upcoming cutover notification is delivered to subscribed recipients with: preset name, from_version_id, to_version_id, schedule_time (UTC), affected batches count/list (≤ 20 listed, rest summarized), and a deep link to details When an activation or rollback completes with success or failure Then a notification is delivered within 60 seconds including: event_type, outcome, error_code and message if failure, correlation_id, and deep link And duplicate notifications with the same correlation_id are not sent more than once And if Slack delivery fails (non-2xx), the failure is logged and email is attempted as a fallback And per-event-type subscriptions (upcoming_cutover, activation_success, activation_failure, rollback_success, rollback_failure) are respected
Recipient Configuration & Permissions
Given a user with Workspace Admin role opens Notifications settings When they add or remove email recipients and Slack webhooks Then emails must pass format validation and Slack webhooks must pass a connectivity test (HTTP 2xx) before saving And recipients can be subscribed per event type (upcoming_cutover, activation_success, activation_failure, rollback_success, rollback_failure) And saving changes records a configuration-changed audit entry with before/after (secrets redacted) And users without Admin role can view but cannot modify recipients (controls disabled and server rejects writes)
Inline Failure Reasons & Remediation
Given a scheduled activation or rollback fails When a user opens the incident details via the audit log or notification deep link Then the UI displays error_code, error_message, failed_step, correlation_id, affected entities (workspace, preset_id, version_id, batch_ids), and timestamp And at least one remediation tip is displayed with a link to relevant docs or settings (e.g., re-auth Slack, adjust permissions, resolve conflicting freeze) And a context-appropriate action is available (Retry, Rollback, or Dismiss) based on event type and state And details and tips render within 10 seconds of page load And acknowledging the incident records an audit entry with actor and timestamp
Release Webhooks & API Events
"As a developer integrating PixelLift, I want webhook events and APIs for releases so that our storefront and workflows can react to changes in real time."
Description

Expose secure APIs to manage schedules, pins, and freeze windows, and publish signed webhooks for key lifecycle events (scheduled, activated, skipped, failed, rolled_back). Include HMAC signature verification, retries with backoff, idempotency keys, and per-workspace rate limits. Provide event payloads that include preset identifiers, version, timestamps, and affected batches so external systems (CMS, storefront, CI) can react in real time to visual changes.

Acceptance Criteria
Webhook HMAC Signature & Replay Protection
Given a workspace has a webhook endpoint and secret S When PixelLift sends any release lifecycle event webhook (scheduled, activated, skipped, failed, rolled_back) Then the request includes headers: X-PixelLift-Timestamp (epoch ms), X-PixelLift-Signature (HMAC-SHA256 over "{timestamp}.{raw_body}" using S), X-PixelLift-Event-ID (UUID), X-PixelLift-Delivery-ID (UUID), X-PixelLift-Delivery-Attempt (integer >= 1) Given the consumer recomputes the signature with S over the exact raw body and X-PixelLift-Timestamp within a 5-minute tolerance When compared to X-PixelLift-Signature Then the signatures match Given the same delivery is retried When sent again Then X-PixelLift-Delivery-ID remains the same and X-PixelLift-Delivery-Attempt increments by 1 Given the webhook body or timestamp is altered in transit When the consumer recomputes the HMAC Then the signature does not validate
Event Delivery, Exponential Backoff, and At-Least-Once
Given a subscriber responds with 2xx When a release lifecycle event is generated Then 99% of deliveries complete within 10 seconds of event creation and 100% complete within 60 seconds Given a subscriber responds with 5xx or times out When delivery fails Then PixelLift retries with exponential backoff and full jitter for up to 6 total attempts (initial + 5 retries), each delay capped at 60 seconds, with a total retry window <= 5 minutes Given the final attempt also fails When retries are exhausted Then the delivery is marked failed; no further retries occur; a delivery record is accessible via API including attempt history and last response/status Given multiple events exist for the same preset_id When delivered Then deliveries maintain per-preset causal order (earlier events are attempted before later ones) Given a transient failure When a retry receives a 2xx Then the delivery is marked delivered and no additional retries occur
Idempotency for Management APIs
Given a client sends POST to create or mutate schedules, pins, or freeze windows with an Idempotency-Key header and identical request body When the same request is retried within 24 hours Then the API returns 200/201 with the original response body, echoes Idempotency-Key, and no duplicate side effects or duplicate events are created Given two concurrent POST requests with the same Idempotency-Key When processed Then exactly one operation is committed; the other returns the same result Given a non-matching body is sent with a reused Idempotency-Key When processed Then the API responds 409 Conflict indicating key reuse mismatch and performs no side effects Given GET and DELETE endpoints When supplied an Idempotency-Key Then GET ignores the header; DELETE is safe to retry (idempotent) and does not create duplicate events
Per-Workspace Rate Limiting for Management APIs
Given a workspace W has a configured limit of 600 requests per 10 minutes for management APIs When W sends requests under the limit Then each response includes X-RateLimit-Limit: 600, X-RateLimit-Remaining with the correct remaining count, and X-RateLimit-Reset with the reset epoch seconds Given W exceeds the limit within the window When an additional request is received Then the API responds 429 Too Many Requests with Retry-After set to remaining seconds until reset and performs no side effects Given another workspace W2 with a different limit When W2 sends requests Then W2’s quota is enforced independently of W’s Given outbound webhook deliveries occur When measuring API usage Then webhook delivery traffic does not consume management API rate limit quota
Event Payload Schema Completeness
Given any release lifecycle event (scheduled, activated, skipped, failed, rolled_back) When the webhook is delivered Then the JSON payload validates against the published schema (via field schema_version) and includes: event_id (UUID), event_type, occurred_at (RFC3339), workspace_id, preset_id, preset_version, affected_batch_ids (array), actor (user_id or "system"), reason (for "skipped"/"failed"), previous_version (for "rolled_back"), and metadata.trace_id Given a new optional field is added in a newer schema_version When delivered to an older client Then required fields and semantics remain backward-compatible Given an event of type "rolled_back" When delivered Then payload contains from_version and to_version with correct values and a non-empty reason Given an "activated" event resulting from a scheduled release When delivered Then payload contains schedule_id and activation_time matching server-side records
Secure APIs for Schedules, Pins, and Freeze Windows
Given a workspace-scoped API key with permission "releases:write" When calling endpoints to create/update/delete schedules, pin versions to batches, and create freeze windows Then unauthorized requests return 401, insufficient scope returns 403, and authorized requests return 2xx with stable resource IDs Given a valid schedule creation specifying preset_id, preset_version, and a future activation_time When created Then the API returns 201 with schedule_id and a "scheduled" event is emitted with matching fields Given a valid pin request specifying preset_version and batch_ids When processed Then the API returns 200/201, the batches are locked to the pinned version, and an "activated" event includes affected_batch_ids and preset_version Given an active freeze window overlapping an activation_time or pin attempt When a change is attempted Then the API rejects with 409 Conflict and emits a "skipped" event with reason "freeze_window" Given a rollback request for a preset to a prior version When executed Then the API returns 200 and a "rolled_back" event is emitted with from_version, to_version, and affected_batch_ids

Brand Binding

Automatic enforcement of preset-to-brand and channel pairing. Block off-brand usage, auto-assign the correct preset based on supplier or folder tags, and warn on mismatches—reducing rework and safeguarding visual identity across catalogs.

Requirements

Brand–Preset Mapping Engine
"As a brand manager, I want to define which style presets are approved per brand and channel so that all processed images remain consistent with our visual identity."
Description

A centralized mapping service that binds each brand to its approved style presets and channel variants. Supports one-to-many relationships, channel-level overrides, versioning, and effective date ranges to accommodate seasonal campaigns. Provides default fallbacks when metadata is incomplete and exposes an API for other PixelLift services to resolve the correct preset during batch processing. Ensures every image is processed with the right, brand-compliant preset without manual selection.

Acceptance Criteria
Preset Resolution by Brand and Channel Overrides
Given brand B1 has base preset P1 and channel override Instagram->P1_IG When resolvePreset(brand=B1, channel=Instagram) Then response.presetId = P1_IG and response.mappingVersionId is not null Given brand B1 has base preset P1 and no channel override for Web When resolvePreset(brand=B1, channel=Web) Then response.presetId = P1 Given unknown brand When resolvePreset(brand=Unknown, channel=Web) Then response.presetId = GlobalDefaultPreset and response.warnings includes WARN_FALLBACK_BRAND Given normal load When performing 10,000 single-key lookups over 10 minutes Then p95 latency <= 100 ms and error rate < 0.1%
Auto-Assignment via Supplier and Folder Tags
Given mappings: supplierTag=Acme -> P2; folderTag=Summer24 -> P3 When resolvePreset(brand=B1, channel=Web, metadata={supplierTag:Acme, folderTag:Summer24}) Then response.presetId = P3 Given mapping precedence When conflicting tag mappings exist Then precedence is channelOverride > folderTag > supplierTag > brandDefault > globalDefault and response.decisionPath reflects applied steps Given no metadata tags When resolvePreset(brand=B1, channel=Web) Then response.presetId = brandDefaultPreset Given unit tests covering precedence When running the mapping precedence test suite Then all 12 test cases pass
Effective Date Ranges and Versioning for Seasonal Campaigns
Given brand B1 default P1 (v1) and seasonal override P2 (v2) effective [2025-10-01T00:00Z, 2025-12-31T23:59:59Z] When resolvePreset is called with processingTimestamp=2025-11-15T12:00Z Then response.presetId = P2 and response.mappingVersionId = v2 Given the same configuration When processingTimestamp=2026-01-01T00:00Z Then response.presetId = P1 and response.mappingVersionId = v1 Given overlapping effective ranges for the same brand+channel When both match the timestamp Then the rule with the latest effectiveStartDate wins; if equal, the highest version number wins; if equal, the latest updatedAt wins Given any timestamp ambiguity When resolving Then all timestamps are interpreted in UTC and returned as UTC
Block Off-Brand Preset Usage and Channel Mismatch Warning
Given preset P9 is not approved for brand B1 When processBatch is called with explicitPresetId=P9 for images of brand B1 Then the request is rejected with HTTP 403 and errorCode=ERR_OFF_BRAND and allowedPresetIds are returned Given preset P1 base is approved for brand B1 and channel variant P1_IG exists When processBatch is called with explicitPresetId=P1 and channel=Instagram Then the service auto-corrects to P1_IG, proceeds, and returns warnings=[WARN_CHANNEL_MISMATCH] and appliedPresetId=P1_IG Given any block or auto-correction event When it occurs Then an audit log entry is written with fields {brandId, channel, requestedPresetId, appliedPresetId, userId/requestId, timestamp} within 2 seconds
Batch Resolution API Contract and Performance
Given endpoint POST /v1/preset-resolution When called with a payload of up to 1,000 items Then it returns per-item decisions with HTTP 200 and content-type application/json in under 300 ms p95 and 600 ms p99 Given a requestId header X-Idempotency-Key When the same key is retried Then identical responses are returned and no duplicate side effects are recorded Given sustained traffic of 10,000 resolutions per minute When load-tested for 30 minutes Then success rate >= 99.9% and mean CPU utilization <= 70% Given invalid items in the batch When N out of M items are invalid Then the API returns HTTP 207 Multi-Status, processes valid items, and reports per-item errors with codes
Fallback Hierarchy When Metadata Is Incomplete
Given brand B1 has default preset P1 and global default P0 exists When resolvePreset(brand=B1, channel=Unknown) Then response.presetId = P1 and response.decisionPath includes ["brandDefault"] Given unknown brand and global default P0 exists When resolvePreset(brand=Unknown, channel=Web) Then response.presetId = P0 and response.warnings includes WARN_FALLBACK_BRAND Given no global default configured When resolvePreset cannot determine a preset Then the API returns HTTP 412 with errorCode=ERR_NO_DEFAULT_CONFIG and does not process the image Given any fallback decision When resolved Then response includes decisionPath enumerating each applied rule in order
Auditability and Change History for Mappings
Given mapping changes are made When a mapping is created, updated, or deleted Then a new immutable version is recorded with {versionId, brandId, channel, tags, presetId, effectiveRange, changedBy, changedAt, changeReason} Given the history endpoint GET /v1/mappings/{brandId}/history When called Then it returns the last 100 changes in reverse chronological order within 200 ms p95 Given role RBAC 'BrandAdmin' When a user without this role attempts to modify mappings Then the API returns HTTP 403 ERR_FORBIDDEN Given any resolution response When returned Then it includes mappingVersionId and effectiveRangeStart/End fields referencing the applied version
Rule-Based Auto Assignment
"As an operations lead, I want presets to auto-assign based on supplier and folder tags so that batch uploads require zero manual selection."
Description

A rules engine that auto-assigns presets based on supplier, folder tags, filename patterns, SKU prefixes, EXIF/camera data, or custom metadata. Rules are prioritized with deterministic conflict resolution and fallbacks. Integrates at import and pre-process stages to apply bindings at scale for batch uploads. Includes dry-run mode, decision logging, and idempotent reprocessing to avoid duplicate work.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Assign by Supplier on Import (Batch Upload)
Given a rule exists: supplier = "Acme" -> preset = "StudioClean v3" And a batch of 500 images is imported with supplier = "Acme" When the import begins Then 100% of images are auto-assigned preset "StudioClean v3" before entering the processing queue And no manual action is required to apply the preset And each item displays assignment status = "Auto-assigned by rule: supplier=Acme"
Auto-Assign via Filename Pattern and SKU Prefix
Given a rule exists: filename matches "*_hero.*" OR SKU prefix = "HR-" -> preset = "HeroPop v2" And files 12345_hero.jpg and HR-7788.png are imported without supplier or folder tags When the files are evaluated by the rules engine at import Then both files are assigned preset "HeroPop v2" And files not matching the filename or SKU patterns are not assigned by this rule
Auto-Assign via EXIF and Custom Metadata
Given a rule exists: EXIF.CameraModel = "Canon EOS R5" AND custom.collection = "Lookbook" -> preset = "Lookbook SoftLight v1" And an image has EXIF.CameraModel = "Canon EOS R5" and custom.collection = "Lookbook" When the image is imported or reaches the pre-process evaluation stage Then the preset "Lookbook SoftLight v1" is assigned And if the EXIF field is missing or mismatched, this rule is skipped without error and other rules continue to evaluate
Deterministic Rule Priority and Conflict Resolution
Given rules exist: - R1: supplier = "Acme" -> preset = "A" priority = 90 - R2: filename contains "_hero" -> preset = "B" priority = 80 - R3: SKU prefix = "AC-" -> preset = "C" priority = 90 And an image from supplier "Acme" has filename "AC-123_hero.jpg" and SKU "AC-123" When the rules engine evaluates matches Then the applied preset is "A" because higher priority wins and ties are resolved by specificity order: supplier > folder tag > SKU prefix > filename > EXIF > custom metadata; if still tied, lowest rule ID wins And the decision records the evaluated rules, priorities, and the applied tie-breaker
Fallback to Brand/Global Defaults When No Rule Matches
Given no rule matches an image And a brand default preset "BrandDefault v4" exists for the image's brand/channel When the image is evaluated at import or pre-process Then the preset "BrandDefault v4" is assigned And if no brand default exists, the global default preset "Neutral v1" is assigned And the decision record notes "Fallback: Brand Default" or "Fallback: Global Default"
Dry-Run Mode with Decision Logging and Export
Given dry-run mode is enabled for an import job with 200 images And rules R1..Rn are configured When the job is executed in dry-run Then no presets are applied or persisted to any image And a decision report is generated listing for each image: selected preset (if any), matched rule IDs, tie-breaker used, and whether fallback was applied And the report is viewable in the UI and downloadable as CSV And the dry-run summary shows counts for: matched by rule, used brand fallback, used global fallback, no decision
Idempotent Reprocessing and Update Behavior
Given an image was previously auto-assigned preset "P1" and processed When the rules engine is re-run with the same rules and inputs Then no duplicate assignment or reprocessing occurs And when rules change so the image now matches preset "P2" and re-evaluation is invoked with allowUpdates = true Then the assignment updates to "P2" and the image is reprocessed exactly once And when allowUpdates = false, the existing assignment "P1" remains unchanged
Off-Brand Usage Blocker & Override
"As a brand manager, I want the system to block off-brand preset usage and allow controlled overrides so that we reduce rework while retaining governance."
Description

Real-time enforcement that prevents applying non-approved presets to a brand or channel. Provides clear error messaging, suggested compliant alternatives, and a governed override path for authorized roles (with reason codes, approver identity, and time-limited exceptions). Configurable strictness per workspace or brand, with batch-safe handling to stop only offending items while continuing valid ones.

Acceptance Criteria
Real-Time Block on Non-Approved Preset (UI Single Apply)
Given a workspace with brand "Acme" and channel "Amazon" configured to Block non-approved presets And preset "Moody Vibe" is not approved for the Acme-Amazon pairing When a user attempts to apply "Moody Vibe" to an image in the Acme-Amazon context via the UI Then the apply action is prevented (no mutation to the asset) And an error is displayed containing: presetName, brandName, channelName, policyMode=Block And 1–3 compliant preset suggestions are shown, ranked by relevance And the decision is logged with fields: userId, assetId, presetId, brandId, channelId, timestamp, policyMode, overrideAvailable=true And the UI response occurs within 300 ms P95 from click to message
Batch Processing: Partial Continue with Offending Items Isolated
Given a batch of N images where some have a non-approved preset for the active brand-channel When the batch is processed Then compliant items are processed successfully And offending items are blocked without halting the entire batch And the batch result indicates Partial Success with counts: total=N, succeeded=S, blocked=B, failed=F (non-policy failures) And each blocked item has reasonCode=OFF_BRAND_PRESET and 1–3 suggested compliant presets And a downloadable per-item report (CSV and JSON) is available within 60 seconds of batch completion And batch duration overhead is <= 10% compared to an all-compliant baseline of the same size
Governed Override Request and Approval (Four-Eyes)
Given a user with role Editor encounters a Block on applying a non-approved preset When the user submits an override request with required fields: reasonCode (from configured list) and optional comments (<= 500 chars) Then the request is routed to a Brand Admin or Compliance Approver (not the requester) And approval by an eligible approver issues an override token scoped to {brandId, channelId, presetId} with TTL default 24h (configurable 1–168h) And the apply action succeeds only after approval and only within token scope and validity And the audit log records requesterId, approverId, timestamps (requested, approved), tokenId, expiry, reasonCode And if requester==approver, the approval is rejected with code FOUR_EYES_REQUIRED And upon expiry, subsequent applies are blocked again until a new approval is granted
Configurable Strictness per Workspace/Brand
Given policyMode can be set at workspace-level and overridden at brand-level to one of [Block, Warn, Off] When a brand-level mode is set, it takes precedence over the workspace-level mode Then for Warn mode, non-approved preset applies are allowed but display a warning with suggestions and are logged with outcome=WARNED And for Off mode, no policy check runs and no warnings are shown And policy changes propagate to enforcement (UI and API) within 60 seconds and are visible in the policy settings UI And a GET policy endpoint returns the effective mode for a brand-channel And unit/integration tests cover all mode combinations and precedence
API Enforcement and Error Contract
Given the API endpoints POST /apply-preset and POST /batches/{id}/apply-preset When a non-approved preset is requested under policyMode=Block Then the server returns HTTP 422 with code=OFF_BRAND_PRESET and a payload including: presetName, brandName, channelName, policyMode, suggestedPresetIds (0–3) And no changes are persisted to the target asset(s) And under Warn mode, the server returns 200 with warnings[] containing code=OFF_BRAND_PRESET and suggestions, while applying the preset And including a valid, unexpired override token (X-Override-Token) that matches {brandId, channelId, presetId} yields 200 and applies the preset And invalid/expired/mismatched tokens yield 403 with code=INVALID_OVERRIDE And P95 API latency for enforcement checks is <= 400 ms for single apply and <= 800 ms for batch per 100 items
UI Messaging and Discoverability of Compliant Presets
Given a user is blocked or warned for off-brand preset usage in the UI When the message is shown Then the modal/banner headline reads "Preset not approved for Brand-Channel" And the body includes reason, current preset, effective policyMode, and a link "View brand-approved presets" that opens a filtered list And suggested compliant presets (1–3) show name, thumbnail, and Apply buttons; selecting one applies immediately if allowed And the component meets accessibility: focus is trapped, Esc closes, screen-reader labels for controls, and all visible text is localizable And analytics events track impressions, suggestion clicks, and conversion to compliant apply
Audit Log and Reporting for Compliance Events
Given enforcement is enabled When any of the following occurs: Block, Warn, OverrideRequested, OverrideApproved, OverrideDenied, AppliedWithOverride Then an audit event is recorded with fields: eventType, userId, assetId|batchId, presetId, brandId, channelId, policyMode, reasonCode (if any), overrideTokenId (if any), timestamp (UTC), outcome And Admins can filter and export these events via UI and API over a selectable date range And data retention is 365 days with role-based access controls (only Admins view PII) And exported CSV reflects filters and includes a checksum/hash of rows for integrity verification
Real-Time Mismatch Detection
"As a catalog editor, I want real-time warnings when a photo’s preset doesn’t match its destination channel so that I can fix issues before publishing."
Description

Validation layer that detects preset-to-brand or channel mismatches during upload, editing, and export. Checks parameters like aspect ratio, background color, margins, watermarking, and color profile against the bound preset. Surfaces inline warnings and one-click fixes (reapply correct preset or adjust parameters), plus a batch summary view to resolve issues before publishing.

Acceptance Criteria
Inline Warning on Upload for Preset Mismatch
Given a project with a bound preset-to-brand and/or channel mapping When a user uploads images and analysis completes Then any image whose aspect ratio, background color, margin, watermarking, or color profile deviates from the bound preset is flagged with an inline warning badge on the thumbnail and a summary tooltip listing the offending parameters And the warning appears within 1 second per image at the 95th percentile for batches up to 500 images And each flagged image shows two CTAs: "Reapply Correct Preset" and "Adjust Parameters" And unflagged images display no warning and proceed normally
Auto-Assign Correct Preset by Supplier or Folder Tag
Given a folder or upload batch tagged with a supplier or brand identifier that has a configured preset binding When images are added to the batch Then the correct bound preset is auto-applied without user action and the action is indicated via a non-blocking toast and per-image icon And accuracy is 100% for all images with a valid mapping; images without a mapping are left unchanged and listed in a "No Mapping" filter And attempting to manually select an off-brand preset is blocked with an explanatory message
Real-Time Parameter Drift Detection During Editing
Given the editor is open on an image with a bound preset When the user modifies any controlled parameter (aspect ratio, background color, margin, watermarking, or color profile) so that it no longer matches the preset Then a real-time warning banner and inline control highlights appear within 200ms, identifying the specific parameters out of compliance And the "Revert to Preset" CTA becomes enabled; selecting it restores only the drifted parameters while preserving other edits And the warning clears immediately when parameters return to compliance
One-Click Fix Applies Bound Preset
Given an image is flagged for mismatch When the user clicks "Reapply Correct Preset" Then all out-of-compliance parameters are reset to the bound preset values in a single operation within 500ms, the image revalidates, and the warning state is cleared And non-conflicting user edits (e.g., exposure or retouch adjustments) remain intact And an undo step is added to history allowing full reversal in one action
Pre-Export Batch Mismatch Summary and Resolution
Given a user initiates export for a batch When any images in the batch are out of compliance with their bound preset/channel rules Then a pre-export modal shows counts by mismatch type, affected image thumbnails, and per-image checklists of failing parameters And the modal provides "Fix All" and "Fix Selected" actions that apply corrections and revalidate before allowing export And if organizational policy blocks off-brand exports, export is prevented for failing items with a clear reason and link to fix; otherwise user can proceed after acknowledging warnings
Channel-Specific Rules Enforcement on Export
Given a bound channel with explicit constraints (e.g., marketplace requires 1:1 aspect, pure white background #FFFFFF, sRGB, no watermark) When the user selects an export target that conflicts with the bound channel or when the image parameters violate channel constraints Then the system flags the conflict, auto-selects the correct channel preset if available, or blocks export until parameters comply And the validation explicitly checks and reports: aspect ratio tolerance ±0.01, background color deltaE < 2 to #FFFFFF, margins within preset %, watermarking disabled/enabled per rule, and ICC profile equals sRGB
Channel-Specific Preset Variants
"As an e-commerce marketer, I want channel-specific preset variants to be applied automatically so that each marketplace receives optimized, compliant images."
Description

Support for per-channel variations of a base brand preset (e.g., Amazon white background, Instagram square crop, Shopify padding). Automatically selects and renders the correct variant at export or publish time, with reprocessing when channel policies or presets change. Maintains asset versioning to track which variant was used and ensures consistent outputs across marketplaces.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Select Preset Variant per Export Channel
- Given a base brand preset has channel-specific variants configured, When an export or publish job targets a specific channel (e.g., Amazon, Instagram, Shopify), Then the system auto-selects the matching channel variant without user input. - And the job record for each asset stores brand_id, preset_id, variant_id, and channel. - And the output asset filename includes the channel and variant version in the pattern: <sku>_<channel>_v<presetVersion>.<ext>. - And 100% of assets in the job receive the correct channel variant; any asset without a mapping is halted with status "BLOCKED" and reason "MISSING_VARIANT".
Brand Binding Blocks Off-Brand Variant Usage
- Given workspace brand B is active, When a user attempts to apply a preset variant from brand C, Then the action is blocked with error code BRAND_BINDING_VIOLATION and cannot proceed to export/publish. - Given a variant is selected that does not match the target channel, When the user queues export, Then a warning is shown and a one-click "Switch to <channel> variant" option is provided; proceeding without switch is blocked if policy=Block, otherwise allowed with recorded warning if policy=Warn. - And all blocks/warnings are logged with user_id, asset_id, rule_id, timestamp, and decision (Blocked|Warned|Auto-switched).
Auto-Assign Variant via Supplier and Folder Tags
- Given supplier and/or folder tags are mapped to a brand preset and channel, When images are batch-uploaded into a tagged folder, Then the system auto-assigns the corresponding channel-specific variant and queues processing. - And the assigned variant is displayed in batch review; users with Brand Manager role may override before processing; overrides are captured in audit with old_variant_id and new_variant_id. - And if multiple rules match, the highest-priority rule is chosen and the decision path is shown; if no rules match, default to the base preset and set job warning NO_RULE_MATCH.
Auto-Reprocess on Policy or Preset Change with Versioning
- Given a channel policy or any channel-specific preset variant is edited and saved, When the change is published, Then previously exported assets tied to that variant are marked Outdated and added to a Reprocess queue. - And reprocessing creates new asset versions with incremented presetVersion (and variant settings hash), leaving prior versions intact and retrievable. - And enabled channel connectors receive updated assets after reprocessing; publish actions reference the new version id. - And a summary report lists counts of impacted, reprocessed, skipped, and failed assets with reasons.
Asset Version Metadata and Traceability
- Given any export or publish generates an output, When the asset is produced, Then the system persists an immutable version record with fields: assetVersionId, brand_id, preset_id, variant_id, presetVersion, channel, settings_hash, source_hash, and timestamp. - And the version history view can filter by channel and presetVersion, and displays the exact variant used. - And a Reproduce Output action re-runs processing pinned to the recorded presetVersion and settings_hash; the resulting file matches the stored version by byte-level checksum.
Fallback Behavior When Channel Variant Missing
- Given a base preset has no defined variant for the target channel, When a user exports or publishes to that channel, Then the system applies the base preset with channel-safe defaults and emits warning MISSING_CHANNEL_VARIANT. - And an org-level policy controls fallback behavior (Block | Allow with Warning); the configured policy is enforced consistently across batch jobs. - And when a new channel variant is later defined, users can bulk reprocess previously warned assets to replace fallback outputs; the new versions are linked to the original via priorVersionId.
Binding Audit & Compliance Reporting
"As a compliance analyst, I want audit logs and reports of bindings and overrides so that I can track adherence and identify training gaps."
Description

Comprehensive, immutable logs of preset bindings, assignments, blocks, and overrides, including user, timestamp, source metadata, and reason codes. Provides dashboards and exportable reports for compliance rate, off-brand attempts prevented, and rework avoided. Offers filters by brand, supplier, channel, and time window, plus webhooks/CSV exports for BI integration and retention controls.

Acceptance Criteria
Immutable Audit Log for Binding Events
Given a binding action (auto-assign, block, or override) occurs, When the event is processed, Then an audit entry is created within 5 seconds containing: event_id (UUID), event_type, outcome, preset_id/name, brand_id/name, channel_id/name, supplier_id/name, source_folder, tag_ids, image_id(s), rule_id, user_id/email or "system", timestamp (ISO 8601 UTC), reason_code (if block/override), request_id, and hash_chain value. Given an audit entry exists, When any actor attempts to modify it via API or UI, Then the system prevents mutation and logs a tamper_attempt event with actor and timestamp. Given audit entries are appended, When a daily integrity check runs, Then each entry’s hash_chain equals SHA-256(prev_hash + canonical_entry_json) and the check reports 0 mismatches. Given an event_id, When retrieved via API, Then the response returns the exact stored entry and a 200 status within 300 ms for the 95th percentile.
Dashboard Metrics: Compliance, Blocks, Rework Avoided
Given a selected time window and scope, When the dashboard loads, Then compliance_rate = compliant_events ÷ eligible_events rounded to 1 decimal and displayed with numerator/denominator. Given block events occurred in scope, When the dashboard loads, Then off_brand_attempts_prevented equals the count of block events in scope. Given minutes_per_rework is set to 5, When calculating rework_avoided, Then rework_avoided_minutes = off_brand_attempts_prevented × 5 and is displayed as HH:MM and (if cost_per_min configured) as currency. Given new events stream in, When 60 seconds elapse, Then dashboard aggregates reflect the new totals. Given filters return no data, When the dashboard loads, Then the UI shows zeros and an empty-state message without errors.
Filterable Reporting by Brand, Supplier, Channel, and Time
Given filters for brand, supplier, channel, and time window, When multiple values are selected per facet, Then results include events matching any selected value within each facet and all facets are combined with AND. Given a time zone is chosen, When the time window is applied, Then boundaries are computed in that time zone and displayed; default is UTC if none provided. Given a query returning ≤ 100,000 events, When results are requested, Then the first page loads within 3 seconds and the query supports deterministic sorting: timestamp desc, event_id as tiebreaker. Given paginated results, When navigating pages, Then the total count is accurate and page changes do not alter ordering for a fixed dataset.
Exports: CSV Download and Webhook Delivery for BI
Given a user requests CSV export for the current filters, When the export completes, Then the CSV is UTF-8 with a header row and columns: event_id, event_type, outcome, preset_id, preset_name, brand_id, brand_name, channel_id, channel_name, supplier_id, supplier_name, source_folder, tag_ids, image_ids, rule_id, user_id, user_email, timestamp_utc, reason_code, request_id, hash_chain. Given an export exceeds 100,000 rows, When requested, Then an asynchronous job is created and a downloadable, signed URL is provided that expires in 24 hours. Given fields contain commas, quotes, or newlines, When generating CSV, Then values are escaped according to RFC 4180. Given a webhook destination with shared secret is configured, When new audit events occur, Then a JSON batch is POSTed within 30 seconds signed with HMAC-SHA256 (header X-PixelLift-Signature) and includes an Idempotency-Key. Given a webhook delivery receives a non-2xx response, When retrying, Then the system retries up to 6 times with exponential backoff capped at 10 minutes and guarantees at-least-once delivery.
Override Logging with Reason Codes and Approvals
Given a user initiates a preset override, When submitting, Then a reason_code from the configured list is required and an optional note up to 500 characters is allowed. Given override requires approval, When the request is made, Then the approver must differ from the requester and the approver’s user_id is recorded in the audit log. Given an override is executed, When logging the event, Then the entry includes previous_preset_id/name, new_preset_id/name, override=true, and links to the originating rule_id. Given a user lacks override permission, When they attempt an override, Then the action is blocked and a block event is logged with reason_code=permission_denied and no state change occurs.
Retention Controls and Redaction Policy
Given an admin sets a workspace retention policy (e.g., 365 days), When a log entry exceeds the retention window and is not under legal hold, Then it is deleted or archived per policy and a retention_deletion summary event is recorded. Given PII fields (e.g., user_email) are configured for redaction after 90 days, When an entry passes the redaction threshold, Then those fields are irreversibly redacted while preserving non-PII fields and metric integrity. Given a legal hold is applied to a brand, When retention jobs run, Then entries under hold are excluded from deletion until the hold is lifted and the hold is auditable. Given a retention policy change, When saved, Then the change is logged with admin user_id, timestamp, and old/new values and applies prospectively to new deletions.
Mapping Admin Console
"As a workspace admin, I want an admin console to manage mappings and import rules in bulk so that onboarding new brands and suppliers is fast and error-free."
Description

An admin UI for managing brand-to-preset mappings and auto-assignment rules. Includes bulk import/export, in-line validation, role-based access control, preview of presets on sample images, and test-run capability before applying changes to full catalogs. Tracks change history with rollback, supports multi-brand workspaces, and provides guardrails to avoid breaking existing bindings.

Acceptance Criteria
Bulk Import with Inline Validation
- Given an Admin or Editor uploads a CSV/JSON using the provided template, the system validates required fields (brand_id, channel_id, preset_id, rule_scope, priority, status) before commit. - Row-level errors and warnings are displayed inline with line numbers; first 200 surfaced in UI and a full downloadable error report is generated. - Critical errors (missing required fields, invalid IDs, duplicate key brand+channel+scope, non-integer priority) block import; warnings (unused columns, deprecated fields) allow proceed with explicit confirmation. - Import is atomic: either all valid rows are applied or none if any critical error exists. - Idempotency: re-importing an identical file produces zero changes and records a no-op audit entry. - Performance: validation for 10,000 rows completes ≤ 15s; applying 10,000 valid rows completes ≤ 60s. - Audit: a single change-set is created with counts of created/updated/deleted mappings and a checksum of the source file. - Guardrail: attempts to overwrite active mappings used by in-flight jobs require Admin confirmation and are deferred if a safe window is scheduled.
Auto-Assignment Rule Engine Evaluation
- When an asset enters the pipeline with brand_id, channel, supplier_tag, and folder_tag, rules evaluate in descending priority; match order: supplier_tag > folder_tag > brand default; first match wins. - Deterministic outcome: given identical inputs and ruleset version, the same preset_id is assigned; tiebreaker is most recent update timestamp if priorities are equal. - Fallback: if no rule matches, processing is blocked with error "No preset mapped"; a notification is sent to brand owners and Admins. - Per-channel enforcement: a preset not bound to the asset's brand+channel is rejected with a mismatch error; asset is not processed. - Rule application logs rule_id, ruleset_version, and assigned preset_id with the asset's job record. - Rule changes affect only jobs queued after the save timestamp; in-flight jobs retain previous assignments. - Throughput: the engine evaluates ≥ 300 assets/second per workspace under nominal load with p95 decision latency ≤ 50 ms.
Role-Based Access Control for Mapping Admin Console
- Roles supported: Owner, Admin, Editor, Viewer; default new users are Viewer. - Owner/Admin: full CRUD on mappings, rules, imports, rollbacks, and can apply test-run results. - Editor: can create/edit mappings and run dry runs; cannot apply to production or perform rollbacks. - Viewer: read-only; may export reports; no create/update/delete actions. - All mutating endpoints enforce authorization and return 403 on insufficient permission; corresponding UI controls are disabled and tooltipped. - Every attempted and successful action is logged with actor_id, role, IP, timestamp, and outcome. - SSO group-to-role mapping is supported; manual overrides persist and are auditable. - Permission changes take effect immediately across sessions and are reflected in UI within 5 seconds.
Preset Preview on Sample Images
- Selecting a brand and preset allows previewing up to 5 sample images; previews render ≤ 2s per 1080p image (batch of 5 ≤ 10s, p95). - Preview shows before/after toggle and 1:1 zoom; no catalog changes are persisted. - The rendering pipeline version used is identical to production; the version is displayed in the UI. - Visual fidelity: color difference between preview and production output for the same input is ΔE ≤ 2. - Input color spaces supported: sRGB and Adobe RGB; others are rejected with an explanatory message. - Optional preview download as JPEG/WebP is available with max file size 10 MB per image; watermark "Preview" is applied. - Caching: repeating the same preset+image preview returns cached result with p95 ≤ 500 ms.
Dry Run of Rule Changes Before Catalog Apply
- Users select a ruleset and target scope (workspace/brand/channel/folder) and initiate a dry run; no changes are persisted. - The system evaluates ≥ 50,000 assets and produces an impact report: counts per rule, conflicts, blocked assets, and proposed preset assignments. - Report generation completes ≤ 3 minutes for 50,000 assets with progress feedback and cancel option. - Admins can promote the dry run to apply; a content hash of the evaluated set ensures the applied set matches the report; if the catalog has changed, promotion is blocked and a re-run is required. - No emails or processing jobs are triggered by dry runs; results are stored for 30 days and are auditable. - Applying from a dry run executes transactionally; success/failure and counts are recorded in a change-set.
Change History and Point-in-Time Rollback
- Every create/update/delete of mappings or rules generates a versioned change-set with before/after values, actor, timestamp, and rationale (optional text). - History view supports filtering by brand, channel, actor, and date range; export available as CSV/JSON. - Admins can rollback an individual change-set or restore to a specific timestamp; the system presents an impact summary before execution. - Rollback is atomic and requires a confirmation with a reason ≥ 15 characters. - Guardrails block rollbacks that would introduce duplicate/conflicting mappings; suggested resolutions are presented. - All rollback operations are logged and reversible (forward-apply the prior change-set). - Performance: rollback of change-sets ≤ 10,000 rows completes ≤ 60s.
Guardrails in Multi-Brand Workspaces
- Isolation: a preset from Brand A cannot be mapped to Brand B; cross-workspace access is blocked. - Uniqueness enforced: at most one active default preset per brand+channel; scoped rules (supplier/folder) cannot overlap at equal or higher priority without explicit override and justification. - Impact check on save shows affected catalogs/assets; if affected_count > 0, Admin confirmation is required; option to schedule apply window is provided. - Deletion is blocked if a mapping is referenced by active or scheduled jobs; UI lists blockers and links to cancel or reschedule. - Real-time validation returns field-level errors within 500 ms of input change. - Concurrency: optimistic locking prevents stale updates; saves with outdated versions are rejected with guidance to refresh. - Notifications are sent to brand owners and Admins on blocked saves, high-impact changes, and scheduled applies.

Audit Insights

Tamper-proof activity trails with usage analytics by brand, user, and preset version. Receive anomaly alerts (e.g., off-brand attempts), export compliance reports, and map usage to cost centers for clear accountability and simpler audits.

Requirements

Immutable Audit Log Ledger
"As a security and compliance officer, I want an immutable, tamper-evident audit log of all processing activities so that I can prove compliance and investigate incidents with confidence."
Description

Provide an append‑only, tamper‑evident audit ledger that records every significant action in PixelLift, including uploads, AI retouch operations, background removals, style‑preset applications (with preset/version IDs), exports, approvals, and administrative changes. Each entry must capture timestamp (NTP-synchronized), actor (user/service/API key), brand/workspace, cost center tag, asset IDs, operation parameters, model versions, originating IP/agent, and outcome status. Entries are hash‑chained and signed to detect alteration, stored on WORM-capable storage with configurable retention and legal holds. Include a verifiable proof endpoint to validate integrity of individual entries or ranges. Integrate via an event bus so all services emit standardized audit events with correlation IDs, ensuring end‑to‑end traceability across the processing pipeline.

Acceptance Criteria
Append‑Only Hash‑Chained Ledger Writes
Given a valid audit event, When it is appended, Then the entry includes previous_hash, entry_hash, and digital_signature with key_id, and the chain continuity is verifiable end-to-end. Given any attempt to update or delete an existing ledger entry via API or storage, When executed, Then the operation is rejected with 403 and a tamper_attempt audit event is recorded. Given the ledger data at rest, When any bit in a past entry is modified, Then the next verification detects chain break and reports the earliest affected entry_id. Given signing key rotation occurs, When new entries are appended, Then signatures verify with the new key_id and previously signed entries continue to verify with their original key_id.
Complete Field Capture for Significant Actions
Given actions upload, AI_retouch, background_removal, style_preset_apply, export, approval, and admin_change, When performed, Then an audit entry is recorded for each with fields: timestamp_utc, actor (user/service/api_key), brand_workspace, cost_center_tag, asset_ids, operation_type, operation_parameters, model_version, originating_ip, user_agent, outcome_status, correlation_id. Given a style_preset_apply action, When recorded, Then preset_id and preset_version are present and non-empty. Given an action fails, When recorded, Then outcome_status includes failure_code and error_message. Given timestamps are captured, When validated against NTP, Then ntp_offset_ms is present and within ±500 ms.
WORM Storage, Retention, and Legal Hold
Given WORM-capable storage is configured, When ledger objects are written, Then they are immutable for the active retention period. Given a brand/workspace retention policy between 1 and 10 years is configured by an authorized admin, When saved, Then new entries inherit the policy and the change is itself audited. Given a legal hold is placed on a brand/workspace or entry range, When retention expiry is reached, Then deletion is prevented until the hold is lifted and all actions are audited. Given an attempt to delete or rewrite a WORM-protected object, When executed, Then the operation fails with 403 and a tamper_attempt audit event is recorded.
Integrity Proof Endpoint (Entry and Range)
Given an entry_id, When GET /audit/proof?entry_id={id} is called with valid auth, Then 200 is returned with entry_hash, previous_hash, signature, key_id, and verification_result=true. Given start and end identifiers, When GET /audit/proof?start={s}&end={e} is called, Then a contiguous-chain proof for the range is returned within 2 seconds for ranges ≤ 10,000 entries and verifies client-side. Given a nonexistent entry_id or range, When proof is requested, Then 404 is returned with error_code=ENTRY_NOT_FOUND. Given a chain break within the requested range, When proof is requested, Then verification_result=false and first_corrupted_entry_id is included.
Event Bus Standardization and Correlation
Given any service emits audit events, When publishing to the event bus, Then messages conform to schema_version=X with required fields and pass schema registry validation. Given a user action triggers downstream processing, When events are emitted across services, Then a single correlation_id is propagated and present in all related ledger entries. Given the event bus is unavailable, When an event is to be emitted, Then the service retries with exponential backoff up to 5 minutes, persists to an outbox, and duplicates are handled idempotently. Given a publish fails schema validation, When attempted, Then it is rejected, captured in a DLQ with reason, and the failure is audited.
Administrative Key and Role Controls
Given RBAC policies are enforced, When a user without Audit.Admin role attempts to change retention, legal holds, signing keys, or proof settings, Then the request is denied with 403 and is audited. Given a key rotation is initiated by Audit.Admin, When completed, Then a new key pair with incremented key_id is active for signing, prior keys remain for verification-only, and rotation metadata is recorded. Given a brand-scoped user requests audit entries, When authorized, Then results are limited to the user's brand/workspace scope and access is audited.
Time Synchronization and Clock Drift Monitoring
Given system nodes synchronize time via NTP, When drift exceeds ±500 ms on any node, Then new audit writes from that node are blocked, an alert is raised, and the event is audited. Given entries are timestamped, When saved, Then each includes server_time_utc and a monotonic_sequence to guarantee ordering for same-millisecond events. Given NTP services are restored, When drift returns within threshold, Then audit writes resume and recovery is audited.
Granular Audit Filters & Search
"As a compliance analyst, I want to filter and search audit records by brand, user, preset version, and time range so that I can quickly find relevant evidence during reviews."
Description

Deliver a queryable audit interface (UI + API) that supports filtering by brand, user, role, time range, action type, asset ID, preset name/version, outcome status, IP/geolocation, and correlation ID. Provide full‑text search on metadata, sortable columns, pagination, saved searches, and export of result sets. Enforce role‑based access controls so users only see records within their permitted scopes. Optimize for large datasets with indexed queries and consider time‑partitioned storage. Include quick pivots from aggregated views to raw audit entries for fast investigations.

Acceptance Criteria
Multi-Dimensional Filtering (UI & API)
Given an organization with ≥10M audit records spanning multiple brands, users, roles, action types, asset IDs, preset names/versions, outcome statuses, IPs/geolocations, correlation IDs, and a time range ≥90 days When a user applies any single supported filter (brand, user, role, time range, action type, asset ID, preset name/version, outcome status, IP/geolocation, correlation ID) in the UI or via API Then only matching records are returned and the applied filter is shown as active And p95 response time for single-indexed filter queries is ≤2s for result sets ≤10k rows When multiple different filter types are applied concurrently Then filters combine with AND semantics across types and OR semantics within multi-select values of the same type And the total count equals the filtered set size (±0.1%) And time range filters are inclusive of start and exclusive of end in UTC And IP filter accepts exact IP and CIDR; geolocation filter accepts country/region/city codes And correlation ID filter is exact and case-insensitive And UI and API return identical results for equivalent queries
Full-Text Search Across Metadata
Given audit records containing metadata fields (e.g., file name, preset name, notes, error messages) When the user submits a full-text query string in the UI or API parameter q Then results include records where any metadata field contains the query terms (case-insensitive, tokenized on alphanumerics) And combining full-text search with filters returns the intersection of both And p95 response time for full-text queries over ≤10k returned rows is ≤3s And results are ranked by relevance then by timestamp desc when sort is not explicitly set And an empty query or only stop-words returns no full-text matches and does not alter applied filters
Sortable Columns & Pagination (UI & API)
Given the audit list view with columns: timestamp, brand, user, role, action type, asset ID, preset name, preset version, outcome status, IP, geolocation, correlation ID When the user clicks a column header (UI) or sets sort parameters (API) Then the list sorts ascending/descending correctly and stably, defaulting to timestamp desc on initial load And changing sort resets pagination to the first page And pagination supports page sizes 25/50/100 (default 50) in UI, and API supports cursor-based pagination with next/prev tokens and a limit up to 500 And the same query + sort + cursor deterministically returns the same page And p95 latency to fetch any page ≤2s for pages up to 500 rows And the total count reflects the filtered set across all pages
Saved Searches: Create, Run, Manage
Given a user with permission to save searches When the user saves the current combination of filters, full-text query, sort, and columns as a named Saved Search Then the Saved Search is persisted with a unique name per user (1–120 chars) and is listed under the user’s Saved Searches When the user runs a Saved Search Then the UI applies the exact saved parameters and returns identical results to the original at the same data snapshot And p95 load time to apply a Saved Search is ≤2s for queries returning ≤10k rows When the user renames, updates, or deletes a Saved Search Then the changes are persisted and reflected in the list; deleted searches no longer appear And Saved Searches are private to the owner user and not visible to other users
Export Filtered Results (CSV/JSON, Sync/Async)
Given a filtered/sorted result set in the audit interface When the user exports results to CSV or JSON via UI or API Then only records within the current query scope are exported and RBAC is enforced And for result sets ≤50k rows, the export downloads synchronously within 60s; for larger sets up to 5M rows, an asynchronous job is created and a downloadable link is provided upon completion And exported data preserves applied sort order and includes the selected columns; timestamps are ISO 8601 UTC And the export file name includes org/brand (where applicable), query date range, and a timestamp And the API exposes endpoints to create export jobs and poll job status And the number of exported rows equals the query’s total count at export time
Role-Based Access Scope Enforcement
Given users with different scopes (e.g., Org Admin with all brands in org; Brand User restricted to Brand A; Standard User restricted to own actions) When a user queries the audit UI or API Then only records within that user’s permitted brands/resources are returned And out-of-scope filter values are disabled in UI and rejected by API with 403 and an explanatory error And tenant isolation is enforced so users cannot access records from other organizations under any circumstances And API tokens inherit the issuing user’s scopes and produce identical visibility And all access denials are themselves auditable with user, reason, and attempted scope
Pivot from Aggregated Views to Raw Audit Entries
Given an aggregated view (e.g., counts by brand, action type, or outcome over a selected time window) When the user clicks an aggregate bucket (bar, slice, or table cell) Then the app opens the raw audit list view with corresponding filters and the same time window pre-applied And the raw list total count matches the aggregate bucket count at query time (±0.1%) And the pivoted state is shareable via a deep link URL capturing filters, time range, and sort And navigating back returns to the aggregate view with prior state preserved And p95 latency to open the pivoted raw list is ≤2s for ≤10k-row result sets
Usage Analytics by Brand/User/Preset Version
"As a brand operations manager, I want usage analytics by brand, user, and preset version so that I can measure adoption, efficiency gains, and enforce brand standards."
Description

Aggregate audit events into analytics dashboards that show volumes processed, success/failure rates, average processing time, estimated time saved, preset adoption and effectiveness, and anomaly counts. Provide drill‑down from charts to underlying audit entries, with breakdowns by brand, cost center, user, preset version, and time window. Ensure multi‑tenant data isolation, near‑real‑time updates via streaming aggregations, and exportable widgets. Surface KPIs relevant to e‑commerce outcomes (e.g., conversion lift correlation where available) to demonstrate value and drive preset governance.

Acceptance Criteria
Real-Time Brand-Level Aggregates
Given audit events for tenant T and brand B are ingested via the streaming pipeline When new events arrive Then dashboard metrics for brand B (processed volume, success rate, failure rate, average processing time, estimated time saved) update within 60 seconds at p95 and 120 seconds at p99 And estimated time saved is computed as sum(max(0, baseline_edit_time_per_asset - processing_time_per_asset)) with a brand-configurable baseline (default 180 seconds), and the baseline value is displayed in the widget info And for any 1-hour window, each metric matches a point-in-time recomputation from the audit store within the greater of 0.5% absolute difference or ±5 events
Drill-Down From Charts to Audit Trail
Given a user views an analytics chart with filters for brand(s), cost center(s), user(s), preset version(s), and a time window When the user clicks a chart element (bar, slice, point, or legend bucket) Then a drill-down table opens showing underlying audit entries constrained by the same filters and time window And the table includes columns: timestamp, brand, cost center, user, preset version, status, processing time, assetId, error code (if any) And the drill-down supports server-side pagination to at least 50,000 rows with sortable columns; p95 response time <= 2 seconds for page sizes up to 100 rows And a deep link "View in Audit Trail" preserves the drill-down filters and time window; a back action returns to the original dashboard and scroll position
Multi-Tenant Isolation and Role-Based Access
Given a user authenticated for tenant A requests analytics for tenant B Then the request is denied with HTTP 403 and no cross-tenant identifiers or counts are leaked in error bodies or timing side channels beyond a constant-time response window (±100 ms) And all analytics and drill-down queries require and verify tenantId from the access token and enforce brand/cost-center scopes from the user role (e.g., AnalyticsViewer) so that only authorized brands/cost centers are visible And a support break-glass role requires a justification string and produces an immutable audit event; access is time-bound (default 1 hour) and is visible in the tenant's audit trail And automated integration tests with two synthetic tenants confirm zero cross-join leakage and zero data visibility across tenants
Advanced Breakdown and Filtering
Given filters for brand(s), cost center(s), user(s), preset version(s), and time window (Last 15m, 1h, 24h, 7d, 30d, Custom) When any combination of these filters is applied Then all widgets and tables reflect the filters consistently within 2 seconds at p95 for up to 1,000,000 events in range And breakdown mode renders grouped/stacked charts for the selected dimension and totals equal the sum of buckets within the greater of 0.1% or ±5 events And empty-result states render a clear "No data for selected filters" message without errors; clearing filters restores prior state And the current filter state is encoded in a shareable URL and is restored when the URL is revisited
Anomaly Detection and Counts
Given anomaly rules are enabled (off-brand attempts, failure-rate spikes, processing-time outliers, abnormal preset adoption changes) When an anomaly is detected in the last 1-hour window Then the anomaly count widgets update within 2 minutes at p95 and 5 minutes at p99 of detection And each anomaly entry includes rule id, severity, brand, user, preset version, count, first_seen, last_seen, and a link to filtered drill-down And on a labeled validation dataset, the false-positive rate is <= 5% and true-positive rate is >= 80% And disabling a rule removes it from counts and suppresses new detections within 60 seconds
Exportable Analytics Widgets and Reports
Given a user selects Export on any analytics widget When export is requested Then the system provides PNG (visual), CSV (aggregated rows), and JSON (widget config and query) that respect current filters, breakdowns, and user scopes And downloads begin within 5 seconds at p95; CSV exports up to 1,000,000 rows complete within 2 minutes or stream progressively without errors; column headers are consistent and UTF-8 encoded And an embeddable signed URL (iframe) is generated with tenant/brand scoping and a configurable TTL (default 7 days); access after TTL expiration is denied And exported artifacts include metadata (generated_at UTC, tenantId, brand(s), time range, filters) and a SHA-256 checksum for integrity verification
KPI Correlation: Preset Adoption vs Conversion Lift
Given a brand has connected conversion/order data with at least 30 days and 1,000 sessions of coverage When computing correlation between preset adoption rate and conversion lift over a selectable time granularity (day/week) Then the dashboard displays Pearson r, 95% confidence interval, and p-value; results marked "significant" when p < 0.05 And where data coverage is insufficient, the widget shows an "Insufficient data" state with required minimums and does not show a misleading value And the correlation methodology and data sources are linked; last computed timestamp is shown; computations refresh daily at 02:00 UTC and backfill within 24 hours
Anomaly Detection & Off‑Brand Alerts
"As a brand security admin, I want real-time alerts on off-brand or anomalous activity so that I can intervene before noncompliant images reach customers."
Description

Implement policy‑driven anomaly detection that flags off‑brand or risky activity, such as use of unapproved presets, manual overrides beyond thresholds, unusual processing spikes, access from atypical locations/IPs, or after‑hours usage. Allow per‑brand rules and baselines with severity levels, suppression windows, and alert routing to email, Slack, and webhooks. Each alert must link to supporting audit entries and include enough context for triage. Provide acknowledge/snooze/resolve workflows and capture analyst feedback to refine detection over time. Ensure low latency from event to notification to block noncompliant outputs before publication where configured.

Acceptance Criteria
Off‑Brand Preset Usage Blocks Publication
Given Brand A has an approved preset list and blocking enabled for off-brand usage When a user processes an image with a preset not on Brand A’s approved list Then the output is blocked from publication, a High severity alert is generated, and alerts are routed to Brand A’s configured email, Slack, and webhook channels And the first alert delivery occurs within 10 seconds at p95 (30 seconds p99) from the event time And the alert and block are recorded with a correlation ID and linked audit trail entries
Manual Override Threshold Breach Alert
Given Brand B has policy thresholds configured for manual adjustments (e.g., exposure, saturation, crop) When a user’s manual override exceeds any configured threshold for Brand B during processing Then a Medium or High severity alert (per rule config) is generated and routed to Brand B’s channels And the processed output is blocked if the rule’s action is set to Block, otherwise allowed with alert-only And the alert includes the parameter, attempted value, allowed threshold, user ID, asset ID, timestamp, and rule ID
Processing Spike Anomaly per Brand Baseline
Given Brand C has a baseline defined as the 7-day moving median per weekday-hour for jobs/hour with a spike threshold of 3x When processing volume for Brand C in a given hour exceeds 3x the baseline Then a Medium severity anomaly alert is generated and delivered to Brand C’s routing And duplicate alerts for the same spike are suppressed for the configured suppression window (e.g., 60 minutes) And the alert includes baseline value, observed value, multiplier, timeframe, and initiating users (if identifiable)
Atypical Location/IP and After‑Hours Access Alerts
Given Brand D has allowed geographies/IP ranges and business hours configured When a login or processing action occurs from a new country or ASN not on the allowlist, or outside business hours by more than 30 minutes Then a High (geo/IP) or Medium (after-hours) severity alert is generated and routed to email, Slack, and webhook And the first alert delivery occurs within 10 seconds at p95 (30 seconds p99) from the event time And the alert includes user ID, IP, geo lookup, ASN, device fingerprint (if available), local time, rule ID, and recommended actions
Alert Payload Completeness and Audit Linkage
Given an alert is generated for any rule When the alert is viewed in the console or received via any channel Then it contains: brandId, userId, assetId(s), ruleId, rule name, severity, event timestamp (UTC), processing node, presetId/version (if applicable), action taken (Block/Allow), correlationId, and links to supporting audit entries And following any audit link displays the corresponding immutable audit records with matching correlationId and hashes
Acknowledge/Snooze/Resolve Workflow with Suppression
Given an active alert is visible in the console When an analyst acknowledges the alert Then the alert status changes to Acknowledged with user, timestamp, and note captured When the analyst snoozes the alert for 60 minutes Then no duplicate alerts for the same rule-entity (brand+rule+asset or brand+rule+user, as applicable) are emitted during the snooze window unless severity escalates When the analyst resolves the alert with a disposition (True Positive, False Positive, Benign) and optional tags/notes Then the resolution, disposition, tags, and notes are persisted and visible in audit and via API
Per‑Brand Rule Configuration and Routing Isolation
Given Brands E and F have separate rule sets, severities, suppression windows, and channel routings configured When an off-brand event occurs in Brand E Then only Brand E’s rules evaluate and only Brand E’s channels receive the alert per its severity and suppression settings And no alerts are emitted to Brand F’s channels, and Brand F’s rules/baselines remain unaffected And updating Brand E’s rule (e.g., severity change) does not modify Brand F’s rules or baselines
Compliance Report Export (CSV/PDF/API)
"As an auditor, I want to export signed compliance reports with detailed activity and summaries so that I can satisfy audit requests efficiently."
Description

Offer one‑click and scheduled export of compliance reports over a selected scope and period, delivering digitally signed PDFs and CSV/JSON datasets via download, email, or S3. Reports include executive summaries, KPI snapshots, detailed activity line items, preset versions used, approval records, anomalies with dispositions, and cryptographic proofs (hash‑chain anchors and signatures) for evidentiary integrity. Provide time zone normalization, localization, and versioned report templates mapped to common frameworks (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001 evidence categories). Expose an API for programmatic retrieval and integration with GRC systems.

Acceptance Criteria
One-Click On-Demand Compliance Report Export
Given a user with "Reports.Export" permission selects a scope (brands/users/presets) and a date range and clicks "Export", When processing completes, Then a digitally signed PDF and CSV and JSON dataset are produced and available via in-app download within 2 minutes for workloads ≤ 10,000 activity records. And Then, if an email recipient is specified, the same artifacts are delivered by email with expiring signed download links valid for 7 days. And Then, if an S3 destination is configured, the artifacts are uploaded to the configured bucket/path with server-side encryption enabled (SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS) and private ACL. And Then each artifact name follows compliance_<scope>_<periodStart>-<periodEnd>_<templateVersion>_<timestampZ>.<ext> and includes a stable reportId in metadata. And Then the PDF includes sections: Executive Summary, KPI Snapshot, Detailed Activity Line Items, Preset Versions Used, Approval Records, Anomalies with Dispositions, and Cryptographic Proofs; CSV/JSON contain machine-readable equivalents with a data dictionary and templateVersion.
Scheduled Recurring Report Delivery
Given a schedule (daily/weekly/monthly) is created with a specific time zone and delivery channels (email and/or S3), When the schedule triggers, Then the report for the prior period aligned to that time zone is generated and delivered within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. And Then runs are idempotent: reruns for the same schedule+period overwrite S3 objects atomically and suppress duplicate emails (max one per period per recipient). And Then failures notify owners and retry up to 3 times with exponential backoff; after final failure, the run is marked failed with an error code and correlationId. And Then a backfill option allows generating historical reports from a chosen start date with no missing periods. And Then schedule creation, updates, and executions are audit logged with who/when and parameters.
Cryptographic Integrity and Tamper-Proofing
Given a report is generated, Then the PDF is digitally signed (PAdES-B) with an organization X.509 certificate and validates as trusted in Adobe Acrobat and via command-line verification. And Then CSV and JSON artifacts are accompanied by a manifest.json containing SHA-256 hashes of each file, a Merkle root, chainHeight, previousRoot, anchorTimestamp, and a detached signature. And Then recomputing file hashes matches manifest values, and the manifest signature validates against the published public certificate. And Then altering any artifact or manifest causes verification to fail, producing a distinct integrity error code.
API Retrieval for GRC Integration
Given a service authenticates via OAuth 2.0 client credentials with scope reports:read, When it POSTs to /api/v1/reports with parameters (scope, periodStart, periodEnd, templateVersion, formats, delivery), Then it receives HTTP 202 with jobId and correlationId. And Then GET /api/v1/reports/{jobId} returns status (queued|running|failed|complete), progress percent, and on completion, signed URLs for PDF/CSV/JSON, metadata (reportId, templateVersion, itemCount, timeZone), and expiresAt. And Then GET /api/v1/reports supports listing with filters (scope, createdAt range, templateVersion) and pagination (limit, cursor) sorted by createdAt desc. And Then API enforces rate limits (429 with Retry-After) and returns structured errors with machine-readable codes and correlationId; all timestamps are ISO 8601 with offset.
Framework-Mapped Template Versions
Given a user selects a report template version mapped to SOC 2 and ISO 27001 evidence categories, When the report is generated, Then it includes a control mapping section referencing the chosen frameworks and a templateVersion identifier. And Then changing the default template does not alter previously generated reports; prior reports render with their original template version. And Then deprecated templates are flagged at selection with a warning and suggested replacement, and selection is still allowed for backward compatibility. And Then all template selections and changes are audit logged with actor, timestamp, and reason.
Localization and Time Zone Normalization
Given a user sets locale and time zone (e.g., fr-FR and Europe/Paris), When a report is generated, Then the PDF renders headings and date/number formats per locale and normalizes all timestamps to the selected time zone with explicit offset (e.g., 2025-09-21 14:30:00 GMT+02:00). And Then CSV/JSON timestamps are ISO 8601 with offset and include top-level fields timeZone and locale; numeric fields use dot decimal in machine-readable datasets regardless of locale. And Then KPI rollups and period boundaries are computed using the selected time zone and match PDF narratives and dataset aggregates.
Cost Center and Usage Analytics Breakdown
Given cost centers are configured and entities (brands/users/preset versions) are mapped, When a report is generated, Then it includes breakdowns by brand, user, preset version, and cost center with totals for photos processed, processing minutes, storage egress, anomalies, approvals, and attributable cost. And Then overall totals reconcile with the sum of group totals within 0.1% tolerance and differences are explained (e.g., rounding) in the report notes. And Then the report includes an appendix listing entity-to-cost-center assignments; unmapped entities are flagged and grouped under "Unmapped" with counts and costs. And Then all grouping keys include stable IDs in CSV/JSON and human-readable names in PDF.
Cost Center Mapping & Chargeback
"As a finance ops manager, I want to map usage to cost centers and generate chargeback reports so that I can allocate costs accurately across teams."
Description

Enable administrators to define cost center codes and map them to brands, teams, users, or API keys, with rule‑based overrides by preset type or project tag. Attribute usage from the audit stream to cost centers and generate periodical chargeback reports with unit counts, rates, taxes, and totals. Provide simulations to preview the financial impact of mapping changes and support retroactive reclassification with a controlled workflow. Integrate exports to billing/ERP systems and enforce permissions so only finance roles can modify mappings and rates.

Acceptance Criteria
Cost Center Mapping by Entity with Rule-Based Overrides
Given a FinanceAdmin defines cost center codes with names, status, currency, and effective-dated unit and tax rates And creates mappings for brand, team, user, and API key entities And defines override rules that match on preset type and/or project tags (exact and glob patterns) And sets a global default cost center for unmatched usage When a usage event arrives with attributes {brand, team, user, apiKey, presetType, projectTags} Then the system resolves the event to exactly one cost center using this precedence: override rules (higher priority > higher specificity > most recent) > user > apiKey > team > brand > global default And the resolved mapping includes costCenterCode, mappingVersion, matchedRuleId (if any), and evaluation timestamp And conflicting or overlapping mappings are prevented at save time with validation errors And p95 rule resolution latency is <= 100 ms per event at a throughput of 5,000 events/minute
Mapping Change Simulation & Financial Impact Preview
Given a FinanceAdmin edits mappings, rates, or taxes in draft mode When they run a simulation for a selected date range and scope (brand/team/user/preset type/tag) Then the system computes projected deltas per cost center: unit counts, subtotals, taxes, and totals, comparing draft vs current production And presents a side-by-side comparison with net impact and top-affected entities And the simulation excludes events already reclassified in an approved retroactive workflow unless explicitly included And for up to 1,000,000 events the simulation completes within 10 minutes, with progress updates and cancel support And no production data or reports are modified until the draft is approved and published
Audit Stream Usage Attribution
Given audit events contain tenant, brand, team, user, apiKey, presetType, projectTags, unitType, unitQuantity, and timestamp When events are ingested Then attribution to a cost center is applied idempotently based on the active mapping at event timestamp (effective-dated) And the attribution record stores {eventId, costCenterCode, unitType, unitQuantity, rate, taxRate, mappingVersion, matchedRuleId} And p95 end-to-end attribution delay from ingestion to availability for reporting is <= 60 seconds And malformed events are quarantined with alerting, retriable after fix, and excluded from reports until attributed And tenant boundaries are enforced so mappings and attributions are isolated per tenant
Scheduled Chargeback Report Generation & Contents
Given FinanceAdmin schedules reports (weekly or monthly) with time zone and currency When a report is generated for a period Then it includes per cost center and per unit type: unit counts, rate, subtotal, tax rate, tax amount, and total, plus period start/end, tenant, mappingVersionHash, and number of unattributed events And provides breakdowns by brand and preset type, and an optional detail file with line items limited by configured retention And totals reconcile: sum(subtotals) + sum(taxes) = grand total, with rounding to 2 decimals using bankers rounding And rates and taxes used reflect the effective configuration at event time (not report time) And the report is available as CSV and JSON, downloadable in-app and deliverable via configured exports
Finance-Only Permissions and Change Auditability
Given role-based access control is configured When a non-Finance user attempts to create/update/delete cost centers, mappings, rates, or taxes Then the action is blocked with 403 and no changes persist And when a FinanceAdmin performs such changes, MFA (if enabled) is required and changes are versioned with before/after, user, timestamp, and reason And every change produces a tamper-evident audit log entry linked to related reports and exports And read-only viewers can access reports but cannot view rates if rate visibility is disabled by policy
ERP/Billing Export Delivery and Reliability
Given FinanceAdmin configures export destinations: SFTP (SSH key), HTTPS webhook (OAuth2), or email When a report is finalized Then the system exports summary and detail files with deterministic filenames {tenant}_{period}_{version}.{csv|json} And includes an idempotency key and SHA-256 checksum; deliveries use at-least-once retries with exponential backoff for up to 24 hours And success is recorded only upon 2xx webhook response, verified SFTP write, or accepted email status; failures trigger alerts with retry status And exported payloads conform to the published schema with required columns and field types
Retroactive Reclassification Approval Workflow
Given a FinanceAdmin proposes a reclassification for a date range and filters (brand/team/user/apiKey/preset type/tag) from cost center A to B with a justification When the request is submitted Then the system runs a pre-apply simulation showing deltas and impacted reports And requires a second approver with Finance role to approve before changes apply And upon approval, affected attributions and reports are recalculated, prior report versions are retained and marked superseded, and corrected exports are sent with a correction flag And the workflow supports rollback to the prior state, producing a new version and corresponding exports And all steps are audit-logged and immutable
Preset Version Lineage & Change Diff
"As a brand owner, I want visibility into preset version history and differences so that I can control changes and trace outcomes for accountability."
Description

Track full lineage of style presets, including who changed what and when, approval status, and version notes. Provide visual and textual diffs of preset parameters (e.g., background style, crop rules, retouch intensities) and link each processed image in the audit ledger to the exact preset version applied. Support allow/deny lists of preset versions per brand, rollback to prior versions, and optional reprocessing of affected assets. Expose this lineage in analytics and exports to strengthen brand governance and explain outcome differences over time.

Acceptance Criteria
Immutable Preset Version Lineage Visible per Brand
Given a brand preset exists and a user saves changes, When the changes are committed, Then a new preset versionId is created with parentVersionId, editorUserId, ISO-8601 UTC timestamp, changeSummary, approvalStatus, and versionNotes recorded in the audit ledger Given any existing preset version, When a user attempts to edit it directly, Then the system prevents modification and returns an error indicating versions are immutable and a new version must be created Given a preset with 200+ versions, When viewing the lineage timeline, Then versions render in chronological order with parent-child links, and the view loads in under 2 seconds for up to 500 versions Given the audit ledger, When a ledger entry is programmatically altered outside the application, Then tamper detection marks the entry as invalid and the UI surfaces a tamper-evident warning
Visual and Textual Diff Between Any Two Preset Versions
Given two versions of the same preset are selected, When requesting a diff, Then changed parameters (e.g., background.style, crop.rules, retouch.intensity) are listed with exact old and new values Given two versions are selected, When displaying the diff, Then a side-by-side visual preview renders using the product sample image, and a textual JSON-style diff shows parameter paths with old→new values Given parameters that have not changed, When rendering the diff, Then they are excluded from the changed list and can be optionally toggled on via a "show unchanged" control Given numeric parameters changed within tolerance (e.g., float rounding), When computing the diff, Then the result suppresses false positives via stable rounding and order-insensitive comparisons Given the diff view, When the user clicks Export, Then a downloadable artifact (PDF for visuals and JSON for text) is generated containing versionIds, timestamps, editors, and the full change list
Audit Ledger Links Each Processed Image to Exact Preset Version
Given a batch is processed with preset version V, When inspecting any resulting image’s audit entry, Then the entry includes presetId and presetVersionId=V with a link to the version details Given a preset is updated to a new version during an ongoing batch, When later inspecting images, Then images completed before the update reference the previous version and images completed after reference the new version Given an export of processed assets is requested, When the CSV is downloaded, Then each row includes presetId, presetVersionId, jobId, brandId, and processedAt timestamp Given an image was reprocessed, When viewing its history, Then all prior presetVersionIds are shown in chronological order with who initiated each processing run
Enforce Brand Allow/Deny Lists for Preset Versions
Given a brand has an allow list of preset versionIds, When a user attempts to process with a version not on the allow list, Then the job is blocked and the API responds 403 BRAND_VERSION_NOT_ALLOWED with the offending versionId Given a brand has a deny list entry for a preset versionId, When a user attempts to process with that version, Then the job is blocked and an anomaly event is logged and alert is sent to brand admins Given an admin updates allow/deny lists, When the change is saved, Then the change is recorded in the audit ledger with editorUserId, timestamp, and rationale and takes effect within 10 seconds Given the UI lists available versions for a brand, When rendering the selector, Then only allowed and non-denied versions are selectable, and denied versions appear disabled with a tooltip reason
One-Click Rollback to Prior Preset Version with Optional Reprocessing
Given a preset has multiple versions, When an admin selects a prior version Vprev and confirms rollback, Then Vprev becomes the active version for the brand and the action is recorded with actor, timestamp, and notes Given rollback is performed with "Reprocess affected assets" checked, When the job runs, Then assets processed since a specified date or since version Vbad are reprocessed using Vprev and linked to the new processing run Given the reprocessing job completes, When viewing the job summary, Then success/failure counts, duration, and sample error messages are shown and each affected image’s audit entry is updated with the new presetVersionId Given a rollback is executed, When inspecting the lineage, Then no historical versions are deleted and the lineage shows a rollback event node linking from the current to Vprev
Lineage and Version Usage Exposed in Analytics and Exports
Given the analytics dashboard, When filtering by presetId and presetVersionId, Then usage metrics (images processed, success rate, average processing time, conversion lift if available) update accordingly Given a multi-brand account with cost centers, When exporting usage analytics, Then the CSV includes brandId, costCenter, presetId, presetVersionId, userId, jobId, processedAt, and counts per day Given a large export request of up to 100k rows, When the export is initiated, Then the file is delivered within 60 seconds or the system returns an asynchronous download link within 10 seconds and emails when ready Given a time range is selected, When viewing the trend chart, Then version changes are annotated on the timeline with tooltips linking to diffs and approver notes
Approval Workflow and Gating for Preset Versions
Given a new preset version is created, When saved, Then its approvalStatus defaults to Draft and cannot be used for production processing by non-admins Given a user with approver role, When they set approvalStatus to Approved and add notes, Then the change is recorded with approverUserId, timestamp, and notes and the version becomes eligible for production Given a non-approver attempts to approve or use a Draft/Pending version for production, When they submit, Then the system blocks the action with 403 VERSION_NOT_APPROVED and logs an anomaly event Given a version is Rejected or Deprecated, When a user attempts to select it, Then the UI disables selection and the API denies processing with a clear error referencing the approvalStatus

Smart Sampler

Automatically selects five representative images from your recent uploads—covering lighting, backgrounds, product types, and edge cases—so your brand preset is trained on the real variety you ship. Skip guesswork and get a sturdier, more reliable style in minutes.

Requirements

Diversity Sampler Engine
"As a boutique owner, I want PixelLift to automatically pick a diverse set of five photos from my latest uploads so that my brand preset learns from the real variety in my catalog without me handpicking examples."
Description

Implements the core selection algorithm that automatically chooses five representative images from a user’s recent uploads. Uses computer vision embeddings and clustering to capture variation across lighting conditions, background types, product categories, materials, and compositions. Applies quality heuristics (sharpness, exposure, noise) and tie-breakers to avoid near-duplicates and ensure coverage of distinct visual modes. Integrates with PixelLift’s asset store and indexing pipeline, outputs a ranked set with reason codes (e.g., “low-key lighting,” “busy background,” “reflective surface”) for transparency. Provides confidence scores and fallbacks when insufficient diversity is detected, and exposes a service API consumed by preset training.

Acceptance Criteria
Five-Image Selection from Configured Recent Uploads Window
Given a user has at least 5 eligible recent uploads within the configured recent-uploads window and assets are indexed and visible When the Diversity Sampler Engine is invoked for that user Then it returns exactly 5 unique image_ids ordered by representativeness_score descending And all returned images originate from the configured recent-uploads window And the selection is deterministic for identical input set and configuration (same 5 ids and order)
Diversity Coverage Across Visual Modes
Given an eligible pool of >= 5 images with computed embeddings and attribute tags When the engine samples the representative set Then the 5 selections belong to at least 4 distinct embedding clusters at k>=5 using cosine distance And pairwise cosine similarity between any two selections is < 0.90 And attribute coverage across the 5 selections spans at least 3 dimensions among: lighting variants, background types, product categories, material types, composition types And cluster_ids, diversity_score [0,1], and covered_dimensions are included in the response
Near-Duplicate and Redundancy Avoidance
Given near-duplicate candidates exist in the eligible pool When building the selection set Then items with perceptual-hash Hamming distance <= 8 or embedding cosine similarity >= 0.97 to a higher-ranked candidate are excluded from the 5 And no two returned items share the same source_capture_id and capture_timestamp within 2 seconds And if de-duplication reduces eligible choices below 5, fallback behavior is triggered
Quality Heuristics Filtering
Given quality metrics are computed for each candidate image When scoring candidates Then every selected image meets all thresholds: sharpness (Laplacian variance) >= 120, exposure EV in [-1.5, 1.5], SNR >= 20 dB, short_side >= 800 px, no major motion blur detected And quality_scores per metric are included per selected image And if fewer than 5 candidates meet thresholds, fallback behavior is triggered
Transparency via Reason Codes and Ranking
Given a ranked selection is produced When the response is returned Then each selected item includes 1–3 reason_codes from the controlled vocabulary and a primary_reason And each item includes: image_id, rank (1–5), cluster_id, representativeness_score [0,1], quality_scores, attribute_flags And ties in representativeness_score are broken by higher quality_score, then more recent upload_time And ranks are contiguous and strictly increasing from 1 to 5
Confidence Scores and Low-Diversity Fallback
Given diversity and quality metrics are computed When diversity_score < 0.60 or unique_clusters < 4 or eligible_count < 5 Then the engine returns the best-available set (minimum 3 items) with fallback=true, fallback_reason, guidance_message, and missing_dimensions And sampler_confidence [0,1] is included and reflects diversity and quality (monotonic with diversity_score) And can_train=false when returned_count < 3, else true
Service API and Indexing Integration
Given a client presents valid credentials and organization_id When POST /sampler/jobs is called with org_id and optional window/config Then the service responds 202 with a job_id and enqueues the task And the engine queries the asset store for assets where index_status=ready and visibility=seller within the specified window And GET /sampler/jobs/{job_id} returns 200 with status in {queued, running, succeeded, failed}, duration_ms, and the selection payload on success And the operation is idempotent for identical inputs within 24h (same job_id and result) And P95 end-to-end time for pools up to 2,000 assets is <= 45,000 ms; P99 <= 90,000 ms
Edge Case Inclusion
"As a seller of varied products, I want tricky product scenarios automatically represented in the sample so that my preset performs reliably on hard cases I actually ship."
Description

Detects and prioritizes inclusion of edge-case photos (e.g., transparent or reflective products, black-on-black, white-on-white, intricate patterns, extreme aspect ratios, low-resolution, motion blur) when present in the candidate set. Maintains a taxonomy of edge-case types and thresholds to ensure at least one edge case is represented without over-weighting anomalies. Includes safeguards to exclude irrecoverable defects (e.g., corrupted files) from selection. Produces labeled tags that can be surfaced in the UI rationale and stored with the training snapshot.

Acceptance Criteria
Edge Case Inclusion When Present
Given a candidate set of 5–1000 images and the edge-case taxonomy thresholds are loaded, When the set contains ≥1 image classified as any edge-case type with classifier confidence ≥ its configured threshold, Then the 5 selected images include ≥1 edge-case image; And when no image meets any edge-case threshold, Then 0 edge-case images are selected; classifications below threshold must not trigger inclusion.
Edge Case Non-Overweighting Rule
Given the proportion P of edge-case images (meeting thresholds) in the candidate set, When selecting 5 images, Then the number of edge-case selections E satisfies: - If P < 20%, E ≤ 1 - If 20% ≤ P < 50%, E ≤ 2 - If P ≥ 50%, E ≤ 3
Edge Case Diversity Preference
Given the candidate set contains ≥2 distinct edge-case types meeting thresholds, When selecting edge-case images for inclusion, Then selected edge-case images must prefer distinct types (no duplicate type) until each present type has at least one representation or the edge-case cap is reached; And ties are broken by classifier confidence in descending order.
Irrecoverable Defects Safeguard
Given the candidate set contains corrupted or unreadable files (e.g., zero-byte, unsupported format, decode error), When running selection, Then such files are excluded from consideration and not counted toward edge-case proportion P or selections E; And a reason code per file is logged and included in the selection rationale output; And the sampler returns up to 5 valid selections; if <5 valid candidates exist, it returns all valid ones with a shortfall reason.
Edge Case Tagging and Snapshot Persistence
Given selection completes, When returning the 5 selected images, Then each selected image includes tags[] with zero or more edge-case types, classifier confidence per tag, and taxonomyVersion; And these tags and the taxonomyVersion are persisted with the training snapshot and available to the UI rationale endpoint within 1 second of selection completion.
Taxonomy Versioning and Thresholds
Given the system is initialized, When retrieving the edge-case taxonomy, Then it is versioned and includes at least: transparent, reflective, black-on-black, white-on-white, intricate pattern, extreme aspect ratio, low-resolution, motion blur; And each type has a configurable confidence threshold in [0.0, 1.0]; And the taxonomyVersion used is recorded with every selection output for auditability.
Recency & Eligibility Rules
"As a brand manager, I want Smart Sampler to pull from my most recent, valid uploads so that the sample reflects what I’m currently listing, not outdated or low-quality images."
Description

Defines the candidate pool for sampling based on configurable recency windows (e.g., last 14 days or last 500 uploads), workspace/brand scoping, and eligibility filters. Excludes failed imports, near-duplicates, and images below minimum quality thresholds. Supports manual refresh and rerun to capture newly uploaded images. All rules are configurable per workspace and auditable to ensure the sample reflects true, current catalog conditions.

Acceptance Criteria
Recency Window — Last N Days
Given a workspace with time zone set and recency rule type "Days" = 14 When Smart Sampler builds the candidate pool Then only images with uploaded_at in [now-14 days, now] in the workspace time zone are included And images older than now-14 days are excluded And images with uploaded_at exactly at now-14 days are included
Recency Window — Last N Uploads
Given recency rule type "Uploads" = 500 in Workspace A When Smart Sampler builds the candidate pool Then the 500 most recent successfully imported unique uploads in Workspace A are included And if fewer than 500 eligible uploads exist, all eligible uploads are included And ties on uploaded_at are resolved by descending upload_id
Workspace and Brand Scoping
Given Workspace A with brands B1 and B2 and the brand filter set to B1 When Smart Sampler builds the candidate pool Then only images where workspace_id = A and brand_id in {B1} are eligible And images from other workspaces or brands are excluded And if the brand filter is unset, all brands within Workspace A are eligible
Eligibility Exclusions — Import Failures, Near-Duplicates, Low Quality
Given workspace thresholds min_quality_score = 0.7, min_dimension_px = 1000, and duplicate_similarity_threshold = 0.95 When Smart Sampler evaluates eligibility Then images with import_status != "completed" or is_soft_deleted = true are excluded And images with similarity >= 0.95 to any other image within the recency window are near-duplicates; only the highest quality_score instance is retained and the rest excluded And images with quality_score < 0.7 or min(width, height) < 1000 are excluded And an exclusion_reason code is recorded for every excluded image
Manual Refresh & Rerun Captures New Uploads
Given a previous sampler run completed and new eligible images have been uploaded since that run When the user clicks "Refresh & Rerun" for the workspace Then the candidate pool is rebuilt using the currently saved rules and includes the new eligible images And triggering "Refresh & Rerun" twice without additional uploads yields identical candidate pools And the rebuild completes within 10 seconds for up to 10,000 eligible images
Audit Trail for Candidate Pool Generation
Given Smart Sampler generates a candidate pool When the run completes Then an audit record is stored with: run_id, timestamp, initiated_by (user_id/service), workspace_id, brand filter, rule_version, recency rule type/value, quality thresholds, duplicate threshold, include_count, exclude_count by reason, and lists of included and excluded image IDs with reason codes And a user with audit permissions can view and export the audit record in JSON and CSV And rerunning with the same data snapshot and rule_version reproduces the same candidate pool and audit counts
Per-Workspace Rule Configuration & Versioning
Given a workspace admin updates recency and eligibility rules When the admin clicks Save Then the configuration is validated and saved as a new version with version_id, editor_id, and timestamp And subsequent Smart Sampler runs use the latest saved version; in-flight runs use the version snapshot they started with And non-admin users cannot modify the rules; they can view the active version and its effective values
Sample Review & Override
"As a boutique owner, I want to quickly review and swap any of the five picks before training so that I stay confident the sampler reflects my brand reality."
Description

Provides a lightweight review UI showing the five selected images, their diversity rationale, and suggested alternates per slot. Enables one-click swap, approve, or regenerate actions before preset training. Persists an immutable selection snapshot (image IDs, model/version, parameters, reason codes) tied to the preset training job for traceability. Includes keyboard shortcuts and accessible controls to minimize friction and support quick confirmation.

Acceptance Criteria
Display Sampler Selection with Diversity Rationale & Alternates
Given a completed Smart Sampler run for recent uploads When the user opens the Sample Review UI Then exactly 5 slots are displayed with the selected representative images And each slot shows a human-readable diversity rationale mapped to reason codes And each slot lists 1–3 suggested alternates with their reason codes And thumbnails use skeletons while loading and show a fallback with retry on error And the selection shows the model name, version, and key parameters used
One-Click Approve, Swap, and Regenerate
Given the Sample Review UI is open When the user clicks Approve All Then all 5 slots are marked approved and the Continue/Train action becomes enabled Given a slot with alternates When the user clicks Swap on an alternate Then the alternate becomes primary within 300 ms and the previous primary moves to alternates Given a slot When the user clicks Regenerate Then up to 3 new alternates return within 5 seconds with updated reason codes and previously rejected images are excluded Given any in-progress changes When the user navigates away and returns Then the current selection state is preserved until approval and snapshot
Immutable Selection Snapshot & Traceability
Given the user confirms the selection When the system persists the snapshot Then it records: preset ID, training job ID, 5 primary image IDs, per-slot alternates at decision time, reason codes, model name, model version, sampler parameters, timestamps, and user ID And the snapshot is immutable; subsequent changes create a new snapshot with a new version and existing records are read-only And each training job references exactly one snapshot ID; re-running training on the same selection reuses the same snapshot And an audit API allows retrieval by preset ID and training job ID and returns a checksum to verify integrity
Keyboard Shortcuts & Efficient Navigation
Given the Sample Review UI When keyboard shortcuts are used Then the user can approve all (A), approve current slot (Enter), swap to highlighted alternate (S), regenerate current slot (R), navigate slots (Left/Right), and cycle alternates (Up/Down) And a visible shortcut hint panel is toggled with ? and is accessible to screen readers And all actions are fully operable without a pointing device; a full review can be completed via keyboard alone And shortcuts avoid conflicts with native browser defaults via scoped handling or remapping
Accessibility Compliance (WCAG 2.1 AA)
Given assistive technology users navigate the Sample Review UI When interacting with controls and status changes Then all actionable elements have programmatic names, roles, and states with logical focus order And focus indicators meet 3:1 contrast; text and interactive elements meet 4.5:1 contrast; images and rationales have text alternatives And dynamic updates (swap, regenerate, approve) are announced via ARIA live regions without stealing focus And the UI is operable at 200% zoom and in high-contrast mode with no keyboard traps and 44x44px minimum hit targets
Performance & Responsiveness
Given a median network and typical session When the user opens the Sample Review UI Then above-the-fold content renders within 2 seconds and all thumbnails within 3 seconds And approve/swap actions update the UI within 300 ms; regenerate returns alternates within 5 seconds at p95 And snapshot persistence completes within 1 second at p95 and does not block the UI And UI animations and transitions maintain responsiveness above 55 FPS during loading and interactions
Error Handling & Recovery
Given an image fails to load When a retry is triggered Then the system retries up to 3 times with exponential backoff and provides a visible Retry control; if still failing, a meaningful error is shown and the slot remains actionable Given regenerate fails for a slot When the user retries Then previous alternates are retained, a non-blocking toast explains the failure, and no partial state corruption occurs Given snapshot persistence fails When the user confirms again Then a blocking error with safe retry is shown and no training job starts without a persisted snapshot And all errors are logged with a correlation ID and exposed in the audit trail with failure reason codes
Processing SLA & Scalability
"As a time-pressed seller, I want the sample to be ready in seconds even for large batches so that I can train and publish presets without waiting."
Description

Ensures the sampler processes large catalogs quickly and reliably. Targets selection completion within 30 seconds for up to 2,000 eligible images and scales via background jobs and batching to 10,000+ images. Implements queueing, backoff, and partial results fallback when resources are constrained. Exposes progress indicators and clear error states in the UI. Observability includes latency metrics, timeouts, and autoscaling signals to maintain the SLA under peak loads.

Acceptance Criteria
SLA: Complete selection within 30s for 2,000 eligible images
Given a tenant with 2,000 eligible images and no other sampler job running for that tenant When the user starts Smart Sampler Then five representative images are selected and persisted within 30 seconds end-to-end in at least 95% of runs And the 99th percentile completes within 45 seconds And no job-level timeout or unhandled error occurs And a completion event is emitted within 1 second of persistence
Scalability: Background jobs and batching for 10,000+ images
Given a tenant with 10,000 eligible images When Smart Sampler is started Then the sampler job enqueues within 1 second and begins processing within 5 seconds when a worker is available And images are processed in batches of no more than 500 per worker with parallel workers And a per-tenant concurrency cap is enforced (default 2) to prevent noisy-neighbor impact And the job completes without worker crashes or data corruption
Reliability: Queueing, retries, and backoff under resource constraints
Given transient failures (e.g., HTTP 5xx, timeouts) while processing a batch When a batch fails Then the system retries with exponential backoff (initial 2s, max 30s, full jitter) up to 5 attempts And duplicate concurrent sampler jobs for the same tenant are prevented And after final failure the batch is moved to a dead-letter queue with error code and trace metadata And a DLQ metric increments for alerting
Resilience: Partial results fallback with deadline
Given the job exceeds the 30-second SLA or encounters resource constraints When fewer than five selections are ready by the SLA deadline Then at least three high-confidence representatives are returned if available and the job is marked Partial And remaining selections continue in the background until completion or a 2-minute ceiling, whichever comes first And the UI shows 'Partial (X/5)' with Resume and Retry actions And a completion notification is emitted when the remaining selections finalize
UX: Real-time progress indicator and states
Given an active sampler job When the user views job status Then the UI displays state (Queued, Processing, Partial, Completed, Failed), percent complete, items processed/total, and ETA And progress updates within 1 second of backend state changes without requiring a manual refresh And progress is announced via ARIA live regions for screen readers And Cancel and Retry actions are available when applicable
UX: Clear error states with actionable recovery
Given a sampler job fails When the user views the error Then the UI presents a specific error category (Upload Corruption, Rate Limited, Resource Exhausted, Internal Error) And shows recommended next steps and a Retry button for retryable errors And displays a correlation ID matching backend logs And non-retryable failures do not requeue automatically
Observability & Autoscaling: Maintain SLA under peak load
Given a peak load of 100 concurrent sampler jobs each with 2,000 eligible images When the load persists for 5 minutes Then P95 end-to-end selection latency remains ≤ 30 seconds And metrics are emitted for queue wait, processing time, retries, timeouts, and batch sizes at 1-minute resolution And an alert fires if P95 latency > 30s for 5 consecutive minutes And autoscaling increases worker capacity within 60 seconds of sustained queue depth > 50 and scales back within 10 minutes after queue depth < 10
Selection Telemetry & Feedback Loop
"As a product manager, I want insights into how users accept or modify the sampler’s picks so that we can continuously improve selection quality and training outcomes."
Description

Captures user interactions (approvals, swaps, regenerations) and post-training outcomes (preset acceptance rate, downstream edit rate) to measure sampler effectiveness. Computes coverage metrics for lighting, backgrounds, and product categories in chosen samples versus catalog distribution. Feeds anonymized statistics into model improvement while respecting workspace boundaries and privacy settings. Surfaces basic quality analytics to the product team for iterative tuning.

Acceptance Criteria
User Interaction Telemetry Capture
Given telemetry is enabled for workspace W and a user is interacting with Smart Sampler selections When the user approves a sample, swaps a sample, requests a regeneration, or dismisses a sample Then an event is recorded with fields: event_id (UUIDv4), workspace_id, anonymized_user_id (workspace-scoped hash), session_id, sampler_session_id, selection_id, action_type ∈ {approve, swap, regenerate, dismiss}, action_metadata (optional), timestamp (ISO-8601 UTC), client_version, latency_ms And no raw image pixels, filenames, or free-text notes are included in the payload And server-side idempotency ensures duplicate event_ids do not create multiple records And the end-to-end capture rate for eligible actions over a 24h window is ≥ 99.5%
Telemetry Reliability & Latency
Given the client is offline or experiencing intermittent connectivity When interaction events are generated Then events are queued locally up to 5,000 events or 10 MB (whichever comes first) for up to 24 hours And queued events are retried with exponential backoff and jitter until acknowledged by the server And P95 end-to-end latency from event creation to server availability is ≤ 120 seconds; P99 ≤ 5 minutes And daily event loss (client-sent minus server-acknowledged) is ≤ 0.2% And server guarantees at-least-once delivery with idempotent upserts (dedupe by event_id), resulting in ≤ 0.5% duplicate insert attempts and 0% duplicate stored records
Coverage Metrics Computation
Given a Smart Sampler run is finalized for workspace W When coverage is computed Then the baseline distribution is derived from W’s last 30 days of uploads or the most recent 10,000 images, whichever is smaller And the selected 5 samples are classified for lighting ∈ {studio, natural, low-light, mixed}, background ∈ {white, colored, textured, in-situ}, and product_category (workspace taxonomy) And classifier macro-F1 on a validation set is ≥ 0.90 for lighting and background, and ≥ 0.85 for product_category And the system computes per-dimension representation deltas (selected vs baseline) and an overall Coverage Score ∈ [0,1] And metrics are persisted within 60 seconds of selection and are queryable by sampler_session_id
Post-Training Outcome Tracking
Given a brand preset is trained from a Smart Sampler session S When the preset is used in production Then the system attributes downstream outcomes to S for the next 14 days or first 500 processed images, whichever comes first And preset acceptance rate is computed as accepted_presets / eligible_presets and is updated daily And downstream edit rate is computed as images with manual edits beyond crop / generated images and is updated daily And outcome metrics exclude workspaces that opt out of telemetry and sessions with fewer than 50 generated images And metrics are available via internal analytics API with filters by workspace_id and date range
Privacy & Workspace Boundary Controls
Given workspace W has telemetry disabled When a user performs sampler-related actions Then no telemetry payloads are transmitted or stored for W and local buffers are purged within 60 seconds Given telemetry is enabled When events are processed and aggregated Then user identifiers are hashed with a workspace-scoped salt; no email, names, or image content are stored And cross-workspace joins are blocked; queries are constrained to workspace_id unless using approved aggregated datasets with k-anonymity k ≥ 20 And data retention for raw events is ≤ 180 days; deletion requests are honored within 7 days And all access to telemetry and analytics requires authorized roles and SSO; access is logged
Product Team Quality Analytics
Given a product analyst with the appropriate role accesses the Quality Analytics dashboard When viewing Smart Sampler analytics Then the dashboard displays, by selectable time range, event volumes, action rates (approve/swap/regenerate/dismiss), coverage scores, preset acceptance rate, and downstream edit rate And no raw images, product names, or free-text are displayed; workspace identifiers are hashed And API/dashboards return within P95 ≤ 800 ms for cached queries and ≤ 3 s for uncached, with 99.9% monthly availability And metric definitions are documented and accessible via in-UI tooltips And data freshness is ≤ 60 minutes
Anonymized Model Feedback Ingestion
Given the nightly aggregation window closes When the model improvement pipeline requests input Then the system exports only cohort-level aggregates (cohort size ≥ 20) with workspace identifiers removed and differential privacy noise calibrated to ε ≤ 2, δ ≤ 1e-5 per 30 days And the exported schema includes coverage_score, per-dimension representation deltas, preset_acceptance_rate, downstream_edit_rate, and sample_size And exports are versioned and lineage-tracked; the consumer job references the dataset version and fails closed if privacy checks or schema validation fail And no data from telemetry-disabled workspaces is included
Audit & Reproducibility
"As a support engineer, I want to reproduce a customer’s sample exactly so that I can debug issues and explain selection rationale with confidence."
Description

Provides deterministic sampling via seeded randomness and records all inputs required to reproduce a given selection (candidate set identifiers, embeddings version, classifier versions, thresholds, seed). Enables support and power users to re-run the sampler and verify identical outputs or explain divergences after model upgrades. Stores audit logs with retention aligned to workspace policy and exposes a support-only replay tool.

Acceptance Criteria
Deterministic Sampling With Seed
Given a fixed candidate_set_ids list, embeddings_version, classifier_versions, threshold set, sampler_version, and seed S When Smart Sampler is executed three consecutive times without changing any inputs Then each run returns exactly five unique image_ids identical to one another and in the same order And the run records indicate the same seed S was used for all executions
Complete Audit Record Per Sampler Run
Given a sampler run completes successfully When the audit record is written Then the record contains: run_id, timestamp (UTC), workspace_id, actor (user_id or service_account), candidate_set_ids, embeddings_version, classifier_versions (by component), thresholds, sampler_version, seed, sampling_strategy, and output image_ids with ranks And the record is immutable and retrievable by run_id via support tooling And no successful run is observable to end users unless its audit record exists
Retention Enforcement Aligned to Workspace Policy
Given a workspace retention policy of N days is configured When an audit record becomes older than N days Then it is purged within 24 hours of crossing the threshold and is no longer retrievable by any role And audit records newer than N days remain retrievable And purge events are themselves logged with run_id and purge_timestamp
Support-Only Replay Reproduces Output
Given a user with support role and permission sampler.replay and a target run_id When they invoke Replay with option use_recorded_versions=true Then the tool re-runs Smart Sampler using the recorded candidate_set_ids, embeddings_version, classifier_versions, thresholds, sampler_version, and seed And it returns the same five image_ids in the same order and marks the replay status as Reproduced And if required inputs are missing (e.g., candidate not present or version unavailable), the tool returns an error code (MISSING_INPUTS or VERSION_UNAVAILABLE) without partial results And users without support role receive 403 Forbidden with no leakage of audit fields
Divergence Report After Model Upgrades
Given a historical run_id and newer component versions are available When Replay is invoked with use_recorded_versions=false (use_latest=true) Then the tool executes the sampler with the latest available embeddings/classifiers while keeping the same candidate_set_ids and seed And it produces a divergence report including: original vs new component versions, Jaccard similarity of selection sets, list of added/dropped image_ids with rank positions, and summary reasons where available And the replay is marked DIVERGED if the five image_ids or their order differ
Power-User Deterministic Re-run via API
Given a workspace admin or designated power_user and a historical run_id When they call the re-run API with explicit pins matching the audit record (seed, embeddings_version, classifier_versions, thresholds, sampler_version) and scope limited to their workspace Then the API returns the same five image_ids in the same order And the API creates a new run_id whose audit record references the original run_id as replay_of And access is denied (403) for users outside the workspace

Style Coach

Inline guidance with best‑practice tips and guardrails as you set background, crop, lighting, and retouch levels. Clear, plain‑language hints explain trade‑offs and suggest starting points, helping non‑designers dial in an on‑brand look with confidence.

Requirements

Contextual Inline Tips & Explanations
"As a non‑designer seller, I want clear, in‑context explanations for each adjustment so that I can choose settings confidently without learning photo jargon."
Description

Provide inline, plain‑language guidance for background, crop, lighting, and retouch controls that explains what each adjustment does, the trade‑offs (e.g., “stronger retouching may reduce texture realism”), and suggests starting values based on product category and selected brand preset. Hints appear contextually as users hover or adjust sliders, with concise do/don’t examples and quick links to apply recommended settings. Content is non-technical, localized, and accessible, with glossary rollovers for unfamiliar terms. Integrates with the existing editor UI as a collapsible “Coach” panel and lightweight tooltips, instrumented with analytics to measure usage and tip efficacy, and supports A/B testing of copy variants.

Acceptance Criteria
Tooltip guidance for background control during hover and adjustment
Given the user hovers over or focuses the Background control or begins adjusting its slider When the trigger occurs Then a tooltip appears within 300 ms, anchored to the control, never obscuring the main image canvas, and remains visible while the control is focused or active And the tooltip copy is plain-language (Flesch-Kincaid Grade ≤ 8), includes a one-sentence what-it-does explanation, a trade-off statement (e.g., realism vs. cleanliness), and a starting value recommendation derived from the current product category and brand preset And the tooltip contains one Do and one Don’t micro-example with 96×96 px thumbnails and alt text And an Apply Recommendation link is present and focusable And pressing Esc or moving focus away dismisses the tooltip And the tooltip is not rendered when the control is disabled
Coach panel integration, collapse/expand, and state persistence
Given the editor is loaded When the user clicks the Coach panel toggle or presses the assigned keyboard shortcut Then the panel expands/collapses without shifting the image canvas and without overlapping critical editor controls And panel open/closed state persists across projects and sessions for the signed-in user And on viewports < 1024 px width the panel renders as a bottom sheet with the same content and controls And the Coach code is lazy-loaded; initial editor bundle size increase is ≤ 30 KB gzipped And first open completes within 500 ms on a 5 Mbps connection (p95) And the panel is fully operable via keyboard (Tab/Shift+Tab) with a visible focus indicator
Personalized starting values by product category and brand preset
Given a product has a detected or selected category and a brand preset is active When a user opens tips for Background, Crop, Lighting, or Retouch Then each tip displays a Recommended starting value sourced from the category×preset mapping table with a visible version tag And clicking Apply sets the corresponding control(s) to the recommended values and updates the preview within 200 ms (p95) And an "Applied" toast appears for 2–4 seconds with an Undo action that reverts the settings And if category is unknown, preset-level defaults are used; if both unknown, global defaults are used; these fallbacks are explicitly labeled And recommendations never exceed the allowed min/max for each control
Do/Don’t examples and quick actions
Given a tip is displayed for any of the four controls When the content renders Then it includes at least one Do and one Don’t example relevant to the current control and product category And each example includes a 96×96 px thumbnail, concise caption (≤ 80 characters), and alt text describing the example And clicking the Do example’s Apply button applies its linked settings immediately without page navigation And the Don’t example has no Apply action And examples are hidden if bandwidth is low and thumbnails fail to load after 2 seconds, with text-only fallbacks shown
Localization and glossary rollovers for non-technical language
Given the user’s locale is en-US, es-ES, fr-FR, or de-DE When tips and Coach content are displayed Then copy is served in the user’s locale with no truncated or clipped strings, and numbers/date formats follow the locale And if the locale is unsupported, content falls back to en-US with a non-blocking notice in settings And all tip bodies meet Flesch-Kincaid Grade ≤ 8 in each locale And glossary-marked terms display an inline dotted underline; on hover or focus, a glossary tooltip opens within 250 ms with a 20–120 character definition and is dismissible with Esc or blur And glossary tooltips are navigable via keyboard and announced by screen readers
Accessibility of tooltips and Coach panel (WCAG 2.2 AA)
Given a keyboard-only or screen reader user interacts with tips or the Coach panel When navigating through controls and content Then all interactive elements are reachable via Tab order, have visible focus, and support activation via Enter/Space And tooltips use role="tooltip" with proper aria-describedby associations; panel uses appropriate landmark/role And content meets contrast ratio ≥ 4.5:1; interactive targets are ≥ 44×44 px And no tooltip auto-dismisses in under 5 seconds while focused/hovered; Esc always dismisses And screen readers announce tooltip open/close and the Apply action result And there is no keyboard trap; focus returns to the invoking control after tooltip dismissal
Analytics instrumentation and A/B testing of tip copy
Given analytics is enabled When a user views a tip, expands/collapses the Coach, clicks Apply, views a glossary term, or dismisses a tip Then events tip_viewed, coach_opened/closed, tip_applied, glossary_viewed, and tip_dismissed are emitted with properties: user_id_hash, session_id, control_id, product_category, brand_preset_id, locale, ab_variant_id, timestamp And events are queued and delivered with p95 latency ≤ 2 s and daily drop rate ≤ 2% And no PII (names, emails, images) is included in payloads And A/B copy variants are supported with a 50/50 random split (configurable), sticky per user for the experiment duration, and the assigned ab_variant_id is included on all related events And experiments can be enabled/disabled remotely with a safe fallback to control copy within 200 ms
Real‑time Before/After Preview
"As a boutique owner, I want to preview changes instantly and compare before/after so that I can see the impact and avoid over‑editing."
Description

Render immediate visual feedback for all Style Coach adjustments with a smooth, low‑latency preview that supports a before/after toggle (split slider and quick tap), per‑adjustment previews, and instant revert to defaults. The preview pipeline incrementally applies changes on-device with GPU acceleration and smart throttling to maintain target frame rates, falling back to progressive updates for large images or low‑power devices. Ensures pixel parity between preview and final export, with safeguards to re-render at full fidelity after adjustments. Includes keyboard shortcuts and accessible controls for comparison modes.

Acceptance Criteria
Split Slider Before/After Comparison
Given a product photo is loaded in Style Coach with at least one adjustment applied And the before/after split slider is visible When the user drags the slider horizontally via mouse, touch, or keyboard arrows Then the preview updates continuously so that pixels left of the divider show the unprocessed "before" image and pixels right show the processed "after" image with no cross-bleed And the divider tracks input within 1 rendered frame of movement And median frame rate during drag on a reference device is >= 45 FPS, with 95th percentile input-to-frame latency <= 120 ms And the divider cannot be dragged outside image bounds and supports RTL locales And there is no flicker, tearing, or mismatch between displayed halves during drag
Quick Tap and Hold Before/After Toggle
Given at least one adjustment is applied When the user presses and holds the comparison key (e.g., Space) or presses and holds the on-screen Compare button Then the preview switches to "before" within 60 ms and remains so while held And on release, the preview returns to "after" within 60 ms preserving current adjustments And a single tap (keyboard or button) toggles persistent compare mode on/off And the toggle state is reflected in the UI and is limited to the current session And frame rate during toggling does not drop below 30 FPS on reference devices
Per-Adjustment Live Preview Responsiveness
Given background, crop, lighting, or retouch controls are being adjusted via drag or input When the control value changes Then the on-device GPU-accelerated preview updates within 80 ms of the latest input and at least every 100 ms during continuous drag And intermediate renders are cancelable; outdated frames are dropped in favor of the newest value And upon interaction end (>= 200 ms idle), a full-fidelity re-render completes within 500 ms And visual output of the full-fidelity re-render matches the next exported image per Pixel Parity criteria
Instant Revert to Defaults
Given adjustments have been made When the user invokes Revert to Defaults (button or Cmd/Ctrl+Backspace) Then all Style Coach controls reset to system defaults and the preview updates within 150 ms And the action is atomic (single undo step) and undo/redo restores prior state including compare mode And no residual crop, mask, or hidden parameters remain after revert And any in-progress renders are canceled and replaced by a default-state full-fidelity render
Preview-to-Export Pixel Parity Safeguard
Given the preview has stabilized after user interaction (>= 200 ms idle) When the user triggers Export or background save Then the system verifies parity by producing a full-fidelity render with the same pipeline and color management as preview And the exported image and the stabilized preview buffer are bitwise identical in linear RGB 16-bit (or 8-bit where applicable) for supported devices Or, if hardware/driver variance prevents bitwise equality, the per-pixel absolute delta must be <= 1/255 with SSIM >= 0.999; otherwise an automatic re-render is performed before export until criteria are met And color profile, ICC tags, and output dimensions match exactly between preview and export
Smart Throttling and Progressive Updates on Constrained Devices
Given a large image (> 24 MP) or a device flagged as low-power or thermally throttled When the user adjusts any Style Coach control Then the system maintains interactive frame rate >= 30 FPS by throttling expensive passes and rendering lower-resolution tiles first And a progressive preview appears within 150 ms and refines to full resolution within 700 ms after interaction ends And no UI thread stall exceeds 16 ms at 60 Hz; input remains responsive throughout
Keyboard Shortcuts and Accessible Comparison Controls
Given a keyboard-only or screen reader user is operating Style Coach When interacting with compare modes (split slider, quick toggle) and revert Then all functions are reachable via documented shortcuts: Focus split slider, Move divider (Left/Right), Quick compare (Space), Toggle compare (C), Revert (Cmd/Ctrl+Backspace) And every control exposes accessible name, role, and state; focus order is logical; no focus trap occurs And features are operable without a pointer; shortcuts are surfaced in tooltips and Help And meets WCAG 2.2 AA for 2.1.1 Keyboard, 2.4.3 Focus Order, 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value And screen readers announce compare mode state and divider position (percentage) within 500 ms
Style Guardrails & Safe Ranges
"As a marketplace seller, I want guardrails that keep edits within platform guidelines so that my listings aren’t penalized and my brand looks consistent."
Description

Enforce recommended and hard‑limit ranges for background, crop, lighting, and retouch parameters based on brand presets and marketplace policies (e.g., pure white background, minimum subject coverage). Provide proactive warnings before settings violate guidelines, explain why, and offer one‑click corrections ("snap to safe"). A rules engine maps product category and target marketplace to parameter bounds and validation checks, with configurable templates per marketplace and brand. Guardrails never block experimentation in sandbox mode but require confirmation to publish non‑compliant results. Includes audit logging for applied guardrails and a visual indicator when settings are outside recommended ranges.

Acceptance Criteria
Non-Compliant Publish Requires Explicit Confirmation
Given a live publish target is selected for marketplace M and brand preset B is active And at least one parameter (background, crop, lighting, retouch) violates a configured rule When the user clicks Publish Then a confirmation modal appears within 500 ms listing each violated rule with plain-language explanation and source (Marketplace/Brand) And for any hard-limit violation, the Publish Anyway action is not available; primary actions are Snap to Safe & Publish and Cancel And if only recommended-range violations exist, actions include Publish Anyway, Snap to Safe & Publish, and Cancel And choosing Snap to Safe & Publish adjusts all violating parameters to the nearest compliant values per the active ruleset and completes publish successfully And if there are no violations, publish proceeds with no modal
Sandbox Mode Allows Unrestricted Experimentation
Given sandbox mode is enabled for the current project When the user sets parameters outside recommended or hard-limit ranges Then no editing interactions are blocked and changes are applied in the editor And inline warnings and indicators still appear to inform about potential non-compliance And exporting previews or downloading test renders proceeds without confirmation And attempting to publish to a live marketplace from sandbox triggers the non-compliant publish confirmation modal if violations exist
Proactive Warning Explains Violation and Suggests Fix
Given the user is adjusting a parameter slider governed by a ruleset When the value enters within 10% of a hard limit Then an inline caution tooltip appears within 300 ms indicating proximity to the limit and the reason source (e.g., Marketplace policy) When the value crosses a recommended bound Then a yellow warning pill appears within 300 ms with message explaining the recommendation, the why, and a CTA Snap to Safe When the value exceeds a hard limit Then the control is marked red, a persistent banner appears with a plain-language explanation and link to Learn more, and publish will require correction And all warnings clear within 300 ms after the value returns to within recommended range
One-Click Snap to Safe Corrects Settings
Given one or more parameters are outside compliant ranges for the active ruleset When the user clicks Snap to Safe from a warning, banner, or modal Then the system computes nearest compliant values and applies them to the current selection (single image or batch) in under 700 ms per 100 images And a toast confirms "Fixed N issues across K images" with a View details link listing adjustments by parameter And after correction, no hard-limit violations remain and any recommended-range violations are resolved unless explicitly excluded by the user
Rules Engine Loads Bounds by Category and Marketplace
Given product category C and marketplace M are selected and brand preset B is active When the editor session initializes or the user changes C, M, or B Then the rules engine loads the configured templates for M and B, including any category-specific overrides And hard-limit bounds are computed as the most restrictive intersection of M and B hard limits And recommended ranges are taken from B and clipped to the computed hard-limit bounds; if B lacks a recommendation, fall back to M, else to global defaults And the active ruleset exposes ruleId(s), ruleVersion(s), and sources for each parameter And ruleset evaluation completes within 200 ms when cached and within 800 ms on a cold fetch
Audit Log Captures Guardrail Events
Given a guardrail-related event occurs (warning shown, snap-to-safe applied, publish override, ruleset change) When the event is processed Then an audit log entry is written within 1 s containing: timestamp, userId, projectId, imageId(s), environment (sandbox/live), actionType, parameter(s), previousValue(s), newValue(s), ruleId(s), ruleVersion(s), marketplace, brandPresetId, and outcome And audit entries are retained for at least 180 days and are exportable as CSV and JSON And viewing Compliance History for an image shows the last 20 guardrail events in chronological order
Visual Indicator for Out-of-Range Settings
Given a parameter value is within recommended range Then the control shows a neutral state with no badge and no thumbnail indicator When the value exits the recommended range but remains within hard limits Then a yellow Out of recommended badge appears on the control and a yellow indicator appears on affected image thumbnails within 300 ms When the value exceeds a hard limit Then a red Non-compliant badge appears on the control, affected thumbnails show a red indicator, and the Publish button displays a red dot with the count of violating images And returning values to within recommended range clears indicators within 300 ms
AI Smart Defaults
"As a time‑pressed seller, I want smart starting values based on my product type so that I can get an on‑brand look faster with fewer adjustments."
Description

Auto‑suggest starting values for background, crop, lighting, and retouch based on detected product type, material, and initial image conditions (exposure, shadows, background uniformity). The model leverages existing product metadata, visual features, and the user’s selected brand preset to compute a balanced baseline, displaying confidence and reasoning in plain language (e.g., “jewelry identified—reduce shadows to reveal sparkle”). Users can accept all suggestions, apply per‑control, or dismiss. The system learns from user overrides to refine future defaults per brand. Includes privacy‑safe processing and deterministic fallbacks when detection is uncertain.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Suggest Smart Defaults Based on Product and Brand
Given a product image with metadata and a selected brand preset When the Style Coach panel is opened Then the system proposes values for background, crop, lighting, and retouch for that image without applying them. Given a batch of up to 200 images When suggestions are generated Then 95th-percentile latency per image is <= 2 seconds and average latency is <= 1 second. Given different product types (e.g., jewelry, apparel, footwear) When suggestions are generated Then proposed values vary appropriately by type and respect brand preset constraints.
Apply All, Per-Control, or Dismiss Suggestions
Given suggestions are available for an image or batch When the user selects "Apply all" Then all four controls adopt the suggested values and a confirmation toast appears. Given suggestions are available When the user toggles apply per control Then only the selected controls update to suggested values and others remain unchanged. Given suggestions are available When the user selects "Dismiss" Then no control values change and the suggestion banner is hidden for the current session. Given any application of suggestions When the user clicks Undo within 30 seconds Then all affected controls revert to their exact prior values.
Confidence and Plain-Language Reasoning Display
Given suggestions are available When the UI renders them Then each control shows a numeric confidence score (0–100%) and a one-sentence rationale referencing detected product, material, or image conditions. Given a rationale sentence When measured for readability Then it has a Flesch–Kincaid grade level <= 8 and length <= 140 characters. Given any control has confidence < 50% When displayed Then a "Low confidence" badge appears with a link to view fallback criteria. Given the user opens the rationale tooltip When expanded Then detection signals (product type, material, exposure level, background uniformity) and their confidences are listed.
Learning From User Overrides Per Brand
Given brand learning is enabled When a user adjusts any control by >= 15% from the suggested value on >= 5 images of the same detected product type within 30 days Then subsequent suggestions for that brand and product type shift at least 50% toward the median of those overrides. Given multiple brands operate in the system When overrides differ between brands Then learned adjustments remain brand-scoped and never influence other brands. Given the admin selects "Reset learning" for a brand When confirmed Then all learned adjustments for that brand are cleared and new suggestions revert to the model baseline. Given a brand has opted out of learning When users make overrides Then no new override data is stored and suggestions remain at baseline.
Deterministic Fallback on Low Detection Confidence
Given overall detection confidence < 0.5 or product type is unknown When suggestions are requested Then the system uses deterministic brand-neutral baseline values for all controls. Given the same input image and brand preset under fallback conditions When suggestions are requested multiple times Then identical fallback values are returned each time. Given fallback is active When suggestions are displayed Then the UI shows a banner stating "Using fallback defaults due to low confidence" and suppresses per-control confidence scores. Given the user selects "Retry detection" once per session When re-run completes Then the system either replaces fallback with new suggestions (if confidence >= 0.5) or remains in fallback with an updated timestamp.
Privacy-Safe Processing and Data Retention
Given images are processed to generate suggestions When processing completes Then raw images and derived features are automatically deleted within 30 minutes and are not used to train global models. Given system event logs are stored When reviewed Then they contain no full-resolution images or PII, only anonymized event IDs, timestamps, and aggregated metrics. Given override-learning data is stored When scoped Then it is limited to brand ID, contains only control deltas and detection labels, and can be purged upon brand request within 72 hours. Given a brand admin requests a data export When initiated Then the system provides an export of learned adjustments and anonymized event history for that brand within 24 hours.
Batch Consistency Advisor
"As a catalog manager, I want the system to flag inconsistent edits across a batch so that all images align with my brand preset."
Description

Analyze parameter variance across a batch and flag inconsistencies that may harm brand coherence (e.g., mixed crops or background hues). Provide a summary view with suggested harmonization actions such as “apply average crop to all,” “normalize background tone,” and “match lighting to reference image,” with previews and per‑image exceptions. Supports cluster‑based grouping for different subcategories within a batch and runs as a background job with progress updates for large uploads. Integrates with existing batch apply/undo, and records changes for easy rollback.

Acceptance Criteria
Background Hue Inconsistency Flagging
Given a batch of images is uploaded and Consistency Advisor analysis is initiated When the system computes each image’s background hue and detects ΔE00 > 3.0 relative to the batch median on ≥10% of images or ≥5 images (whichever is greater) Then the Summary view displays a "Background hue inconsistent" flag with the exact count of affected images and a preview grid of at least 6 thumbnails And the flag shows measured variance (median hue and ΔE00 standard deviation) and includes a "Normalize background tone" action
Normalize Background Tone Action with Preview and Exceptions
Given a "Background hue inconsistent" flag is present When the user clicks "Normalize background tone", selects target = batch median hue, and optionally deselects exception images Then a side-by-side preview renders within 2 seconds for the selected subset, showing before/after for at least 3 representative images And on Apply, the normalized tone is applied only to selected images, thumbnails and metadata update within 5 seconds, and a confirmation reads "<updated> images updated, <excluded> excluded" And the operation is recorded as a single batch action with parameters (target hue, method, affected image IDs) for rollback
Average Crop Apply and Undo
Given the advisor detects more than one output aspect ratio across the batch When the user selects "Apply average crop to all" Then the system computes the modal aspect ratio and center alignment, shows preview overlays for at least 3 images, and on Apply updates crops for all selected images within 5 seconds And a single Undo reverts all applied crops and restores previous crop metadata and thumbnails for all affected images
Cluster-Based Grouping of Subcategories
Given a batch contains visually distinct subcategories When the advisor performs clustering Then images are partitioned into k ≥ 2 groups, each with a group identifier and ≥5 images when available, and the Summary view shows per-group inconsistency flags and suggested actions And applying a harmonization action at the group level affects only images in that group and leaves other groups unchanged
Match Lighting to Reference Image
Given the user selects a reference image from the batch When the user chooses "Match lighting to reference" Then the advisor estimates exposure, contrast, and color temperature from the reference and generates previews for at least 3 sample images And on Apply, adjusted images’ mean luminance and white balance deviate by no more than ±2% from the reference metrics (unless excluded), and a confirmation shows the affected count
Background Job and Progress Updates for Large Batches
Given an upload of ≥200 images or total size ≥500 MB When analysis starts Then the Consistency Advisor runs as a background job with visible status stages (Queued, Analyzing, Suggestions ready) and a progress bar updating at least every 2 seconds And users can continue other in-app tasks while the job runs, and the Summary view becomes available with incremental results within 60 seconds
Change Log and One-Click Rollback
Given one or more harmonization actions have been applied When the user opens the change log Then each entry lists action type, parameters, actor, timestamp, and exact image IDs affected And clicking "Rollback" on an entry reverses the changes across all affected images within 10 seconds, restoring previous thumbnails and metadata, and creates a log entry noting the rollback
Guidance Content Management & Localization
"As a content admin, I want to manage and localize the guidance copy so that tips remain accurate, testable, and relevant across markets."
Description

Provide a lightweight CMS for Style Coach copy and examples, allowing product/UX teams to author, version, localize, and target tips by control, product category, marketplace, and user proficiency. Supports feature flags, rollout scheduling, and A/B testing hooks. Content is delivered via a cached, schema‑validated config to avoid app rebuilds, with rollback on failure and analytics to track tip engagement and impact on edit outcomes. Enables consistent tone of voice and rapid iteration of guidance without code changes.

Acceptance Criteria
CMS Authoring, Versioning, and Style Compliance
Given I am a CMS editor with permission "Guidance:Write" When I create or edit tip copy or examples Then I can save as Draft with a semantic version increment and required change log notes Given a Draft exists When I Publish it Then the config version is incremented, the previous version is retained as Last Good, and the audit trail records timestamp, editor, diff, and reason Given two editors modify the same tip concurrently When the second editor attempts to Publish Then a merge conflict is surfaced and must be resolved before publish succeeds Given content fails tone-of-voice/style lint rules When I attempt to Publish Then the publish is blocked with actionable lint errors and required approver(s) can override only via recorded approval Given I view the Version History of a tip When I select any prior version Then I can preview and restore it in one action without code changes
Localization Coverage and Fallback
Given locales en-US and es-ES are required for a tip When I submit a Draft for review Then the schema validator enforces either localized strings for each key or an explicit fallback marker Given a user with locale de-DE When de-DE and de are not provided Then the system serves en-US per the configured fallback chain and records the fallback level in telemetry Given a locale ar-SA (RTL) When the tip is rendered Then layout direction, punctuation, and numerals follow locale rules and screenshots/examples swap direction where applicable Given a new translation is Published When client cache TTL expires or a purge is issued Then clients fetch the updated locale strings without an app rebuild and without visual flash of untranslated text
Contextual Targeting by Control, Category, Marketplace, and Proficiency
Given targeting rules {control:"Crop", category:"Apparel", marketplace:"Amazon", proficiency:"Novice"} When a Novice user opens the Crop control on an Apparel item configured for Amazon Then the targeted tip renders in the Style Coach within 200 ms of panel open Given multiple tips match the same context When priorities are defined Then the highest priority tip displays; when priorities tie Then the most specific rule (greatest attribute match count) wins deterministically Given no tip matches the context When the panel opens Then the control-level default tip displays if enabled, otherwise no tip renders and no empty container is shown
Feature Flags and Scheduled Rollouts
Given a tip group is gated by feature flag "stylecoach.tips.v2" When the flag is Off for a cohort Then members of that cohort do not receive v2 content Given a rollout schedule 10% at T0, 50% at T0+12h, 100% at T0+24h When time passes each threshold Then exposure adjusts automatically without deploy and the change is visible in audit logs Given an internal QA override is enabled When a user is in the QA cohort Then they receive 100% exposure regardless of global rollout settings Given a pause is invoked due to incident When the rollout is paused Then further exposure increases halt within 60 seconds and newly ineligible users revert to the previous config
A/B Testing Hooks and Stable Assignment
Given an experiment with variants A and B and experiment_id is defined When an eligible user first views the Style Coach in the targeted context Then the user is assigned a stable variant by (user_id, experiment_id) hashing for 30 days Given a tip impression, click, or dismiss occurs When the analytics event is emitted Then payload includes experiment_id, variant_id, tip_id, control, category, marketplace, proficiency, locale, and config_version Given hourly sample-ratio monitoring is active When absolute allocation imbalance exceeds 2 percentage points for >2 consecutive checks Then an alert is sent to the analytics channel with experiment metadata
Schema-Validated Cached Config with Health-Based Rollback
Given a config build completes When it is promoted to CDN Then it must pass JSON Schema vX validation and signature verification; otherwise the promotion fails and Last Good remains active Given a client launches offline When a Last Good config is cached Then guidance content loads from cache without errors and is marked as offline-source in telemetry Given a newly activated config correlates with >3% 5xx or client error rate increase over 5 minutes When the health check triggers Then an automatic rollback to Last Good is executed and a purge forces clients to revert within the cache TTL window Given a manual purge is requested When executed Then 95% of active clients fetch the new config within 10 minutes, confirmed by config_version in heartbeat events
Engagement Analytics and Outcome Attribution
Given a tip is displayed When the user views, clicks Learn More, hovers, or dismisses Then impression, click, hover_time_ms, and dismiss events are captured with session_id and tip_id Given the user adjusts the targeted control within 2 minutes of a tip impression When events are processed Then the adjustment is attributed to the tip with control_name and delta value recorded Given daily aggregation runs at 02:00 UTC When metrics are computed Then the dashboard surfaces tip-level CTR, average engagement time, and post-tip adoption rate by locale, marketplace, and proficiency with data freshness < 24h

Preview Grid

See instant before/after results across all five samples at once. Toggle elements (shadow, crop ratio, background tone, retouch strength) to compare variants side‑by‑side and lock choices faster—no tab hopping or reprocessing delays.

Requirements

Instant Multi-Sample Preview Grid Rendering
"As an online seller previewing my catalog, I want to see all five samples appear instantly in a grid so that I can evaluate options quickly without waiting or switching tabs."
Description

Render five sample images in a responsive grid with instant before/after visibility, using progressive preview generation and client-side GPU acceleration (WebGL/canvas) to achieve sub-200ms interaction latency. Provide skeleton loaders, lazy-loading for high-resolution frames, and caching to avoid reprocessing delays. Support synchronized zoom/pan, responsive breakpoints, and device memory safeguards to prevent crashes on large batches. Implement error and retry states per tile, plus observability (metrics and logs) for time-to-first-preview, FPS, and failure rates. Ensure parity with final server-rendered output via color profiles and consistent tone mapping, with graceful fallback to static previews when hardware acceleration is unavailable.

Acceptance Criteria
Five-Sample Responsive Grid with Before/After Toggle and Breakpoints
- Given the Preview Grid is opened with at least five uploaded samples, When the viewport width is >= 1200px, Then five tiles render in a single row with equal gutters and consistent aspect-fit, showing all five simultaneously. - Given the viewport width is 992–1199px, When the grid renders, Then five tiles are visible within two rows (columns 3+2) without horizontal scroll; gutters are 8–16px; tiles maintain aspect-fit. - Given the viewport width is 768–991px, When the grid renders, Then three columns are used and all five tiles are accessible via vertical scroll with no content overflow. - Given the viewport width is < 768px, When the grid renders, Then two columns are used and all per-tile controls remain accessible without overlapping content. - Given a user activates the global Before/After toggle, When toggled, Then all five tiles switch state in unison and each tile indicates the active state. - Given a user modifies shadow, crop ratio, background tone, or retouch strength, When applied, Then the same parameters are applied uniformly across all five visible tiles for side-by-side comparison. - Given keyboard navigation, When using Tab/Shift+Tab and Enter/Space, Then each tile’s controls (including Before/After) are focusable and operable with a visible focus indicator.
Progressive Previews with Skeletons, Lazy-Loading, and Caching
- Given a visible tile requests a preview, When loading starts, Then a skeleton loader appears within 100ms and persists until an image frame is displayed. - Given Good 4G network conditions (≈10 Mbps, RTT ≈150ms), When loading visible tiles, Then time-to-first-preview (low-res) per tile is <= 600ms at the 95th percentile. - Given high-resolution frames are available, When swapping from low-res to high-res, Then each visible tile completes the swap within 2.5s at P95 without layout shift (CLS <= 0.01 per tile). - Given tiles are outside the viewport, When the grid loads, Then high-res requests for those tiles are deferred until they are within 300px of the viewport edge. - Given network concurrency limits, When loading multiple tiles, Then no more than 6 image requests are in-flight concurrently. - Given a previously rendered style combination is requested again, When the tile renders, Then the preview is served from cache and displayed within 150ms at P95 without issuing a server request. - Given the device is offline and a cached preview exists, When the tile becomes visible, Then the cached preview is displayed; otherwise an offline placeholder is shown with no spinner.
Performance and Observability Under Load
- Given five tiles are visible, When the user performs a before/after toggle, a single style change, zoom, or pan, Then end-to-end visual response latency is <= 200ms at the 95th percentile on Desktop Baseline (8-core CPU, 8GB RAM, integrated GPU) and Mobile Baseline (A14-class or equivalent). - Given the user pans continuously for 3 seconds, When measuring frame cadence, Then average FPS is >= 45 and FPS does not drop below 30 for more than 200ms. - Given telemetry is enabled, When a session uses the Preview Grid, Then the client emits metrics: time_to_first_preview_ms, interaction_latency_ms, pan_fps_avg, preview_failure_rate, gpu_backend (WebGL/Canvas), each tagged with session_id, tile_id, and timestamps. - Given a preview failure occurs, When logging, Then a failure event is recorded with error_code and retry_count and is included in preview_failure_rate; sampling rate is 100% for this feature. - Given distributed tracing, When any tile loads, Then a trace_id is propagated across client logs and image requests to correlate timing.
GPU Acceleration with Graceful Fallback to Static Previews
- Given the browser supports WebGL2 or WebGL, When the grid initializes, Then GPU acceleration is used for compositing and tone operations and gpu_backend=WebGL is reported in diagnostics. - Given WebGL context creation fails or is lost, When rendering, Then the system automatically falls back to Canvas2D/WASM without a crash and displays a non-blocking notice that hardware acceleration is disabled. - Given a QA flag to force software mode, When enabled, Then rendered results match the GPU path within defined color parity thresholds and the UI remains fully operable. - Given hardware acceleration is unavailable and software cannot meet performance targets, When necessary, Then static server-generated previews are displayed while controls remain functional and the user is informed of the fallback.
Synchronized Zoom/Pan Across Grid
- Given any tile is focused or hovered, When the user zooms via Ctrl/scroll, pinch, or zoom controls, Then all five tiles synchronize to the same zoom level within one frame and maintain the same focal point within 1px. - Given the user pans by dragging within one tile, When the drag ends, Then all other tiles reflect the same relative pan offset simultaneously. - Given the user activates Reset View, When triggered, Then all tiles return to fit-to-frame within 100ms. - Given zoom constraints, When zooming, Then the supported zoom range is 100%–400% with smooth interpolation and no visible aliasing at 200% on 2x DPR displays.
Color and Tone Parity with Server Output
- Given a calibration set of images with server-rendered outputs, When the client renders previews, Then CIEDE2000 color difference per tile vs server output is median <= 1.0 and P95 <= 2.0 in sRGB. - Given tone mapping and gamma, When comparing luminance histograms, Then mean luminance delta is <= 2% and clipped pixel proportion differs by <= 0.5% vs server output. - Given input images contain sRGB or Display P3 profiles, When rendered, Then colors are correctly converted/managed such that the above parity thresholds are maintained. - Given the browser lacks color management, When detected, Then the system warns via a non-blocking toast and falls back to sRGB assumptions while maintaining P95 <= 3.0 DeltaE.
Resilience: Device Memory Safeguards and Per-Tile Error/Retry
- Given the device reports Device Memory <= 4 or a memory pressure signal is received, When rendering five tiles, Then concurrent decoded image buffers are limited to <= 3 tiles and peak JS heap <= 200MB and GPU textures <= 256MB as verified in performance profiling. - Given a memory pressure or WebGL out-of-memory event, When detected, Then the grid reduces preview resolution by one step and disables optional effects (e.g., soft shadows) and continues without a crash. - Given a tile fails due to network timeout or processing error, When the failure occurs, Then the tile shows an error state with message, error_code, and Retry action while other tiles remain interactive. - Given retry policy, When auto-retry triggers or the user taps Retry, Then exponential backoff is applied (e.g., 1s, 3s) with a maximum of 2 automatic retries and 1 manual retry; on success the tile returns to normal. - Given requests are superseded by new style changes, When cancellation occurs, Then the previous request is aborted and no stale frames replace newer ones (no flashback).
Real-time Variant Toggles (Shadow, Crop Ratio, Background Tone, Retouch Strength)
"As a boutique owner refining my product photos, I want to toggle styling controls and see instant updates so that I can compare variants side-by-side and decide faster."
Description

Provide interactive controls that update previews in real time without a server round-trip: shadow on/off and intensity, selectable crop ratios (e.g., 1:1, 4:5, 3:2) with safe-zone guides, background tone palette/slider including brand presets, and retouch strength levels with live approximations. Support per-sample overrides and a global apply mode with clear UI state. Use worker threads for image operations to keep the UI responsive and reconcile client approximations with server-quality renders in the background to guarantee visual consistency. Persist chosen values in session state and prefill from the last-used brand preset.

Acceptance Criteria
Instant Shadow Toggle and Before/After in Preview Grid
Given the Preview Grid shows five sample images with shadow controls and Before/After mode available When the user toggles Shadow On or Off Then all five previews reflect the new shadow state within 150 ms without a loading indicator And no synchronous network request is made and the UI remains interactive (pointer latency ≤ 50 ms) And the Shadow Intensity slider is enabled only when Shadow is On Given Shadow is On and the user drags the Shadow Intensity slider When the slider value changes Then previews update continuously at least every 100 ms and land on the exact final value on release And the chosen intensity value is persisted in session state Given the user activates Before/After mode When any toggle is changed Then each of the five tiles displays synchronized Before and After states for the current image without reprocessing delay
Crop Ratios with Safe-Zone Guides Across Samples
Given crop ratio options 1:1, 4:5, and 3:2 are visible When the user selects a ratio Then safe-zone guides render on all five previews within 100 ms and the crop overlays reflect the selected ratio exactly And panning/zooming within the crop remains ≥ 55 fps And the selected ratio is saved per-sample and (if Global Apply is active) as a global value Given Global Apply mode is active When the user changes crop ratio Then all samples without overrides adopt the new ratio, and overridden samples remain unchanged and are visibly marked as locked
Background Tone Palette and Brand Preset Application
Given the background control shows a tone palette, a numeric slider, and brand presets When the user selects a brand preset Then all five previews update within 150 ms to the preset tone and the preset is highlighted as selected And the applied tone matches the preset target within ΔE00 ≤ 2 And the choice is persisted in session state Given the user adjusts the tone slider When the slider is moved Then the preview updates continuously without visible banding And the numeric value is displayed and copyable Given Global Apply is Off When a tone change is made Then only the active sample updates
Retouch Strength Live Approximation and Background Reconciliation
Given retouch strength control with levels 0–100 is visible When the user sets a new value Then the local preview updates within 200 ms using a client-side approximation And when the background server-quality render completes, SSIM ≥ 0.98 and ΔE00 ≤ 2 between local preview and final within the product region And the swap to server-quality occurs without flicker and with layout shift ≤ 1 px And the retouch value persists in session and restores on reload
Per-Sample Overrides vs Global Apply with Clear UI State
Given a Global Apply toggle is visible and Off by default When Global Apply is turned On Then subsequent control changes apply to all samples except those with per-sample overrides And overridden samples display a lock icon and tooltip "Override active" And a "Reset to Global" action is available on overridden samples Given a sample has an override When the user clicks "Reset to Global" Then the sample adopts the current global values and the override indicator is removed Given global values change Then overridden samples remain unchanged
Worker Threads Keep UI Responsive During Image Operations
Given the app is processing 5× 2048 px previews on a device with ≥ 4 logical cores When the user rapidly toggles controls and drags sliders for 10 seconds Then the main thread frame rate remains ≥ 55 fps and input latency ≤ 50 ms And image processing executes in worker threads with no single main-thread long task ≥ 50 ms aside from painting And no "Unresponsive" browser prompt appears Given network latency is 200–400 ms and background reconciliation is active Then preview updates are never blocked by network and no spinner is shown for local updates
Session Persistence and Last-Used Brand Preset Prefill
Given the user sets values for shadow, crop ratio, background tone, and retouch strength When the user navigates away and returns within the same session Then the same values are restored for each sample and the global state Given a new batch is started without selecting a preset When the editor loads Then controls prefill from the last-used brand preset for the account And the preset name is displayed as selected And users can override any control per-sample or globally
Synchronized Before/After Comparison & Grid Controls
"As a power user comparing edits, I want synchronized before/after controls across the grid so that I can spot differences quickly without repeating the same actions on each image."
Description

Enable per-tile and global comparison modes, including a before/after flip, a draggable split slider, and synchronized zoom/pan across selected tiles. Provide reset-to-default and quick-compare (press-and-hold) interactions. Maintain consistent overlays (crop guides, safe zones) in both before and after states. Ensure keyboard and pointer parity for all compare actions and maintain performance targets under 60 FPS on supported hardware.

Acceptance Criteria
Per‑Tile and Global Compare Scoping
Given five preview tiles are visible and at least one tile is selected When the user switches scope to Global compare Then any compare action (flip, split slider, zoom, pan) applies simultaneously to all selected tiles, and non-selected tiles are unaffected And a scope indicator displays "Global" and the count of affected tiles equals the number of selected tiles When the user switches to Per‑Tile scope and focuses a tile Then compare actions affect only that focused tile and other tiles remain unchanged And switching scopes does not modify underlying image adjustments or style presets
Synchronized Zoom/Pan Across Selected Tiles
Given two or more tiles are selected and Global scope is active When the user zooms via mouse wheel, trackpad pinch, or keyboard +/− Then all selected tiles adjust zoom by the same factor within ±1% tolerance and maintain the same focal point When the user pans by dragging or using arrow keys Then all selected tiles pan by the same pixel offset within ±1 px, clamped to image bounds; non-selected tiles do not move And continuous zoom/pan interactions render at an average ≥60 FPS (p95 ≥50 FPS) on supported hardware
Before/After Comparison Modes (Flip and Split)
Given compare mode is Flip When the user toggles Before/After via the toolbar control or its keyboard shortcut Then the image state switches instantly between Before and After with toggle latency <50 ms and no reprocessing delay Given compare mode is Split When the user drags the split handle within a tile Then the handle moves smoothly and reveals Before on one side and After on the other, with the handle position persisted per tile in Per‑Tile scope and shared in Global scope And the handle snaps at 0%, 50%, and 100% when within 8 px proximity And split interactions render at ≥60 FPS average on supported hardware
Quick‑Compare Press‑and‑Hold
Given the After state is visible When the user press‑and‑holds the Quick Compare control (pointer down on the compare button or holding the assigned keyboard key) Then the affected tile(s) temporarily switch to the Before state for the duration of the hold and revert to the previous state within 50 ms of release And in Global scope only selected tiles are affected; in Per‑Tile scope only the focused tile is affected And Quick Compare uses no transitional animations; overlays remain visible and unchanged
Reset Compare Controls to Defaults
Given any non‑default compare settings are active (e.g., zoom not fit‑to‑tile, non‑zero pan, split mode on, flip active) When the user activates Reset Compare Then all tiles return to defaults: After state, Fit‑to‑Tile zoom, centered pan, Split mode off, Flip mode off, split handle hidden, overlays on, scope unchanged And the reset completes within 100 ms and produces no change to image edits or style presets
Keyboard and Pointer Parity for Compare Actions
Given the application window has focus When a user performs any compare action with a pointer (zoom, pan, flip, split slider, quick‑compare, reset) Then an equivalent keyboard interaction exists and is accessible via documented shortcuts And all compare controls are reachable by Tab order, show a visible focus indicator, and can be activated via Enter/Space as applicable And no compare functionality is pointer‑only; automated tests verify keyboard parity for each action
Overlay Consistency Across States and Compare Modes
Given crop guides and safe‑zone overlays are enabled When the user flips Before/After, uses the split slider, or performs zoom/pan in any scope Then overlay position, size, and opacity remain constant relative to the image content (alignment error ≤1 px at 100% zoom or ≤0.5% of tile dimension at other zoom levels) And overlays render above imagery in both states without flicker or duplication and never lag behind image transforms by more than one frame
Variant Pinning and Choice Locking
"As a seller narrowing options, I want to pin the best-looking variant so that I don’t lose it while testing other adjustments."
Description

Allow users to pin a preferred variant in any tile, freezing its settings and visual state while continuing to experiment with others. Indicate pinned status visually and prevent accidental overrides until explicitly unlocked. Support naming or tagging the locked choice and persisting it when navigating between pages or sessions. Expose a concise summary of locked parameters for auditability.

Acceptance Criteria
Pin Variant in Tile and Freeze State
Given the Preview Grid is loaded with at least five sample tiles and each tile has multiple generated variants When the user pins any variant within a tile via the pin control or context menu action Then the selected tile’s current image and parameter values (shadow, crop ratio, background tone, retouch strength, preset) are snapshotted and frozen And subsequent adjustments to any global toggle or preset do not alter the pinned tile’s visual output or stored parameters And the pin action completes within 300 ms from user input And any number of tiles can be pinned simultaneously without error
Pinned Status Indicator and Accessibility
Given a variant is pinned in a tile Then the tile displays a lock icon overlay and a distinct border style indicating pinned status And a tooltip labeled "Pinned" appears on hover or focus of the tile And the pinned indicator has a minimum 4.5:1 contrast ratio against the image/background And assistive technologies announce the state change via an ARIA label/state (e.g., aria-pressed or aria-selected equivalent) as "Pinned" And the indicator remains visible and accurate after grid refreshes, scrolling, or viewport resize
Prevent Overrides and Respect Pins in Batch Operations
Given one or more tiles are pinned When the user attempts to modify a pinned tile’s parameters (e.g., change retouch strength, crop ratio) via per-tile controls Then the controls are disabled or the change is blocked for the pinned tile, and no parameter value is altered And a non-blocking toast appears within 500 ms stating the action was skipped due to a pin, with a direct "Unlock" action When the user applies a batch preset/reset to all tiles Then pinned tiles are excluded from the operation and a summary toast reports "Skipped N pinned tiles" with accurate count And no reprocessing is triggered for pinned tiles during batch actions
Name/Tag Locked Choice and Edit Constraints
Given a tile is pinned When the user adds or edits a tag for the pinned choice Then the input accepts 1–32 characters consisting of letters, numbers, spaces, hyphens, and underscores only And invalid characters are rejected with inline validation messaging within 200 ms And the tag is saved automatically within 300 ms of input blur or Enter And the tag is rendered on the tile and in details view without truncation up to 32 chars (ellipsis beyond) And removing a tag leaves the pin intact
Persistence Across Navigation and Sessions
Given one or more tiles are pinned (with optional tags) When the user navigates to another page within the app and returns to the Preview Grid, or refreshes the browser Then all pinned states, frozen images, and tags are restored exactly as saved When the user signs out and signs back in on the same account within 30 days Then all pinned states, frozen images, parameter snapshots, and tags persist for the associated catalog/batch And pinned state restoration for grids up to 100 tiles completes within 1 second on a typical broadband connection
Locked Parameters Summary for Auditability
Given a tile is pinned When the user opens the details/summary for the pinned tile Then the UI displays the exact frozen parameter values: shadow (on/off), crop ratio (numeric), background tone (code/name), retouch strength (0–100), and applied preset (name/version) And the summary includes timestamp of pin and user identifier And the values match the underlying stored snapshot with no rounding beyond one decimal place for numeric sliders And the user can copy the summary to clipboard in a single action
Explicit Unlock Flow, Confirmation, and Undo/Redo
Given a tile is pinned When the user selects Unlock via the lock control or context menu Then a confirmation appears once per session (until "Don’t ask again" is checked) and, upon confirm, the tile is unlocked within 300 ms And after unlocking, subsequent global or per-tile changes apply normally to that tile When the user performs Undo after an unlock action Then the tile returns to the pinned state with the original frozen image and parameters restored And Redo reapplies the unlock state
Batch Apply Selected Settings to Full Upload
"As a store owner, I want to apply my chosen look to all product photos at once so that I can finish edits quickly and keep my brand consistent."
Description

Provide a one-click action to apply the currently selected settings (or pinned variant parameters) to the entire batch or a selected subset. Validate conflicts (e.g., incompatible crop ratio for certain SKUs) and show an impact summary before committing. On confirm, update the processing job configuration, enqueue reprocessing, and display progress with the ability to cancel or revert. Ensure idempotency and record the chosen settings as a reusable style preset.

Acceptance Criteria
Apply Selected Settings to Entire Batch with Impact Summary
Given the user has selected settings or pinned variant parameters in the Preview Grid And a batch of N images is available When the user clicks "Apply to All" Then an impact summary modal is displayed containing: total_selected=N, compatible_count, conflict_count grouped by reason, parameter_deltas, estimated_duration_range, and estimated_storage_delta And the Confirm button remains disabled until the summary renders with all counts When the user confirms Then the processing job configuration is updated atomically with a new version number And one reprocessing job with a unique job_id is enqueued And a progress panel appears showing states (Queued, Processing, Finalizing) with item-level counts updating at least every 5 seconds
Apply Settings to Filtered Subset or Manual Selection
Given the user has filtered the grid or manually multi-selected K items (K ≥ 1) When the user clicks "Apply to Selection" Then the impact summary reflects total_selected=K and excludes unselected items And only the selected items are included in the updated job configuration And non-selected items remain unchanged after processing completes
Conflict Detection and Resolution for Incompatible Crop Ratios
Given one or more items are incompatible with the selected crop ratio or min-dimension requirements When conflicts are detected during pre-commit validation Then the impact summary lists conflict_count with reason codes (e.g., AR_LOCKED, MIN_DIM) and example SKUs And the user can choose a resolution policy: (a) Skip conflicted items [default], (b) Auto Adjust per SKU rule, or (c) Use Original crop And changing the policy updates the counts in the summary before confirmation When the user confirms Then the chosen policy is applied consistently, and each conflicted item receives a logged resolution outcome
Idempotency and Concurrency Control
Given the user triggers "Apply" and the client retries or the user clicks again within 60 seconds When duplicate requests with the same settings hash are received Then the backend returns the same job_id and does not enqueue duplicate jobs And the UI deduplicates and shows a single progress panel for that job When two different clients attempt to apply changes to the same batch concurrently Then optimistic concurrency prevents a stale write, and the second request receives a 409 with the latest config version to review
Cancel and Revert Reprocessing
Given a reprocessing job is in progress When the user clicks Cancel Then the job is aborted and no additional items are updated And if any items were already updated, a Revert option is presented When the user clicks Revert within 24 hours of the job start Then all affected items and configuration are restored to the previous version within 5 minutes for batches up to 1,000 images And an audit log records cancel/revert actions with timestamps and actor
Save Chosen Settings as Reusable Style Preset
Given the user confirms applying selected settings Then those parameters (background tone, shadow, crop ratio, retouch strength, pinned variant parameters) are saved as a new preset with a generated default name and optional user override And the preset appears in the user's preset library within 5 seconds And presets are immutable and versioned; editing creates a new version When the user applies this preset to a future batch Then the settings populate instantly and can be batch-applied using the same flow
Non-Destructive Versioning & Undo History
"As a user experimenting with styles, I want non-destructive history so that I can safely explore options and roll back if needed."
Description

Track all preview-grid changes as non-destructive versions per asset, enabling undo/redo and revert-to-original without data loss. Store lightweight diffs and parameter sets rather than duplicating full images. Persist session state to recover work after refresh or reconnect, and allow exporting/importing the parameter set for reuse across projects.

Acceptance Criteria
Undo/Redo of Preview Grid Parameter Changes
- Given an asset open in Preview Grid with five samples visible, when the user changes any parameter (shadow, crop ratio, background tone, retouch strength) on any sample, then a new undo entry is recorded with parameter name, old value, new value, sampleId, assetId, timestamp, and userId. - Given there are N undo entries, when the user invokes Undo stepwise, then the preview updates to each prior state in order, with visual update latency ≤ 300 ms per step if cached or ≤ 1000 ms per step if recomposition is required, and no image data is duplicated. - Given the user has undone M steps, when Redo is invoked M times, then the resulting render is visually equivalent to the pre-undo state (SSIM ≥ 0.99, ΔE2000 ≤ 2.0) and the parameter sets are identical to their recorded values.
Revert to Original Without Data Loss
- Given an asset with one or more saved versions, when the user selects Revert to Original, then the original image and default parameters are restored while preserving the ability to Undo back to the previous state. - Given a revert operation, when the change is persisted, then no full-resolution image blob is duplicated and the storage delta for the new version record is ≤ 5 KB (parameters + metadata only). - Given the asset is reverted, when the user exports the current parameter set, then the export clearly indicates it is the "original" baseline (versionId, schemaVersion, createdAt) and contains no derived adjustments.
Session Persistence After Refresh/Reconnect
- Given an active editing session on an asset in the Preview Grid, when the browser is refreshed or the network disconnects and reconnects within 24 hours, then the last active version, full undo/redo stack, selected sample, and parameter values are restored automatically upon project reload. - Given any parameter change, when 2 seconds of user inactivity elapse, then the session state is autosaved to durable storage and survives process restarts. - Given the client was offline when changes were made, when connectivity is restored, then the queued diffs are synced exactly once in causal order with no lost or duplicated version entries.
Lightweight Diff Storage and Reconstruction Fidelity
- Given versioning uses parameter sets and lightweight diffs, when reconstructing any prior version from the original image, then the rendered output matches a fresh application of the same parameters with SSIM ≥ 0.99 and ΔE2000 ≤ 2.0 across the full image. - Given a sequence of K parameter changes, when K versions are saved, then total additional storage consumed is ≤ 5 KB × K and at most one original image blob exists for the asset. - Given a version record, when inspected, then it includes parentVersionId, schemaVersion, parameterSetHash, createdAt, and userId fields for auditability.
Export/Import Parameter Set Across Projects
- Given an asset version is active, when the user selects Export Parameters, then a portable JSON (≤ 10 KB) is downloaded containing schemaVersion, parameterSet, seed/randomness controls, and a checksum. - Given a valid exported file, when Import Parameters is used in a different project and asset, then the parameters apply successfully and the resulting render is visually equivalent to the source (SSIM ≥ 0.99, ΔE2000 ≤ 2.0). - Given an export with an unsupported schemaVersion, when import is attempted, then the user receives a clear, actionable message and the import is blocked without mutating the current asset.
Version Timeline Visibility and Selection in Preview Grid
- Given an asset is open, when the user opens the Versions panel, then a chronological list of versions is shown with versionId, createdAt, author, and a compact diff summary (changed parameters) for each entry. - Given a version is selected in the panel, when applied, then all five samples update consistently to reflect that version’s parameter set within 500 ms and the selection is reflected in the undo/redo stack. - Given multiple versions exist, when hovering a version, then a quick preview renders without committing, and dismissing hover leaves the current state unchanged.
Accessibility & Keyboard-First Navigation
"As a keyboard and screen-reader user, I want complete access to preview and compare controls so that I can efficiently make decisions without a mouse."
Description

Implement full keyboard navigation of the grid and controls with logical tab order, focus indicators, and shortcuts for common actions (toggle before/after, adjust retouch strength, cycle crop ratios, pin/unpin). Provide ARIA roles, labels, and live region announcements for state changes (e.g., variant pinned, batch apply started). Ensure color-contrast and screen-reader compatibility for overlays and sliders, with motion-reduction options for users sensitive to animations.

Acceptance Criteria
Keyboard-Only Grid Navigation and Logical Tab Order
- Given the Preview Grid is loaded, When the user presses Tab from the page start, Then focus moves in this order: top action bar → grid view controls → grid tiles (left-to-right, top-to-bottom) → details panel controls (if present) → footer actions, with no dead-ends or skipped interactive elements. - Given focus is on a grid tile, When the user presses Arrow Up/Down/Left/Right, Then focus moves to the adjacent tile and a screen reader announces "Tile X of Y" for the newly focused tile. - Given any modal or overlay opens, When it appears, Then focus moves to the modal's first focusable element, is trapped within until closed, and returns to the triggering control on close. - Given a control becomes disabled or hidden, When tabbing, Then it is removed from the tab sequence and skipped. - Given the grid re-renders (e.g., after applying a crop), When the previously focused element no longer exists, Then focus is set to the nearest relevant element (same tile index or parent group) without dropping to the document body.
Visible Focus Indicators on All Interactive Elements
- Given any interactive element is focused via keyboard, Then a 2px focus indicator with at least 3:1 contrast against adjacent colors is clearly visible and not clipped by container overflow. - Given focus is on an image tile, Then a focus ring or overlay ensures 3:1 contrast regardless of the image content beneath. - Given the app is in light or dark theme, Then the focus indicator maintains the 3:1 contrast requirement in both themes. - Given the browser zoom is set to 200%, Then the focus indicator remains at an effective thickness of ≥2px and fully visible around the element.
Shortcut Keys for Toggle, Pin, Retouch, and Crop Ratio
- Given a grid tile is focused and no text input is active, When the user presses B, Then the tile toggles Before/After preview and an aria-live polite message announces "Before view" or "After view". - Given a grid tile is focused, When the user presses P, Then the variant is pinned/unpinned within 100 ms, the pin icon reflects the state, and aria-live announces "Pinned" or "Unpinned". - Given retouch strength is adjustable for the focused tile, When the user presses ] or [, Then the value increases/decreases by 5 within bounds 0–100, the numeric value updates, aria-valuenow matches the value, and holding the key repeats at ~5 steps/second. - Given multiple crop ratios exist (e.g., 1:1, 4:5, 16:9), When the user presses C, Then the next ratio is applied; When Shift+C is pressed, Then the previous ratio is applied; aria-live announces the new ratio label. - Given focus is inside a text input or while dragging a slider, When shortcut keys are pressed, Then no shortcut action is triggered to avoid conflicts.
ARIA Roles, Labels, and Live Announcements for State Changes
- Given interactive components are rendered, Then tiles expose role="group" or role="button" as appropriate with accessible names (e.g., "Sample 3"), buttons have aria-labels or visible labels, and toggleable controls use aria-pressed to reflect state. - Given sliders are present, Then each uses role="slider" with aria-label or aria-labelledby and correct aria-valuemin, aria-valuemax, and aria-valuenow reflecting the current value. - Given state changes occur (pin/unpin, before/after toggled, crop ratio changed, batch apply started/completed/failed), Then a single aria-live="polite" (or role="status") region announces a concise, non-duplicated message within 500 ms (e.g., "Pinned sample 2", "Batch apply started for 5 items", "Batch apply complete: 5 succeeded, 0 failed"). - Given page structure is defined, Then landmark roles (header, main, complementary, contentinfo) are present for efficient screen reader navigation.
Screen Reader Operability of Sliders and Modals
- Given the retouch strength slider has focus, When Arrow Left/Right (or Up/Down) are pressed, Then the value changes by 1; When PageUp/PageDown are pressed, Then the value changes by 10; When Home/End are pressed, Then the value jumps to min/max; each change is announced as a percentage. - Given any slider change occurs via keyboard or mouse, Then aria-valuenow updates immediately and the visible numeric value stays in sync. - Given a modal or side panel opens, Then it has aria-modal="true", is labelled by an element referenced via aria-labelledby, provides an accessible description if needed via aria-describedby, and pressing Escape closes it. - Given a modal closes, Then focus returns to the element that opened it.
Motion Reduction Preference and In-App Toggle
- Given the user has OS/browser prefers-reduced-motion enabled, Then non-essential animations (transitions, parallax, wipes) are disabled (0 ms) and essential feedback animations are reduced to ≤100 ms fade with no motion. - Given the user toggles "Reduce animations" in app settings, Then the preference takes effect immediately across the grid and controls, persists across sessions, and overrides default motion settings. - Given before/after comparisons are shown, Then with motion reduction enabled they switch instantly with no sliding wipe effects.
Overlay and Control Color Contrast on Image Tiles
- Given text and icons appear over images, Then all text meets WCAG AA contrast ≥4.5:1 and UI components (icons, controls, focus rings) meet ≥3:1 against their immediate background, achieved via dynamic scrims or alternative styling as needed. - Given hover, active, and focus states of controls, Then the contrast ratios remain at or above their respective thresholds. - Given the interface is zoomed to 200% and in both light and dark themes, Then the stated contrast ratios are maintained.

Consistency Meter

Real‑time score that measures uniformity across your sample set and predicts how well the preset will generalize to the rest of your catalog. Flags outliers and offers quick fixes (e.g., adjust crop margin by 2%) to secure a cohesive, brand‑true finish.

Requirements

Real-time Uniformity Scoring Engine
"As an online seller, I want a real-time consistency score while configuring my preset so that I can quickly see whether my catalog will look cohesive before I process the full batch."
Description

Implements a streaming analyzer that computes a 0–100 Consistency Score and per-metric sub-scores (e.g., crop margin, subject centering, aspect ratio, background uniformity, exposure, white balance, shadow hardness, color cast, edge cleanliness, resolution consistency, compression artifacts, and style similarity to the selected preset). Scores update instantly as users upload samples, tweak preset parameters, or change the sample set. Reuses shared image features from PixelLift’s preprocessing to minimize recomputation, exposes an event bus for UI updates, and supports idempotent rescoring on partial batches. Allows brand-specific thresholds and weighting profiles, and handles missing or corrupted images gracefully.

Acceptance Criteria
Real-time Score Update and Event Publication
Given a project with Consistency Meter visible and an active sample set When (a) an image upload completes and preprocessing finishes, (b) a preset parameter is changed, or (c) an image is added or removed from the sample set Then the overall Consistency Score (0–100, integer) and all per‑metric sub‑scores are recalculated and published on the scoring event bus within 300 ms of the triggering change And Then the published message includes: projectId, sampleSetVersion (monotonic), changeType ∈ {uploadComplete, presetChanged, sampleSetChanged}, overallScore, subScores[{metricId, value 0–100, unit}], timestamp (ISO‑8601), dedupKey And Then events for a given project are delivered in ascending sampleSetVersion order to subscribed clients
Comprehensive Per‑Metric Sub‑Scores and Overall Calculation
Given any scoring run Then sub‑scores are produced for each metric: crop margin, subject centering, aspect ratio, background uniformity, exposure, white balance, shadow hardness, color cast, edge cleanliness, resolution consistency, compression artifacts, style similarity to the selected preset And Then each sub‑score is an integer in [0,100], where 100 = perfect adherence to the preset/brand target And Then the overall Consistency Score equals the weighted arithmetic mean of the sub‑scores using the active weighting profile; difference between published and recomputed overall score ≤ 0.5 points And Then with identical inputs, repeated runs produce identical sub‑scores and overall score
Feature Reuse and Incremental Scoring Efficiency
Given N images with cached preprocessing features When only preset weights or thresholds change Then zero image features are recomputed and only aggregation runs; end‑to‑end score update latency ≤ 150 ms for N ≤ 200 on reference hardware When exactly k images in the sample set change content or features (k ≤ N) Then only those k images are rescored; total recomputed images = k; cache hit rate for unaffected images ≥ 90% And Then average CPU time for rescoring after weight‑only changes is ≤ 20% of a cold scoring run baseline for the same N
Idempotent Rescoring on Partial Batches
Given a partial batch upload where some images are pending, retried, or duplicated by the client When a rescoring request with the same inputs (projectId, sampleSetVersion, changeSet hash) is processed multiple times Then the engine produces identical overall and sub‑scores, emits the same dedupKey, and increments sampleSetVersion at most once And Then a rescoring trigger that results in no score changes produces no new event and no version increment
Brand Thresholds and Weighting Profiles
Given Brand A and Brand B with distinct thresholds and weighting profiles applied to the same sample set When scoring is executed under each brand profile Then sub‑scores and the overall score reflect the respective weights and thresholds, and the published overall score difference matches the recomputed difference within 0.5 points And Then when no brand profile is specified, the system applies the default profile and records profileId in the event payload And Then updating a brand profile’s weights takes effect on the next scoring and is published within 300 ms of the change
Outlier Flagging with Actionable Quick Fixes
Given active brand thresholds for each metric When an image’s metric deviates beyond its threshold by Δ Then the image is flagged as an outlier for that metric and the deviation amount and direction are included in the result payload And Then the engine provides at least one quick‑fix suggestion containing: parameterName, suggestedDelta within allowed range (e.g., cropMargin:+2%), and expected score improvement (Δscore) And Then applying the suggestion via API triggers rescoring and increases the targeted metric sub‑score by ≥ 80% of the predicted Δscore on a controlled test set
Graceful Handling of Missing or Corrupted Images
Given an input sample set containing missing or corrupted images When scoring runs Then affected images are skipped, marked with errorCode ∈ {MissingImage, CorruptImage, UnsupportedFormat, Timeout}, and the remaining images continue processing And Then the overall score is computed using only successfully processed images and includes completenessRatio = processedCount/totalCount in the event payload And Then the API returns a multi‑status result (e.g., 207) or equivalent, and no unhandled exceptions or crashes occur
Preset Generalization Predictor
"As a boutique owner, I want the meter to predict how well my chosen preset will generalize to the rest of my catalog so that I can avoid rework and ensure brand consistency across new uploads."
Description

Forecasts how a chosen style preset will perform on the remainder of the catalog by modeling variance in the sample set, product category metadata, and historical outcomes. Produces confidence bands (e.g., high/medium/low) and expected failure modes (e.g., dark fabrics underexposed, reflective items with harsh shadows). Requires a minimum diverse sample size, highlights underrepresented categories, and suggests additional samples to improve prediction quality. Integrates with the scoring engine to run quick what‑if simulations as the user adjusts preset parameters.

Acceptance Criteria
Real‑time Confidence Band Display
- Given a sample set that meets the minimum diversity threshold, when a user selects a style preset, then the predictor outputs a numeric confidence score (0–100) and a band mapped as: High ≥ 80; Medium 50–79; Low < 50. - When the user changes any preset parameter, the confidence score and band refresh within 700 ms for sample sets ≤ 500 images and within 1.5 s for ≤ 2,000 images. - The displayed score and band remain consistent after page refresh and when re-opening the project (persisted in project state). - The confidence band tooltip lists contributing factors including sample variance, category coverage, and historical performance weights.
Expected Failure Modes Enumeration
- When predicting, the system returns at least the top 3 expected failure modes with human-readable labels and example thumbnails sourced from the sample. - Each failure mode includes an estimated prevalence percentage (0–100%) and severity levels mapped as: High ≥ 70th percentile severity, Medium 40–69th, Low < 40th. - For each failure mode, at least one auto-fix suggestion is provided (e.g., exposure +0.2 EV, crop margin +2%) and is previewable on click. - On a labeled holdout set (n ≥ 200), ≥ 70% of predicted failure modes correspond to observed issues after applying the preset. - Failure modes and metadata are available via API at GET /v1/predictions/{id}.
Minimum Diverse Sample Size Enforcement
- The predictor requires a minimum of 24 images spanning ≥ 3 product categories with no single category > 60% of the sample; thresholds are configurable per workspace. - If the minimum is not met, the Predict action is disabled and an inline message lists unmet conditions and the exact additional images required per category. - The system suggests up to 3 categories to add with required counts and provides a CTA to upload or select from catalog. - Once requirements are satisfied, the Predict action enables without manual refresh, and the first prediction completes within 1 s for ≤ 500 images.
Underrepresented Category Highlighting and Sample Suggestions
- Category coverage is computed as sample share divided by catalog share; categories with coverage index < 0.5 are flagged as underrepresented. - Underrepresented categories are shown in the UI with a badge and a recommendation "Add N images" where N is computed to reach coverage index ≥ 0.8. - Clicking the recommendation opens the uploader pre-filtered to the category; after adding images, coverage recalculates and flags clear within 1 s. - A downloadable CSV report lists categories, coverage index, required N, and current counts.
What‑If Simulation Integration
- When a user adjusts a preset parameter (e.g., crop margin +2%, exposure +0.2 EV), a what‑if simulation runs and returns updated confidence score, band, and Consistency Meter delta (± points) within 800 ms for ≤ 500 images. - A side‑by‑side comparison view shows baseline vs simulated metrics and the top 5 images with greatest predicted change. - Toggling off the simulation or clicking Reset restores baseline metrics instantly (<150 ms) with no state persisted. - No database writes occur until the user clicks Apply; event logs include parameter changes and deltas.
Outlier Detection and Quick Fixes
- Outliers are defined as images with predicted post‑process quality > 2.0 standard deviations below the sample mean or in the lowest 10th percentile; the system lists count and thumbnails. - Each outlier includes at least one quick fix with estimated impact (predicted score change) and a one‑click preview. - Batch apply is available for outliers sharing feature similarity cosine ≥ 0.8; processing completes within 2 s for up to 100 images. - After applying a quick fix (preview or batch), the predictor recalculates metrics for affected images and updates the overall confidence score within 700 ms.
Outlier Detection & Smart Suggestions
"As a product photographer, I want outliers flagged with specific, actionable suggestions so that I can fix the few problem images without manually hunting for them."
Description

Identifies per-metric outliers within the sample set using robust statistics and learned thresholds, visually flags them, and generates targeted, parameter-level suggestions (e.g., increase crop margin by 2%, shift white balance +250K, reduce shadow intensity by 10%). Quantifies expected score lift for each suggestion and allows users to apply fixes per-image or across the preset. Ensures suggestions remain within brand guardrails and clearly label any trade-offs.

Acceptance Criteria
Detect Per‑Metric Outliers in Sample Set
- Given a labeled sample set (>=30 images) with known per-metric outliers (crop margin, white balance, shadow intensity), when the Consistency Meter runs, then the system flags outliers per metric on image tiles and lists them in the Outliers panel. - Then per-metric detection achieves >=90% precision and >=85% recall versus ground truth on the set. - Then thresholds are computed via robust statistics (median + k*MAD) combined with learned per-metric offsets, and the effective threshold value is shown in a tooltip. - Then each flag stores metric name, measured value, deviation in MAD units, and timestamp for auditability.
Visual Flagging and Drill‑Down
- Given flagged images, when a user hovers a flag, then a tooltip shows: metric, image value, sample median, deviation (MAD units). - When the user clicks a flag, then a side panel opens with a histogram of the sample distribution and the image’s position highlighted. - Then flag icons render within 500 ms after analysis completion for a 100-image sample set. - Then each flag control has an accessible aria-label: "Outlier: {metric}" and is keyboard focusable.
Generate Parameter‑Level Smart Suggestions
- For each flagged metric, the system generates 1–3 parameter-level suggestions with explicit numeric adjustments (e.g., crop margin +2%, white balance +250K, shadow intensity −10%). - Each suggestion displays an expected Consistency score lift (+X points) with an 80% confidence interval and a model confidence score (0–1). - Suggestions that would violate brand guardrails are not shown; instead, a note states "Blocked by guardrail" with the specific rule. - Each suggestion lists any trade-offs (e.g., "May reduce naturalness by 1–2 pts") next to the lift value. - Numeric adjustments respect per-metric step sizes (crop: 0.5%, WB: 50K, shadows: 1%) and rounding rules.
Apply Fixes Per‑Image and Across Preset
- Given a flagged image, when the user clicks "Apply fix" on a suggestion, then only that image is re-rendered with the adjustment and its Consistency score is recalculated. - When the user selects "Apply to preset", then the preset parameter updates and all images in the sample set re-evaluate; for 100 images, updated flags and scores appear within 3 seconds. - Batch apply provides an Include/Exclude filter defaulted to images matching the outlier condition; changes affect only the filtered set. - All apply actions are undoable in one step; selecting Undo restores the prior preset and image states with matching scores. - Partial failures surface an error list with retry for failed images; successful applies remain intact.
Expected Score Lift Calculation Validity
- Given a held-out validation subset (>=50 images), when applying the top suggestion in dry-run evaluation, then predicted lift is within ±2 Consistency points of realized lift for >=80% of images. - When two suggestions are stacked, then cumulative lift prediction error is <=30% relative for >=70% of cases. - If model confidence <0.5, then expected lift displays "N/A" and the suggestion is tagged Low Confidence. - The lift detail panel shows model version and validation dataset timestamp.
Brand Guardrails Enforcement
- Suggestions never propose values outside brand guardrails defined in the active brand profile; attempts are blocked with the message: "Blocked by guardrail: {rule}". - Guardrails are enforced for both per-image and preset-level applies, including batch operations. - Overrides require a user with the "Brand Admin" role; otherwise the override control is disabled. - All blocked or overridden actions are logged with user, rule, old/new values, and timestamp in the audit trail.
One-click Auto-tune Preset
"As a time-pressed seller, I want one-click fixes that auto-tune the preset based on the meter’s guidance so that I can lock in a cohesive look with minimal effort."
Description

Applies selected meter suggestions to the active preset in a single action, creates a versioned draft, updates previews, and triggers automatic rescoring. Supports scoped application (entire batch, subset, or single image), instant undo, and side-by-side before/after comparison. Enforces safe bounds, respects locked brand settings, and writes an audit trail of parameter changes to support review and rollback.

Acceptance Criteria
One‑Click Apply Selected Meter Suggestions
Given an active preset with one or more Consistency Meter suggestions visible and at least one suggestion selected, When the user clicks "Auto‑tune Preset", Then the system creates a new draft preset version with an incremented version tag (e.g., vN+1) without altering the published preset, And applies only the selected suggestions to the draft parameters exactly as specified (including units), And validates all changes against schema and constraints prior to save; any invalid change is rejected with a field‑level error and no partial save occurs, And updates on‑canvas previews for the current scope within 2 seconds of save, And enqueues an automatic Consistency Meter rescore for the same scope within 1 second of save, And displays a success confirmation including the new draft version identifier.
Scoped Application (Batch, Subset, Single Image)
Given the user has chosen a scope (Entire batch | Selected subset | Current image), When "Auto‑tune Preset" is executed, Then only images within the chosen scope have previews and sidecar edits updated, And images outside the scope remain unchanged, And the Consistency Meter rescore job is created for the chosen scope only, And the UI reflects the active scope via a visible scope badge, And a progress indicator reports counts for total, completed, and failed items within the scope until processing completes.
Respect Locked Brand Settings and Safe Bounds
Given one or more brand settings are locked and safe bounds exist for all tunable parameters, When Auto‑tune attempts to modify any locked parameter, Then the locked parameters remain unchanged, And those suggestions are skipped with a non‑blocking notice listing each skipped field and reason "locked", And all applied parameter values are clamped within defined min/max bounds; any clamping is recorded and surfaced as an informational note, And the operation completes without errors and with remaining applicable suggestions applied.
Instant Undo of Auto‑tune
Given Auto‑tune has been applied to a draft in the current session, When the user clicks Undo, Then all parameter changes from the last Auto‑tune action are reverted atomically to the prior values, And previews revert to the prior state within 2 seconds, And a Consistency Meter rescore is triggered for the reverted state within 1 second, And the activity log records an undo entry referencing the reversed change set and resulting draft version.
Side‑by‑Side Before/After Comparison
Given the user has enabled side‑by‑side comparison, When Auto‑tune is applied, Then the "Before" pane displays the exact pre‑apply render frozen at the moment before changes, And the "After" pane displays the updated draft render, And zoom and pan remain synchronized between panes, And each pane is labeled with timestamp and version (Before: vN, After: vN+1).
Audit Trail of Parameter Changes with Versioning
Given Auto‑tune modifies the draft preset, When the draft is saved, Then an audit entry is created containing: ISO‑8601 timestamp, actor (user ID), action "auto_tune_apply", preset ID, new draft version tag, scope (type and counts), list of parameter deltas (field, previous value, new value, units), suggestion IDs applied, suggestions skipped with reason (locked/safe_bound_violation), and rescore job ID, And the audit entry is immutable and retrievable via Activity Log UI and API endpoint, And rollback can target this audit entry to restore the prior version in one action.
Outlier Reduction Feedback and Quick Fix Application
Given the Consistency Meter flags outliers and provides quick‑fix suggestions, When the user selects those suggestions and runs Auto‑tune, Then the subsequent rescore presents an updated score and delta versus prior for the scoped items, And previously flagged outliers are re‑evaluated and marked resolved or unresolved with counts displayed, And any unresolved outliers present follow‑up actionable suggestions, And the success notification summarizes score delta and count of outliers resolved.
Meter UI & Drilldown Dashboard
"As a user, I want a clear meter UI with drilldowns and previews so that I can understand why the score is low and confidently apply targeted adjustments."
Description

Provides a responsive UI component showing the primary Consistency Score, sub-score bars, and status badges with hover tooltips and plain-language explanations. Includes a drilldown modal with sortable thumbnails, per-metric filters, and a diff view to compare suggested adjustments. Offers keyboard navigation, accessible labels, and clear empty/error/loading states. Integrates into the batch upload flow and preset editor without blocking other actions and supports localization.

Acceptance Criteria
Primary Score and Sub-score Display (Responsive)
Given a processed sample set and an active preset When the Meter UI is rendered on a desktop viewport (width ≥ 1280px) Then the primary Consistency Score (0–100) and five labeled sub-score bars are visible without horizontal scrolling Given the same context When the viewport is mobile (width ≤ 480px) Then the primary score and sub-scores reflow into a single-column layout with no visual overlap and essential labels remain readable Given an adjustment to the active preset settings When the change is applied Then the primary and sub-scores visually update within 1000 ms
Status Badges and Tooltips with Plain-Language Explanations
Given sub-score thresholds configured for Good, Needs Review, and Outlier When a sub-score meets a threshold Then the correct status badge is shown with the mapped label and color and the mapping is consistent across views Given a status badge is hovered or keyboard-focused When the tooltip is triggered Then a tooltip appears within 200 ms containing a one-sentence explanation, the relevant threshold, and a suggested quick fix Given a tooltip is open When focus moves away or Escape is pressed Then the tooltip dismisses and focus returns to the triggering element
Drilldown Modal with Sortable Thumbnails and Per-Metric Filters
Given the user clicks View details from the Meter UI When the drilldown opens Then a modal overlays the page without navigation and initial focus is set to the modal header Given thumbnails with per-image scores are displayed When the user clicks a column header (Score, File name, Time) Then the grid sorts by that column and toggles between ascending and descending on subsequent clicks Given metric and status filters are available When the user selects a metric and a status Then only matching thumbnails remain visible and the filter chips reflect the active filters Given the user closes the modal When the modal is dismissed Then the underlying page scroll position and state are preserved
Diff View to Compare Suggested Adjustments
Given a thumbnail is selected in the drilldown When the user opens Diff view Then a side-by-side before and after is shown with a comparison slider and metric deltas Given quick fix suggestions are available for the selected image When the user applies a suggested adjustment Then the after preview updates and metric deltas recalculate within 1000 ms and an undo option becomes available Given the user cancels or undoes the change When the action is triggered Then the view reverts to the original state without residual visual artifacts
Keyboard Navigation and Accessibility Compliance
Given the Meter UI and drilldown are present When navigating by keyboard Then all interactive elements are reachable via Tab and Shift+Tab with a visible focus indicator and Enter or Space activates the focused control Given the drilldown modal is open When navigating Then focus is trapped within the modal and Escape closes the modal and focus returns to the previously focused trigger Given assistive technology users interact When screen readers announce elements Then the primary score, sub-scores, badges, and tooltips have accessible names and roles, and color contrast for text and essential indicators is at least 4.5:1
Empty, Error, and Loading States
Given no sample images are available When the Meter UI loads Then an empty state appears with a concise message and a primary action to add images and no errors are shown Given metrics are being computed When the user opens the Meter UI Then skeleton placeholders are shown until data arrives and no layout shift exceeds 100 px during loading Given an error occurs while fetching or computing metrics When the UI receives an error Then a non-technical message with an error reference code and a Retry action is displayed and the app remains responsive
Non-blocking Integration and Localization Support
Given the user is in the batch upload flow or preset editor When the Meter UI mounts Then Upload, Save Preset, and Apply Preset actions remain available and responsive and meter computation runs asynchronously Given the user navigates away mid-computation When the view changes Then computation is canceled or safely paused and no blocking dialogs prevent navigation and returning restores the last known state Given the user switches locale between en-US, fr-FR, and es-ES (and RTL ar) When the locale change is applied Then all visible strings come from localization files, numbers and dates format per locale conventions, RTL layouts mirror correctly, and no hard-coded text remains
Low-latency Incremental Scoring at Scale
"As a team lead, I want the meter to update quickly as images stream in so that my team doesn’t stall during large batch uploads."
Description

Meets real-time performance targets with initial scoring in ≤2 seconds for up to 50 images and ≤200 ms incremental updates per additional image at the 95th percentile. Uses batched inference, background workers, and cached features to minimize latency and compute cost. Degrades gracefully for very large sets, providing progressive results and queue status indicators. Includes telemetry, rate limiting, and backpressure controls to ensure stability under load.

Acceptance Criteria
P95 Initial Scoring ≤2s for First 50 Images
Given a user uploads up to 50 images and selects a style preset When the Consistency Meter starts scoring Then the first overall score and all per-image scores are displayed within 2,000 ms at the 95th percentile over at least 500 runs in a warm-service environment And fewer than 1% of runs exceed 5,000 ms And a visible progress indicator is shown until scores appear
P95 Incremental Update ≤200ms Per Additional Image
Given an already-scored set of 50 images When 1 to 10 additional images are added Then the overall score updates and the new image(s) receive scores with server-side latency ≤200 ms per image at P95, measured from enqueue to publish, across ≥500 runs And client UI renders the updated score(s) within 300 ms P95 from server publish And updates are streamed without requiring a page refresh
Progressive Results and Queue Status for Large Uploads
Given an upload of 5,000 images When scoring begins Then the UI displays progressive results with at least the first 50 scores within 3,000 ms and subsequent updates at intervals ≤2,000 ms And a queue status indicator shows items processed/total, current throughput (images/sec), and ETA, updated at least every 2,000 ms And no update gap exceeds 5,000 ms until processing completes
Telemetry and Alerts for Latency and Stability SLOs
Given production load When telemetry is collected Then metrics are emitted for initial and incremental latency (P50/P95/P99), queue depth, batch size distribution, cache hit rate, worker utilization, and error rates at 10-second resolution And dashboards visualize these metrics with 1-minute and 5-minute windows And alerts trigger when P95 initial latency >2,000 ms or P95 incremental latency >200 ms for 5 consecutive minutes, or 5xx error rate >0.5% for 5 minutes
Rate Limiting and Backpressure Under Multi-tenant Load
Given 100 tenants concurrently uploading totaling ≥20,000 images at ~200 requests/sec When a tenant exceeds its configured limit Then the API returns HTTP 429 with a Retry-After header and the excess work is queued or rejected without data loss And tenants under their limits continue to meet latency SLOs (P95 initial ≤2,000 ms; P95 incremental ≤200 ms) And system 5xx error rate remains ≤0.5% and worker CPU utilization ≤85%
Cached Features Accelerate Re-scoring
Given a previously scored batch is re-scored with the same preset within 15 minutes When scoring is re-triggered Then time to first 50 scores decreases by ≥60% compared to a cache-cold baseline measured the same day And cache hit rate for feature retrieval is ≥80% during the run And compute time (GPU/CPU seconds) per image is reduced by ≥50% as reported by telemetry

Channel Targets

Declare where images will go (Amazon, Etsy, Shopify, social) and Sprint auto‑sets compliant bounds for margins, backgrounds, DPI, and aspect ratios. You design once while PixelLift enforces the right constraints to pass marketplace checks later.

Requirements

Channel Rules Engine
"As a boutique seller, I want PixelLift to automatically apply channel-specific rules so that my images pass marketplace checks the first time."
Description

A centralized, versioned repository of marketplace and social channel compliance rules (e.g., aspect ratios, min/max dimensions, DPI, file types, file-size limits, background color/opacity, margin/safe-area, watermark/border allowances, color space). Rules support variants by channel, locale, and image role (e.g., Amazon Main vs Additional). Rules are expressed in a machine-readable schema consumed by the rendering pipeline and UI. PixelLift maintains default templates and updates them; admins can extend/override within workspaces. When a user declares targets, the engine resolves applicable constraints and exposes them as enforceable policies to processing, validation, and export services, ensuring consistent, auditably correct outputs.

Acceptance Criteria
Resolve Constraints for Declared Targets (Single Channel, Role, Locale)
- Given channel=Amazon, locale=US, role=Main Image, when targets are saved, then the rules engine returns a resolved policy scoped to those three dimensions. - The policy includes: aspect_ratio, min_width, max_width, min_height, max_height, min_dpi, allowed_file_types, max_file_size_bytes, background_color, background_opacity, safe_area_pct, watermark_allowed, border_allowed, color_space, and rule_version_id. - The policy payload includes source identifiers: channel_id, locale_id, role_id, template_version_id. - Resolution occurs within 200 ms at p95 under nominal load. - If any dimension is unknown, the engine returns HTTP 400 with error_code="UNKNOWN_TARGET_DIMENSION" and no policy is produced.
Workspace Rule Override Precedence and Audit Logging
- Given a workspace-level admin override on a rule (e.g., background_color) for channel=Amazon US Main Image, when resolving a policy, then the override value is returned and the default template value is not. - Overrides apply only within the originating workspace; other workspaces continue to resolve defaults. - All override create/update/delete actions are captured with actor_id, timestamp, change_diff, and version_id; the audit log is retrievable via an API and includes pagination. - Submitting an override with invalid schema is rejected with HTTP 422 and a list of schema violations; no changes are persisted. - Non-admin users attempting to create overrides receive HTTP 403.
Machine-Readable Rule Schema Validation and Coverage
- Rules are stored and retrieved as JSON conforming to schema version v1.x; JSON Schema validation passes for all default templates. - Required properties cannot be null or missing; invalid values trigger descriptive errors with JSON Pointer paths to the offending fields. - The engine exposes a validation operation that returns valid=true/false and violations[]; test suite includes at least 20 positive and 20 negative samples. - The schema supports variants by channel, locale, and image role; resolving selects the most specific matching rule per dimension. - Backward-compatible schema changes increment the minor version; incompatible changes increment the major version and are rejected unless a feature flag explicitly enables them.
Versioning, Pinning, and Update Propagation
- Each resolved policy includes rule_version_id and template_version_id; IDs are immutable and monotonically increasing. - When a batch job starts, it pins the rule_version_id; subsequent rule updates do not affect that job's processing, validation, or export. - New jobs created after a rule update automatically use the latest version by default; users may opt to pin to a prior version via API/UI. - Publishing a rule update propagates to resolution within 60 seconds; p95 publish-to-availability latency <= 60s. - A diff operation returns a structured comparison between two versions, including breaking_change=true/false and a list of impacted fields.
Enforcement During Processing, Validation, and Export
- Processing enforces resolved policies; any image violating a constraint is marked non-compliant with reason codes (e.g., ASPECT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE) and remediation hints. - The validation service returns per-image, per-target pass/fail with a complete list of violations and the rule_version_id used. - Export blocks non-compliant images by default; an authorized override flag is required to export non-compliant images, and the export includes a compliance report JSON alongside assets. - For a batch of 500 images, validation p95 latency per image <= 50 ms; validation completes successfully for >99% of images without timeouts. - Exported assets include a manifest embedding channel, locale, role, and rule_version_id; the manifest validates against a published JSON Schema.
Multi-Channel Targets and Per-Target Policy Output
- When multiple targets are declared (e.g., Amazon US Main, Etsy Listing, Instagram Feed), the engine returns a distinct policy object for each target with unique policy_id and rule_version_id. - The rendering pipeline receives a per-target policy map; it produces separate outputs when constraints differ and reuses a single output when constraints are identical; the number of outputs equals the count of unique policies. - Conflicting constraints across targets are not merged; the engine flags conflicts with a warning list and recommends multi-render; no single-output over-constraining occurs. - The UI and API display compliance status per target; a target can pass while another fails within the same batch. - For 10 combined targets across 100 images, policy resolution p95 latency per target <= 50 ms, and total memory overhead remains within 200 MB during resolution.
Target Selection & Preset Overrides
"As a store owner, I want to select my sales channels once per batch so that PixelLift enforces the right constraints without manual tweaks."
Description

An intuitive project/batch-level UI and API to declare one or more channel targets (Amazon, Etsy, Shopify, Instagram, etc.) with brand-default presets per workspace. Supports per-channel overrides (e.g., different background policy), per-image exceptions, and preset saving/sharing. Displays real-time rule summaries (badges for required dimensions, background, margins) and conflict warnings. Selections persist in project metadata, are version-aware with respect to rules, and drive downstream enforcement, validation, and export. Streamlines setup to a single step while enabling granular control when necessary.

Acceptance Criteria
Select Multiple Channel Targets at Project Level
Given a new project with no channels selected When the user selects Amazon and Etsy and clicks Save Then the project metadata stores ["amazon","etsy"] and the UI shows 2 selected Given a saved project with channels selected When the project is reloaded Then the previously selected channels remain selected with no duplicates Given a project with three channels selected When the user deselects Etsy and saves Then "etsy" is removed from project metadata and the badges update within 500 ms Given an attempt to add an unsupported channel ID When the selection is saved Then the save is rejected and a validation error message is shown
Apply Workspace Brand-Default Presets on New Project
Given workspace brand-default presets exist for Amazon and Etsy When a new project is created and those channels are selected Then the defaults auto-apply and are visible in the rule summary (background, margins, DPI, aspect ratio) Given no brand-default preset exists for a selected channel When the channel is added to the project Then PixelLift applies global defaults and marks them with a "Default" badge Given brand-default presets are changed at the workspace level When creating a new project after the change Then the new defaults apply to the new project, and existing projects remain unchanged Given an override was made and saved When the user clicks "Reset to default" for that channel Then the preset values revert to the brand-default values
Per-Channel Preset Override at Project Level
Given Amazon and Instagram are selected for a project When the user changes Instagram background to #F7F7F7 and leaves Amazon at #FFFFFF Then only Instagram's preset reflects #F7F7F7 and Amazon remains #FFFFFF Given a channel has at least one overridden field When viewing the channel list Then an "Overridden" indicator is shown for that channel Given a channel has overrides When the user clicks "Reset to default" for that channel Then all overridden fields revert to the channel's default preset and the indicator disappears Given channel overrides are saved When the project is re-opened Then the overrides persist exactly as saved
Per-Image Exception Overrides Within Batch
Given a batch of 100 images with Amazon and Etsy selected When the user sets a 10% margin exception for image IMG_001 on Amazon only Then only IMG_001 on Amazon uses 10% margin, while all other images and channels retain their channel-level settings Given 10 images are multi-selected When a 3000x3000 export size exception is applied for Etsy Then the exception applies to those 10 images on Etsy only Given an image has one or more exceptions When opening its details panel Then a badge lists each overridden property per channel Given exceptions exist on an image When the user clicks "Clear exceptions" Then the image reverts to the project/channel preset and exception badges are removed Given exceptions are set When exporting the batch Then the rendered outputs honor the exceptions for the affected images and channels
Real-Time Rule Summaries and Conflict Warnings
Given one or more channels are selected When viewing the rule summary panel Then badges show per-channel requirements for dimensions, background policy, margin bounds, DPI, and aspect ratio Given a setting violates a selected channel's rule When the user changes a value into a non-compliant state Then a conflict warning appears within 200 ms with guidance to restore compliance Given a conflict warning is visible When the user adjusts the value into the allowed range/policy Then the warning clears within 200 ms and the badge becomes compliant Given mutually incompatible settings across selected channels are detected When the summary is displayed Then the UI surfaces a non-blocking notice suggesting per-channel overrides and allows the project to be saved
Version-Aware Rule Persistence in Project Metadata
Given marketplace rule definitions are versioned with IDs When a project is saved with selected channels Then the project metadata stores ruleVersionIds per channel at time of save Given ruleVersionIds have been updated upstream When opening an existing project saved on older versions Then the stored versions remain active and a banner offers to upgrade with a changelog preview Given the user accepts an upgrade When confirmation is given Then the project switches to the new ruleVersionIds, revalidates, and displays any new conflicts introduced Given an export is performed When the export manifest is generated Then it records the ruleVersionIds used for validation and enforcement
Preset Saving and Sharing Across Workspace
Given a user with permission edits channel presets When the user saves the configuration as a named preset Then a preset with a unique ID is created and visible to all workspace members Given a shared preset exists When another member applies it to a project/channel Then all preset fields apply exactly and the action is audit logged with user, time, and preset version Given a preset is updated When changes are saved Then a new preset version is created; existing projects retain their previous version until explicitly upgraded Given a preset is deleted When it is referenced by existing projects Then those projects retain a frozen copy; the preset is no longer available for new applications
Auto-Adjust Constraint Enforcement
"As a catalog manager, I want PixelLift to auto-adjust images to meet channel requirements so that I don’t have to re-edit or reshoot."
Description

Non-destructive processing that automatically enforces selected channel constraints: canvas resize, smart crop/pad using subject-aware bounding boxes, background replacement/flattening, DPI resampling, color profile conversion, margin normalization, and format/quality optimization to meet file-size caps. Detects and removes/flags prohibited elements (e.g., watermarks, borders, text overlays) when rules require. Provides configurable strictness (auto-fix vs flag-only) and protects against quality loss via thresholds and skip-with-warning behavior. Ensures outputs meet compliance while preserving visual integrity and brand style.

Acceptance Criteria
Amazon Main Image Constraints Auto-Enforcement
Given a channel profile "Amazon Main Image" with constraints: background=#FFFFFF flattened; subject coverage 85–95% of canvas; aspect ratio 1:1; min longest side=1600 px; DPI=300; color profile=sRGB IEC61966-2.1; max file size=10 MB; prohibited elements: text, logos, watermarks, borders. When a batch of 50+ varied product photos is processed with Auto-Adjust Constraint Enforcement. Then each output: - has a pure white background (CIE ΔE2000 to #FFFFFF ≤ 1.0) and no transparency - maintains the detected subject fully inside frame; subject coverage is between 85% and 95%; edge padding ≥ 2% on all sides - is 1:1 aspect ratio; longest side ≥ 1600 px; metadata DPI set to 300 - embeds sRGB IEC61966-2.1; flattened single layer - is exported as JPEG with file size ≤ 10 MB while SSIM ≥ 0.98 vs the pre-optimization image - contains no prohibited elements; any removed elements are logged with reason codes - passes channel compliance validation with zero errors - leaves the original source files unmodified
Shopify Color Profile Conversion & File Size Optimization
Given a channel profile "Shopify Product" with constraints: target longest side=2048 px (upscale limit 2×), color profile=sRGB IEC61966-2.1, preferred export=WebP then JPEG, max file size cap=20 MB, quality threshold SSIM ≥ 0.98. When images are processed with Auto-Adjust Constraint Enforcement. Then each output: - has longest side set to 2048 px unless that requires >2× upscaling; in that case upscaling is limited to 2× and a "ResolutionLimit" warning is recorded - is converted to and embeds sRGB IEC61966-2.1 - is exported as WebP if it meets the cap with SSIM ≥ 0.98; otherwise exported as JPEG - has file size ≤ 20 MB; if meeting the cap would break SSIM ≥ 0.98, the system retains SSIM ≥ 0.98, attaches "SkipWithWarning:FileSize", and marks compliance=false
Social Square Crop with Subject-Aware Padding
Given a channel profile "Instagram Square" with constraints: aspect ratio 1:1; min size 1080×1080; safe margin ≥ 3% around detected subject; background preset="Gradient A"; color profile=sRGB; max file size=8 MB. When an image with an off-center subject is processed. Then the output: - is 1:1 with dimensions ≥ 1080×1080 via subject-aware crop/pad; no subject pixels are clipped (subject IoU ≥ 0.99 with pre-crop mask) - has ≥ 3% padding between the subject bounding box and each edge - replaces background with preset "Gradient A" and flattens layers - is in sRGB and ≤ 8 MB with SSIM ≥ 0.98 vs pre-optimization
Prohibited Elements Detection & Handling
Given a channel where prohibited elements include watermarks, borders, and text overlays, and strictness=Auto-Fix, and a test set containing examples for each violation plus clean images. When the batch is processed. Then: - watermarks are removed or masked without altering subject pixels (no change inside subject mask; Dice coefficient ≥ 0.99) - borders are trimmed and the canvas is re-padded/cropped to restore required margins and aspect ratio - text overlays not integral to the subject are removed; if removal would alter the subject, the image is flagged "RemovalRisk" and left unchanged - clean images are not modified - each action logs type, bounding box coordinates, and reason code; compliance=true where all violations are fixed; compliance=false for flagged images
Strictness Modes: Auto-Fix vs Flag-Only Behavior
Given the same violating input and channel constraints, with strictness toggled at the channel level. When strictness=Auto-Fix. Then all fixable violations are corrected automatically; unfixable violations are flagged; final compliance=true only if no violations remain; originals are unmodified; an audit trail lists each fix. When strictness=Flag-Only. Then no pixel-level changes are applied; all violations are detected and reported with reason codes; final compliance=false; suggested fixes are included in the report.
Quality Preservation Thresholds & Skip-with-Warning
Given a channel profile with a file size cap and quality thresholds SSIM ≥ 0.98 and PSNR ≥ 40 dB. When resampling or compression would require breaching thresholds to meet the file size cap. Then the system: - attempts alternate formats and qualities and selects the smallest file that maintains thresholds - if no setting meets the cap while maintaining thresholds, outputs the version that maintains thresholds, attaches "SkipWithWarning:QualityGuard", and marks compliance=false unless the channel allows "allow-near-cap ≤ 10%", in which case exceeding the cap by ≤ 10% is permitted and compliance=true
Non-Destructive Processing, History & Reversion
Given any channel constraints and an input image. When Auto-Adjust Constraint Enforcement is applied and the user later changes a rule and reprocesses. Then: - the original asset remains unchanged on disk - all operations are stored as an ordered, parameterized history - reprocessing starts from the original asset, not from a prior export; results are deterministic for identical inputs/configuration - the user can revert to any prior step and export again; exports are versioned and traceable to the source and configuration hash
Preflight Compliance Report
"As a marketer, I want a preflight report per channel so that I know what will fail and how to fix it before publishing."
Description

A pass/fail validator that checks each image against each selected channel’s rule set prior to export or publishing. Presents actionable diagnostics (what failed and why) with one-click fix suggestions, bulk apply, and preview. Summarizes blocking errors vs non-blocking warnings at batch and image levels. Exposes results via UI and downloadable CSV/JSON for audit/QA. Integrates with the rules engine for versioned, reproducible validation, reducing rejections and back-and-forth edits.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Preflight Validation Across Multiple Channels
Given a batch of at least 100 images and channels Amazon and Etsy selected with rules engine version v1.12 pinned When the user runs Preflight Validation Then each image is evaluated independently against each selected channel’s rule set And the report lists for every image–channel pair a status of Pass, Fail, or Warn And the batch summary displays counts of Pass, Fail, and Warn across all images and channels And validation completes without error within 120 seconds for a batch of up to 500 images on the standard plan
Blocking Errors vs Warnings Summary
Given the rules define severities Blocking and Warning When validation completes Then the batch header shows total Blocking Errors and total Warnings separately And each image row shows per-channel chips for Blocking and Warning counts And a filter “Show blocking only” lists only images with one or more blocking errors And non-blocking warnings do not prevent export, but remain visible in summaries
Actionable Diagnostics and One-Click Fix with Preview
Given a failed rule (e.g., background color non-compliant for Amazon) When the user opens the image detail panel Then the panel lists each failed rule with channel, ruleId, severity, human-readable message, and suggested fix And a “Preview Fix” shows a non-destructive preview of the adjustment When the user clicks “Apply Fix” Then the image variant is updated and validation re-runs for affected channels And “Bulk Apply All Suggested Fixes” applies the corresponding fixes across all applicable images and re-runs validation And all applied fixes are logged with timestamp, user, and affected imageIds
Exportable Compliance Report (CSV and JSON)
Given preflight validation has been executed When the user downloads the CSV report Then the file contains one row per image–channel–rule with columns: batchId, imageId, filename, channel, ruleId, ruleVersion, severity, status, message, fixSuggested, fixApplied, timestamp And when the user downloads the JSON report Then it contains the same fields grouped by image and channel and validates against schema version 2.0 And exported filenames include batchId and ISO-8601 timestamp And exports complete within 30 seconds for up to 10,000 rows
Reproducible Validation via Versioned Rules
Given channels are selected and the rules engine exposes versioned rule sets When validation runs Then the report header records the exact rules version ID per channel And re-running validation on the same images with the same pinned versions yields identical results And when a newer rules version is available, the UI displays an “Update available” indicator and offers “Revalidate with latest” Then results from the latest run are labeled with the new version and do not overwrite prior results unless confirmed by the user
Preflight Gate Prior to Export or Publish
Given a batch contains images with mixed Pass, Fail, and Warn results When the user opens the Export/Publish dialog Then channels with any blocking errors have export toggles disabled and show the count of blocking issues And channels with zero blocking errors are enabled for export And a “View issues” link opens the report filtered to the selected channel and blocking errors And attempting to export a channel with blocking errors is prevented and shows an error listing up to three blocking issues with a link to view all; warnings do not block export
Multi-Channel Derivative Export
"As an operations lead, I want per-channel exports with correct naming and metadata so that my upload automations and listings just work."
Description

Generation of per-channel, per-variant outputs from a single design, applying naming conventions, folder structures, and embedded metadata mappings appropriate to each destination. Handles color profile normalization (e.g., sRGB), background flattening/alpha handling, DPI setting, and compression strategies tuned to hit file-size limits without visible artifacts. Supports parallelized, resumable batch export with deterministic outputs for caching and duplicate detection. Ensures ready-to-upload assets for every target with minimal manual handling.

Acceptance Criteria
Per-Channel Variant Export From Single Design
Given a project with one base design, 3 channel targets (Amazon, Etsy, Shopify), and 4 product variants When Multi-Channel Derivative Export is triggered Then exactly 12 output images are produced (3 channels × 4 variants) And each file name matches the channel’s naming template (including SKU, VariantID, and Channel suffix) And each file is placed under the correct channel/variant folder structure as configured And the export summary reports counts per channel and variant that match files on disk
Metadata Mapping & Embed Per Destination
Given a channel-specific metadata mapping defining required keys and prohibited fields When the export completes Then each output embeds exactly the mapped metadata for its destination (e.g., SKU, VariantID, Channel, AltText) And prohibited metadata (e.g., GPS, camera serial) is removed And validating metadata with the built-in checker returns 0 errors and 0 warnings for all files
Color Profile Normalization & Background Handling
Given inputs may contain varied color profiles and transparency When exporting to channels that require sRGB and opaque backgrounds Then outputs are converted to sRGB IEC61966-2.1 and transparency is flattened to the configured background color And for channels that allow transparency, alpha is preserved and no background flattening occurs And measured color difference after conversion is ΔE00 ≤ 2 against the reference transform And exported files include exactly one embedded sRGB profile tag
DPI, Aspect Ratio, and Margin Compliance
Given each channel profile defines target pixel bounds, aspect ratio, DPI tag, and content margins When the export runs Then each output’s pixel dimensions and aspect ratio fall within the specified constraints for its channel And DPI metadata matches the channel profile value And auto-crop/pad operations do not clip the detected product bounding box (0 clipped pixels) And channel compliance validation passes 100% for all outputs
Compression & File Size Compliance With Quality Guardrails
Given each channel defines a maximum file size and recommended codec/quality settings When encoder settings are applied during export Then every output is ≤ the channel’s max file size And structural similarity SSIM ≥ 0.98 and PSNR ≥ 40 dB versus the pre-compression rendered image And no visible blocking/ringing is detected by the artifact detector (0 flagged tiles) And the export log records the chosen quality level and number of encode passes per file (≤ 3 attempts)
Parallelized Resumable Batch Export
Given a batch of 500 images with concurrency set to 8 workers When the export is paused at 37% and later resumed Then previously completed files are not reprocessed and the job resumes from the last confirmed checkpoint And no partial/corrupted files are present (all outputs are written atomically) And final produced file count equals the expected total and matches the manifest And average CPU utilization of workers remains within configured limits without worker crashes (0 worker failures)
Deterministic Outputs, Caching, and Duplicate Detection
Given identical inputs and channel configurations across two runs When Multi-Channel Derivative Export is executed twice Then all outputs are byte-identical with matching checksums and metadata across runs And unchanged items are served from cache on the second run (cache hit rate ≥ 90% when no inputs changed) And duplicate detection prevents emitting multiple identical files to the same destination (0 duplicate files), with dedup events logged
Direct Publish Connectors
"As a seller, I want to publish directly to my stores and marketplaces so that I can go live faster without downloading and reuploading files."
Description

Optional connectors to publish validated assets directly to Shopify, Etsy, Amazon (SP-API), and social platforms. Provides OAuth account linking, per-store/channel mapping, SKU/handle association, destination collection/album selection, and dry-run mode. Implements queued, rate-limited uploads with retries, webhook/callback handling, and clear error surfacing. Adheres to each platform’s API constraints and quotas, enabling end-to-end flow from design to live listing without manual downloads/uploads.

Acceptance Criteria
OAuth Account Linking and Token Management
- Given I am an org admin and select "Connect Shopify" from Direct Publish Connectors, when I complete the OAuth flow successfully, then the connector status changes to "Linked" and displays the store domain and shop ID. - Given an access token has expired, when a publish job is initiated, then the system refreshes the token using the stored refresh token and retries the request once without user action. - Given I click "Unlink" for a linked connector, when I confirm, then all tokens are revoked at the provider (if supported), deleted from storage, audit-logged, and the connector status becomes "Not linked". - Given multiple stores/accounts are linked for a provider, when I view publish settings, then each account is selectable independently with its own saved configuration. - Rule: Access and refresh tokens are stored encrypted at rest and redacted in logs and UI.
Per-Store/Channel Mapping and Destination Selection
- Given multiple channels are linked (Shopify, Etsy, Amazon, social), when I configure per-store/channel mappings for a project, then the mapping is saved and preselected on subsequent publish flows. - Given Shopify is selected, when I choose one or more destination collections and/or a product handle, then published images are attached to the specified product and the product is assigned to the selected collections. - Given Etsy is selected, when I specify a listing ID (draft or active), then images are uploaded to that listing's gallery in the configured order. - Given Amazon (SP-API) is selected, when I specify Seller SKU(s) and marketplace, then images are attached to the correct catalog item(s) under the selected marketplace. - Given a selected channel is missing required destination details, when I attempt to start a publish job, then validation fails with a blocking message identifying the channel and missing fields.
SKU/Handle Association and Image Attachment
- Given assets carry SKU/handle metadata or a mapping table is provided, when publishing to Shopify, then each image attaches to the product matching the handle or SKU per the mapping. - Given publishing to Amazon, when an image is marked as "MAIN" vs "ADDITIONAL", then it is submitted to the corresponding image slot (MAIN or PT01–PT08) for the specified SKU. - Given duplicate images are mapped to multiple variants of the same product, when publishing, then the image is uploaded once and associated to each variant as allowed by the platform without duplicate uploads. - Given no matching SKU/handle is found for an asset, when validating, then the asset is flagged as "Unmapped" and is excluded from publishing with an actionable error.
Dry-Run Mode Publish Simulation
- Given Dry Run is enabled, when I start a publish job, then no external write calls are executed and no assets are created/modified on any platform. - Then a per-asset simulation report is generated including target channel, destination identifier (e.g., shop ID, listing ID, SKU), intended slot/position, and predicted payload size. - Given Dry Run, when constraints or mappings are invalid, then the same validation errors are surfaced as in a real publish and the job result shows 0 successful publishes. - Rule: Audit logs for Dry Run include only simulated requests and explicitly mark the job as "Dry Run".
Queued, Rate-Limited Uploads with Retries and Idempotency
- Given a publish job with 500+ assets across channels, when the job runs, then uploads are queued and processed with a maximum concurrency of 5 per channel by default (configurable). - Given a 429 or rate-limit response is received, when retrying, then the system honors Retry-After headers (if present) and uses exponential backoff with jitter up to 5 attempts before marking the asset as failed. - Rule: Each asset publish attempt uses a stable idempotency key per channel (jobId+assetId) so that retries do not create duplicate images within a 24-hour window. - Given the worker service restarts mid-job, when it resumes, then already-succeeded assets are not re-sent and remaining queued items continue processing.
Webhook/Callback Handling and Status Synchronization
- Given a provider emits success/failure callbacks for image uploads, when a webhook is received, then the corresponding asset/job status updates within 30 seconds and stores external identifiers (e.g., Shopify image ID). - Given no webhook is received within 10 minutes of a request, when the job is still pending, then the system polls the provider every 60 seconds up to 30 minutes or until completion, after which remaining items time out as failed. - Rule: Duplicate or out-of-order callbacks are handled idempotently and do not regress a terminal status. - Then the user-facing job summary shows counts by channel: Succeeded, Failed, Skipped, and Pending, with downloadable error details.
Marketplace Constraint Validation and Blocking Pre-Publish
- Given Channel Targets are applied, when an asset violates a selected channel's requirements (e.g., Amazon MAIN not on pure white background, aspect ratio outside bounds, DPI below minimum, margins outside limits, max file size exceeded), then the asset is blocked from publish with a specific, per-violation message and proposed fix. - Given all selected assets meet their channel constraints, when I start a publish job, then pre-flight validation passes in under 10 seconds per 1,000 assets and the job proceeds to queue. - Rule: Blocked assets are excluded from API calls; the publish job proceeds for compliant assets and reports the count and reasons for exclusions per channel.
Rule Change Monitoring & Alerts
"As a brand admin, I want to be alerted when marketplace rules change so that my presets stay compliant and exports continue to pass."
Description

Continuous monitoring of marketplace documentation and PixelLift-maintained rule templates to detect changes. On updates, creates a new rules version, shows human-readable diffs, notifies workspace admins (in-app, email, Slack), and proposes migration of presets/targets with effective-date scheduling. Triggers automatic re-validation of affected projects and flags at-risk exports. Maintains an audit log of rule versions applied to each asset for traceability and compliance evidence.

Acceptance Criteria
Rule Change Detection and Version Creation
Given a monitored rules source (marketplace documentation or PixelLift template) publishes a material change When the monitoring job next runs (<= configured polling interval) Then the system detects the delta and creates a new immutable rules version with unique versionId, channelTarget, source, createdAt, and parentVersionId And Then no new version is created if the normalized rules JSON is unchanged versus the latest version (idempotent) And Then the new version is persisted and visible in the Rules Library list
Human-Readable Diffs for Updated Rules
Given a new rules version exists When an admin opens the diff view Then the UI shows added, removed, and modified constraints with plain-language labels and old vs new values for margins, background, DPI, and aspect ratio And Then the diff view displays the total number of changes and the count of impacted presets/targets And Then a link to the diff is available for sharing with other admins
Admin Notifications (In-App, Email, Slack) on Rule Update
Given a new rules version is created When notifications are dispatched Then all workspace admins receive an in-app alert, an email, and a Slack message (if a webhook is configured) within one polling interval containing channel name, versionId, change summary, link to diff, and impacted preset/target counts And Then if Slack delivery fails, the failure is logged and email/in-app delivery still succeeds
Preset/Target Migration Proposal with Effective-Date Scheduling
Given a new rules version exists When an admin opens the migration wizard Then the system lists all impacted presets and channel targets with per-item change summaries and a selectable checkbox And Then the admin can schedule an effective date/time (with timezone) for migration and preview the resulting constraints And Then upon confirmation, scheduled migration jobs are created and tracked with statuses (pending, running, completed, failed) And Then at the effective time, selected presets/targets are atomically updated to reference the new rules version
Automatic Re-Validation and At-Risk Export Flagging
Given a new rules version is created When automatic re-validation runs Then assets in affected projects and channel targets are re-validated against the new rules and results are recorded And Then any existing exports that would fail under the new rules are flagged At Risk with the failing constraints listed And Then At-Risk flags are visible in the dashboard and on project pages with links to the failing assets
Asset-Level Audit Log and Compliance Evidence
Given any asset has been validated or exported When viewing its audit log Then entries show ruleVersionId, channelTargetId, validation outcome, timestamp, and actor (system/user) for each event And Then audit entries are immutable and can be filtered by asset, project, channel, and ruleVersionId And Then the audit log can be exported to CSV for a selected time range
Source Attribution and Impact Scoping
Given a rules update is detected When viewing the version details Then the source is labeled as Marketplace Documentation or PixelLift Template with a source URL or internal reference And Then the scope of impact is enumerated (channels and constraint categories changed) And Then only impacted presets/targets are included in migration proposals and re-validation

Batch Validator

Run your new preset on a small test batch and get instant feedback: pass/fail reasons, visual diffs, and estimated processing time and cost. Accept or tweak with one click, ensuring you only roll out settings that meet standards and timelines.

Requirements

Sample Set Builder
"As a boutique owner, I want to run my preset on a representative subset of my catalog so that I can validate quality and timing without processing the entire batch."
Description

Enable users to select and generate a small, representative test batch (e.g., 10–50 images) from an uploaded catalog to validate a style-preset before full rollout. Provide selection modes (random, stratified by product/category/SKU, and outlier-focused sampling such as low-resolution or atypical aspect ratios) with configurable caps to control spend. Display sample composition and representativeness indicators (e.g., coverage by category, lighting, background types). Integrates with PixelLift’s catalog metadata and image analysis services to tag images for stratification and to precompute attributes used in sampling.

Acceptance Criteria
Random Sample Generation (10–50 images)
Given an uploaded catalog with at least 50 images and Random mode selected When the user requests a sample size between 10 and 50 (inclusive) and confirms Then the system returns exactly the requested number of unique images within 3 seconds for catalogs up to 10,000 items And each image has an equal selection probability (±2% over 100 repeated draws with fixed parameters) And if the catalog contains fewer images than requested, the system blocks generation and displays a validation error explaining the minimum and current counts And if a random seed S is provided, repeated generation with the same catalog snapshot and S returns the identical image set
Stratified Sampling by Category/SKU
Given an uploaded catalog with category and SKU metadata available and Stratified mode selected When the user requests N images and chooses proportional by category (default) or custom targets per category/SKU Then the sample contains items per stratum that match the target distribution within ±1 item per stratum or ±5% (whichever is larger), and totals equal N And strata with no available items are omitted and reported; shortfalls are reallocated proportionally to remaining strata And at least one item per present stratum is included when N >= number of strata, unless explicitly excluded by the user And the composition summary displays counts and percentages per stratum matching the actual sample
Outlier-Focused Sampling (low-res, atypical aspect ratios)
Given image analysis tags (resolution, aspect ratio, background type) are available and Outlier-focused mode is selected When the user defines outlier rules (e.g., lowest 10% resolution and aspect ratio outside 0.75–1.5) and requests N images Then at least 60% of the sample satisfies at least one outlier rule or the maximum possible if fewer outliers exist, with any shortfall backfilled by random non-outliers And the sample metadata lists which rules each selected image matched And if fewer than 5 outliers exist, the system warns the user before generation And generation completes within 5 seconds for catalogs up to 10,000 items
Spend Cap Enforcement and Cost/Time Estimation
Given pricing per image is available and a spend cap is set by image count or currency When the user requests a sample size N that would exceed the cap Then the system suggests the maximum allowable sample size K that fits the cap, with estimated cost and processing time, and blocks sizes > K unless the cap is changed And the estimated cost equals unit price × selected image count within ±$0.01 rounding tolerance and updates within 1 second of parameter changes And if pricing is unavailable, the system disables cap-by-currency and informs the user
Representativeness Indicators Display
Given a generated sample and catalog attribute distributions (category, lighting, background) are available When the composition is displayed Then indicators show counts and percentages for each attribute value for both sample and catalog And any attribute value whose sample percentage deviates by more than 20% relative from the catalog is flagged with a warning icon and tooltip And coverage includes at least 90% of attribute values present in the catalog when N >= number of values, otherwise a warning explains limitations And the indicators render within 2 seconds and can be exported as CSV
Integration with Metadata and Image Analysis Services
Given access to catalog metadata and image analysis services When sampling requires tags not present locally Then the builder requests and caches required tags before selection, with each external call retried up to 3 times with exponential backoff And if either service is unavailable after retries, only Random mode remains enabled with a non-blocking alert explaining reduced functionality And all selected images in the sample are saved with their tags and sampling mode in the sample record for audit
Persist and Reuse Sample Definitions
Given a configured sampling setup (mode, parameters, seed, filters) When the user saves the sample definition Then the definition is stored with a unique ID and can be rerun later to produce the same image set when executed against the same catalog snapshot and seed And if the catalog has changed, rerun displays differences and requires confirmation before regenerating And users can rename, duplicate, and delete saved definitions; deletes are soft-deleted and recoverable for 30 days
Validation Rule Engine
"As a brand manager, I want explicit pass/fail criteria with clear reasons so that I can ensure images meet our standards and marketplace requirements."
Description

Provide a configurable rules framework that evaluates processed test images against brand and marketplace standards to yield clear pass/fail outcomes and human-readable reasons. Support rules such as background uniformity and color tolerance, subject centering and margin bounds, minimum resolution and aspect ratio, shadow/halo tolerances, color palette adherence, compression/file size limits, and watermark detection. Include default rulesets (e.g., Amazon white background, Shopify guidelines) and allow custom thresholds per workspace. Compute per-image metrics and aggregate pass rate, highlight failing rules with guidance, and expose an extensible metrics registry for future criteria.

Acceptance Criteria
Core Rule Suite Evaluation on Test Batch
Given a configured ruleset "Amazon Default" with thresholds: background L*a*b* std dev <= 2.0; background mean deltaE to pure white <= 3.0; subject margins between 5% and 15% of image edges; subject centroid offset <= 2% of image width/height; minimum resolution >= 1600x1600 px; aspect ratio = 1:1 ± 1%; shadow/halo opacity <= 5%; color palette adherence >= 95% to brand palette; file size <= 2 MB; JPEG quality >= 85; watermark detection confidence <= 0.10 When a test batch of N images is processed with a selected preset Then each image is marked Pass only if all enabled rules are satisfied within thresholds, otherwise Fail with failing rules listed per image
Default Marketplace Rulesets Availability and Selection
Given a workspace with no custom rules defined When the user selects "Amazon Default" or "Shopify Default" Then the engine loads the corresponding predefined rule bundle with documented thresholds and enabled rule list And running validation applies those rules without additional configuration And switching between defaults updates the active bundle and subsequent validation outcomes accordingly
Workspace Threshold Overrides and Precedence
Given a workspace that duplicates "Amazon Default" into "Brand A - Amazon" And overrides: background deltaE <= 2.5, min margin >= 8%, max file size <= 1.5 MB When validation runs under "Brand A - Amazon" Then the engine uses the overridden thresholds for evaluation And unspecified thresholds inherit from the base ruleset And changes to the base ruleset after duplication do not alter overridden values in the workspace version And any rule disabled at workspace level is not evaluated
Aggregate Pass Rate and Metrics Export
Given a processed test batch of N images with per-image rule evaluations and metrics recorded When validation completes Then the engine returns aggregate pass rate = (count of images with Pass)/N to two decimal places And returns batch-level summaries (mean, p95) for background deltaE, centroid offset, margin min/max, resolution, aspect ratio, file size, watermark confidence And exports per-image metrics in a documented schema including ruleId, metric name, value, threshold, and pass boolean
Failing Rule Reasons and Actionable Guidance
Given any image that fails one or more rules When the validation report is generated Then each failing rule includes: rule name, measured value, threshold, delta from threshold, and a concise remediation tip And remediation tips reference relevant preset controls (e.g., "Increase background cleanup to 70–80%") And reasons are human-readable and do not expose internal model IDs
Extensible Metrics Registry and New Rule Onboarding
Given a new metric plugin "specularHighlightRatio" registered with id "metric.specularHighlightRatio" and documentation And a new rule "MaxSpecularHighlightRatio" configured to use that metric with threshold <= 0.12 When the engine loads the registry Then the new metric is discoverable via API and usable in rule expressions without core engine changes And validation using a ruleset that includes the new rule evaluates it and affects Pass/Fail as expected And removing the plugin cleanly invalidates the dependent rule with a descriptive configuration error
Deterministic Evaluation and Repeatability
Given the same input image bytes, preset, and ruleset version When validation is executed multiple times on the same hardware and configuration Then per-image metrics and Pass/Fail outcomes are identical across runs And outputs include the ruleset version hash and preset version to enable reproducibility
Visual Diff Viewer
"As a photo editor, I want to visually compare before-and-after results with rule overlays so that I can quickly spot issues and decide whether the preset is acceptable."
Description

Provide an interactive viewer to compare original vs. processed images with side-by-side and overlay modes, adjustable opacity slider, zoom/pan, grid and safe-margin overlays, clipping and color gamut warnings, and rule annotations directly on the image (e.g., centering boxes, background masks). Allow quick navigation across the sample set, keyboard shortcuts for review speed, and download/export of processed samples. Ensure responsive performance for large images and accessibility compliance for controls and annotations.

Acceptance Criteria
Compare Modes and Opacity Control
Given a test batch image pair is open in the Visual Diff Viewer When the user toggles view mode via UI or hotkey "M" Then the viewer switches between Side-by-Side and Overlay within 150 ms and preserves zoom/pan state Given Overlay mode is active When the user adjusts opacity via slider, arrow keys (1% step), or Shift+Arrow (10% step) Then overlay opacity updates continuously at ≥30 fps and the current percentage is displayed and announced to assistive tech Given the reviewer advances to the next image When no changes are made to display settings Then the last-used mode and opacity persist across images in the session
Synchronized Zoom and Pan Performance
Given Side-by-Side mode with 24–50 MP images When the user zooms via wheel/pinch (5%–800%) or double-click to 100% and pans via drag/space-drag Then both panes stay synchronized within 1 px, interactions render at ≥60 fps (24 MP) or ≥30 fps (50 MP), and reset ("R") completes within 100 ms Given the user holds "Alt" When panning or zooming Then panes temporarily desynchronize and revert to sync on release Given the viewer is resized from 1280x800 to 4K When maintaining current zoom Then content scales without pixelation beyond source resolution and maintains centering
Overlays and Rule Annotations
Given overlays are toggled via "G" (grid) and "S" (safe margin) When enabled Then a rule-of-thirds grid and a safe-margin overlay (default 5%, adjustable 0–20% in 1% steps) render on both panes with opacity 10–60% and persist across images Given rule annotations are toggled via "T" When enabled Then centering crosshair, subject bounding box, and background mask appear with labels; center deviation and fill percentage are shown with numeric readouts accurate to ±1 px/±0.5% Given any overlay or annotation is visible When tabbing through controls Then each has an accessible name, ARIA state, and visible focus indicator meeting WCAG 2.2 AA contrast
Clipping and Color Gamut Warnings
Given the warnings toggle "W" is activated When evaluating the processed image against its embedded or assigned color profile Then clipped pixels (<=0.5% or >=99.5% per channel) and out-of-gamut pixels (relative to sRGB or the selected profile) are highlighted with distinct legends and counts Given synthetic test charts with known clipped and out-of-gamut regions When analyzed Then the viewer reports pixel counts within ±1% tolerance of ground truth and updates the legend in under 150 ms Given warnings overlay is active with other overlays When overlay opacity is adjusted Then all overlays remain distinguishable with a minimum 3:1 contrast against the image content
Sample Navigation and Keyboard Shortcuts
Given a sample set of 200 images When navigating with Right/Left arrows, Home/End, or clicking thumbnails in the filmstrip Then the next image renders within 300 ms on cache hit and 800 ms on first load, with prefetch of the next two images Given keyboard shortcuts are used When pressing "M", "R", "G", "S", "T", or "W", or holding Space for pan Then the mapped action occurs and a non-intrusive toast shows the action name and shortcut for 2 seconds Given the first or last image is in view When pressing Left at first or Right at last Then navigation wraps around only if "Wrap" is enabled; otherwise an edge hint is shown and focus remains
Download/Export Processed Samples and Reports
Given one or more samples are selected When the user clicks "Download Processed" Then a ZIP containing processed images with original filenames and a JSON summary (image_id, pass/fail reasons, diff metrics, processing time and cost estimates) is generated and downloaded Given a selection of up to 50 images totaling ≤500 MB When exporting Then the ZIP is prepared server-side and the download starts within 10 seconds; progress is displayed and the operation is cancellable Given color profiles are embedded in processed files When files are exported Then processed images retain the intended ICC profile and metadata is preserved or stripped according to export settings
Accessibility and Compliance
Given keyboard-only navigation When reviewing all controls and overlays Then all functions are operable via keyboard with a logical focus order and visible focus states Given a screen reader such as NVDA, JAWS, or VoiceOver When announcing UI controls and overlay states Then controls expose accessible names, roles, states, and live updates; opacity, zoom, and mode changes are announced within 500 ms Given WCAG 2.2 AA criteria When auditing color contrast, target sizes, and motion Then controls meet contrast ≥4.5:1, interactive targets are ≥24x24 px, reduced-motion preference disables animated transitions, and no content flashes more than 3 times per second
Time & Cost Estimator
"As an independent seller, I want to know how long processing will take and what it will cost so that I can plan my listing schedule and stay within budget."
Description

Estimate total processing time and monetary cost for running the selected preset across the entire batch by extrapolating from the test run, factoring in current queue load, hardware tier, image resolution distribution, and pricing rules. Present min/avg/max time ranges, confidence indicators, and currency breakdown. Update estimates dynamically when the preset, rules, or sample composition changes. Persist the estimate alongside the validation report and surface alerts if estimates exceed workspace budgets or SLA targets.

Acceptance Criteria
Extrapolate from Test Batch to Full Batch
Given a completed test batch of at least 10 images processed with preset P and recorded per-image timings and costs by resolution bucket When the estimator is opened for a full batch of M images Then the total estimated cost equals the sum over resolution buckets of (avg per-image cost from the test batch × image count in the full batch) using the current pricing rules, with rounding tolerance ≤ ±0.01 in the workspace currency And the total estimated processing time equals the sum over resolution buckets of (avg per-image processing time from the test batch × image count in the full batch), expressed in minutes And images flagged as unsupported are excluded from both totals and displayed as an excluded count
Factor Real-Time Queue Load and Hardware Tier
Given a current queue load Q (jobs ahead) and a selected hardware tier T with a configured performance multiplier When the estimator computes time ranges Then the ranges include queue wait time based on Q and the rolling average per-job time, and are scaled by the multiplier for T And the UI displays the current Q and selected T alongside the estimate And changing T updates the time estimates within 2 seconds of selection
Present Time Ranges with Confidence Indicator
Given test batch size N and coefficient of variation cv derived from per-image processing times When computing and displaying the estimate Then the UI shows numeric min, avg, and max durations with units (minutes/hours) and ensures min ≤ avg ≤ max And a confidence badge is displayed as High if N ≥ 50 and cv ≤ 0.20, Medium if N ≥ 20 and cv ≤ 0.35, else Low And the badge tooltip communicates expected error bounds: High ±15%, Medium ±25%, Low ±40%
Show Currency and Cost Breakdown
Given workspace currency settings and active pricing rules (base, hardware surcharges, preset surcharges, discounts) When the estimator displays cost Then the UI shows currency code and symbol and a breakdown with per-image average, batch total, and line items (base, surcharges, discounts) And totals equal the sum of line items, rounded to two decimals, with no hidden adjustments And the pricing rules version/timestamp used is visible in a tooltip or details panel
Dynamic Refresh on Preset/Rules/Sample Changes
Given the estimator panel is open When the user changes preset settings, pricing rules, or the test batch composition (add/remove images) Then the estimate recalculates and the UI refreshes within 2 seconds And an "Updated" timestamp and change highlight are shown And if recalculation fails, an inline error is shown and the prior estimate is labeled "Stale" and visually dimmed
Persist Estimate with Validation Report
Given a completed test run with an active estimate When the user saves or exports the validation report Then the estimate (time ranges, confidence, cost breakdown, and inputs snapshot: preset version, pricing rules version, queue timestamp, hardware tier, resolution distribution) is persisted with the report And reopening the report later shows the same values regardless of subsequent changes to presets or pricing rules And the report appears in the Batch Validator history with the estimate accessible from the list and detail views
Budget and SLA Exceedance Alerts
Given a workspace remaining budget B and SLA target T_sla When the estimated total cost exceeds B Then a blocking red alert states the overage amount and the "Accept" action is disabled unless the user has override permission and confirms When the estimated average or P95 processing time exceeds T_sla Then a non-blocking amber warning states the delta and provides actions to adjust preset, choose a faster hardware tier, or reduce batch size
One-click Accept/Tweak/Retry
"As a shop owner, I want to accept or adjust my preset and revalidate with minimal friction so that I can confidently roll out settings without wasting time."
Description

Provide primary actions to either accept the current preset and launch full-batch processing, open the preset editor with current settings for tweaks, or re-run the validator with a new sample in one click. Gate acceptance on meeting a configurable pass-rate threshold or require explicit override with confirmation and reason. Ensure idempotent job creation, atomic transition from validation to production run, and real-time status updates/notifications. Preserve context so edits in the preset editor can be revalidated and compared to prior runs.

Acceptance Criteria
Accept gated by pass-rate threshold with explicit override
Given an organization-level or preset-level pass-rate threshold is configured (default 95%) and the latest validator run is completed When the validator results screen loads Then the Accept button is enabled only if pass-rate >= threshold and disabled otherwise Given the Accept button is disabled due to threshold not met When the user selects Override Then a confirmation modal requires a reason of at least 10 characters, displays the current pass-rate and threshold, and shows an explicit warning about risks Given the user confirms the override with a valid reason When the override is submitted Then the production run is initiated and an audit log entry is recorded with userId, timestamp, presetVersion, validatorRunId, pass-rate, threshold, and override reason Given the pass-rate >= threshold When the user clicks Accept Then the production run is initiated without requiring an override modal
Atomic promotion and idempotent production job creation
Given a validator run meets gating (or override confirmed) When the user clicks Accept Then exactly one production job is created with an idempotency key composed of orgId + batchId + presetVersion + validatorRunId and duplicate attempts within 5 minutes do not create additional jobs Given the job creation succeeds When transitioning from validation to production Then the validator run is marked Promoted atomically only after the job is persisted and a jobId is returned; otherwise the run remains Unpromoted and an actionable error is shown Given the job is created When viewing the job details Then metadata includes presetVersion, validatorRunId, source batchId, item counts, and a snapshot of estimated time and cost as of acceptance
One-click Tweak opens editor with preserved context and compare
Given a completed validator run is in view When the user clicks Tweak Then the preset editor opens preloaded with the exact settings used by the latest run and the sampled images, metrics, and diffs context are preserved Given the editor is open with preserved context When the user clicks Revalidate Then a new validator run executes against the same sample by default, with an option to pick a different sample, and the results view shows side-by-side comparison to the prior run (scores, pass/fail reasons, and visual diffs) Given the user saves changes and exits the editor When returning to the validator results view Then the latest run is selected, prior runs remain available in history, and filters/selections persist across page refresh
One-click Retry runs validator with a new sample
Given a completed validator run is in view When the user clicks Retry Then a one-step sample picker offers Last Sample, Random (10, 50, 100), and Custom selection options with Random 50 preselected, and starting the run requires a single confirm click Given a new validator run is started via Retry When the run begins Then the UI reflects Validating state within 3 seconds and shows an updated time and cost estimate Given the Retry run completes When results are displayed Then pass/fail reasons, visual diffs, and summary metrics are shown and Accept gating is recalculated from this latest run Given rate limits are in place When more than 5 validator runs are triggered for the same preset within 60 seconds Then the Retry control is disabled and a cooldown countdown is displayed until limits reset
Real-time status updates and notifications
Given a validator run or production job is active When backend status changes occur Then in-app progress updates are displayed within 2 seconds via WebSocket; if WebSocket is unavailable, polling occurs every 10 seconds Given key state transitions occur (Run Completed, Job Started, Job Completed, Job Failed) When notifications are enabled Then users receive an in-app toast with the state, primary metrics, and a deep link to details Given email/webhook notifications are configured at the workspace level When a production job starts or finishes Then an email/webhook is sent containing jobId, presetVersion, validatorRunId, total items, succeeded/failed counts, startedAt, finishedAt, and duration
Concurrency safety for Accept across multi-clicks and clients
Given multiple Accept attempts occur (double-clicks, rapid retries, or from different clients) for the same presetVersion and validatorRunId within 30 seconds When requests reach the backend Then only the first succeeds in creating a production job and subsequent attempts return 409 Already Promoted with the existing jobId surfaced to the UI Given the first Accept succeeds When the page is refreshed or opened on another device Then the UI shows the Promoted state with a link to the existing job and Accept is disabled Given suppressed duplicate attempts occur When viewing the activity log Then one Promotion entry exists with additional Suppressed duplicate records capturing userId, timestamp, and source client
Validation Audit Trail & Versioned Reports
"As an operations lead, I want a complete history of validation runs and decisions so that I can audit quality, reproduce results, and roll back when necessary."
Description

Record every validation session with immutable metadata: preset version and diff, ruleset and thresholds, sample selection method and composition, per-image results and annotations, aggregate metrics, time/cost estimates, user decisions, and any overrides. Provide searchable history, sharable links, and export (PDF/CSV) for compliance and collaboration. Support retention policies by workspace and enforce role-based access to reports and sample outputs. Enable one-click rollback to a previously validated preset version.

Acceptance Criteria
Immutable Session Recording
Given a completed batch validation run in workspace W When the system persists the session Then the session record includes non-null fields: session_id, created_at (UTC ISO-8601), created_by_user_id, workspace_id, preset_id, preset_version, preset_diff (JSON Patch), ruleset_id, ruleset_thresholds, sample_selection_method, sample_composition, per_image_results (image_id, pass/fail reasons, annotations, visual_diff_uri), aggregate_metrics (pass_rate, avg_score, stdev), estimated_time_ms, estimated_cost_cents, user_decision, overrides (approver_id, rationale) And subsequent attempts to modify any of these fields return HTTP 409 and are audit-logged with actor_id and timestamp And repeated reads of the session return the same SHA-256 checksum for the persisted payload
Searchable Validation History & Filters
Given a workspace with >= 1,000 validation sessions over the last 90 days When a user applies filters (date range, preset_version, ruleset_id, user_decision, pass_rate >= threshold) and a full-text query on History Then only matching sessions are returned And the first page (<= 50 rows) renders within 2000 ms at p95 And results are sortable by created_at and pass_rate And the full-text query matches across metadata and per-image annotations And an empty state is shown when no records match
Role-Based Access Enforcement
Given RBAC roles Owner, Admin, Editor, Viewer, External Reviewer with defined permissions When a user attempts to view, export, share a report, or download sample outputs Then access is granted only if the role has the corresponding permission in that workspace And unauthorized attempts return HTTP 403 and are audit-logged with actor_id, action, resource_id And sample output URIs are time-limited and require the same authorization context
Shareable Link Lifecycle
Given a user with Share permission creates a shareable link to a specific session When they set scope (report-only | report+samples) and expiry (1 hour to 30 days) Then the system issues a signed URL that grants exactly the requested scope until expiry And revoking the link invalidates access within 60 seconds And each access is logged (viewer_id or IP, timestamp, user_agent) And the shared view is read-only and hides destructive actions
Export Reports (PDF/CSV) with Data Fidelity
Given a session record with up to 500 images When a user exports PDF and CSV Then the PDF includes metadata, aggregate metrics, per-image summaries (image_id, pass/fail reasons), visual diff thumbnails or URIs, and a document hash And the CSV contains one row per image with stable column headers and UTC timestamps And generation completes within 10 seconds at p95 And the contents of both exports match the persisted session data exactly
Workspace Retention Policies & Purge
Given workspace retention policy R days and optional legal holds on sessions When a session reaches age > R and has no active legal hold Then its report, exports, share links, and sample outputs are permanently deleted And search indexes are updated and access attempts return HTTP 410 Gone And purge runs at least daily and emits an audit log entry per session And sessions on legal hold are excluded from purge until the hold is removed
One-Click Rollback to Validated Preset Version
Given an authorized user views a previously validated preset version in History When they click Rollback and confirm Then that version becomes the active preset for the workspace within 60 seconds And an audit entry links the rollback action to the source session and prior active version And new validations started after propagation use the rolled-back version And rollback is blocked if there are uncommitted preset edits, showing a clear error message

RuleStream

Always-current rule engine that auto-syncs marketplace specs by region and category. Get change alerts with plain‑language summaries, auto-revalidate impacted images, and see exactly what needs updating—eliminating surprise rejections and last‑minute rework.

Requirements

Marketplace Spec Auto-Sync
"As an e-commerce seller, I want PixelLift to automatically keep marketplace rules up to date for my regions and product categories so that my images always meet current requirements without me having to track changes manually."
Description

Continuously ingest and normalize marketplace compliance specifications (e.g., Amazon, Etsy, eBay, Shopify) by region and category via scheduled pulls and webhook triggers. Map external rule fields (dimensions, background, watermark, file size/format, text overlays, margins) into PixelLift’s internal rule schema and category taxonomy. Provide resilient caching, rate limiting, and fallback to last-known-good rules on source outages. Detect deltas between versions to mark impacted categories/regions and set effective dates. Expose a health panel showing last sync time, source URLs, and any parser errors. Enables always-current compliance without manual updates, reducing listing rejections and rework.

Acceptance Criteria
Scheduled Pull Normalizes Multi-Market Rules by Region & Category
Given scheduled sync interval is configured to 60 minutes and sources for Amazon, Etsy, eBay, and Shopify are enabled When the scheduler runs at the configured interval Then the system fetches specs for each enabled marketplace-region-category combination from the configured source URLs And parses and normalizes fields into the internal rule schema: dimensions (unit-normalized), background, watermark, file size (bytes), file format (enum), text overlays, margins (percent or pixels) And maps each rule to the internal category taxonomy ID for the corresponding marketplace-region-category And persists a normalized RuleSet with keys {marketplace, region, categoryId, versionId} including sourceUrl and fetchedAt timestamps And records metrics per marketplace for requests made, RuleSets stored, and failures And completes without error with success rate 100% for reachable sources
Webhook Change Event Triggers Idempotent Delta Sync
Given a valid marketplace webhook notification for a specific marketplace-region-category with a unique changeId is received When the webhook is processed Then the system fetches the latest source spec and computes a field-level delta against the last stored version And creates a new version only if a non-empty delta exists And sets version metadata: versionId, changeId, effectiveDate (from source or now), and delta summary And ensures idempotency by ignoring duplicate webhooks with the same changeId for 24 hours And enforces a single in-flight sync per marketplace-region-category via locking
Version Delta Detection Marks Impacted Categories/Regions and Effective Dates
Given two consecutive RuleSet versions exist for a marketplace-region-category When any of the mapped fields (dimensions, background, watermark, file size/format, text overlays, margins) differ between versions Then the system generates an ImpactRecord listing impacted marketplace, region, and categoryId with change types per field And marks the affected marketplace-region-category as "Impacted" until the effectiveDate passes And assigns effectiveDate from the source if provided; otherwise sets effectiveDate to the ingestion timestamp And emits a RuleSetChanged event containing marketplace, region, categoryId, previousVersionId, newVersionId, effectiveDate
Rate Limiting, Caching, and Retry Backoff Protect Source APIs
Given provider rate limits and a cache TTL are configured When the sync client calls provider APIs Then requests are paced so that the configured rate limits are never exceeded And responses are cached per source URL for the configured TTL and served from cache when within TTL And on HTTP 429/5xx/timeouts, the client retries up to 3 times with exponential backoff starting at 1s and jitter And after retries are exhausted, the sync marks the source as DEGRADED and continues with other sources
Fallback to Last-Known-Good Rules on Source Outage
Given a source API experiences sustained failures (>=3 consecutive attempts within 15 minutes) When a sync is attempted Then the system serves and exposes the last-known-good RuleSet for all affected marketplace-region-category combinations And flags the affected scope with usingFallback=true and records outage details And prevents deletion or overwriting of the last-known-good data until a successful sync occurs And clears the fallback flag automatically on the next successful sync
Health Panel Exposes Sync Status, Source URLs, and Parser Errors
Given the health API endpoint /rulestream/health is queried When the request is made with or without filters (marketplace, region, categoryId, status) Then the response includes for each marketplace-region-category: lastSyncStartedAt, lastSyncSucceededAt, sourceUrl(s), status (OK/DEGRADED/ERROR), currentVersionId, parserErrors[] And the endpoint responds within 800 ms for up to 10,000 records And parser errors include categoryId, field, message, and sample payload snippet And the data reflects the latest completed sync run
Schema Mapping Completeness for Core Fields
Given a source spec payload contains fields for dimensions, background, watermark, file size, file format, text overlays, and margins When the payload is parsed Then 100% of required fields are mapped to the internal schema or a parser error is recorded with details And units are normalized (e.g., inches/cm to mm) and enumerations are validated against allowed values And invalid or unsupported fields do not block processing of supported fields; partial mappings are flagged with severity=WARNING And the stored RuleSet passes schema validation with no critical errors
Plain-Language Change Summaries
"As a catalog manager, I want plain-language alerts explaining what changed and which listings are affected so that I can quickly assess impact and prioritize fixes."
Description

Generate human-readable summaries for rule changes with clear highlights of what changed, why it matters, affected categories/regions, effective dates, and severity (blocking vs advisory). Provide concise diffs (before/after) and link to full rule details. Deliver alerts across channels (in‑app notifications, email, Slack/webhook) with actionable CTAs to review impact or start revalidation. Summaries use non-technical language and examples (e.g., “Main image must have pure white background (#FFFFFF)”); localize terms and units per user locale. Improves awareness and reduces time to understand and act on changes.

Acceptance Criteria
In-App Alert: Plain-Language Summary with CTAs
Given a marketplace rule update affects at least one category or region in the user’s workspace When RuleStream syncs changes Then an in-app notification is created within 15 minutes containing: a human-readable title, what changed, why it matters, affected categories/regions, severity (Blocking or Advisory), effective date/time, and a concise before/after diff snippet, plus a link to full rule details And Then the notification shows a Review Impact CTA that opens the impact view filtered to the specific change And Then the notification shows a Start Revalidation CTA only if impacted images > 0; otherwise the CTA is hidden or disabled with an explanation And Then clicking Start Revalidation enqueues revalidation for all impacted images and displays progress status in-app
Email Notification: Localized Summary with Before/After Diff
Given a user has email alerts enabled and a locale/time zone set When a rule change is synced that impacts the user’s selected marketplaces/regions/categories Then an email is sent within 15 minutes with a subject that includes severity, marketplace, region, and a short change summary And Then the email body includes: what changed, why it matters, affected categories/regions, effective date/time in the user’s time zone, a concise before/after diff, at least one simple example, and links to Review Impact and full rule details And Then terms, dates, color codes, and units are localized to the user’s locale (e.g., cm vs inches, date format, decimal separators) without altering numeric accuracy And Then the email is sent once per unique rule change per workspace (no duplicates) and includes a Manage Notifications link respecting user preferences
Slack/Webhook Delivery: Actionable Alert and Structured Payload
Given a workspace has Slack integration configured When a relevant rule change is synced Then a Slack message posts within 15 minutes using clear, plain language and includes severity color/label, what changed, why it matters, affected categories/regions, effective date/time, a concise before/after diff snippet, and links to Review Impact and full rule details And Then all links in the Slack message deep-link to the corresponding in-app views Given a workspace has a generic webhook configured When a relevant rule change is synced Then a POST is delivered with a JSON payload that includes: change_id, severity, marketplace, regions, categories, effective_at (ISO 8601), summary_text, diff.before, diff.after, examples[], urls.review_impact, urls.rule_details, locale, impacted_counts, created_at And Then the webhook is HMAC-SHA256 signed via shared secret with X-Signature header, uses an Idempotency-Key, and retries up to 3 times with exponential backoff on 5xx responses
Diff Generation: Concise, Accurate Before/After Highlights
Given the previous and current versions of a marketplace rule When generating the change summary Then the before/after diff highlights only modified elements (added/removed/changed) and preserves exact tokens (e.g., “#FFFFFF”) And Then each side of the diff is truncated to a maximum of 240 characters with ellipses if longer, and provides a View full rule link And Then the diff includes one positive and one negative example illustrating compliance vs non-compliance And Then visual diff indicators meet accessibility contrast (WCAG AA) and include text labels for screen readers
Severity and Effective Date Display Logic
Given rule metadata indicates enforcement level When summarizing Then severity is mapped to Blocking or Advisory and displayed consistently across all channels with corresponding label and color Given the rule has an effective date/time When summarizing Then the effective date/time is shown in the user’s time zone and formatted per locale; if effective immediately, display Effective now And Then summaries for Blocking changes include an Action required badge; Advisory changes include a Recommended badge
Plain-Language Quality and Examples
Given technical rule text is available When creating the human-readable summary Then the text is non-technical, avoids undefined jargon, and achieves a readability score at or below 8th-grade level (Flesch-Kincaid Grade <= 8.0) And Then the summary includes at least one concrete example with localized units/terms (e.g., “Main image must have a pure white background (#FFFFFF)”) and is <= 120 words And Then prohibited/ambiguous terms list (e.g., “utilize”, “henceforth”, “hereunder”) does not appear in the summary
Impact Review and Revalidation Flow
Given a rule change is detected When the user opens Review Impact from any channel Then the impact view is scoped to the change_id and lists impacted assets grouped by severity (Blocking vs Advisory), with exact counts And Then if auto-revalidation is enabled for the workspace, impacted assets are queued within 15 minutes and results update the counts in real time; otherwise the user can trigger Start Revalidation from the view And Then revalidation job status (queued, running, completed) and outcome (Pass/Fail) are visible, and completing revalidation updates the alert to Resolved if all assets pass
Impact Analysis & Auto-Revalidation
"As a merchandising lead, I want PixelLift to automatically revalidate affected images when rules change so that I can see exactly what will fail and fix it before listings are rejected."
Description

Identify all assets, listings, and style-presets impacted by rule deltas using category/region mapping and historical validation results. Automatically queue revalidation jobs to test images against new rules (e.g., background color, aspect ratio, edge whitespace, watermarks, text overlays, file type/size). Produce pass/fail results with reasons, confidence scores, and remediation tags. Update dashboards with affected counts, risk levels, and deadlines based on effective dates; support filtering by marketplace, region, category, and account. Minimizes surprise rejections by proactively catching upcoming noncompliance.

Acceptance Criteria
Impact Analysis on Background Color Rule Delta
Given a published rule delta changing background color for marketplace=MKT-A, region=EU, category=Shoes with effective_date set When impact analysis runs Then 100% of assets, listings, and style-presets historically validated under (MKT-A, EU, Shoes) are evaluated within 10 minutes And the impacted set includes all and only items that would fail under the new rule And each impacted item record includes id (asset/listing/preset), marketplace, region, category, impacted_rule_ids, effective_date, and last_validated_at
Auto-Queue Revalidation for Aspect Ratio Change
Given impacted items exist for a rule delta on aspect_ratio When the delta is published Then revalidation jobs for all impacted items are enqueued within 5 minutes And job priority is ordered by ascending effective_date and higher risk_level first And the queue prevents duplicate jobs per (asset_id, rule_version) pair And a retry policy (max 3 attempts, exponential backoff up to 15 minutes) is applied for transient failures
Pass/Fail Results with Reasons, Confidence, and Remediation Tags
Given a revalidation job completes for an asset When rules are evaluated Then a result is produced with status PASS or FAIL for the asset And for each failed rule the result includes rule_id, reason_code, human_readable_reason, confidence_score between 0 and 1 with two-decimal precision, and at least one remediation_tag And the result is persisted and available via dashboard and API within 1 minute
Dashboard Affected Counts, Risk Levels, and Deadlines
Given at least one rule delta with impacted items exists When the dashboard loads Then it displays total impacted counts and breakdowns by marketplace, region, category, and account And shows risk_level as High when effective_date <= 7 days and impacted_count > 0, Medium when 8–30 days, Low when > 30 days And displays deadline equal to the rule's effective_date for each group And all aggregates refresh within 1 minute after new results are persisted
Filtering by Marketplace, Region, Category, and Account
Given the dashboard contains impacted data across multiple marketplaces, regions, categories, and accounts When the user applies filters marketplace=MKT-A, region=US, category=Apparel, account=ACC-123 Then lists, charts, and counts display only items matching all selected filters And the URL/query state reflects the filters for shareable deep links And clearing filters restores unfiltered totals within 2 seconds
Idempotent Revalidation on Rule Version Updates
Given a rule delta is superseded by a new version before its effective_date When the new version is received Then queued jobs for the old version are cancelled within 2 minutes And assets already revalidated against the old version are requeued only if their expected outcome differs under the new version And the system guarantees no more than one active job per (asset_id, rule_version) at any time
One-Click Remediation Suggestions
"As a seller, I want one-click, compliant fixes for failing images so that I can remediate issues at scale without manual editing."
Description

Provide prescriptive, auto-generated fixes for failed validations and enable one-click batch remediation. Supported actions include adjusting canvas to required aspect ratio, adding padding for edge whitespace, enforcing pure white or compliant background, converting file format/quality to meet size caps, and removing disallowed text/watermarks. Integrate with PixelLift style-presets to suggest safe preset updates and version bumps; allow preview and selective apply with rollback. Track changes back to the specific rule version that prompted the fix. Accelerates recovery from rule changes while preserving brand consistency.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Generated Fix Suggestions for Failed Validations
Given a batch upload contains images failing marketplace rules by region and category When the user opens the RuleStream Remediation panel for that batch Then the system displays for each failed rule on each image: a prescriptive fix action, a plain‑language explanation referencing rule name and version, a preview thumbnail, and estimated impact (aspect ratio, background, file size) And suggestions are generated for up to 500 images within 60 seconds And every suggestion is traceable to the specific rule ID and version that triggered it
One-Click Batch Remediation Execution and Auto-Revalidation
Given the user selects any subset of suggested fixes across the batch When the user clicks Remediate All Then the system applies the selected fixes atomically per image, creating a new image version and preserving the original And completes processing of 500 images within 10 minutes under normal load And displays a completion summary with counts: succeeded, failed, retried, skipped And automatically revalidates all remediated images against the active rule set And shows pass/fail per image with links to any remaining issues And partial failures do not block other images; failed items have actionable error messages and a retry option
Aspect Ratio and Edge-Whitespace Compliance via Canvas Adjust/Padding
Given images fail aspect ratio or edge‑whitespace rules When the user accepts the "Adjust canvas/add padding" suggestion Then each output image matches the required aspect ratio within ±0.01 tolerance And minimum edge whitespace meets or exceeds the rule requirement And no subject clipping is introduced; the subject remains fully visible And revalidation for aspect ratio and edge‑whitespace rules passes And output dimensions and file size remain within marketplace caps
Background Compliance and Text/Watermark Removal
Given images fail background or disallowed text/watermark rules When the user accepts the "Enforce background and remove text/watermarks" suggestion Then background is set to the rule‑compliant color/template (e.g., pure white #FFFFFF) per rule And OCR/watermark detection confidence for disallowed elements is below the rule's rejection threshold And no text overlays remain except those explicitly allowed by the rule And revalidation for background and text/watermark rules passes
Format/Quality Conversion to Meet File Size Caps
Given images exceed file size caps or have non‑compliant format/color profile When the user accepts the "Convert format/quality" suggestion Then output format, color profile, and metadata match the rule requirements And file size is ≤ the marketplace cap while maintaining SSIM ≥ 0.98 versus the input And pixel dimensions meet min/max constraints And revalidation for file type, color profile, and size passes
Style-Preset Safe Update, Preview, Selective Apply, and Rollback with Traceability
Given a rule change conflicts with the current PixelLift style‑preset When the user opens preset suggestions Then the system proposes a new preset version with only rule‑safe parameter changes, listing the changed parameters And the user can preview side‑by‑side before/after on sample images within 3 seconds per preview And the user can selectively apply the new preset version to chosen catalogs or images And a one‑click rollback restores prior image versions and reverts the preset to the previous version And all actions are logged with timestamp, user, impacted assets, and the originating rule ID/version And remediated images are revalidated and results recorded
Rule Versioning & Audit Trail
"As a compliance officer, I want a complete versioned history of rules, validations, and fixes so that I can demonstrate due diligence and trace issues when marketplaces question a listing."
Description

Maintain immutable, versioned snapshots of marketplace rules per source/region/category with timestamps, source references, and content hashes. Store validation outcomes and remediation actions per asset, linked to the rule version in effect at the time. Provide exportable audit logs (CSV/JSON/PDF) and APIs for compliance evidence, including who approved changes and when. Support rollback to prior rule mappings if a feed is erroneous. Ensures traceability for enterprise customers and simplifies dispute resolution with marketplaces.

Acceptance Criteria
Create Immutable Rule Snapshot on Sync
Given a new or changed marketplace rule feed is detected for a specific source/region/category When the sync job runs Then the system creates a new rule version snapshot with fields: versionId (UUID), sourceReference, region, category, fetchedAt (ISO 8601 UTC), contentHash (SHA-256), and rawRulePayload And the snapshot content is immutable; any update attempt returns 409 and does not alter contentHash or payload And retrieving by versionId returns the exact stored snapshot bytes And if the computed contentHash matches the latest active snapshot for the same source/region/category, no new version is created and the sync is recorded as idempotent
Link Validation Outcomes to Rule Version
Given an asset is validated against marketplace rules When validation completes Then the system stores a validation record with assetId, ruleVersionId used, validatorEngineVersion, validatedAt (UTC), outcome (Pass/Fail), and violations[] And the record persists unchanged even if newer rule versions are activated later And remediation actions (manual or automated) are appended with actionType, actorId, actionAt (UTC), and reference the originating validation recordId And API/UI retrieval returns a complete chronological history per asset including all validation records and remediation actions
Export Audit Logs for Compliance
Given a user with audit:read scope requests an export via API or UI with filters (date range ≤ 90 days, region, category, assetIds[], outcome) When the export is generated Then CSV and JSON files are produced for up to 100,000 records within 2 minutes and a PDF summary for up to 5,000 records within 2 minutes And each record includes assetId, ruleVersionId, ruleFetchedAt, sourceReference, region, category, contentHash, outcome, violations, remediation actions, actorIds, decision/approval info, and timestamps (UTC) And download URLs are returned with SHA-256 checksums and 24-hour expiry And exports larger than 100,000 records are paginated via a cursor-based API without data loss or duplication across pages And all export requests are themselves logged in the audit trail with requesterId, requestedAt, filters, and file checksums
Record Rule Change Approvals
Given a proposed rule mapping change requires approval before activation When an approver with role Compliance Admin approves or rejects the change Then an approval record is stored with approverId, decision (Approve/Reject), decisionAt (UTC), changeSummary, priorVersionId, newVersionId, and optional rationale And the approval record is tamper-evident via an HMAC signature over its fields using the organization key And activation of a rule version without an approval record returns 403 and the version remains inactive And audit queries by versionId return who approved and when
Rollback to Prior Rule Mapping
Given an active rule version is determined erroneous for a source/region/category When a user with rollback permission selects a prior version to activate Then the selected prior version becomes the active mapping within 60 seconds and a rollback event is recorded with requesterId, reason, priorActiveVersionId, newActiveVersionId, and timestamp (UTC) And no snapshots are deleted or modified; only the active pointer changes And all impacted assets are queued for revalidation against the restored version within 15 minutes And notifications are sent to subscribed users indicating rollback details and revalidation status
Auto-Revalidate on Rule Update
Given a new rule version becomes active for a source/region/category When activation occurs Then impacted assets in that scope are identified and queued for revalidation within 5 minutes And 95% of queued assets up to 50,000 complete revalidation within 60 minutes And new validation records reference the new ruleVersionId while preserving prior records intact And assets that transition from Pass to Fail are flagged and included in a change-impact report accessible via API
Rule Testing Sandbox
"As a brand ops manager, I want to test upcoming rules against my catalog and presets so that I can anticipate failures and adjust workflows before changes go live."
Description

Offer a sandbox to simulate current, upcoming, or custom rule sets against selected assets and style-presets without affecting production. Allow users to import proposed marketplace changes or upload custom rule JSON for private channels, run validations, and preview remediation outcomes. Provide what-if comparisons (current vs upcoming) and estimated effort to fix. Enable promotion of a tested rule set to production with safeguards and approvals. Helps teams prepare for changes and de-risk rollouts.

Acceptance Criteria
Upload and Validate Custom Rule JSON
- Given a user with Rules:Manage permission uploads a custom rule JSON file (<=10 MB) conforming to PixelLift RuleStream schema v1.2, When validation runs, Then the system accepts the upload, displays parsed rule count, channel=Private, and assigns a rule-set version ID. - Given a JSON that violates schema or has syntax errors, When validation runs, Then the system rejects the upload and returns a clear error list with file name, line, column, and up to 100 issues; no rule set is created. - Given duplicate rule IDs or key collisions, When validation runs, Then the system blocks save and prompts to auto-namespace or fix conflicts before proceed. - Given references to unknown marketplace categories or regions, When validation runs, Then the system requires mapping to known categories/regions before enabling Run; unresolved references keep status=Draft.
Import Proposed Marketplace Rule Changes
- Given a supported marketplace, region, and category are selected, When the user clicks Import Upcoming Changes, Then the system fetches the latest proposed rules, tags them with Effective Date, and shows a plain-language summary with counts of Added/Modified/Removed rules and links to sources. - Given the marketplace feed is unavailable, When import is attempted, Then the system shows a retry/backoff status and offers manual file import; successful manual import is tagged Source=Manual. - Given an upcoming rule set is imported, When saved, Then it is read-only (annotatable), versioned, and available for sandbox runs without altering production rules.
Non-Destructive Sandbox Validation Run
- Given a user selects up to 10,000 assets and one or more style-presets, and selects a rule set (current, upcoming, or custom), When Run Validation in Sandbox is started, Then the system validates all selected combinations without writing to production assets, metadata, caches, or publish statuses. - Given the run completes, When results are stored, Then they are saved under a Sandbox Project ID with full audit log and auto-expire in 30 days; production automations are not triggered. - Given asset selection exceeds 10,000, When run is initiated, Then the system blocks start and prompts to split the batch or request a quota increase.
What-If Comparison: Current vs Upcoming Rules
- Given the same asset set is evaluated against Current and Upcoming rule sets, When the comparison completes, Then the system displays side-by-side pass/fail totals, newly failing/passing asset lists, and the specific rules causing status changes. - Given comparison results are shown, When the user exports, Then a CSV export containing asset IDs, rule IDs, current status, upcoming status, and delta is downloadable. - Given per-rule estimated fix time defaults (minutes) are configured, When the comparison identifies failures, Then the system displays total estimated effort (hours), average per asset, and breakdown by rule.
Remediation Preview for Failed Assets
- Given failed assets have auto-remediable rules, When the user requests Preview Fix, Then the system generates non-destructive preview thumbnails (min 1024px) showing proposed changes with visual diffs within 60 seconds per asset, without altering originals. - Given an issue is not auto-remediable, When viewing details, Then the system provides plain-language remediation guidance referencing the violated rule and required change. - Given previews are generated, When the user downloads the remediation plan, Then a JSON/CSV containing asset IDs, proposed actions, and estimated effort is provided.
Governance and Safeguards for Promotion to Production
- Given a sandbox rule set has passed review, When Promote to Production is initiated, Then at least two distinct approvers with Rules:Approve must approve; the requester cannot self-approve. - Given promotion pre-checks are configured (0 critical fails, <=5% non-critical fails), When the system runs a gating validation on a defined sample or full set, Then promotion is blocked unless thresholds are met or documented waivers exist. - Given promotion succeeds, When finalization occurs, Then the system records an immutable audit entry (timestamp, approvers, rule-set hash) and provides one-click rollback to the previous production version.
Performance and Progress for Batch Sandbox Runs
- Given a sandbox run includes up to 5,000 assets, When validation starts, Then 95% of runs complete within 5 minutes and display a live progress indicator with remaining time estimate. - Given a sandbox run is executing, When the user pauses or cancels, Then the system safely pauses/cancels within 30 seconds and preserves partial results for later resume. - Given runs up to 10,000 assets, When completed, Then per-asset and per-rule timing metrics are available for download to support capacity planning.

Category IQ

Automatically identifies the correct product category from image cues and listing metadata, then applies the right, category‑specific checks. Cuts false flags and ensures precise validation (e.g., apparel vs. jewelry nuances) without manual mapping or guesswork.

Requirements

Multimodal Category Classification Engine
"As a boutique seller, I want the system to automatically detect the correct category from my photos and listing details so that I don’t have to map categories manually and can trust downstream checks."
Description

Build a production-grade classifier that fuses image features with listing metadata (titles, tags, attributes) to predict the correct product category from PixelLift’s unified taxonomy. Must output category ID, full path, and confidence score; support top-k predictions and out-of-distribution detection; be resilient to background removal artifacts and partial occlusions. Expose as a horizontally scalable microservice (REST/gRPC) with p95 latency ≤300 ms per item at batch size 32, autoscaling, health checks, and detailed metrics/tracing. Enable safe, zero-downtime model updates via canary and version pinning.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Classification Output Schema and Top‑K Results
Given a request to classify a batch of items (batch_size ≤ 128) via REST /v1/classify or gRPC Classify with images and listing metadata When the request is processed Then each item response includes: category_id (string in unified taxonomy), full_path (string "Department>Category>Subcategory"), confidence (0.0–1.0), and top_k results each with category_id and confidence sorted by descending confidence And the number of top_k results equals the requested k (default 5, max 20) And responses preserve input order and include the client-supplied item_id And all returned category_id values exist in the taxonomy snapshot for the returned model_version
Multimodal Accuracy on Unified Taxonomy Benchmark
Given the PixelLift validation set v1.0 (stratified by category; n ≥ 50,000) When evaluating the production model with default settings Then top-1 accuracy ≥ 92% and top-3 accuracy ≥ 98% overall And weighted F1 ≥ 0.93 overall And per-major-department top-1 accuracy ≥ 88% And expected calibration error (ECE, 15 bins) ≤ 0.05
Out‑of‑Distribution Detection and Unknown Handling
Given an OOD benchmark consisting of non-taxonomy product types and non-product images, and an operational OOD threshold τ When evaluating the service Then AUROC for OOD vs in-distribution ≥ 0.95 and FPR at 95% TPR ≤ 10% And OOD items are returned with ood=true, category_id="unknown", and confidence ≤ 0.20 And in-distribution items are returned with ood=false and in-distribution recall ≥ 95% at τ And τ is configurable per model_version and applied without restart within 60 seconds of change
Robustness to Background Removal and Partial Occlusions
Given a paired dataset of original images and variants with AI background removal artifacts (alpha edges), JPEG compression at Q=60, and 20% area rectangular occlusions When running classification with default settings Then top-1 accuracy on the perturbed set decreases by ≤ 2 percentage points vs the original set And for pairs where original confidence ≥ 0.60, predicted top-1 category matches the original in ≥ 95% of cases And OOD flag rate on transparent PNGs differs by ≤ 2 percentage points from originals
Latency, Throughput, and Horizontal Scalability
Given steady load generated with batch size = 32 and typical payloads When the service runs on the target production instance type per pod Then p95 per-item latency ≤ 300 ms and p99 ≤ 450 ms over a 30-minute window And throughput ≥ 200 items/second per pod at ≤ 85% GPU/CPU utilization And autoscaling increases replicas from min=2 to max=20 within 60 seconds of sustained CPU > 70% or queue backlog > 1000 items, maintaining p95 ≤ 300 ms And request error rate (HTTP 429/503/gRPC UNAVAILABLE) ≤ 0.10% during 10× baseline load for 30 minutes
Service Interfaces, Validation, and Observability
Given clients integrate via REST and gRPC When invoking REST POST /v1/classify or gRPC Classify with a batch payload Then the service validates inputs and returns 400/INVALID_ARGUMENT for schema violations with machine-readable error codes And supports parameters: top_k (1–20), model_version, ood_threshold, and returns model_version in responses And exposes /healthz (liveness), /readyz (readiness), and /metrics (Prometheus) including latency histograms, error rates, model_version labels, and top-k distribution And propagates W3C tracecontext (traceparent) and emits spans per request and per item with attributes: model_version, batch_size, device, latency_ms
Zero‑Downtime Model Updates with Canary and Version Pinning
Given a new model version is deployed behind the service When initiating a canary rollout Then traffic starts at 10% for ≥ 15 minutes and auto-promotes only if canary p95 latency within +5% of baseline, error rate ≤ 0.5%, and shadow top-1 agreement with baseline ≥ 99% And automatic rollback triggers within 2 minutes if any threshold is breached And clients can pin model_version; pinned requests are not routed to canary and remain available during rollout And no downtime occurs (availability ≥ 99.99% and 5xx spike ≤ 0.5% over rollout window)
Adaptive Taxonomy Mapping & Versioning
"As an operations manager, I want Category IQ to stay aligned with marketplace category changes so that validations remain accurate without rework."
Description

Maintain a normalized, versioned category graph aligned to major marketplaces (Shopify, Etsy, Amazon) and custom merchant taxonomies. Provide tools to import external taxonomies, map them to the internal schema, manage synonyms/aliases, and deprecate or merge categories with effective dates. Expose read APIs to resolve current and historical mappings and ensure backward compatibility for existing jobs and presets.

Acceptance Criteria
Shopify/Etsy/Amazon Taxonomy Import and Mapping to Internal Graph
- Given a valid Shopify/Etsy/Amazon taxonomy export (≤50k nodes), When an admin imports it via tooling, Then a new immutable internal taxonomy version is created with a unique version_id and full audit log (actor, checksum, timestamp). - Given repeated import of the same file, When executed, Then the operation is idempotent (0 changes detected). - Given source nodes lacking mappings, When import completes, Then 100% are either mapped to internal categories or reported with actionable errors; import fails and fully rolls back if unmapped nodes > 0. - Given a successful import, When validation runs, Then parent/child integrity is preserved (no cycles, no orphans) and P95 import time ≤ 5 minutes.
Custom Merchant Taxonomy Mapping with Synonyms and Aliases
- Given a merchant uploads a custom taxonomy with synonym/alias columns, When mapping to internal categories, Then each alias resolves to a single canonical internal_category_id and is case- and locale-insensitive. - Given an alias collides across two internal categories, When saving, Then the operation is rejected with a conflict error listing collisions. - Given synonyms are added or removed, When a new taxonomy version is published, Then the change is versioned and historical resolutions continue to honor the prior version. - Given an alias is resolved via the read API, When requested, Then the response returns the canonical internal_category_id and indicates it was resolved via alias.
Scheduled Category Deprecation with Effective Dates and Redirects
- Given a category is scheduled for deprecation with effective_at and optional replaced_by, When current time < effective_at, Then the category remains active and writable. - Given current time ≥ effective_at, When creating new mappings or jobs targeting the deprecated category, Then the operation is blocked and a redirect to replaced_by is suggested if present. - Given existing jobs/presets referencing the deprecated category created before effective_at, When resolving without an explicit timestamp, Then they resolve via their pinned version; When resolving with at ≥ effective_at, Then they return the replacement category (or status=deprecated if none). - Given a deprecation is published, When auditing, Then an immutable audit log entry exists with actor, reason, and effective_at.
Category Merge with Historical Resolution Preservation
- Given categories A and B are merged into category C with effective_at, When resolving with at < effective_at, Then A and B resolve to themselves; When resolving with at ≥ effective_at or without at, Then A and B resolve to C. - Given the merge is committed, When validating graph integrity, Then no cycles or orphaned nodes exist and all synonyms of A and B transfer as aliases of C. - Given presets or jobs referencing A or B, When run after the merge, Then they execute via redirect to C with no configuration changes required and the redirect is logged.
Read API: Resolve Current and Historical Mappings
- Given marketplace_id, marketplace_category_id, and optional at timestamp, When calling the category resolution API, Then it returns 200 with internal_category_id, version_id, and status for known mappings. - Given a deprecated category without at, When calling the API, Then it returns 410 with replaced_by metadata if available. - Given an unknown mapping, When calling the API, Then it returns 404 with error_code=MAPPING_NOT_FOUND. - Given normal system load, When calling the API, Then P95 latency ≤ 200 ms and availability ≥ 99.9% monthly.
Backward Compatibility for Existing Jobs and Presets
- Given a job was created under taxonomy version V, When a new taxonomy version V+1 is published, Then the job completes using V without change and outputs identical internal category IDs to prior runs. - Given a preset references an internal_category_id that becomes deprecated or merged, When the preset is used after the change, Then it auto-resolves to the replacement and logs the redirect in the run metadata. - Given system-wide taxonomy updates, When examining job failure rates, Then the post-update 24-hour failure rate does not increase by more than 0.5 percentage points relative to the 7-day prior baseline. - Given a merchant opts to migrate presets to the latest taxonomy, When using the migration tool, Then a preview shows affected items and the change applies atomically with rollback support.
Category-Specific Validation Rules Engine
"As a seller, I want the correct checks to run for each product type so that issues are caught and fixed according to category nuances."
Description

Implement a declarative rules engine that triggers category-specific validations after classification (e.g., apparel: mannequin/pose compliance and wrinkle detection; jewelry: specular highlight/reflection and macro focus; footwear: pair presence and sole visibility; cosmetics: label legibility and shade swatch; home decor: scale reference). Rules are configurable per merchant and brand, support thresholds and dependencies, and emit pass/fail with structured reason codes and suggested fixes. Integrate with PixelLift’s retouch pipeline to auto-apply corrective actions where possible and re-validate post-fix.

Acceptance Criteria
Post-Classification Apparel Rule Execution
Given an image is classified as category=apparel When the rules engine runs category-specific validations Then it executes only apparel rules: pose_compliance, mannequin_presence_policy, wrinkle_intensity And it applies thresholds from brand override if present, otherwise merchant default And each rule returns status in {Pass, Fail} with a reasonCode and suggestion on Fail And no non-apparel category rule is executed for this image
Jewelry Reflection and Macro Focus Validation
Given an image is classified as category=jewelry When the rules engine validates category rules Then specular_highlight_percentage <= configured threshold results in Pass, otherwise Fail with reasonCode=JEWELRY_GLARE_EXCESS and a suggestion And macro_focus_score >= configured threshold results in Pass, otherwise Fail with reasonCode=JEWELRY_MACRO_FOCUS_LOW and a suggestion And the response includes per-rule metric values and thresholds used
Footwear Pair Presence and Sole Visibility
Given an image is classified as category=footwear When category-specific validations run Then pair_presence is detected for two shoes in frame; otherwise Fail with reasonCode=FOOTWEAR_PAIR_MISSING and a suggestion And sole_visibility_percent for at least one shoe >= configured threshold; otherwise Fail with reasonCode=FOOTWEAR_SOLE_NOT_VISIBLE and a suggestion And only footwear rules are evaluated for this image
Cosmetics Label Legibility and Shade Swatch
Given an image is classified as category=cosmetics and listing metadata contains a shade attribute When category validations run Then for primary images, label_ocr_confidence >= configured threshold; otherwise Fail with reasonCode=COS_LABEL_ILLEGIBLE and a suggestion And a shade_swatch is detected with swatch_area_percent >= configured threshold; otherwise Fail with reasonCode=COS_SWATCH_MISSING and a suggestion And thresholds reflect brand overrides when configured
Auto-Correction Integration and Re-Validation
Given a rule evaluation fails and has a mapped auto-corrective action with autoFixEnabled=true When the engine triggers the retouch pipeline for that action Then the engine re-validates the previously failed rule(s) exactly once on the corrected image And if the rule passes after correction, the result records autoFixApplied=true, fixAction code, and before/after metric values And if the rule still fails, the result records autoFixApplied=false and updated metrics with the same reasonCode and a suggestion And the job completes with consolidated results for the original and re-validated evaluations
Merchant/Brand Config Overrides and Rule Dependencies
Given a merchant default config and a brand-level override that raises the wrinkle_intensity threshold and disables mannequin_presence_policy When an apparel image tagged with that brand is evaluated Then wrinkle_intensity uses the brand override threshold And mannequin_presence_policy is not executed and does not appear in evaluated rules And for images where human_presence=false, pose_compliance is not executed and does not appear in evaluated rules And images without the brand tag use merchant default thresholds
Structured Result Envelope with Reason Codes and Fix Suggestions
Given any category validation run completes When the engine emits results Then the top-level payload includes assetId, merchantId, brandId, category, configVersion, engineVersion, evaluatedAt, and overallStatus derived from per-rule statuses And each evaluated rule entry includes ruleCode, category, status in {Pass, Fail}, metric name(s) with numeric values, threshold(s), severity, reasonCode (on Fail), suggestion (on Fail), autoFixAttempted, autoFixApplied, and fixAction (if applied) And the payload validates against the published JSON schema without errors
Confidence Thresholds & Human-in-the-Loop Review
"As a catalog manager, I want low-confidence items routed to a quick review flow so that I can resolve edge cases fast without slowing the batch."
Description

Provide configurable per-merchant thresholds for auto-assign vs. review. For low-confidence or conflicting metadata cases, surface top-3 category suggestions with rationales and allow one-click selection or keyboard-driven bulk actions. Support review queues, SLAs, and notifications. After resolution, the system re-runs validations and records the decision for learning and audit.

Acceptance Criteria
Per‑Merchant Confidence Threshold Configuration
Given I am a merchant admin in PixelLift settings When I configure AutoAssignThreshold and ReviewThreshold values between 0.00 and 1.00 with two‑decimal precision Then the form validates the range, prevents invalid input, and shows default values of 0.85 (auto‑assign) and 0.50 (review) And saving the settings versions the change with timestamp, actor, previous value, and merchant ID And the new thresholds take effect for new ingestions within 1 minute and apply only to my merchant’s items
Auto‑Assign on High Confidence Without Metadata Conflict
Given an item is ingested and Category IQ returns a top‑1 category with probability p And the merchant’s AutoAssignThreshold = Ta And no metadata conflict is detected When p ≥ Ta Then the system auto‑assigns the top‑1 category within 30 seconds And immediately runs the category‑specific validations And logs an audit entry with p, Ta, selected category, and rationale And the item bypasses the review queue
Top‑3 Suggestions for Low Confidence or Conflicting Metadata
Given Category IQ returns probabilities for categories and the merchant thresholds Ta (auto) and Tr (review) When p < Ta or a metadata conflict is detected (metadata‑derived category ≠ top‑1 image category) Then the UI displays the top‑3 category suggestions sorted by probability with confidence scores and one‑sentence rationales And the reviewer can apply any suggestion with a single click And applying a suggestion updates the category in under 1 second and removes the item from the queue And the decision is logged with all top‑3 suggestions and confidences
Keyboard and Bulk Actions in Review Queue
Given a reviewer is focused on the review queue When they navigate with Arrow/J/K keys and open the suggestion picker with Enter Then pressing 1/2/3 selects the corresponding suggestion and applies it in under 1 second And Shift+Arrow or Space allows multi‑select of items And choosing a bulk action to apply suggestion index (1/2/3) applies to up to 200 selected items within 5 seconds And a results summary shows success and per‑item failures without losing selection context
SLA Tracking and Reviewer Notifications
Given the merchant configures a review SLA duration and notification channels (email/Slack/webhook) When an item enters the review queue Then an SLA deadline is computed in the merchant’s time zone and displayed with a countdown And a reminder is sent at 15 minutes before deadline to assigned reviewers And an escalation notification is sent upon breach to the configured channel(s) And all notifications are logged with timestamp, recipients, and delivery status
Post‑Resolution Re‑Validation
Given a reviewer selects a category (via single or bulk action) When the decision is saved Then category‑specific validations automatically re‑run and results are available within 10 seconds And if all validations pass, the item status updates to Validated and downstream workflows resume And if any validation fails, failures with reasons are shown and the item remains in Needs Fix until re‑run passes
Decision Recording for Learning and Audit Export
Given a classification decision occurs (auto‑assign or human selection) When the decision is finalized Then an immutable audit record stores merchant ID, item ID, actor, timestamps, thresholds in effect, conflict flags, top‑3 suggestions with confidences, chosen category, rationale, and validation outcomes And human corrections are queued for the learning pipeline within 5 minutes And an authorized merchant admin can export audit records via API for a date range (≤100k rows) as CSV or JSON within 2 minutes
Batch Processing & Throughput Guarantees
"As a user uploading a large catalog, I want Category IQ to process quickly at scale so that my editing workflow isn’t blocked."
Description

Enable high-throughput processing for batches of 100–10,000 items with parallel inference, autoscaling across GPU/CPU nodes, and backpressure-aware job orchestration. Targets: sustain 1,500 items/min per node and complete 1,000-item batches with end-to-end p95 under 5 minutes. Provide resumable jobs, idempotent tasking, retries with exponential backoff, and real-time progress via WebSockets and webhooks.

Acceptance Criteria
Sustain 1,500 Items/Minute Per Node
Given a single production node under normal operating conditions and representative item mix When a steady-state load is applied for at least 10 consecutive minutes Then the node sustains >= 1,500 processed items per minute measured over rolling 1-minute windows And the item-level error rate is <= 0.5% And the input queue depth does not increase over the interval (net drain >= 0)
1,000-Item Batch p95 End-to-End Under 5 Minutes
Given a 1,000-item batch submitted via API with autoscaling enabled When processing begins under normal production conditions Then the end-to-end latency (submission to final completion webhook delivery) for >= 95% of items is <= 5 minutes And the batch completes with 100% of items either succeeded or placed in a dead-letter list with error details And WebSocket progress indicates >= 95% completion by 5 minutes
Autoscaling Across GPU/CPU Nodes to Clear Backlog
Given the global queue backlog exceeds 2x the sustainable per-node rate for 60 seconds When autoscaling evaluates capacity Then additional GPU/CPU worker nodes are provisioned within 60 seconds to achieve a processing rate greater than the arrival rate And backlog begins to decrease within 2 minutes of scale-out And no in-flight tasks are dropped during scale-out or scale-in And scale-in occurs only after backlog remains < 0.5x sustainable rate for 10 minutes
Backpressure-Aware Orchestration and Ingestion Throttling
Given worker queues exceed the target wait threshold of 30 seconds When additional batch submissions arrive Then the ingestion API responds with HTTP 429 and a Retry-After header reflecting current drain capacity And the orchestrator rate-limits dispatch to saturated nodes so queue wait time p95 stays <= 60 seconds And no tasks fail with resource exhaustion due to overload And no message loss occurs in the job queue
Resumable Batches After Network/Worker Interruptions
Given an active batch with some items completed and others pending When the client disconnects or a worker restarts and later recovers Then the batch resumes without reprocessing completed items And the client can query an accurate list of completed, in-progress, and pending item IDs And duplicate outputs produced per batch is 0
Idempotency and Retry with Exponential Backoff
Given a batch submission includes an Idempotency-Key header When the same submission is repeated within 24 hours Then the API returns the original batch ID and status without creating duplicate work or side effects And transient item failures are retried up to 5 attempts with exponential backoff starting at 2 seconds, factor 2, with full jitter capped at 60 seconds And after max attempts the item moves to a dead-letter queue with machine-readable error code and trace ID
Real-Time Progress via WebSockets and Webhooks
Given a client subscribes to WebSocket updates and registers a webhook endpoint When a batch is running Then progress updates are emitted at least every 2 seconds or on >= 1% progress change, whichever is sooner And webhook events (started, progress, completed, failed) are HMAC-SHA256 signed and delivered with at-least-once semantics with retries for 24 hours And event delivery latency p95 from state change to client receipt is <= 3 seconds And WebSocket streams can resume using the last sequence number without loss or duplication
Explainability & Audit Trail
"As a QA lead, I want to see why a category was chosen and what checks ran so that I can verify correctness and train my team."
Description

Expose interpretable signals behind each categorization, including saliency heatmaps for visual cues and highlighted metadata tokens. Display reason codes and rule results in UI and API. Persist detailed audit logs (predictions, confidences, overrides, rules invoked, outcomes) for at least 180 days with export to CSV/NDJSON and searchable trace IDs for support and compliance.

Acceptance Criteria
UI Explainability: Heatmaps, Token Highlights, Reason Codes
Given a completed Category IQ categorization in the UI for a single product image with listing metadata When the user opens the Explainability panel Then a saliency heatmap overlay toggle is visible and defaults to off And enabling the overlay displays the top 3 visual regions ranked by saliency with numeric scores (0–1) and tooltips on hover And the listing metadata shows the top highlighted tokens (minimum 3, maximum 10) contributing to the prediction with contribution scores And a Reason Codes list shows at least 1 and up to 5 codes with human‑readable labels and machine codes And a Rules Evaluated section lists each invoked rule with result (Pass/Fail), threshold(s), input(s), and rule version And all scores in the panel match the API values for the same trace_id within a tolerance of 0.001
API Explainability Payload with Reason Codes and Rules
Given a GET request to /v1/category/explanations/{trace_id} with a valid trace_id When the response returns 200 Then the payload includes: category, confidence (0–1), reason_codes[], rules_invoked[], saliency_map.url, saliency_regions[], metadata_tokens[] with offsets and contribution, and trace_id And each rules_invoked[] item contains: name, version, inputs, thresholds, result (pass|fail), and outcome_notes And reason_codes[] contains code, label, and weight And the response validates against the published OpenAPI schema and is backward compatible with the last minor version And response time p95 ≤ 500 ms without raster saliency_map; ≤ 1500 ms when including raster And if trace_id is not found, Then 404 is returned with error.code="TRACE_NOT_FOUND" and support_contact
180-Day Audit Log Persistence and Retrieval
Given predictions and any overrides are generated When the audit record is written Then it is persisted within 5 seconds and includes: timestamp (UTC ISO‑8601), user/account_id, job_id, trace_id, input_refs, predicted_category, confidence, reason_codes[], rules_invoked[], outcome, override_flag, override_details (if any), and actor And records are retained for at least 180 days and purged on day 181 And retrieval by exact trace_id returns the record with p95 latency ≤ 300 ms And a tamper‑evident hash is stored per record and can be verified via API
Export Audit Logs to CSV and NDJSON with Filters
Given an admin selects a time window and optional filters (account, category, outcome, has_override) When they request an export Then a downloadable file is generated in CSV and NDJSON with identical content And exports include headers/keys matching the audit log schema and include trace_id in every row/object And exports up to 1,000,000 records complete within 10 minutes and are chunked if larger And exports can be requested via API POST /v1/audit/exports and polled at GET /v1/audit/exports/{export_id} And files are UTF‑8 encoded; NDJSON is newline‑delimited; ZIP compression is applied when size > 100 MB
Search and Trace ID-based Case Reconstruction
Given a user has a trace_id from a support ticket When they search in the UI or call GET /v1/audit/records?trace_id={id} Then exactly one matching record is returned (or zero if purged) with full details And trace_id values are unique within the 180‑day retention window And the UI opens a timeline view showing events: prediction, rules evaluation, override (if any), export references And partial search by prefix (first 8 chars) returns the exact match if unique, else prompts to disambiguate
Manual Override Logging and Explainability Update
Given a human reviewer overrides a category in the UI or via API When the override is saved Then the system records override_reason (free‑text up to 280 chars), actor_id, timestamp (UTC), previous_category, new_category, and linkage to original trace_id And the audit record is versioned (v1, v2, …) preserving the original prediction as v1 And explainability views and API reflect override_applied=true and display the override reason and actor And exports include both original and latest outcomes with version metadata
Rule Invocation Trace with Inputs and Outcomes
Given a categorization run uses category‑specific rules When evaluation completes Then the system logs for each rule: rule_id, name, category_scope, version, inputs (with values), thresholds, result, latency_ms, and any error And the UI Rules Evaluated section can be expanded to show inputs and thresholds for each rule And the API returns the same details under rules_invoked[] with consistent ordering And if a rule errors, Then result="error" and the overall prediction includes a reason_code indicating degraded rules evaluation
Continuous Learning from Corrections
"As a product owner, I want the system to improve from user feedback so that accuracy increases over time without manual rule maintenance."
Description

Capture user overrides and validation outcomes into a feedback store and use them to fine-tune ranking or adapters on a scheduled cadence. Run guarded A/B evaluations and monitor precision/recall by category and merchant; alert on degradations >5% and enable one-click rollback to previous model versions. Support per-merchant personalization with caps to prevent overfitting and maintain global performance.

Acceptance Criteria
Feedback Capture from User Overrides
Given a merchant changes the predicted category in Category IQ, When the override is saved, Then a feedback event is written to the feedback store within 5 seconds with fields: event_id (UUID), timestamp (UTC), merchant_id, product_id, original_category, new_category, confidence_score, user_id (hashed), session_id, source=ui, model_version, category_tree_version. Given the same override is retried with the same event_id, When the write is processed, Then the store performs idempotent upsert and retains a single record. Given a batch CSV correction import, When the import completes, Then one feedback event per item is stored with source=batch and a batch_id linking the set. Given transient storage or network errors, When an event write fails, Then the client retries with exponential backoff up to 3 attempts and emits an error metric; overall 24h write success rate >= 99.5% and P95 write latency <= 2s. Given privacy requirements, When the feedback is stored, Then no raw PII is stored (user_id hashed, no emails) and records are encrypted at rest.
Nightly Fine-Tuning with Data Thresholds
Given the nightly scheduler at 02:00 UTC, When the training job triggers, Then it assembles the last 30 days of labeled feedback and validation outcomes partitioned by category and merchant. Given a category-partition has insufficient data, When counts are calculated, Then training for that partition is skipped if total labeled examples < 500 or positives per class < 50, and an 'insufficient_data' event is logged. Given sufficient data for a partition, When training runs, Then it completes within 60 minutes and produces versioned artifacts (semver vX.Y.Z+build), with registry entry including checksum and data snapshot_id for reproducibility. Given training completes, When validation is evaluated, Then precision and recall are computed per category and per merchant and stored in the experiment tracker; if any partition deviates >5% from the last successful validation, the candidate is flagged for guarded A/B only (no auto-promotion).
Guarded A/B Evaluation and Promotion Gate
Given a candidate model version exists, When an A/B experiment is started, Then 10% of traffic is routed to the candidate and 90% to the control with stratified sampling across merchants and top 50 categories. Given the experiment is running, When stop criteria are evaluated, Then it runs until each of the top 20 categories has ≥ 5,000 predictions or 7 days elapse, whichever comes first. Given sufficient sample sizes, When metrics are computed, Then precision, recall, and false-positive rate are calculated per category and per merchant cohort (cohorts with ≥ 500 predictions) with 95% confidence intervals. Given metrics are available, When eligibility for promotion is checked, Then the candidate is promotable only if: (a) overall weighted precision and recall are ≥ control, (b) no category shows > 5% relative degradation in precision or recall with 95% confidence, and (c) no merchant cohort shows > 5% relative degradation. Given eligibility fails, When the gate evaluates, Then the experiment auto-stops, the candidate is rejected, and a notification is sent to the ML channel with links to the report. Given eligibility passes, When promotion occurs, Then the serving registry updates atomically to the new model version and the experiment is archived with final metrics.
Real-time Degradation Monitoring and Alerting
Given any serving model version, When rolling 24h precision and recall per category or merchant drop by > 5% relative to baseline with ≥ 1,000 predictions, Then an alert is sent to Slack #ml-alerts and PagerDuty within 2 minutes. Given an alert is sent, When the payload is constructed, Then it includes model_version, baseline_version, impacted categories/merchants, metric deltas, volume, start time, and dashboard and rollback links. Given the degradation condition clears, When metrics recover within thresholds for 24h, Then the alert auto-resolves and the incident is closed with resolution notes captured. Given persistent degradation > 48h, When auto-remediation is evaluated, Then a recommendation to rollback is posted to the incident with a one-click action link.
One-Click Rollback to Previous Model
Given a current serving model and a previous passing model exist, When a user triggers rollback via UI or API, Then 100% of traffic is switched back to the previous model within 5 minutes with zero failed prediction requests attributable to the switch. Given rollback executes, When system state is recorded, Then the serving registry logs actor, timestamp, from_version, to_version, reason, and request_id, and all new predictions include the rolled_back model_version. Given rollback is initiated, When safety checks run, Then a 1% canary is executed for up to 2 minutes; if canary fails health checks, rollback aborts and an alert is raised; otherwise rollout proceeds to 100%. Given rollback completes, When monitoring runs, Then precision/recall and error rates return to baseline levels within 30 minutes or an incident is opened automatically.
Per-Merchant Personalization with Global Caps
Given merchant-specific feedback exists, When eligibility is evaluated, Then a per-merchant adapter is enabled only if the merchant has ≥ 100 labeled corrections and outcomes in the last 60 days across ≥ 3 categories and each included category has ≥ 30 examples. Given a merchant adapter is trained, When its impact is assessed, Then on a 10% merchant holdout it shows ≥ 3% relative improvement in both precision and recall, and simultaneously the global (all-merchants) holdout shows < 2% relative degradation in either metric. Given personalization weights are applied, When serving constraints are enforced, Then adapter weight norms are clamped to configured caps, and at least 10% of the merchant's traffic is routed to the global model for exploration and drift detection. Given a personalized merchant shows drift, When 7-day rolling metrics degrade by > 3% with ≥ 1,000 predictions, Then the merchant is automatically reverted to the global model and a notification is sent to the account owner and ML channel.

FixFlow

Configurable auto‑fix pipeline that resolves common failures (background, margins, DPI, shadow) with safe thresholds and rollback. Choose when to auto‑apply vs. request review, preview diffs in one click, and ship compliant images faster without compromising brand fidelity.

Requirements

Rule-Based Auto-Fix Engine
"As a boutique owner, I want my product photos auto-corrected for background, margins, DPI, and shadow in one pass so that I can publish a consistent catalog faster without hand-editing."
Description

Implements a configurable pipeline that automatically detects and corrects common image issues (background cleanup, margin normalization, DPI standardization, and shadow reconstruction) using ordered, modular rules. Each rule is toggleable, parameterized, and can be scoped per workspace, brand, style-preset, or marketplace profile. The engine supports batch execution for hundreds of photos, honors preset styles from PixelLift, and records per-step outcomes for observability. It ensures consistent, studio-quality outputs while reducing manual editing time by up to 80% and aligning with brand guidelines across large catalog uploads.

Acceptance Criteria
Scoped, Toggleable Rule Configuration
1) Given a workspace W with defaults and overrides at brand B, style-preset S, and marketplace profile M, When an image tagged (B, S, M) is processed, Then rule parameters resolve using scope precedence S > M > B > W and unspecified params inherit from the next-wider scope. 2) Given a rule R is toggled OFF at scope S, When processing images under S, Then R is not executed and is recorded as "skipped (disabled)" in the run log. 3) Given an invalid parameter value is saved for rule R at any scope, When saving, Then the system rejects it with a validation error and no changes are applied.
Ordered, Modular Batch Execution
1) Given a pipeline order [background_cleanup, margin_normalization, dpi_standardization, shadow_reconstruction], When processing a batch of 500 images, Then each image's run log lists the rules executed in exactly that order with per-rule status applied/skipped/failed. 2) Given a batch job is started, When 500 images are submitted, Then the system processes all images without exceeding the configured concurrency limit and exposes real-time progress (total, processed, succeeded, failed, pending). 3) Given a batch contains corrupt images, When the pipeline runs, Then corrupt images are marked failed with error codes while the rest complete successfully.
Auto-Apply vs Review Gate with Safe Thresholds and Rollback
1) Given rule-level confidence scores in [0,1] and a per-scope threshold T, When R's confidence < T, Then the system routes the image to "Request Review", does not commit R's changes, and notifies the review queue. 2) Given safe delta limits for metrics (e.g., margin variance <= 2%, background residual <= 0.5%, DPI = target), When any post-rule metric violates its limit, Then the engine rolls the image back to the pre-rule state, records a rollback event, and marks the step "failed (rolled back)". 3) Given a pipeline configured for Auto-Apply, When all rules meet thresholds and deltas, Then the image is committed automatically with status "auto-applied" and no review requested.
Preset Harmony and Marketplace Compliance
1) Given a PixelLift style-preset S sets target margins and background, When the pipeline runs, Then margin_normalization and background_cleanup use S's targets and do not override S-defined aesthetics. 2) Given a marketplace profile M defines background = #FFFFFF and min DPI = 300, When processing images for M, Then outputs meet those constraints exactly or are flagged for review with reasons listed. 3) Given conflicting settings between S and M, When processing for M, Then M's compliance rules take precedence for compliance-critical fields while S governs non-compliance-critical styling, and the precedence is logged.
Per-Step Observability and Diff Preview
1) Given a processed image, When inspecting the run log, Then for each rule the system shows: start/end timestamps, parameters used, metrics before/after, outcome, and any artifacts (e.g., masks) with IDs. 2) Given an image with changes, When "Preview Diff" is clicked, Then the system displays side-by-side original vs final and per-step diffs within 1 second P95 for images <= 25 MB. 3) Given export is requested, When downloading the audit bundle, Then a JSON report and per-step artifacts are included with consistent IDs matching the run log.
Idempotency and Deterministic Ordering
1) Given identical inputs and configuration (including rule order and parameters), When the pipeline is re-run on the same image, Then the final output and run log are byte-for-byte identical. 2) Given the rule order is changed, When the pipeline is re-run, Then the run log reflects the new order and any differences in output are recorded with a change summary. 3) Given non-deterministic operations (if any) exist, When the pipeline runs, Then a fixed seed is used per job so repeated runs reproduce identical results.
Partial Failure Handling and Retry
1) Given a batch with N images where k fail at any rule, When the batch completes, Then a retry action is available that targets only the k failed images with the same config or with updated config. 2) Given a rule times out on an image, When the pipeline continues, Then the image is marked "failed (timeout)" with duration recorded and the batch proceeds without halting. 3) Given a batch job is cancelled by a user, When cancellation occurs, Then in-flight image processing completes current rule and stops with status "cancelled" and no further rules are executed.
Confidence Thresholds & Safeguards
"As a brand manager, I want configurable confidence thresholds so that automated fixes only apply when quality is assured and risky edits are flagged for review."
Description

Adds per-rule confidence scoring and safe thresholds to prevent overcorrection and protect brand fidelity. Each auto-fix computes quality metrics (e.g., mask confidence, edge integrity, fill ratio, color variance) and compares them to configurable thresholds. If confidence is below threshold or deviation exceeds tolerance, the system halts that fix, tags the image for review, and preserves the prior version. Thresholds can be set globally, per brand, or per marketplace compliance profile to balance automation with control.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Apply vs Review Policies
"As an operations lead, I want to auto-apply high-confidence fixes and queue low-confidence ones for review so that my team scales output while keeping quality high."
Description

Provides policy controls to define when fixes are auto-applied versus routed to a human review queue. Policies can be defined per rule, per preset, or per marketplace profile and can leverage confidence scores, product category, or SKU tags. Includes routing to an in-app review inbox, assignment, notifications, and bulk approve/override actions. Ensures high-confidence fixes flow through unattended while edge cases receive timely review, accelerating throughput without sacrificing quality.

Acceptance Criteria
One-Click Diff Preview
"As a photo reviewer, I want a one-click before/after diff so that I can quickly verify fixes and approve or request changes without leaving the flow."
Description

Enables instant visual comparison between original and fixed images with side-by-side and overlay modes, zoom, pan, and toggleable pixel-diff heatmaps. Accessible from the review queue and batch results, the preview shows per-rule annotations (e.g., margin adjustments, background mask edges) and renders in under 300ms for snappy triage. Keyboard shortcuts support rapid navigation across batches, speeding up approvals and rejections during high-volume processing.

Acceptance Criteria
Non-Destructive Rollback & Versioning
"As a store owner, I want to revert any automated fix to a previous version so that I can recover from mistakes and maintain brand consistency."
Description

Stores originals and all intermediate outputs as immutable versions with full audit trails, enabling per-image or batch-level rollback at any time. Each version captures applied rules, parameter values, confidence scores, timestamps, and approver identity. Rollbacks are atomic, reversible, and exposed via UI and API for integrations. This protects against undesirable changes, supports compliance audits, and allows experimentation with new thresholds or presets without risk.

Acceptance Criteria
Marketplace Compliance Profiles
"As a seller listing on multiple marketplaces, I want compliance profiles applied automatically so that my images meet each marketplace’s standards without manual tweaks."
Description

Introduces predefined and customizable profiles for marketplaces (e.g., Amazon, Shopify, eBay) encoding requirements such as background color, product fill percentage, minimum dimensions, DPI, and shadow rules. FixFlow maps rules to these profiles and validates outputs against them, auto-correcting where possible and flagging violations otherwise. Profiles can be attached to style-presets and batches so that images ship compliant by default, reducing listing rejections and rework.

Acceptance Criteria
Resilient Batch Orchestration & Retries
"As a high-volume seller, I want reliable batch processing with automatic retries so that large uploads complete quickly even when individual images fail intermittently."
Description

Adds a fault-tolerant batch processor with idempotent job IDs, prioritized queues, concurrency controls, and exponential backoff retries for transient failures. Provides real-time progress, per-image status, and cost/time estimates, with partial-completion handling and resumable batches. Integrates with PixelLift’s existing upload pipeline and respects per-account rate limits, ensuring reliable high-volume processing during peak catalog updates.

Acceptance Criteria

Crosscheck Matrix

Validate assets against multiple marketplaces at once and visualize conflicts. Get clear recommendations—use one compromise export or auto‑generate channel‑specific variants—so multi‑channel sellers pass all rules the first time with no extra editing cycles.

Requirements

Marketplace Rule Engine
"As a multi-channel seller, I want PixelLift to know each marketplace’s image rules so that my photos are validated accurately without manual research."
Description

Centralized service that aggregates and normalizes image policy rules across marketplaces (e.g., Amazon, eBay, Etsy, Shopify, Walmart) including dimensions, aspect ratios, background color requirements, color profile, max file size, compression, text/watermark/border prohibitions, product fill ratio, and category/region-specific variations. Supports rule versioning with effective dates, change logs, and automatic scheduled updates with manual override. Exposes a low-latency internal API and validation DSL to evaluate PixelLift assets and computed measurements, with fallback defaults when rules are missing and workspace-level custom overrides. Ensures consistent, auditable validations used by the Crosscheck Matrix and export pipeline.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Crosscheck Pipeline
"As a seller uploading a large catalog, I want my entire batch crosschecked in minutes so that I can fix issues before publishing across channels."
Description

Asynchronous, scalable validation pipeline that evaluates hundreds to thousands of images per batch against selected marketplaces in parallel. Implements job queueing, concurrency control, retries/timeouts, and idempotent processing with hashing to skip unchanged assets. Performs image analysis (e.g., background uniformity, margins, product fill ratio) and attaches metrics for rule evaluation. Supports incremental re-validation on deltas, progress tracking, partial results streaming, and webhooks for completion. Integrates before export to prevent non-compliant outputs and after style-presets to catch newly introduced conflicts.

Acceptance Criteria
Conflict Matrix UI
"As a merchandising manager, I want a clear visual of which photos fail which channels so that I can prioritize fixes quickly."
Description

Interactive visualization that displays assets as rows and marketplaces (and/or rule categories) as columns, with cells indicating pass/fail/warn status and severity. Provides filters, sorting, sticky headers, search, and grouping by product or style-preset. Hover reveals rule text and measured values; clicking drills into a detail view with visual overlays (safe crop bounds, padding guides, background uniformity heatmap). Supports keyboard navigation, accessible color contrasts, responsive layouts, and export of the matrix or details as CSV/PDF screenshots to share with teams.

Acceptance Criteria
Actionable Fix Recommendations
"As a seller, I want clear, one-click fixes for violations so that I can pass all marketplace checks without manual editing."
Description

Engine that converts each violation into precise, parameterized remediation steps (e.g., resize to 2000×2000, pad 50px with #FFFFFF, convert to sRGB, compress <1MB, crop to achieve ≥85% subject fill, remove detected text overlay region), with predicted compliance outcomes per marketplace. Honors brand style-presets and constraints, provides confidence scores, and generates instant previews. Enables one-click application to selected assets or entire groups, and queues resulting transforms through the existing rendering pipeline.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Generate Channel Variants
"As a multi-channel seller, I want PixelLift to create channel-specific image variants automatically so that each listing complies without extra effort."
Description

Non-destructive export pipeline that produces marketplace-specific compliant image variants from a canonical master using recommended transforms. Preserves retouching and brand style-presets while adapting technical parameters per channel. Supports naming conventions, folder structures, ZIP packaging, and optional direct pushes to connected storefronts. De-duplicates identical outputs across channels, embeds metadata (e.g., alt text templates), and maintains linkage to the master for re-generation when rules change.

Acceptance Criteria
Compromise vs Variants Assistant
"As a brand owner, I want guidance on whether to use one image for all channels or tailored variants so that I balance compliance with brand consistency."
Description

Decision module that analyzes rule conflicts, marketplace priority weighting, and brand preferences to recommend using a single compromise export or generating channel-specific variants. Provides side-by-side previews, predicted pass rates, and an explanation of trade-offs (e.g., background purity vs brand backdrop). Allows setting workspace defaults and remembers choices per product line, enabling one-click execution of the chosen path.

Acceptance Criteria
Audit Trail & Reporting
"As an operations lead, I want auditable records and reports so that I can prove compliance and improve our workflow over time."
Description

Persistent logging of validation results, applied fixes, rule versions, user actions, and export events at asset and batch levels. Generates downloadable compliance reports, marketplace evidence packs, and trend analytics (e.g., top failing rules, time saved, first-pass yield). Supports RBAC, data retention policies, and re-running validations with historical rule versions to reproduce outcomes.

Acceptance Criteria

CleanSlate Detect

High-accuracy detection for banned overlays like watermarks, text, borders, and stickers. See confidence scores and one‑click, edge‑aware removal that preserves product detail, reducing top rejection causes across Amazon, Etsy, and other platforms.

Requirements

Multi-class Overlay Detection Engine
"As an online seller, I want CleanSlate Detect to automatically find banned overlays in my product photos so that I can avoid marketplace rejections and keep my listings compliant."
Description

Implements high-accuracy detection and localization of banned overlays—including watermarks (opaque and semi-transparent), text (multi-language, rotated/curved), borders/frames, stickers/emojis, QR codes, and logos—across JPEG/PNG/WebP inputs up to 8K resolution. Produces structured outputs per image: detected class, confidence (0–1), and edge-aware polygons/masks, plus an aggregate pass/fail verdict. Targets production performance of ≥0.95 precision and ≥0.90 recall on internal benchmarks, with average latency ≤400 ms per megapixel on GPU (≤1.5 s/MP on CPU). Robust to complex backgrounds, reflective products, and transparent overlays. Integrates as a versioned model within PixelLift’s batch pipeline and public API, with JSON schema responses, telemetry for detection metrics, and graceful degradation: low-confidence cases flagged for review. Ensures secure processing and ephemeral storage aligned with PixelLift privacy standards.

Acceptance Criteria
Edge-Aware One-Click Removal
"As a boutique owner, I want to remove watermarks and borders with one click so that my images look clean and professional without losing product detail."
Description

Delivers single-action, edge-aware removal of detected overlays using product-vs-background segmentation, structure-aware inpainting, and seamless blending to preserve fine product details, edges, and textures. Supports per-item removal (by detection), batch auto-remove rules, and special handling for borders (smart crop vs. reconstruct), semi-transparent watermarks, and stickers casting shadows. Operates non-destructively with reversible layers and history, preview-before-apply, and instant undo. Compatible with PixelLift style-presets and retouch steps, ensuring consistent outputs during batch processing and export. Guarantees artifact thresholds (no halos, color bleeding) and exposes quality safeguards to prevent product damage.

Acceptance Criteria
Confidence Scores & Threshold Controls
"As a power user, I want to tune detection thresholds and use marketplace presets so that I can balance false positives and negatives based on my risk tolerance and policies."
Description

Surfaces per-detection confidence scores with adjustable thresholds by class (text, watermark, border, sticker) and global defaults. Provides marketplace-specific presets to match Amazon/Etsy policies, plus UI controls (sliders, toggles) and batch rules (e.g., auto-remove if confidence ≥ threshold; send to review if within gray zone). Displays optional heatmaps and outlines for transparency, and warns when detections fall near decision boundaries. Persists settings per workspace, supports import/export of detection JSON, and calibrates thresholds via stored ROC data to maintain target precision/recall over model updates.

Acceptance Criteria
Marketplace Compliance Rules Engine
"As a seller listing to multiple marketplaces, I want clear compliance verdicts and reasons per platform so that I can fix issues before I publish and avoid costly rejections."
Description

Maintains an up-to-date, versioned rules library mapping detection outputs to marketplace-specific compliance verdicts (Amazon, Etsy, eBay, Shopify), including regional variations. Produces pass/fail with human-readable reason codes (e.g., “Text on primary image”) and recommended actions (remove, crop, review). Supports scheduled and hotfix rule updates with audit history, offline-safe defaults, and compatibility checks with PixelLift publish/export flows. Exposes verdicts and reasons in UI, API, and downloadable reports, enabling preflight checks that reduce top rejection causes before listing.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Processing & Queue Management
"As a high-volume seller, I want reliable batch processing with progress tracking so that I can process hundreds of photos quickly without babysitting the job."
Description

Adds scalable, fault-tolerant batch execution for detection and removal with prioritized queues, parallel workers, and autoscaling. Supports pause/resume, retries with exponential backoff, idempotent job IDs, and per-image status tracking. Provides real-time progress, ETA, and throughput targets (e.g., ≥300 images/minute with GPU acceleration for 2MP images) while preserving image order and metadata. Integrates tightly with PixelLift’s upload, preset application, and export pipelines, with detailed error reporting and downloadable logs for failed items.

Acceptance Criteria
Reviewer Feedback & Model Improvement Loop
"As a photo editor on my team, I want to quickly review and correct detections so that the system learns from our edits and improves over time."
Description

Introduces a review workspace to confirm, correct, or override detections/removals, including polygon/mask refinement and brush tools. Captures user feedback as labeled data (true positive/false positive/false negative) with consented storage, feeding an MLOps pipeline for periodic re-training and calibration. Supports model version pinning, A/B comparisons, and rollout gating based on measured precision/recall and user-reported issues. Provides audit trails of overrides and reprocessing actions, and ensures permissioned access and data retention controls.

Acceptance Criteria

Proof Pack

Export a rule‑by‑rule compliance dossier per image or batch, including before/after thumbs, specs, and pass reasons. Share with clients or attach to tickets to speed approvals, defend decisions, and keep teams aligned on what’s shipping and why.

Requirements

Rule-by-Rule Compliance Dossier
"As a QA lead, I want a rule-by-rule dossier per image so that I can defend compliance decisions and resolve disputes quickly."
Description

Compile a comprehensive, traceable compliance dossier per image and per batch that enumerates each validation rule evaluated (rule name, category, and version), the measured values versus thresholds, pass/fail outcome, and explicit pass/fail reasons. Include processing context (evaluation timestamp, job ID, preset name/version, model build hash, marketplace/brand rule set version), detected technical specs (dimensions, DPI, background uniformity score, margins, color profile), and links to visual evidence. Persist dossiers with immutable IDs for auditability, enable deterministic re-generation by pinning versions, and structure data to be both human-readable and machine-parseable for downstream systems.

Acceptance Criteria
Before/After Visual Evidence
"As a retoucher, I want clear before/after visuals and annotated evidence so that reviewers can instantly see what changed and why it passed or failed."
Description

Generate optimized before/after thumbnails and annotated visual evidence for each image, including side-by-side comparisons, adjustable split/slider previews, and auto-generated crops highlighting rule violations with overlays and bounding boxes. Produce web-friendly assets (e.g., WebP, 512–1024 px longest side) with consistent file naming, optional watermarking, and alt text for accessibility. Embed visuals in the PDF export and package them in the ZIP alongside JSON, ensuring quick loading and clear visual justification for pass/fail outcomes.

Acceptance Criteria
Multi-format Export & Branding
"As an account manager, I want branded PDF/JSON exports so that I can share professional, machine- and human-readable proof packs with clients."
Description

Provide export options for the proof pack as a branded PDF (paginated, table of contents, batch summary), a machine-readable JSON (schema v1) capturing all rule results and metadata, and a ZIP bundle that includes the PDF, JSON, and visual assets. Support workspace-level branding (logo, colors, header/footer), localized labels (EN at launch, i18n-ready), configurable templates (cover page, sections included), image compression controls, and checksums for file integrity. Enable downloads via UI and API with resumable transfers for large batches.

Acceptance Criteria
Secure Sharing & Ticket Attachments
"As a project manager, I want secure share links and one-click ticket attachments so that approvals and escalations fit our existing workflows."
Description

Enable shareable, time-bound, signed URLs for proof packs with optional password protection, RBAC-based in-app access, access logs, and one-click revocation. Provide native attachments/integrations for Jira and Zendesk (project/issue mapping, authentication via stored OAuth/tokens, retry on failure) and a generic email share that sends a secure link rather than files. Ensure shared artifacts exclude PII, include a client-facing summary, and maintain consistent file naming for easy reference in external workflows.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Index & Versioning
"As a production supervisor, I want batch-level summaries and versioning so that I can track changes, compare results, and maintain an audit trail."
Description

Create a batch-level index that summarizes overall pass rate, per-rule breakdowns, and quick filters, with links to each image’s dossier. Record and display version information for rule sets, presets, and models; maintain a change history; and support re-generation of proof packs when rules change while preserving prior versions for audit. Provide a diff view that highlights what changed between two dossier versions at the rule and metric level to streamline approvals across iterations.

Acceptance Criteria
Automation, API & Webhooks
"As a developer, I want APIs and webhooks for proof packs so that I can automate generation and integrate them into our pipelines."
Description

Add workspace-level policies to auto-generate proof packs on job completion or on manual trigger, with queueing, retries, and idempotency. Expose REST endpoints to request generation, poll status, and download artifacts; emit webhooks on completion/failure including artifact URLs and checksums. Provide Slack/email notifications, rate limiting, and concurrency controls to protect system stability and enable seamless integration into external pipelines.

Acceptance Criteria
Performance, Scalability & Reliability
"As an operations lead, I want performance and reliability guarantees so that large batches deliver proof packs on time without failures."
Description

Meet SLOs for large batches (e.g., 95th percentile generation of PDF+JSON for 500 images within 5 minutes) with autoscaling workers, backpressure, and progress indicators. Support resumable and chunked downloads, storage retention policies (e.g., 30 days with configurable overrides), and encrypted storage/transport. Implement health checks, monitoring, and alerting; graceful degradation and clear user-facing error messages; and disaster recovery objectives (defined RPO/RTO) to ensure dependable delivery of proof packs at scale.

Acceptance Criteria

NeckForge

AI reconstructs the interior neckline for an elegant invisible‑mannequin look. Control depth, curve, and collar spread, toggle label visibility, and reuse brand-specific neck templates for consistent results across collections—no reshoots or manual cloning required.

Requirements

Neckline Reconstruction Engine
"As an online seller, I want my apparel images to have a clean invisible‑mannequin neckline so that my listings look premium and consistent without needing costly reshoots."
Description

Develop a core AI pipeline that reconstructs the interior neckline for an invisible‑mannequin effect from a single product photo. The engine must preserve fabric texture, stitching, and prints; handle common neckline types (crew, V, scoop, mock, turtleneck, polo) and garments (tees, shirts, dresses, hoodies); and output a clean alpha mask plus a composite image. It must maintain color fidelity (sRGB/AdobeRGB workflows), consistent shading, and edge realism with anti‑aliasing and micro‑shadow synthesis. The component exposes tunable parameters (depth, curve, collar spread) and returns quality/confidence scores. Integrates into the PixelLift pipeline post background removal and pre style‑preset application. Performance target: ≤3s per 2048px image on a T4‑class GPU, with deterministic results given identical inputs and seeds. Provides safe fallback to original image when confidence is below threshold.

Acceptance Criteria
Interactive Neck Controls with Live Preview
"As a boutique owner, I want precise, real‑time controls over the neckline shape so that I can match my brand’s look across different garments without trial‑and‑error."
Description

Provide intuitive UI controls for depth, curve, and collar spread with slider + numeric entry, symmetry toggle, and anchor point handles. Changes render in a real‑time preview at 1:1 with GPU acceleration and <100ms interaction latency. Include undo/redo (20 steps), reset to defaults, tooltips, and accessibility (keyboard navigation, screen‑reader labels). Validate parameter ranges per garment type and auto‑suggest starting values based on detected neckline class. Persist settings per image and session, and expose the same controls via API for automation.

Acceptance Criteria
Label Visibility & Placement Control
"As a brand manager, I want to control whether and how the neck label appears so that my images comply with brand guidelines and marketplace policies."
Description

Enable a toggle to show/hide interior labels and configure label placement, size, rotation, and curvature to match the reconstructed neckline. Support uploading a brand label asset, apply perspective and lighting adaptation, and ensure legibility without occluding seam details. Default to a neutral blank label to avoid unintended branding. Export the label as a separate layer group when using layered formats (e.g., PSD) and embed label metadata for downstream systems. Enforce safeguards to prevent hallucinated or duplicated branding, and provide quick presets (centered, offset left/right) with snap‑to seam guides.

Acceptance Criteria
Brand Neck Template Library
"As a studio lead, I want to save and reuse brand‑specific neck settings so that my team can produce consistent results across collections without manual re‑tuning."
Description

Create reusable, versioned templates that store NeckForge parameters (depth, curve, collar spread), label configuration, edge feathering, shadow strength, and color profile preferences. Templates can be named, previewed with thumbnails, assigned to collections/SKUs, and shared across team workspaces with role‑based permissions. Support import/export (JSON) for portability, audit trails for changes, and template pinning as defaults per catalog or uploader. Ensure backward compatibility when the model is updated by keeping template‑to‑model compatibility metadata.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Processing & Pipeline Orchestration
"As an operations manager, I want to run NeckForge on large catalogs with minimal babysitting so that we can meet launch deadlines reliably."
Description

Support batch application of NeckForge to hundreds/thousands of images with template assignment rules (by folder, SKU, or tag), concurrency controls, and autoscaling workers. Provide idempotent job submission via API/CLI, progress tracking, and webhooks for completion/failure events. Integrate with the PixelLift job graph to run after background removal and before style‑presets, with per‑image overrides and automatic retries on transient errors. Provide resumable jobs, per‑item status, and throughput targets of 500+ images/hour/GPU at 2048px.

Acceptance Criteria
Automated QA & Fallback Handling
"As a content QA specialist, I want the system to flag and gracefully handle poor reconstructions so that only studio‑quality images are published without manual spot‑checking every file."
Description

Implement confidence scoring and anomaly checks for artifacts such as jagged edges, seam misalignment, asymmetry beyond tolerance, floating labels, and texture discontinuities. On detection, route images to a review queue with side‑by‑side before/after, overlays, and adjustable thresholds per brand. Provide automated fallbacks (shallower depth, different mask strategy, or bypass NeckForge) and emit alerts/metrics (Datadog/Stackdriver) for sustained failure patterns. Log decisions for traceability and continuously feed outcomes back to improve the model.

Acceptance Criteria

SleeveFill

Automatically rebuilds interior sleeves and armholes with natural drape and symmetry. Dial opening width and fabric tension to match garment type (tank, tee, blazer), preserving cuff geometry and stitching so tops and outerwear present cleanly in every listing.

Requirements

Sleeve Interior Reconstruction Engine
"As an online seller, I want the tool to automatically rebuild empty sleeve interiors so that my product photos look professionally filled and balanced without manual retouching."
Description

Develop the core ML-driven inpainting and geometry-rebuild engine that reconstructs interior sleeves and armholes with natural drape and symmetry. The engine should infer missing interior fabric, estimate garment thickness, and synthesize plausible folds while avoiding distortions. It must ingest the product cutout mask from PixelLift’s segmentation stage, operate before style-presets are applied, and output an alpha-matted layer that preserves original garment boundaries. Include symmetry constraints across left/right sleeves, pose-awareness to handle angled garments, and fail-safes that revert to original if confidence is low. Provide deterministic results for identical inputs and support GPU acceleration for batch throughput targets.

Acceptance Criteria
Fabric Tension & Opening Width Controls
"As a boutique owner, I want quick sliders to adjust sleeve openness and fabric tension so that I can match the look to different tops and brand styling in seconds."
Description

Implement user-facing controls to dial sleeve opening width and perceived fabric tension, with real-time preview. Controls must map to physically plausible bounds per garment type and adjust drape intensity, fold frequency, and aperture shape without breaking cuff geometry. Provide presets (tight/regular/relaxed) and numeric sliders, allow per-image overrides during review, and expose settings via API and batch presets. Ensure latency under 300 ms per adjustment on a mid-range GPU and persist chosen values in project metadata for reproducibility.

Acceptance Criteria
Garment-Type Presets & Auto-Detection
"As a catalog manager, I want the system to auto-select sleeve settings based on garment type so that I don’t have to tune each product manually during batch uploads."
Description

Create garment-type presets (tank, tee, long-sleeve, hoodie, blazer/coat) that set default sleeve opening and tension parameters, symmetry rules, and drape models. Add a lightweight classifier to auto-detect garment type from the product image and apply the corresponding preset, with confidence scoring and fallback to a default. Allow brand-specific custom presets that can be saved and shared across teams and included in one-click style-presets for batch runs. Log applied preset and detection confidence for auditability.

Acceptance Criteria
Cuff Geometry & Stitch Preservation
"As a product photographer, I want cuff edges and stitching to remain crisp and true to the original so that the final images look authentic and high-quality."
Description

Develop edge-aware segmentation and feature-preservation routines that lock cuff contours, seam lines, and visible stitching during sleeve reconstruction. Use high-frequency detail masks and contour constraints to prevent blurring, stretching, or misalignment of cuffs and hems. Include a quality gate that compares pre/post edge metrics (SSIM/edge density) and auto-corrects artifacts. Ensure compatibility with various cuff types (ribbed knit, rolled, buttoned, tailored) and support zoomed inspection in the review UI.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch SleeveFill Processing Pipeline
"As a seller who uploads large catalogs, I want SleeveFill to run reliably in batches with clear progress and fast turnaround so that my listings are ready quickly."
Description

Integrate SleeveFill into the batch pipeline with parallel processing, idempotent job orchestration, and resumable tasks. Support processing hundreds of images concurrently with configurable concurrency, backoff/retry on transient failures, and timeouts. Provide progress tracking, per-item logs, and artifact tagging so SleeveFill outputs can be traced and rolled back. Ensure end-to-end throughput aligns with PixelLift’s promise (hundreds in minutes) and expose pipeline controls via API/CLI and the web dashboard.

Acceptance Criteria
Manual Sleeve Mask Fine-Tune Tools
"As a retoucher, I want simple manual controls to fix rare sleeve artifacts so that I can deliver perfect images without leaving PixelLift."
Description

Offer optional fine-tune tools for edge cases: a smart brush to nudge sleeve apertures, an anchor-point gizmo to adjust symmetry axes, and a toggle to freeze specific regions. Edits must be non-destructive, recorded as layered adjustments, and re-playable in batch via saved presets. Provide undo/redo, before/after diff, and artifact flagging that can feed back into model improvement. Keep the interaction lightweight and consistent with existing PixelLift retouch UI patterns.

Acceptance Criteria

SeamFlow

Maintains pattern and seam continuity through reconstructed areas. Detects and extends stripes, plaids, and darts with smart warping and anchor points, preventing visual breaks that make apparel look cheap—delivering premium, studio-grade realism at scale.

Requirements

Pattern & Seam Auto-Detection
"As an independent seller batch-uploading apparel photos, I want automatic detection of patterns and seams so that SeamFlow can align textures without manual markup."
Description

Automatically identifies repeating textile patterns (e.g., stripes, plaids, herringbone) and structural lines (seams, darts, hems) in apparel images. Produces pixel-accurate masks and vector fields indicating pattern direction and phase continuity across panels. Integrates with PixelLift’s existing garment/region segmentation to avoid backgrounds and accessories. Outputs confidence scores per region to drive downstream warp and inpainting decisions. Reduces manual markup, accelerates batch throughput, and establishes the canonical geometry inputs required for SeamFlow’s continuity operations.

Acceptance Criteria
Anchor Point Snapping & Guides
"As a retoucher using PixelLift, I want to place anchors that snap to true seam lines so that I can precisely control continuity where the algorithm is uncertain."
Description

Provides an interactive tool for placing, editing, and removing anchor points and guide paths along detected seams and darts. Anchors snap to high-confidence seam edges and pattern phase lines, with adjustable tolerance and magnet strength. Supports symmetry mirroring, multi-select, and constraint types (fixed, elastic, rotational) to steer continuity corrections where detection is ambiguous. Non-destructive: anchors are stored in project metadata and can be reused across variants. Integrates into PixelLift’s editor and is callable via API for scripted workflows.

Acceptance Criteria
Continuity Smart Warp Engine
"As a boutique owner, I want patterns to align seamlessly across reconstructed areas so that my listings look premium and trustworthy."
Description

Computes localized, non-linear warp fields that align pattern phase and direction across seam boundaries and reconstructed areas without distorting garment silhouette. Uses detected pattern vectors and user anchors as constraints to minimize phase error while preserving fabric drape. Includes guardrails for skin/hardware exclusion and per-region warp strength. GPU-accelerated for near real-time previews and scalable batch processing. Outputs reversible warp parameters saved to sidecar metadata for auditability and rollbacks.

Acceptance Criteria
Pattern-Aware Inpainting & Extension
"As a photographer, I want inpainting that extends stripes and plaids realistically into missing regions so that background removal or cropping doesn’t break garment realism."
Description

Synthesizes missing or occluded textile content by extending detected patterns with phase-consistent texture generation. Maintains stripe/plaids alignment through hems, folds, and cropped edges, and harmonizes color/lighting with the source fabric. Edge-aware blending avoids halos from background removal. Fallbacks to neutral fill when confidence is low, with automatic flagging for review. Integrates with the Smart Warp Engine to jointly optimize inpaint and warp for continuity.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch SeamFlow Presets & Pipeline Integration
"As a catalog manager, I want SeamFlow to run automatically with presets during batch processing so that hundreds of images are processed consistently without hand-tuning."
Description

Adds configurable presets for common pattern types (stripes, plaids, micro-patterns) and fabric behaviors, enabling one-click application of SeamFlow during batch uploads. Presets define detection sensitivity, warp strength, inpaint bounds, and confidence thresholds. Hooks into PixelLift’s existing batch queue, parallelization, and style-presets so SeamFlow runs alongside retouching and background removal. Includes retry policy, failure isolation, and per-image logs/metrics for observability.

Acceptance Criteria
Continuity Preview, Confidence Heatmap, and Overrides
"As a QA reviewer, I want a real-time preview and confidence heatmap so that I can quickly spot and correct any continuity defects before publishing."
Description

Displays live before/after comparison with seam overlays and pattern phase lines, plus a confidence heatmap highlighting areas at risk of visual breaks. Provides one-click accept, quick adjustments (slider for warp strength), and jump-to-anchor navigation. Surfaces auto-flags from low-confidence regions for human review in a QA queue. Exports review outcomes to inform future auto-thresholds. Available in the editor UI and via lightweight web preview for stakeholders.

Acceptance Criteria

EdgeGuard

Thread‑aware matting that preserves delicate fabric edges (lace, mesh, frayed hems) while eliminating halos and fringing on white or colored backgrounds. Produces crisp, marketplace‑safe cutouts that pass scrutiny and elevate perceived quality.

Requirements

Thread-Aware Edge Detection
"As a boutique product photographer, I want delicate fabric edges to be accurately preserved so that my cutouts look natural and premium without manual masking."
Description

Implements a subpixel, fabric-sensitive edge detection and matting module that recognizes fine threads, frayed hems, lace borders, and mesh patterns to produce a high-fidelity alpha matte. The algorithm classifies edge regions (solid fiber, semi-transparent weave, background gap) and preserves micro-structure without stair-stepping or over-smoothing. It supports variable fiber thickness, motion blur from handheld shots, and complex contours intersecting with shadows. Outputs include an 8–16 bit alpha matte and a refined foreground with edge-aware antialiasing. Integrates as a drop-in matting stage within PixelLift’s processing graph, with tunable sensitivity presets and deterministic results for consistent batch outcomes.

Acceptance Criteria
Color Decontamination & Halo Removal
"As an online seller, I want halos and color fringing eliminated around fabrics so that my listings meet marketplace standards and look professionally retouched."
Description

Provides robust suppression of background color spill and edge halos on both white and colored backdrops by estimating local background color, removing contamination from the foreground edge pixels, and reconstructing true fiber color. Includes adaptive decontamination strength, chroma-only and luminance-aware modes, and guardrails to avoid overdesaturation of genuine fabric dyes. Handles glossy trims and light bleed conditions while maintaining crisp transitions. Exposes a simple on/off with ‘Marketplace Safe’ default enabled, plus an advanced panel for power users. Integrates after alpha estimation and before style-presets, ensuring downstream color grading does not reintroduce fringing.

Acceptance Criteria
Semi-Transparent Fabric Preservation
"As a fashion merchant, I want lace and mesh transparency preserved so that shoppers can see authentic fabric detail and texture in my product photos."
Description

Accurately models partial transparency in lace, mesh, chiffon, and tulle by producing a smooth, physically plausible alpha that retains holes and weave patterns without filling them in. Distinguishes between thread fibers and background gaps, even under backlighting, and avoids haloing in high-contrast scenarios. Supports threshold-free operation with automatic detection of semi-transparent regions and optional controls for minimum hole size and alpha smoothing radius. Ensures exported PNG/WebP retains premultiplied-correct edges for consistent rendering in marketplaces and storefronts.

Acceptance Criteria
Robust Background Modeling (White & Colored)
"As a catalog manager, I want consistent cutouts from both white and colored backgrounds so that I’m free to shoot on whatever backdrop is available without quality loss."
Description

Builds a local background model that handles pure white sweeps, colored paper, and gradient backdrops with shadows. Estimates per-pixel background chroma and luminance to guide matte refinement and color decontamination, including cases with uneven lighting or light ramps. Detects and compensates for soft shadows without erasing fabric edges. Includes safeguards for props or foreground objects that touch backdrop seams. Exposes a ‘Background Type: Auto/White/Colored/Gradient’ selector for deterministic batch behavior and logs chosen model for auditability.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Integration & Preset Compatibility
"As a high-volume seller, I want EdgeGuard to run automatically with my existing style presets so that I can process hundreds of photos quickly without manual tuning."
Description

Integrates EdgeGuard seamlessly into PixelLift’s batch pipeline and style-preset system. Supports per-preset EdgeGuard settings, override flags, and deterministic seed control for reproducible runs across hundreds of images. Provides concurrency-safe processing, resumable batches, and fallbacks to legacy matting if inputs are out-of-distribution. Ensures outputs (alpha, cutout, spill map) are accessible to downstream steps such as background replacement, drop shadows, and color grading. Emits structured logs and metrics for each file to aid QA and troubleshooting.

Acceptance Criteria
Compliance Preview & Validator
"As a QA editor, I want an instant preview and automated compliance checks so that I can catch and fix edge issues before publishing to marketplaces."
Description

Adds a zoomable edge preview with overlay modes (alpha, matte boundaries, decontamination mask) and automated checks against marketplace guidelines (e.g., no visible halos on white, clean subject contour, no residual background tint). Flags issues with visual annotations and actionable suggestions (increase decontamination strength, adjust background model), and supports one-click apply/fix. Generates a per-image compliance score and batch summary report export (CSV/JSON) for operational review.

Acceptance Criteria
GPU-Accelerated Performance & Scalability
"As an operations lead, I want predictable GPU-accelerated throughput so that daily image queues finish within our publishing SLAs."
Description

Optimizes EdgeGuard for GPU inference and post-processing to meet batch throughput targets with predictable latency. Implements tiled processing with seam-free blending for high-resolution images, asynchronous job scheduling, and mixed-precision math where safe. Provides graceful CPU fallback with performance warning. Target SLA: process at least 200 images at 2048px long edge in under 10 minutes on a single mid-tier GPU, with peak memory under 3 GB per worker. Includes telemetry for throughput, GPU utilization, and per-stage timing to guide capacity planning.

Acceptance Criteria

SwatchMatch

Color‑true finishing that matches garments to a provided swatch photo or hex value. Auto‑corrects white balance and hue with per‑batch profiling, shows ΔE accuracy scores, and exports channel‑optimized variants—reducing returns and buyer complaints about color.

Requirements

Swatch Input & Target Color Extraction
"As a boutique owner, I want to set a target color from a swatch photo or hex so that my product images match the true garment color."
Description

Accept a swatch photo upload or direct color entry (HEX/RGB) and extract a precise target color in CIELAB under D65. For photos, provide an eyedropper and auto-detection of uniform color patches with configurable sampling radius and outlier rejection to reduce glare/noise. Validate color inputs, display a live target chip, and persist the target per batch. Support common formats (JPEG/PNG), ICC-aware conversion (assume sRGB if none), and guidance tooltips for best results. Store the resolved target color and metadata in the batch profile for downstream processing modules.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Color Profiling & Auto White Balance
"As a seller managing large uploads, I want automatic white balance and tint correction per batch so that colors are consistent across all photos."
Description

Create a per-batch color profile by estimating illuminant, white balance, and tint from representative images, then normalize exposure and white balance before hue adjustments. Support mixed lighting with per-image refinement anchored to the batch baseline and provide optional user overrides. Persist profile parameters for reproducibility and feed them into subsequent correction stages. Optimize for GPU execution to keep batch throughput high and ensure consistent color normalization across hundreds of photos.

Acceptance Criteria
Garment Segmentation & Protected Adjustments
"As a shop owner, I want color corrections applied only to the garment so that models and backgrounds remain natural."
Description

Isolate the garment using semantic segmentation and apply color transforms only within the garment mask while protecting skin tones, backgrounds, and props. Use edge-aware blending and texture-preserving adjustments to modify hue/chroma while maintaining luminance and fabric detail. Provide fallback handling for complex patterns and optional manual mask refinement on selected images. Store masks with image revisions and share them with other PixelLift tools to prevent conflicting edits.

Acceptance Criteria
ΔE Accuracy Scoring & Tolerance Controls
"As a brand manager, I want to see ΔE accuracy scores and set a tolerance so that I can ensure color fidelity before exporting."
Description

Calculate ΔE00 between the corrected garment’s average Lab color and the target swatch, display per-image scores and batch statistics, and allow users to set tolerance thresholds that flag outliers. Present clear indicators on thumbnails, provide a detailed view with sampled regions, and enable CSV export of results. Record scores in image metadata for auditing and downstream quality checks.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Preview & Approval Workflow
"As a busy seller, I want an efficient review screen with before/after and bulk approvals so that I can quickly finalize large batches."
Description

Offer a fast before/after preview grid with zoom, a swatch chip overlay, and ΔE badges. Enable bulk approve/reject/needs-review actions, keyboard shortcuts, and per-image notes. Maintain version history to compare alternate corrections. Gate exports on approval status to prevent accidental release of out-of-tolerance images and surface review status in batch summaries.

Acceptance Criteria
Channel-Optimized Export & Metadata
"As an e-commerce seller, I want channel-ready exports with embedded color profiles so that colors render consistently across marketplaces."
Description

Generate channel-specific export variants (e.g., Shopify, Amazon, Instagram) with correct color space (sRGB IEC 61966-2.1), compression, and size presets. Embed ICC profiles and write metadata tags for target color and ΔE score. Support JPG/WEBP/PNG and deterministic file naming. Allow filtering to exclude out-of-tolerance images and preserve transparency when applicable. Expose the same options via API for automation.

Acceptance Criteria
Preset & API Integration
"As a developer integrating PixelLift, I want SwatchMatch configurable via presets and API so that I can automate color-matched exports in my pipeline."
Description

Integrate SwatchMatch as a configurable step in PixelLift style presets and expose full functionality via public API parameters (swatch input, tolerance, export profile). Support saving, sharing, and versioning of presets; provide idempotent job submission, webhooks for status, and RBAC-aligned access. Ensure preset execution is deterministic so teams can reuse color-matching workflows across catalogs.

Acceptance Criteria

ContourShadow

Adds physically‑plausible interior and ground shadows to restore depth after mannequin removal. One slider controls intensity with marketplace‑safe presets; auto‑generates shadow/no‑shadow variants for channels that restrict effects while keeping images conversion‑ready.

Requirements

Physically-Based Shadow Synthesis Engine
"As a boutique owner batch-editing product photos, I want realistic shadows that match my products’ shapes and contact points so that my listings look professional and drive more conversions."
Description

Generates physically plausible interior and ground shadows from mannequin-removed product cutouts by inferring product contours, contact points, and approximate scene lighting, producing soft, directionally consistent shadows that restore perceived depth without violating marketplace background rules. Integrates with PixelLift’s background removal output, supports high-resolution exports, honors transparent PNG and JPEG white backgrounds, and exposes a parameter API for opacity, softness, and falloff while defaulting to safe values. The engine must be deterministic for identical inputs and support GPU acceleration to meet batch SLAs, delivering realistic depth restoration that boosts conversion while maintaining channel compliance.

Acceptance Criteria
Intensity Slider with Live Preview
"As a seller preparing a catalog, I want a simple slider to quickly dial in how strong the shadows appear so that I can match my brand style without complex settings."
Description

Implements a single, discoverable slider control (0–100) that adjusts composite shadow intensity in real time on the canvas with instant visual feedback and keyboard step controls, mapping slider positions to predefined opacity/softness curves that remain consistent across batches. Supports per-image tweaks and batch-apply, persists in presets, and includes accessible labels and tooltip guidance. Rendering is latency-optimized (<150 ms) via progressive preview with a high-quality refine on mouse-up to keep editing fluid.

Acceptance Criteria
Marketplace-Safe Presets
"As a merchant publishing to multiple marketplaces, I want ready-made shadow settings that are compliant for each channel so that my images are accepted everywhere without manual tweaking."
Description

Provides a curated library of shadow presets tuned for major marketplaces (e.g., Amazon, Etsy, eBay, Shopify) that enforce channel-specific constraints such as minimal cast shadow, white background thresholds, and maximum opacity, with clear labels and guardrails to prevent non-compliant outputs. Presets are editable, saveable per brand, and selectable at batch start; underlying parameters map to the shadow engine and intensity slider. The system auto-suggests a preset based on channel metadata and allows quick switching without re-upload.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto Variant Generation & Channel Routing
"As a seller syndicating listings across channels, I want PixelLift to export both shadowed and clean variants to the right places so that I don’t have to create and manage duplicates manually."
Description

Automatically generates both “shadowed” and “no-shadow” variants per image during export, tags them with channel-specific metadata, and routes them to the appropriate destinations, filenames, and folders (or via API/webhooks) according to a user-defined mapping. Ensures deterministic visual parity except for shadows, keeps file sizes within marketplace limits, and records variant lineage for auditability. Users can enable or disable variants per channel and see export counts along with success or failure states.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Processing with Preset Application
"As an online shop owner preparing a seasonal drop, I want to apply the same shadow look to my whole catalog in one run so that I can publish quickly and consistently."
Description

Enables applying a selected shadow preset and intensity uniformly across hundreds of images with resumable batch jobs, concurrency control, progress indicators, and error handling that retries failed items without reprocessing successful ones. Batch processing respects per-image overrides, preserves metadata, and ensures consistent output naming. Performance target is 300 images in under 10 minutes on a standard GPU tier, with resource scaling and throttling to maintain SLA.

Acceptance Criteria
Shadow Quality & Compliance Validator
"As a seller concerned about rejections, I want PixelLift to catch and fix shadow issues before export so that my listings aren’t delayed or penalized."
Description

Implements automated checks to detect common shadow artifacts (hard edges, halos, misaligned contact points, floating shadows) and validate against marketplace constraints (white background tolerance, opacity limits), with auto-corrections where possible and clear flags for manual review when not. Runs inline during preview and in batch mode, provides confidence scores, and blocks export for non-compliant selections unless overridden with a warning.

Acceptance Criteria
Performance Guardrails & Fallback Modes
"As a high-volume seller on a deadline, I want predictable processing times with graceful quality fallbacks so that I can meet publishing windows."
Description

Defines per-image time and compute budgets for the shadow pipeline with instrumentation to track render latency, memory use, and GPU utilization; when budgets are exceeded, switches to a faster fallback rendering mode that preserves compliance and visual consistency. Exposes configuration for speed versus quality trade-offs in batch runs and surfaces performance metrics in the job summary to help users choose appropriate settings.

Acceptance Criteria

SizeSync

Locks ghosting parameters (neck depth, sleeve opening, crop margin) across size runs and color variants. Uses size-chart cues to normalize presentation so grids look cohesive, buyers can compare at a glance, and teams spend less time nudging per image.

Requirements

Size-Chart Parsing & Mapping
"As a studio manager, I want SizeSync to read our size charts and map them to image parameters so that product grids stay consistent without manual tweaking."
Description

Ingest size charts (CSV, JSON, or manual form) and map alpha/numeric sizes to garment measurement targets to drive normalized ghosting parameters (neck depth, sleeve opening, crop margin) per product category. Handle unit conversion, tolerances, missing values, and fallback defaults. Persist mappings per brand and collection, version them for auditability, and link to catalog SKUs via PixelLift metadata. Provide a validation step to flag inconsistencies and ensure downstream pipelines can consume normalized targets.

Acceptance Criteria
Parameter Lock Profiles
"As a brand designer, I want to define lock profiles for tees, hoodies, and dresses so that every batch renders with uniform framing across sizes and colors."
Description

Define reusable lock profiles that specify which ghosting and framing parameters to lock (e.g., neck depth, sleeve opening, hem/crop margin), alignment rules, anchor points, and permitted variance thresholds. Allow profile scoping by brand, category, and channel. Auto-apply the correct profile on batch ingest, integrate with PixelLift style-presets, and expose a simple UI for create/edit/clone to promote standardization across teams.

Acceptance Criteria
Variant Cohesion Preview Grid
"As a content coordinator, I want to preview how each size and color will look together so that I can catch inconsistencies before publishing."
Description

Provide an interactive preview grid that displays normalized images across sizes and color variants before export. Visualize locked parameters and highlight outliers exceeding thresholds. Offer quick, bounded per-image nudges and a toggle between original and SizeSync results, with real-time batch recalculation. Integrate with existing PixelLift preview and export flows to streamline decision-making and reduce rework.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto Landmark Detection & Anchor Stabilization
"As a photo editor, I want the system to auto-detect garment landmarks so that framing and ghosting locks are accurate without manual marking."
Description

Detect garment landmarks (neckline, shoulder seam, sleeve opening, hem) using category-specific computer vision models to anchor ghosting and cropping. Produce confidence scores, log detection metrics, and gracefully fall back to size-chart targets when confidence is low. Support mannequin, flat-lay, and ghost imagery; interoperate with background removal; and ensure deterministic anchoring so repeated runs yield stable results.

Acceptance Criteria
Batch Overrides & Tolerance Controls
"As a lead retoucher, I want to set tolerances and override specific items so that exceptions don’t force us to break the whole batch."
Description

Enable global tolerance settings (e.g., ±2% neck depth) and role-based per-image overrides for atypical items without breaking batch consistency. Provide bulk actions by SKU/size/color, undo/reset to defaults, and an audit trail of changes. Persist overrides to the project so subsequent re-renders and pipelines respect the same decisions, and allow import/export of tolerance presets for reuse.

Acceptance Criteria
Consistency Scoring & Alerting
"As an operations manager, I want alerts and scores on batch consistency so that we can ensure catalog cohesion and reduce rework."
Description

Calculate a consistency score per batch and per grid based on variance across locked parameters, surfacing alerts for assets outside thresholds. Generate downloadable QA reports, expose metrics in the PixelLift dashboard, and send notifications via email/Slack/webhooks to prompt timely corrections. Track trends over time to demonstrate process improvements and impact on conversion.

Acceptance Criteria
Preset Compatibility & API Export
"As a developer, I want API endpoints and preset compatibility so that SizeSync fits into our automated media pipeline."
Description

Ensure lock profiles interoperate with existing PixelLift style-presets and batch automation. Provide API endpoints to apply profiles, retrieve variance reports, and export processed images with embedded metadata (locked parameters, scores). Support delivery to connected DAM/e-commerce platforms (e.g., Shopify, BigCommerce) via current connectors, preserving variant associations and ensuring downstream grids render cohesively.

Acceptance Criteria

Fingerprint Builder

Onboard each supplier in minutes by generating a robust visual and metadata signature from a handful of sample images. PixelLift auto-extracts EXIF patterns, logo placements, background hues, lighting histograms, and crop ratios to create a reliable fingerprint that boosts routing accuracy without manual mapping.

Requirements

Supplier Sample Onboarding Intake
"As an operations manager onboarding a new supplier, I want to upload a handful of sample images and start fingerprint creation in minutes so that incoming catalogs route correctly without manual mapping."
Description

Enable rapid onboarding of each supplier by accepting a small set of sample images via upload or URL, validating formats and minimum sample count, deduplicating files, and assigning a unique supplier ID. Kick off asynchronous extraction jobs with visible progress, provide estimated completion time, and support batch onboarding. Capture optional supplier metadata (name, contact, tags) and link to existing PixelLift accounts. Ensure secure, temporary storage for samples and enforce size limits and virus scanning. Emit events for downstream processing and audit logs for traceability.

Acceptance Criteria
EXIF & Metadata Pattern Extraction
"As a technical user, I want PixelLift to extract and normalize metadata patterns from sample images so that the fingerprint captures reliable non-visual cues for routing."
Description

Automatically parse EXIF/IPTC/XMP from sample images, normalize fields (timezones, camera/software strings), and compute statistical patterns across samples (e.g., common camera model, software tag, missing/locked fields). Handle corrupted or absent metadata gracefully and support common formats (JPEG, PNG, TIFF, RAW where available). Identify potential PII and apply configurable scrubbing policies before storage. Persist a canonical metadata signature with tolerances and weights for use in matching, and expose structured outputs to the fingerprint store.

Acceptance Criteria
Visual Signature Feature Extraction
"As a product photo lead, I want PixelLift to compute reliable visual signatures from a few samples so that the system can recognize supplier images even when backgrounds or crops vary slightly."
Description

Derive robust visual features from samples including logo presence and placement heatmaps, dominant/background hue distributions, lighting and tonal histograms (RGB/HSV), crop and margin ratios, aspect ratio frequencies, shadow/reflection profiles, noise/grain characteristics, and palette clusters. Generate both interpretable summaries and learned embedding vectors. Support variable resolutions and orientations, apply color-space normalization, and ensure deterministic outputs across runs. Optimize for batch throughput and provide feature-quality metrics per sample.

Acceptance Criteria
Fingerprint Aggregation, Weighting & Confidence Scoring
"As a routing engineer, I want a unified fingerprint with confidence scoring and explainability so that new images are matched accurately and ambiguous cases are flagged for review."
Description

Aggregate visual and metadata features across all samples to synthesize a single supplier fingerprint with component weights, tolerances, and confidence thresholds. Support minimum sample requirements, outlier rejection, and incremental updates when new samples arrive. Produce an explainable score breakdown for matches and expose a stable fingerprint ID and version. Persist to a scalable store with atomic writes and rollback support to guarantee consistency and reproducibility.

Acceptance Criteria
Routing Integration & Fallback Handling
"As a workflow manager, I want matched images to auto-route with clear fallbacks so that processing remains fast and accurate even when confidence is low."
Description

Integrate fingerprint matching into PixelLift’s ingestion pipeline: compute features for incoming images, match against fingerprints within latency targets, and route to the correct style-presets/workflows. Implement configurable thresholds per supplier, A/B testable matching policies, and deterministic tie-breaking. Provide fallbacks for low-confidence matches (manual review queue, default preset, or supplier selection suggestions), along with decision logs, metrics, and an external API for programmatic routing.

Acceptance Criteria
Fingerprint Review & Admin Controls
"As an admin, I want to review and adjust fingerprint parameters before activation so that quality and accountability are maintained."
Description

Offer an admin console to visualize and govern fingerprints: preview sample coverage, histogram overlays, palette swatches, logo heatmaps, and feature distributions. Allow edits to weights and thresholds, approval before activation, and supplier associations. Include role-based access control, audit trails, change previews, non-destructive drafts, export/import, and rollback. Provide health indicators and warnings for weak or overfitted fingerprints.

Acceptance Criteria
Versioning, Drift Detection & Notifications
"As a supplier manager, I want to be notified when a supplier’s fingerprint drifts so that I can refresh samples and keep routing accurate."
Description

Maintain fingerprint versions with timestamps and provenance, monitor live match scores and feature distributions for drift, and trigger alerts when confidence or feature alignment drops below thresholds. Suggest retraining or sample refresh, support scheduled re-evaluations, and enable auto-incremental updates with human approval gates. Provide dashboards, webhooks, and email notifications, plus one-click rollback to the last stable version.

Acceptance Criteria

Confidence Gate

Set per-supplier confidence thresholds with clear, human‑readable evidence (e.g., logo match 92%, EXIF time-zone match, lighting profile similarity). Images that pass auto-route; borderline cases are queued for quick review—preventing misroutes while keeping throughput high.

Requirements

Per-Supplier Confidence Thresholds
"As a catalog operations manager, I want to set and adjust confidence thresholds per supplier so that we auto-accept good images while catching outliers without slowing the whole pipeline."
Description

Provide admin UI and API to define per-supplier composite confidence thresholds and per-signal minimums (e.g., logo match, EXIF time zone, lighting profile similarity). Includes global defaults, category-level overrides, supplier-level rules, versioning with rollback, validation of ranges, and effective-priority resolution. Changes apply without downtime and are logged with actor/timestamp for audit. Thresholds are evaluated synchronously in the ingestion pipeline and cached for performance with a short TTL and cache bust on update.

Acceptance Criteria
Evidence Generation & Explainability
"As a reviewer, I want clear, human-readable evidence for each decision so that I can quickly trust or override the routing outcome."
Description

For each image, compute and persist a standardized evidence bundle that includes signal scores and human-readable rationales (e.g., "Logo matched at 92%", "EXIF time zone = supplier’s region", "Lighting profile similarity: 0.87"). Support schema versioning, JSON serialization, and redaction of sensitive EXIF fields. Evidence must be viewable in UI, included in webhooks/emails, and attached to audit logs. Provide a deterministic decision summary showing which thresholds were met/failed and the final route. Compute within a strict latency budget for evidence assembly and fall back gracefully if a signal is unavailable.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Routing & Review Queue Orchestration
"As a pipeline engineer, I want deterministic, scalable routing of images based on thresholds so that throughput stays high while misroutes are minimized."
Description

Implement a routing engine that compares evidence to thresholds and assigns one of three states per image: Pass (auto-continue), Borderline (enqueue for review), or Fail (return to supplier). Support batch-aware routing (mixed outcomes within a batch) with idempotent operations and at-least-once delivery to the review queue. Provide configurable borderline bands (e.g., within a percentage of threshold) and SLA-prioritized queue ordering. Ensure horizontal scalability to high throughput with low decision latency. Persist routing state transitions and provide retry/backoff for transient errors.

Acceptance Criteria
Reviewer Quick-Triage UI
"As a human reviewer, I want a fast triage UI with clear evidence so that I can clear borderline queues quickly and accurately."
Description

Provide a responsive triage interface with keyboard shortcuts and bulk actions to approve, reject, or request re-upload for borderline cases. Display the evidence bundle with visual cues (per-signal pass/fail), zoom and histogram tools, and side-by-side comparison against supplier brand references. Capture reviewer notes and tags, support undo within session, and emit structured events for analytics and model feedback. Target a median decision time under seconds and support concurrent reviewers without conflicts.

Acceptance Criteria
Notifications & Supplier Feedback
"As a supplier, I want clear, actionable feedback when my images are held or rejected so that I can fix issues and resubmit quickly."
Description

Send supplier-facing notifications (email, webhook, dashboard alerts) for Fail and Borderline outcomes with concise reasons and remediation tips (e.g., lighting issues, logo occlusion). Allow suppliers to subscribe, set frequency, and choose channel. Include links to affected items and evidence excerpts. Enforce rate limits and localization, record delivery status and retries, and expose an API endpoint for suppliers to securely fetch decision details.

Acceptance Criteria
Analytics & Threshold Tuning
"As a product manager, I want analytics and simulation tools so that I can tune thresholds to balance quality and throughput."
Description

Provide dashboards and APIs that report pass rates, borderline rates, reviewer overrides, estimated false positives/negatives, average time in queue, and conversion impact by supplier and category. Include a sandbox to simulate threshold changes against historical evidence and recommend optimal thresholds to hit target auto-pass rates. Support CSV export and scheduled reports for stakeholders.

Acceptance Criteria
Signal Registry & Versioning
"As an ML engineer, I want a versioned signal registry so that I can evolve models without breaking routing or evidence consumers."
Description

Create a registry for all confidence signals (name, description, version, owner, output schema, performance metrics). Support deprecations, feature flags, canary rollouts, and per-supplier signal enablement. Ensure backward-compatible evidence schemas and automatic migration when signal versions change. Provide monitoring with alerts on drift, missing signals, and anomalies to protect routing quality.

Acceptance Criteria

Auto Bind

Map detected suppliers to the right preset bundle, destination folders, and channel variants with one click. Once bound, every incoming image is processed with the correct style and metadata automatically—eliminating sorting work and preserving brand consistency.

Requirements

Smart Supplier Detection
"As an operations manager, I want suppliers to be detected and normalized automatically so that incoming images are tagged correctly without manual sorting."
Description

Automatically identify and normalize supplier sources for each incoming image using file metadata, upload origin, filename patterns, folder paths, and optional watermark/logo recognition. The system consolidates aliases (e.g., “Acme Co.”, “ACME”, supplier code) into a single canonical supplier profile so bindings are reliable. Detection runs at ingest time, tagging assets with the resolved supplier ID to drive downstream Auto Bind routing without human intervention. This ensures consistent, accurate mapping at scale and eliminates manual sorting.

Acceptance Criteria
One-Click Binding Assignment
"As a studio lead, I want to assign the right presets and destinations to a supplier in one click so that future uploads are processed correctly by default."
Description

Provide a streamlined UI to bind a detected supplier to a preset bundle (style preset + metadata template), destination folders, and channel variants with a single action. The interface surfaces recommended presets based on historical usage and allows quick confirmation or override. Once saved, the binding is active for all future ingests from that supplier, minimizing setup time and ensuring repeatable outcomes.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Routing & Batch Processing
"As a catalog manager, I want images to be routed and processed automatically according to bindings so that batches finish quickly with consistent styling and metadata."
Description

Upon ingest, automatically route images to the correct processing pipeline based on the supplier binding. Apply the bound style preset, metadata template, and channel-specific variants in batch, then deliver outputs to the configured destination folders and channels. Processing should be resilient, support retries, and expose job status so large catalogs complete reliably with minimal oversight.

Acceptance Criteria
Binding Rules & Conflict Resolution
"As a power user, I want clear rules and overrides when bindings conflict so that I can ensure the correct presets are applied in edge cases."
Description

Implement precedence rules and conflict resolution when multiple bindings could match (e.g., overlapping folder rules or ambiguous supplier detection). Provide deterministic priority ordering, rule scoping (global, workspace, channel), and clear fallback behavior (e.g., default preset). Offer manual override per batch and per asset with audit logging to maintain control without sacrificing automation.

Acceptance Criteria
Bulk Binding Import/Export
"As an integrations engineer, I want to manage bindings in bulk via files and API so that I can keep mappings in sync across systems efficiently."
Description

Enable CSV/JSON import and export of bindings to create, update, and share mappings at scale. Support validation, dry-run previews, and error reporting to prevent misconfiguration. Provide API endpoints for programmatic management so larger sellers and integrators can synchronize bindings from their supplier management systems.

Acceptance Criteria
Binding Audit & Version Control
"As a compliance lead, I want a full history of binding changes with rollback so that I can audit decisions and recover from misconfigurations."
Description

Track all binding changes with timestamp, actor, old/new values, and reason. Support version history with rollback to a prior configuration to quickly recover from mistakes. Surface change diffs and exportable logs for compliance and QA, ensuring traceability of automated processing decisions.

Acceptance Criteria
Monitoring & Alerts for Unbound Items
"As a production coordinator, I want alerts when items are unbound or fall back to defaults so that I can fix mappings quickly and keep processing on track."
Description

Provide real-time dashboards and notifications for assets that could not be bound or were processed with default fallbacks. Allow users to triage, bind, and reprocess directly from the alert. Configurable thresholds and channels (email, Slack, webhook) ensure issues are surfaced promptly and do not block catalog throughput.

Acceptance Criteria

Drift Watch

Continuously monitors incoming images for shifts from the saved fingerprint (new studio lighting, background color, watermark changes). When drift is detected, get alerts with suggested updates or branch a new version (Supplier v2) to keep routing precision tight as vendors evolve.

Requirements

Style Fingerprint Baseline
"As a catalog manager, I want PixelLift to generate and save a reliable style fingerprint per supplier so that future photos can be compared consistently to detect meaningful drift."
Description

Create a versioned baseline “fingerprint” per supplier/brand using a curated set of approved images, capturing measurable style attributes (background color profile, illumination/exposure/white balance, shadow softness, composition framing, watermark presence/location, resolution/aspect). Persist fingerprints with metadata (creator, date, lineage), attach them to routing rules and style-presets, and expose them to the processing pipeline. Provide an onboarding flow to select reference images, auto-summarize metrics, and allow manual tweaks. Ensure fingerprints are immutable once locked, with explicit versioning and rollback to support change control and reproducibility across batches.

Acceptance Criteria
Real-time Drift Detection
"As an operations lead, I want new uploads automatically checked for style drift so that issues are caught immediately without slowing our publishing pipeline."
Description

Continuously evaluate newly uploaded images against the supplier’s baseline fingerprint in near real-time (<2 minutes), computing diffs per attribute and returning a drift classification (none/minor/major) with confidence scores. Support both streaming and batch modes, handle spikes (e.g., 10k images/hour), and degrade gracefully with backpressure and retries. Emit structured drift events to the event bus for downstream alerting and workflow, and tag images with drift status to influence subsequent retouching and preset application paths.

Acceptance Criteria
Adaptive Sensitivity & Thresholds
"As a brand owner, I want to adjust how sensitive drift detection is for each vendor so that we minimize false alarms while still catching changes that affect brand consistency."
Description

Provide configurable thresholds for each fingerprint metric at global and per-supplier levels, with optional auto-tuning that learns from recently approved images to reduce false positives. Include presets (strict/standard/lenient), preview tools to simulate sensitivity against historical data, and guardrails (min/max bounds) to avoid drift creep. Store changes with audit metadata and effective dates to ensure consistent evaluation across in-flight batches.

Acceptance Criteria
Drift Alerts & Notifications
"As a photo ops coordinator, I want timely, contextual drift alerts in the tools we already use so that we can act quickly without being overwhelmed."
Description

Deliver actionable alerts when drift is detected via in-app notifications, email, Slack, and webhooks. Group related events to avoid alert storms, apply rate limits, and provide severity levels based on impact on conversion-critical attributes (e.g., background color deviation). Include rich context: supplier, affected metrics, sample thumbnails, confidence, and links to preview/suggested fixes. Allow users to acknowledge, snooze, or resolve alerts and manage subscriptions per team and supplier.

Acceptance Criteria
Suggest-and-Branch Workflow
"As a studio lead, I want one-click suggestions and the option to branch a new supplier version when drift appears so that routing stays accurate as vendor setups change."
Description

Offer a guided flow that, upon drift, computes suggested updates to the fingerprint or proposes creating a new branch (e.g., Supplier v2). Provide side-by-side previews showing how current vs. proposed settings affect retouching, background removal, and style-preset application. Enable one-click actions: update fingerprint, create new version with routing updates, or ignore/accept as new normal with time-bounded trials. Enforce permissions, track decisions, and support rollback/merge between branches to keep routing precise as vendors evolve.

Acceptance Criteria
Drift Dashboard & Audit Log
"As a product manager, I want a centralized view and audit trail of drift events and actions so that we can measure effectiveness, prove compliance, and prioritize improvements."
Description

Provide a dashboard showing drift trends by supplier, severity distribution, mean time to detect/resolve, and the impact on processing outcomes and conversion KPIs. Include searchable audit logs of fingerprint changes, threshold updates, alerts, acknowledgements, and branch operations with who/when/why. Support CSV export and API access for BI tools. Use this telemetry to highlight risky suppliers and recommend proactive reviews before major catalog pushes.

Acceptance Criteria

Correction Memory

Every manual reassignment becomes a learning signal. The router adapts its weights and rules from your fixes, reducing repeat errors and showing measurable gains in precision over time—so teams spend less time correcting and more time launching.

Requirements

Correction Event Capture
"As a photo editor, I want my corrections to be captured reliably so that the system can learn and stop repeating the same routing mistakes."
Description

Log every manual reassignment and edit as a structured learning signal, including the original router decision, the user’s correction (e.g., preset change, background selection, mask fix), image and catalog metadata, workspace/brand, confidence score, and timing. Ensure low-latency, lossless ingestion with retry semantics, idempotency, and linkage between before/after outputs for auditability. Store events in a versioned feature store suitable for training and evaluation, with schema evolution and PII-safe handling. Surface capture status in developer tools and keep runtime overhead under 20 ms per action.

Acceptance Criteria
Incremental Router Learning
"As a boutique owner, I want the router to adapt from my team’s fixes quickly so that new batches are routed correctly without repetitive manual work."
Description

Implement a nearline training pipeline that updates routing model weights on a frequent cadence (e.g., hourly/daily) using captured corrections. Support global and per-workspace adapters to balance shared learning with brand-specific preferences. Handle class imbalance and cold-start via weighted sampling and prior distributions. Register each trained model in a versioned model registry with metadata, reproducible training configs, and automatic rollback. Maintain training SLAs, resource autoscaling, and guard against catastrophic forgetting.

Acceptance Criteria
Confidence-Based Suggestions & Fallbacks
"As a seller managing large uploads, I want the system to suggest the most likely presets when it’s unsure so that I can correct items in one click instead of hunting through options."
Description

Compute calibrated confidence for each routing decision and expose top-N alternative presets when confidence is low. In low-confidence cases, default to a safe brand preset or request a one-click confirmation from the user. Persist confidence, alternatives shown, and the selected option as learning signals. Provide API/UI hooks to render suggestions inline in batch review with no more than one extra click for acceptance. Ensure latency budgets are met for bulk operations.

Acceptance Criteria
Workspace-Level Personalization
"As a brand manager, I want routing to reflect my brand’s style preferences so that my product images stay consistent with minimal supervision."
Description

Maintain per-workspace preference profiles that bias routing toward each brand’s historical choices (e.g., background color, crop style, shadow treatment). Activate personalization after a minimum signal threshold and fall back hierarchically to category- or global-level models when data is sparse. Support explicit admin overrides and rule pinning for critical SKUs or collections. Ensure isolation across tenants while enabling safe meta-learning at the global layer.

Acceptance Criteria
Evaluation & Gated Promotion
"As a QA lead, I want models promoted only when they demonstrably reduce corrections so that we avoid regressions and can quantify time saved."
Description

Define objective metrics—routing precision, correction rate, time-to-approve, and error recurrence—and evaluate each candidate model on holdout data and shadow traffic. Gate promotion with automated checks (e.g., precision +5% or correction rate −20% overall and within key segments). Support canary rollout by workspace, automatic rollback on regression, and version pinning for reproducibility. Expose a changelog and comparison reports for stakeholders.

Acceptance Criteria
Precision & Drift Monitoring Dashboard
"As an operations analyst, I want visibility into precision and correction trends so that I can verify that Correction Memory is improving outcomes across catalogs."
Description

Provide dashboards that track routing precision, correction volume, and error hotspots over time by preset, category, and workspace. Include drift detection on input distributions and confidence calibration checks. Enable alerting when precision drops or correction rates spike beyond thresholds. Integrate with product analytics to attribute gains to Correction Memory and export reports for stakeholders.

Acceptance Criteria
Data Privacy & Consent Controls
"As an account admin, I want control over how my workspace’s data is used in training so that we stay compliant and protect brand confidentiality."
Description

Offer tenant-level controls to opt in/out of contributing corrections to global training while always applying learning locally. Enforce strict data isolation by workspace, uphold regional data residency, and propagate data deletion requests to training datasets and derived models. Anonymize or pseudonymize user identifiers in telemetry and log access. Document governance in admin settings and emit audit logs for compliance.

Acceptance Criteria

Batch Splitter

Drop a mixed upload and let PixelLift auto-separate it into supplier-specific sub-batches. See counts, ETA, and cost per supplier, then process each with the correct presets and optionally re-merge for export—turning chaotic dumps into organized, predictable workflows.

Requirements

Automatic Supplier Detection & Clustering
"As a catalog manager, I want PixelLift to auto-separate a mixed upload into supplier-based groups so that I don’t waste time manually sorting before applying the right presets."
Description

On mixed uploads, automatically infer the originating supplier for each image and group items into supplier-specific sub-batches. Detection combines deterministic rules (SKU prefixes, filename patterns, folder names, barcodes, prior mappings) with ML signals (watermarks, backdrop color, lighting, model/set cues) to maximize accuracy. Each item receives a confidence score, explanation snippet, and supplier tag, with results stored for reuse on future uploads. The system must scale to hundreds of images per drop with sub-minute classification latency, respect existing tenant data boundaries, and expose the clustering outcome via UI and API.

Acceptance Criteria
Supplier Preset Mapping & Defaults
"As a brand owner, I want each supplier’s images to automatically pick up the correct presets so that results stay consistent without repetitive manual selection."
Description

Maintain configurable supplier profiles that map each supplier to its default style presets, retouch levels, background settings, output dimensions, naming templates, and color profiles. When a sub-batch is created, automatically attach the mapped presets and allow per-batch overrides without altering the saved profile. Support versioned presets, a global fallback when no profile exists, permissioned editing, and audit of changes to ensure brand consistency across runs.

Acceptance Criteria
Per-Supplier Counts, ETA, and Cost Estimation
"As a small business owner, I want to see counts, ETA, and cost per supplier before I run the jobs so that I can plan spend and delivery timelines confidently."
Description

Calculate and display, before processing, the number of items, estimated processing time, and projected cost for each supplier sub-batch and for the overall upload. Estimation accounts for preset complexity, current queue load, concurrency limits, and tiered pricing with plan-specific discounts and currency settings. Values update in real time as users edit sub-batches or presets and are available in the UI header, a downloadable summary, and via API, with warnings when budget or time thresholds are likely to be exceeded.

Acceptance Criteria
Review & Edit Sub-batches UI
"As a photo ops lead, I want an easy way to review and fix the auto-split results so that I can correct edge cases before processing begins."
Description

Provide an interactive workspace to review proposed supplier groupings with thumbnails, stats, and confidence indicators. Enable users to split or merge groups, reassign items by drag-and-drop or bulk actions, search by filename/SKU, and view classification reasons. Include undo, keyboard shortcuts, mobile-responsive layout, and accessibility support. Persist edits across sessions and require confirmation before processing to prevent accidental runs with incorrect groupings.

Acceptance Criteria
Parallel Processing Orchestration
"As an operations manager, I want each supplier batch to process in parallel with accurate progress so that I get faster turnaround without losing track of status."
Description

Execute supplier sub-batches concurrently while applying their respective presets, honoring tenant-level concurrency limits and prioritization rules. Provide real-time progress per sub-batch, with pause, resume, and cancel controls. Ensure idempotent job handling, automatic retries with backoff for transient failures, and autoscaling of workers to meet demand. The orchestrator must survive worker restarts and partial failures while maintaining accurate status and cost tracking.

Acceptance Criteria
Re-merge & Export Manager
"As a marketplace seller, I want to export all processed images together with clear structure and manifests so that I can upload to my storefronts without extra rework."
Description

After processing, allow users to re-merge results into a unified export while preserving supplier-based organization as needed. Support export targets such as ZIP download, cloud storage (S3, GDrive), and commerce integrations, along with configurable folder structures, naming templates, and color profiles. Generate a manifest (CSV/JSON) capturing supplier, original filenames, applied presets, processing timestamps, and per-item cost, and provide webhooks and shareable links with retention controls.

Acceptance Criteria
Misclassification Handling & Recovery
"As a content coordinator, I want clear handling for uncertain or incorrect splits so that I can fix them quickly without losing time or paying twice."
Description

Provide safeguards and recovery paths for items that are unclassified, low-confidence, or misclassified. Flag low-confidence items for review, fall back to default presets when no supplier mapping exists, and route failures to an exceptions queue with clear reasons and suggested fixes. Support post-run corrections that trigger reprocessing with correct presets and adjust billing deltas accordingly, while notifying users via in-app alerts and email when attention is required.

Acceptance Criteria

Fallback Rules

Define a smart hierarchy for low-confidence cases—SKU prefixes, folder names, CSV maps, or API tags. The router follows your priority order to place images safely, ensuring no asset stalls while still respecting brand and channel constraints.

Requirements

Hierarchical Rule Engine
"As a catalog operations manager, I want to define a prioritized sequence of routing rules so that low-confidence images are consistently placed in the correct destination without manual intervention."
Description

Implements a deterministic priority stack that evaluates routing rules in a defined order for low-confidence classification cases. Supports conditions using SKU prefixes, folder path patterns, CSV column mappings, and API-provided tags, with scoping at global, brand, and channel levels. Executes until the first match, applies the mapped destination (collection/preset/channel), and falls back to a final catch‑all rule to ensure no asset stalls. Includes conflict resolution, rule scoping precedence, and guardrails to respect brand and channel constraints within PixelLift’s existing routing pipeline.

Acceptance Criteria
Multi-Source Attribute Parsing
"As a technical admin, I want attributes reliably derived from SKUs, folders, CSVs, and API tags so that routing rules have consistent inputs across all my uploads."
Description

Builds parsers to extract normalized attributes from multiple sources: regex/substring SKU prefix parsing, folder name tokenization, sidecar CSV ingestion with configurable column-to-attribute mapping, and API tag retrieval from integrations. Normalizes values into a canonical schema consumed by the rule engine, with validation, error handling, and caching. Operates at batch scale, supports asynchronous enrichment, and preserves tenant isolation for PixelLift workspaces.

Acceptance Criteria
Safe Routing & Quarantine
"As a merchandising lead, I want ambiguous assets to go to a safe default or a review queue with clear reasons so that listings are never blocked and compliance is maintained."
Description

Ensures every asset is routed safely even when ambiguity remains after rule evaluation. Applies a configurable safe default destination per brand/channel or moves the asset into a reviewable quarantine queue with SLA timers. Prevents pipeline stalls by enforcing timeouts and retry policies, applies only allowed minimal transformations under constraints, and surfaces a clear reason code for the chosen fallback in PixelLift’s asset details.

Acceptance Criteria
Rule Builder with Live Preview
"As a brand admin, I want a visual rule builder with live previews so that I can configure fallback behavior confidently without writing code."
Description

Provides an admin UI to create, edit, and reorder rules via drag-and-drop, with a condition builder for SKU/folder/CSV/tag criteria. Includes a live preview that tests rules against sample images or prior batches, showing the matched rule, destination, and applied constraints before publishing. Offers validation, conflict detection, draft/publish workflows, and role-based access aligned with PixelLift’s admin model.

Acceptance Criteria
Decision Audit & Explainability
"As a compliance reviewer, I want a clear audit of how each asset was routed so that I can verify decisions and adjust rules when errors occur."
Description

Captures a per-asset decision trail including input confidence scores, extracted attributes, evaluated rules with outcomes, and the final routing action. Exposes searchable logs in the UI and exportable reports (CSV/JSON) with retention controls. Enables rapid debugging, compliance reviews, and continuous tuning of fallback strategies within PixelLift.

Acceptance Criteria
Versioning, Rollback & A/B Testing
"As a product owner, I want versioned rules with rollback and A/B tests so that I can iterate safely and improve routing outcomes based on data."
Description

Maintains versioned rule sets per workspace with draft, scheduled, and active states, plus single-click rollback. Supports traffic-split A/B testing between rule set versions to measure routing accuracy, manual review rate, and time-to-listing, with guardrails to cap exposure when error thresholds are exceeded. Integrates metrics into PixelLift analytics for data-driven optimization.

Acceptance Criteria

Smart Allocator

Continuously rebalances traffic between style variants (e.g., shadow/no‑shadow, crops, backgrounds) using a multi‑armed bandit strategy. You learn faster with less revenue risk, because high performers get more exposure while weak variants are automatically deprioritized. Set min/max traffic per variant and safe‑start limits for new launches.

Requirements

Bandit Allocation Engine with Traffic Constraints
"As a store owner, I want traffic to shift automatically toward the best‑performing image styles while respecting my min/max limits so that I improve conversions without risking revenue or brand consistency."
Description

Implements a configurable multi‑armed bandit engine (e.g., Thompson Sampling) that continuously reallocates traffic among style variants (shadow/no‑shadow, crops, backgrounds) to maximize a chosen objective while honoring user‑defined guardrails. The engine supports per‑variant minimum/maximum traffic, per‑experiment exploration rate, and safe caps for newly launched variants. It integrates with PixelLift’s style‑preset registry to ensure stable variant IDs across batch uploads and product groups, persists experiment state, and recalculates allocations on a rolling cadence. Expected outcome is faster learning with reduced revenue risk, automatically prioritizing high performers and deprioritizing weak variants without manual intervention.

Acceptance Criteria
Conversion Signal & Attribution Pipeline
"As a marketer, I want the allocator to learn from accurate conversion and revenue data so that traffic shifts reflect true performance rather than noisy signals."
Description

Build a low‑latency, privacy‑aware event pipeline that ingests and aggregates performance signals per style variant from multiple sources (on‑site pixel, server‑side events, Shopify/WooCommerce APIs). Supports configurable objective metrics (e.g., conversion rate, add‑to‑cart rate, revenue per session), sessionization, de‑duplication, and attribution windows with delayed conversion handling. Normalizes metrics across catalogs and preserves multi‑tenant isolation. Feeds the allocator with accurate, timely rewards to drive rebalancing grounded in business impact.

Acceptance Criteria
Safe‑Start Auto‑Ramp for New Variants
"As a seller launching a new image style, I want it to start with limited exposure and only ramp up when it proves itself so that I minimize revenue risk during testing."
Description

Provides cautious rollout for newly introduced style variants by enforcing initial traffic caps, minimum sample sizes, and monotonic ramp rules tied to credible performance intervals. Automatically increases exposure as evidence accumulates and halts or rolls back ramps when expected loss exceeds a defined threshold. Supports per‑store policies and per‑catalog overrides to protect launches while still enabling rapid validation of new PixelLift style‑presets.

Acceptance Criteria
Allocator Control Panel & Reporting
"As a user, I want a clear dashboard to configure the allocator and see which styles are winning so that I can understand results and make quick adjustments."
Description

Delivers a self‑serve UI inside PixelLift to configure experiments and monitor outcomes. Users can select the objective metric, set per‑variant min/max traffic and exploration rates, assign products or catalogs, and pause/disable variants. The dashboard visualizes current allocations, performance trends, lift estimates with uncertainty, and expected loss. Provides CSV export and alerting (email/Slack) for significant changes, reaching guardrails, or automatic deactivations.

Acceptance Criteria
Edge Decision API & CDN Integration
"As a developer, I want a fast, reliable API that tells me which image style to serve so that pages stay performant and users see a consistent variant across their session."
Description

Exposes a low‑latency allocation API that selects the image variant for a given request using current bandit weights and constraints. Supports sticky assignments by user/session, deterministic bucketing for cacheability, and fallbacks to fixed A/B splits when the allocator is unavailable. Integrates with CDN edge logic via SDKs to keep p95 decision latency under 50 ms and encodes allocation versioning in cache keys to prevent stale mixes after rebalances. Ensures high availability with circuit breakers and idempotent decision endpoints.

Acceptance Criteria
Auditability, Guardrails, and Rollback
"As a business owner, I want guardrails and transparent logs with instant rollback so that I can quickly mitigate risk and verify that decisions are helping my KPIs."
Description

Captures immutable logs of allocation decisions, model parameters, variant exposures, and observed outcomes to enable audits and what‑if analyses. Enforces configurable guardrails such as maximum expected loss, floor performance vs. baseline, and per‑day exposure limits, triggering automatic rollbacks or pauses when violated. Provides one‑click rollback to a safe baseline, incident notifications, and data export to the analytics warehouse for independent verification.

Acceptance Criteria

Auto Promote

When a style variant reaches statistical confidence, PixelLift can automatically set it as the default for the product, collection, or supplier fingerprint. It updates Shopify metafields, archives losing variants, and can backfill future batches with the winning preset—no manual follow‑up. Rollback and version notes keep changes safe and auditable.

Requirements

Confidence Threshold Engine
"As a merchandising manager, I want winning variants detected only when they reach statistical confidence so that auto-promotion happens on trustworthy results."
Description

Compute statistical confidence for competing style variants and determine promotability at product, collection, and supplier-fingerprint scopes. Supports configurable significance level, minimum sample size, time windows, and hysteresis to prevent flip-flopping. Aggregates outcome metrics from connected commerce data (e.g., impressions, CTR, add-to-cart, conversion, revenue per view) and weights them by freshness. Provides real-time incremental updates via background jobs and emits a promotable event when criteria are met. Exposes per-scope rules and guardrails and logs inputs and decisions for transparency.

Acceptance Criteria
Scoped Auto-Promotion
"As a store owner, I want the system to auto-promote the best-performing style at the right scope so that my catalog stays consistent without manual upkeep."
Description

Automatically set the winning variant as the default at the configured scope (product, collection, or supplier fingerprint) once promotable. Applies precedence rules and overrides, then updates PixelLift’s internal default style and associated Shopify references. Ensures idempotent, concurrency-safe promotions with conflict resolution when multiple scopes apply. Provides configurable cooldowns, manual locks to prevent auto-changes on sensitive items, and feature flags for staged rollout.

Acceptance Criteria
Shopify Metafield Sync
"As a technical operations admin, I want reliable, rate-limit-safe metafield updates so that catalog defaults stay accurate across Shopify without sync errors."
Description

Synchronize default style and variant state to Shopify by writing to designated metafields and related product attributes. Implements OAuth scopes, rate-limit aware batching, retries with exponential backoff, and transactional behavior with partial failure recovery. Subscribes to relevant webhooks to detect external changes and reconcile state. Provides a dry-run mode and validation to ensure metafield schemas and namespace keys remain consistent across stores and environments.

Acceptance Criteria
Variant Archival and Cleanup
"As a content editor, I want losing variants archived automatically so that my asset library stays clean without risking accidental deletions."
Description

Archive losing style variants after promotion while preserving referential integrity and the ability to restore. Hides deprecated variants from default views, tags them with outcome metadata, and prevents them from re-entering tests unless explicitly re-enabled. Implements retention policies, background cleanup of orphaned assets, and safeguards to avoid deleting assets referenced by live listings, drafts, or ongoing experiments.

Acceptance Criteria
Backfill and Future Batch Inheritance
"As a catalog manager, I want future and eligible existing images to inherit the winning preset so that my listings stay visually consistent without extra work."
Description

When a winner is promoted, apply the winning preset to future uploads within the same scope and optionally reprocess existing items in bulk. Provides per-scope opt-in, scheduling windows to avoid peak hours, and progress tracking. Supports dependency checks (e.g., preset availability, model compatibility) and idempotent job enqueueing so backfills can be safely retried. Exposes controls to limit reprocessing by age, SKU, or supplier fingerprint.

Acceptance Criteria
Audit Trail, Rollback, and Version Notes
"As a team lead, I want a full audit trail with quick rollback so that we can safely revert promotions and understand why decisions were made."
Description

Record every promotion decision with who/what/when, input metrics, thresholds used, and scope. Require version notes on changes and associate links to experiments. Offer one-click rollback to a prior default with automated re-sync to Shopify and restoration of archived variants as needed. Provide a diff view of before/after defaults, notify stakeholders on changes, and enforce permissions for promote/rollback actions. Retain immutable logs for compliance and troubleshooting.

Acceptance Criteria

Audience Splits

Run targeted style tests by device, geo, campaign, customer tag, or price band. PixelLift writes the correct metafield flags so your theme serves the right variant to the right audience. Compare lift by segment to learn what works for mobile vs. desktop, new vs. returning, or US vs. EU—then auto‑clone winners to matching segments.

Requirements

Audience Rule Builder
"As a store owner, I want to define audience splits by device, geo, campaign, customer tag, and price band so that each shopper sees the most effective styled images."
Description

Provide a visual rule builder to define audience splits by device (mobile/desktop/tablet), geo (country/region), campaign (UTM/referrer), customer tag (e.g., new/returning/VIP), and price band. Support AND/OR logic, exclusions, rule priority, and reusable saved segments. Include real-time validation to detect conflicting or overlapping rules, a preview using sample traffic or historical sessions, and versioning/audit trail of changes. Output a normalized rule object per product/catalog to be consumed downstream and referenced by themes. Ensures precise targeting while remaining simple for non-technical users.

Acceptance Criteria
Metafield Flag Orchestration
"As a theme developer, I want PixelLift to write structured metafields for audience-targeted variants so that the theme can reliably select the correct image per shopper."
Description

Generate and write the correct metafield schema for each supported e‑commerce platform so themes can select the right image variant per audience. Map audience rule IDs to style variant IDs, handle bulk writes for large catalogs, respect platform rate limits with retries/backoff, and provide dry‑run and diff views before applying changes. Include platform adapters (starting with Shopify) to abstract authentication, field naming, and data types. Guarantee idempotent operations and emit webhooks/logs for observability.

Acceptance Criteria
Variant-to-Segment Mapping & Fallbacks
"As a store owner, I want to assign style variants to each segment with sensible fallbacks so that no shopper sees broken or mismatched imagery."
Description

Allow users to assign style presets/image variants to each defined segment and configure precedence and default fallbacks. Enforce that every product has at least one valid variant and provide preflight checks for missing assets or invalid mappings. Support catalog-wide defaults, per-collection overrides, and per-product exceptions. At runtime, ensure that if no segment matches, a deterministic fallback (e.g., brand default or original image) is served to avoid broken experiences.

Acceptance Criteria
Traffic Allocation & Experiment Controls
"As a marketer, I want to control traffic splits and run experiments within segments so that I can measure which style performs best safely."
Description

Enable A/B and multi-variant tests within each segment with configurable traffic splits, sticky assignment by user/session, holdout controls, and start/pause/stop scheduling. Provide guardrails such as minimum sample sizes, max runtime, and alerting when variants underperform beyond a threshold. Persist experiment and assignment IDs in metafields or via a lightweight SDK so the theme can honor assignments server- or client-side. Facilitate safe, incremental rollouts to reduce risk.

Acceptance Criteria
Segment Analytics & Lift Reporting
"As an analyst, I want performance dashboards that show lift by segment and variant so that I can identify the winning styles."
Description

Track impressions, clicks, add‑to‑carts, conversions, and revenue per product/variant/segment to compute lift versus control with confidence intervals. Provide dashboards to compare performance across device, geo, campaign, tag, and price band, with filters, cohorting (new vs. returning), and time windows. Support CSV export and webhooks to BI tools. Require a lightweight theme snippet or tag manager integration to emit events enriched with segment and variant IDs while deduplicating and respecting attribution windows.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Clone Winners to Matching Segments
"As a marketer, I want winning variants auto-applied to similar segments once proven so that I can scale improvements without manual work."
Description

Automatically promote the best-performing variant to similar segments once statistical thresholds are met (e.g., significance, minimum samples). Define "matching" segments by shared attributes (e.g., same device class or price band across geos) and support manual approval workflows. When promoting, update mappings and metafields, notify stakeholders, and log change history. Provide quick rollback to prior state if performance regresses.

Acceptance Criteria
Safety, Rollback, and Compliance Controls
"As a store owner, I want safe rollbacks and privacy-safe audience detection so that I can test confidently without breaking the storefront or violating regulations."
Description

Provide one-click rollback at product, collection, or catalog scope; a kill switch to disable audience splits; and a preview mode to QA changes before publishing. Validate for conflicting metafields, missing images, and rate-limit breaches. Ensure geo/campaign detection and event tracking respect consent and privacy requirements (e.g., opt-out, data minimization, pseudonymous identifiers). Emit audit logs and alerts for critical changes or failures to maintain reliability and compliance.

Acceptance Criteria

Variant Matrix

Define the knobs you want to test (background, crop, shadow, retouch) and let Style Splitter auto‑generate a clean matrix of valid combinations. It avoids off‑brand or noncompliant pairs, suggests a minimal set to isolate effects, and batch‑produces the images in one click—turning ad‑hoc guesses into structured experiments.

Requirements

Knob Definition & Level Selection
"As a boutique owner, I want to choose which photo attributes to test and set their options so that I can run a controlled, brand-aligned experiment."
Description

Enable users to define experiment variables (e.g., background, crop, shadow, retouch) and configure their levels using existing style-presets or custom options. Support categorical, boolean, and numeric levels with validation (e.g., allowable crop ratios, supported background presets) and per-catalog applicability checks. Provide defaults aligned to common e-commerce needs and brand settings. Seamlessly integrates with PixelLift’s preset system and batch upload pipeline to ensure each SKU can be consistently processed across selected levels. Outcome: standard, structured variable definitions that make experiments repeatable and comparable.

Acceptance Criteria
Rule-Based Constraint & Compliance Engine
"As a seller, I want the system to automatically block noncompliant style combinations so that my experiments stay on-brand and marketplace-safe."
Description

Introduce a rule engine that prevents generation of off-brand or noncompliant combinations before they are added to the matrix. Support brand guidelines (e.g., jewelry main images must use white backgrounds), marketplace policies (e.g., Amazon main image rules), and product-level constraints (e.g., no heavy skin retouching on fabric textures). Provide a visual rule builder, real-time validation with clear reasons for exclusion, and import of workspace brand presets. Integrate with channel-specific settings to ensure compliance across destinations. Outcome: fewer wasted renders and policy violations, maintaining brand integrity by design.

Acceptance Criteria
Minimal Matrix Design (DOE) Suggestion
"As a marketer, I want a suggested minimal set of combinations so that I can learn what works without rendering every possible variant."
Description

Automatically propose a reduced, statistically sound set of combinations that isolates main effects using orthogonal arrays or fractional factorial designs. Respect user constraints such as maximum number of variants, must-include levels, and excluded pairs from rules. Provide toggles between full factorial and suggested minimal sets with coverage and effect estimability indicators, plus brief explanations of trade-offs. Outcome: lower cost and faster turnaround while preserving the ability to attribute performance changes to specific knobs.

Acceptance Criteria
Matrix UI & Preview Grid
"As a content manager, I want to view and adjust the variant matrix before rendering so that I’m confident the plan is correct."
Description

Present an interactive grid that maps knobs and levels to a clean matrix with inline previews. Visually indicate excluded cells and reasons, allow manual include/exclude overrides with validation, and support sorting, filtering, pinning, and labeling variants. Show per-SKU applicability and counts, with responsive layout for large matrices. Integrate with the media viewer for zoom and side-by-side comparison. Outcome: clear planning, auditability, and confidence before committing to batch generation.

Acceptance Criteria
One-Click Batch Generation & Queueing
"As a seller, I want to generate all selected variants in one click so that I can publish faster without manual steps."
Description

Batch-render all selected combinations across chosen SKUs in a single action using a scalable job queue with concurrency control and GPU autoscaling. Ensure deterministic outputs per seed and preset, idempotent job IDs, deduplication of identical variants, and robust retry/backoff on transient failures. Provide real-time progress, ETA, pause/cancel, and completion notifications. Store outputs in organized folders by experiment and combination. Outcome: reliable, fast production of studio-quality variants at scale with minimal operator effort.

Acceptance Criteria
Variant Metadata, Tagging, and Export
"As an analyst, I want each image tied to its combination metadata so that I can measure performance and report insights."
Description

Tag every generated asset with experiment ID, knob/level values, render settings, source SKU, and seed, and persist this metadata in the asset store and via API. Provide CSV/JSON exports and integration mappings for A/B testing targets (e.g., Shopify, marketplaces, ad platforms). Support invisible watermark or metadata embedding where possible to maintain traceability across uploads. Outcome: structured experiments with end-to-end attribution, enabling performance analysis and rollback.

Acceptance Criteria
Matrix Templates & Team Sharing
"As a team lead, I want to save and share our standard variant matrix so that the team runs consistent experiments across catalogs."
Description

Allow users to save, version, and share matrix configurations—including selected knobs, level sets, rules, and DOE settings—as reusable templates within a workspace. Support permissions, cloning, change logs, and default templates per channel or product category. Outcome: consistent, repeatable experimentation practices across teams and catalogs, reducing setup time and variability.

Acceptance Criteria

Significance Guard

Built‑in sample‑size planning and significance checks prevent false wins. Get plain‑language guidance (e.g., “Need ~480 more views for 95% confidence”) and automatic pauses for underpowered or lopsided tests. Real‑time dashboards plus Slack/Email alerts keep Test‑and‑Tune Taylor moving without stats wrangling.

Requirements

Sample Size Planner & Power Calculator
"As a growth manager, I want an automatic sample size estimate for my test so that I can plan duration and traffic needs without doing manual statistics."
Description

Provide an on-creation planner that computes required sample size per variant from selected primary metric, baseline rate (pulled from recent PixelLift analytics), minimum detectable effect, desired power, and confidence. Display plain-language outputs (e.g., “Need ~480 more views for 95% confidence”) and dynamically update as data accrues. Support binary and continuous metrics, traffic forecast, and seasonality weighting. Persist assumptions, expose a lightweight API for programmatic planning, validate unrealistic inputs, and integrate with the Experiment Setup UI.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto-Pause Underpowered or Lopsided Tests
"As a product owner, I want tests to pause automatically when they cannot reach significance so that we avoid wasting traffic and making bad decisions."
Description

Continuously monitor running experiments for power shortfall and traffic imbalance. If projected power at planned end < required minimum or allocation skews beyond thresholds (e.g., >70/30 for 2+ hours), automatically pause the test, annotate the reason, and notify owners. Preserve randomization, allow admin override with justification, and resume automatically when conditions are corrected. Include backoff to prevent pause/resume churn and integrate with the scheduler and experiment lifecycle states.

Acceptance Criteria
Plain-Language Significance Guidance
"As a busy seller, I want simple explanations of test progress so that I can decide quickly without understanding statistics."
Description

Surface contextual guidance that translates statistical status into actionable, human-readable messages within the experiment detail view and setup wizard. Use templated copy to explain confidence, power, MDE, and remaining sample in simple terms, with optional drill-down for advanced detail. Localize messages, ensure accessibility, and version phrasing for clarity. Highlight next steps (e.g., extend runtime, increase traffic, reduce MDE) without exposing raw formulas by default.

Acceptance Criteria
Real-time Significance Dashboard
"As a data-savvy marketer, I want a live view of my experiment’s significance so that I can track progress and communicate status to stakeholders."
Description

Provide a live dashboard showing per-variant performance (conversion, delta, confidence intervals, p-values or Bayesian probabilities), traffic counts, runtime, imbalance indicators, and projected time to significance. Auto-refresh at configured intervals, support segment filters (e.g., marketplace, device), badge guard status (Healthy, Underpowered, Imbalanced, Paused), and allow CSV export. Ensure mobile-friendly layouts and respect PixelLift roles and permissions.

Acceptance Criteria
Slack and Email Alerting
"As a test owner, I want alerts when my experiment needs attention so that I can act promptly without polling dashboards."
Description

Send actionable notifications for key events: plan created, threshold reached, auto-pause triggered, significance achieved, max runtime hit, and data quality issues. Support per-workspace configuration of channels, quiet hours, and severity. Implement secure Slack webhooks with deep links to the dashboard and fall back to email. Batch low-priority updates into daily digests to reduce noise.

Acceptance Criteria
Multiple Testing and Peeking Controls
"As a product analyst, I want guardrails against peeking and multiple comparisons so that our decisions remain statistically valid."
Description

Introduce controls to limit inflated false positives from repeated looks and concurrent experiments. Support alpha-spending/group-sequential methods for interim analyses and optional false discovery rate control across parallel tests. Enforce minimum observation windows, display adjusted thresholds and decisions, and allow workspace-level configuration with clear explanations of trade-offs.

Acceptance Criteria
Audit Log and Decision Rationale
"As a team lead, I want an audit trail of experiment decisions so that we can review, learn, and ensure accountability."
Description

Maintain an immutable, exportable audit trail capturing sample size assumptions, threshold settings, auto-pause events, overrides with actor and reason, alert deliveries, and final significance calls. Timestamp and attribute all entries, expose them within experiment details, and provide filters and exports for reviews and compliance. Support optional rollback for reversible operations with linked rationale.

Acceptance Criteria

Inventory Sync

Tie testing to stock levels so you don’t burn inventory on a losing look. Style Splitter throttles or stops tests when items near low stock, shifts traffic to stable variants, and delays new tests until replenishment—ideal for fast drops and recommerce where availability fluctuates hourly.

Requirements

Real-time Stock Intake & SKU Mapping
"As a boutique owner, I want PixelLift to sync my live stock by variant across my store so that test decisions reflect actual availability within a minute."
Description

Establish connectors to Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, and custom sources to ingest near real-time stock updates via webhooks with a 60s polling fallback. Normalize inputs to a per-variant SKU model (on-hand, available-to-promise, backorderable, multi-location) and map each SKU to its corresponding Style Splitter experiment variant. Handle ID resolution across systems, ensure idempotent processing, and implement rate-limit-aware batching, retries with exponential backoff, and circuit breakers. Provide a lightweight mapping UI and SDK endpoints for custom integrations. Guarantee <60s data freshness, multi-warehouse support, and secure handling (scoped OAuth, least-privilege access, encryption in transit/at rest).

Acceptance Criteria
Low-Stock Threshold Rules & Throttling
"As a growth marketer, I want configurable low-stock rules that automatically throttle or pause tests so that we don’t burn inventory on variants that can’t be fulfilled."
Description

Provide configurable low-stock policies at global, collection, product, and variant levels using absolute units, days-of-cover, or percentage thresholds with hysteresis to prevent flapping. When thresholds are reached, automatically pause experiments, cap variant traffic (e.g., max N%), or route 100% to control. Support rule precedence, time windows for drops/flash sales, and a simulation mode to preview impact. Evaluate rules on every stock change event and at least every 60s, logging deterministic outcomes for auditability.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto Traffic Shift to Stable Variants
"As a product manager, I want traffic to shift automatically to stable variants when a tested look is low on stock so that we maintain conversions without overselling constrained items."
Description

Integrate the rules engine with Style Splitter’s allocator to dynamically reassign traffic away from constrained SKUs and toward stable variants or control while preserving experimental integrity (consistent unit assignment, holdout preservation). Enforce guardrails such as max reallocation per interval and minimum sample per variant to avoid bias. Provide real-time visibility into allocation, conversion impact, and inventory burn avoided.

Acceptance Criteria
Test Launch Inventory Gatekeeper
"As a merchant, I want PixelLift to block new tests when inventory is too low so that I don’t start experiments that can’t reach significance before selling out."
Description

Block or defer the launch of new Style Splitter tests when projected inventory cannot support the required sample size or run duration. Compute safe test capacity using recent sales velocity, current stock, lead time, and desired statistical power. Offer a preflight checklist with reasons for block and options to auto-queue until replenishment, reduce variant count, or switch to sequential tests. Expose API and UI hooks to schedule starts for drops and limited runs.

Acceptance Criteria
Restock Forecast & Auto-Resume
"As an operations lead, I want tests to auto-resume when restock arrives so that experimentation continues without manual babysitting."
Description

Ingest restock ETAs from connected platforms or merchant input and optionally estimate replenishment using sales velocity and lead times. When items recover above thresholds or ETA is reached, automatically resume paused tests and restore prior allocations. Handle partial replenishments, per-location stock, and backorder toggles with cooldowns and confidence checks to prevent oscillation.

Acceptance Criteria
Alerts, Logs, and Manual Overrides
"As a store owner, I want clear alerts and the ability to override automated decisions so that I stay informed and in control during fast-moving drops."
Description

Deliver proactive notifications (email, Slack, in-app) on test pauses, throttles, resumes, and gating decisions. Provide an admin panel to review events with reason codes and apply scoped manual overrides (e.g., force-continue a test) using RBAC. Maintain an immutable audit log with timestamps, rule versions, inventory snapshots, and before/after allocations, with export via CSV and webhooks for BI pipelines.

Acceptance Criteria

Metafield Mapper

Map variant flags to your theme, page‑builder blocks, and 3rd‑party apps with zero code. Use presets for Dawn, Refresh, and popular Shopify themes, validate assignments before publish, and preview which images will render live per variant. Cuts setup time from hours to minutes and prevents theme regressions.

Requirements

Theme Preset Auto‑Mapping
"As a boutique owner, I want to apply a theme‑specific mapping preset automatically so that I can configure variant image behavior in minutes without learning theme internals."
Description

Provide a built‑in library of mapping presets for Shopify themes (e.g., Dawn, Refresh, Sense) that auto‑detects the store’s active theme and version, then preconfigures metafield-to-block assignments for common variant flags (color, finish, size, image style). Presets are editable and versioned, with safe defaults and transparent diffs when themes update. The system supports override and fallback rules, merges custom mappings with preset updates, and synchronizes changes without code edits. Outcome: merchants can set up mappings in minutes while maintaining brand consistency and reducing misconfiguration risk.

Acceptance Criteria
Zero‑Code Mapping Builder
"As a non‑technical seller, I want to map my variant flags to theme blocks via a visual builder so that I can control which images display per variant without writing code."
Description

Deliver an interactive drag‑and‑drop UI to map data sources (variant metafields, product metafields, tags, options) to targets (theme sections/blocks, page‑builder components, and supported app endpoints) with conditional rules (e.g., if variant.color = "Red" then use preset "Crimson Studio"). Supports priority ordering, test data selection, inline validation, and instant preview handoff. Includes a target catalog with searchable connectors and schema hints, enabling non‑technical users to create robust mappings without editing theme code.

Acceptance Criteria
Live Variant Image Preview
"As a merchandiser, I want to preview which images will render for each variant before publishing so that I can catch gaps and ensure a consistent customer experience."
Description

Provide a safe, sandboxed storefront preview that renders the active theme with proposed mappings to show exactly which images will display for each variant and state (selected, hover, gallery position) across desktop and mobile breakpoints. Supports variant toggling, before/after comparison, highlight of unmapped variants, and deep links for team review. No live changes occur until publish, reducing guesswork and preventing regressions.

Acceptance Criteria
Pre‑Publish Validation & Conflict Detection
"As a store admin, I want automated validation of my mappings before publishing so that I can prevent broken images and theme conflicts on the live site."
Description

Implement a rules engine that validates all mappings prior to publish: existence and type checks for metafields, detection of missing assets, conflicting rules, unsupported theme/app versions, circular conditions, and API permission gaps. Classify issues by severity, provide auto‑fix suggestions, and block publishing on critical errors. Generate a downloadable validation report for audit and collaboration.

Acceptance Criteria
Safe Publish, Versioning & Rollback
"As an operations manager, I want versioned publishes with instant rollback so that I can deploy mapping changes confidently without risking storefront downtime."
Description

Offer a controlled deployment workflow with environments (Draft, Preview, Live), atomic publishes, automatic backups of prior mappings, and one‑click rollback. Include change logs with who/what/when, diff views between versions, and the ability to schedule publishes during low‑traffic windows. This safeguards the storefront and accelerates recovery if unexpected behavior occurs.

Acceptance Criteria
Connector SDK for Themes & Apps
"As a developer partner, I want a stable connector SDK with examples so that I can integrate my app with Metafield Mapper and guarantee compatibility over time."
Description

Provide an extensible SDK to build and maintain connectors for themes, page‑builders, and third‑party apps. Includes schema introspection, capability declaration (supported targets, field types), versioned contracts, test harness, and automated compatibility checks. Ship first‑party connectors for Dawn, Refresh, Shogun, PageFly, and GemPages, with a review process for community contributions. Enables rapid integration growth while keeping mappings reliable across updates.

Acceptance Criteria

Live Cost Meter

See real‑time, per‑batch and month‑to‑date costs as you queue uploads. View per‑image rates by preset, applied discounts, taxes, and remaining cap in one place. Color‑coded warnings and “process within budget” checks prevent surprise bills and help you pick the most cost‑effective settings before you hit run.

Requirements

Real-Time Cost Aggregation Engine
"As a seller preparing a large upload, I want costs to update instantly as I change settings so that I can see the financial impact before I run the batch."
Description

Implement an event-driven service that calculates and streams up-to-the-moment per-batch and month-to-date (MTD) costs as users add, remove, or modify items in the upload queue. The engine merges inputs from the pricing catalog, selected presets, image counts, discounts, and taxes to produce a single authoritative cost model. It must support batching hundreds of photos with sub-second recalculation (<200 ms per queue mutation), be idempotent across retries, and handle partial failures gracefully. Expose a typed API for the web client to subscribe to updates and render granular line items (per-image rate, discounts, tax, totals), ensuring consistency with downstream billing and invoices.

Acceptance Criteria
Preset Rate, Discount, and Promotion Resolver
"As a cost-conscious user, I want to see exactly how preset choices and discounts affect my per-image rate so that I can pick the most affordable configuration."
Description

Create a resolver that determines the effective per-image rate based on the selected style preset, plan tier, and current promotions, and then applies stackable discount rules (e.g., volume breaks, coupon codes, partner discounts) in a deterministic order. The resolver should return transparent line items showing base rate, each discount applied, and the final effective rate per preset. It must reference a versioned pricing catalog, support future-dated pricing, and cache results for fast UI updates while remaining consistent with server-side verification.

Acceptance Criteria
Tax Calculation & Localization
"As an international customer, I want taxes and totals shown accurately in my region and currency so that I avoid surprises on my bill."
Description

Integrate jurisdiction-aware tax calculation that determines applicable VAT/GST/sales tax based on the customer’s billing profile and ship-to region, supporting inclusive/exclusive tax displays as required. Provide localized currency formatting and rounding rules, with real-time tax estimates shown alongside subtotals and totals. Implement a provider abstraction (e.g., Stripe Tax or equivalent) with fallback logic and caching to ensure low-latency updates without diverging from final invoicing.

Acceptance Criteria
Monthly Spend Tracker & Cap Management
"As a subscriber on a capped plan, I want to see my remaining budget and predicted post-batch spend so that I can plan uploads without exceeding my limits."
Description

Track and surface month-to-date spend and remaining plan caps or budgets directly in the cost meter. Reconcile in near-real time with the billing system to reflect processed jobs, pending charges, and credits. Support soft and hard caps, display remaining capacity (e.g., images or currency), and model predicted post-batch totals to show whether a planned run would exceed limits.

Acceptance Criteria
Budget Guardrails & Color-Coded Alerts
"As a user managing tight budgets, I want clear visual warnings when I’m about to overspend so that I can adjust settings before processing."
Description

Provide visual guardrails with configurable thresholds (green/amber/red) that respond to real-time predictions for per-batch and MTD costs. Alerts should cover nearing thresholds, cap breaches, missing billing info, or invalid discounts. Ensure WCAG-compliant color contrast, redundant iconography and text labels, and contextual tooltips that explain why a warning appears and how to resolve it.

Acceptance Criteria
Process-Within-Budget Preflight Check
"As a shop owner, I want a final budget check with suggestions before I start processing so that I don’t accidentally trigger an overage."
Description

Add a preflight validator that, on run, verifies the batch can be processed within the user’s budget, caps, and policy constraints. Provide actionable recommendations (e.g., switch to a lower-cost preset, reduce resolution, split batch) and support one-click optimization to meet a target spend. Respect hard caps by blocking processing with clear guidance; allow overrides only for authorized roles when policies permit.

Acceptance Criteria
Cost Meter UI Components & Accessibility
"As a user comparing options, I want a clear, accessible cost panel that breaks down every component of price so that I can make informed choices quickly."
Description

Build reusable UI components that render the live cost meter: per-batch summary, per-image rate breakdown by preset, applied discounts, tax line, totals, and MTD panel with remaining cap. Components must be responsive, performant for large queues, keyboard-navigable, and screen-reader friendly with concise ARIA labels. Include a currency selector (where allowed), hover details for line items, and stable layout to avoid jitter as values update.

Acceptance Criteria

Smart Caps

Set soft and hard monthly (or daily) caps by workspace, brand, project, or client. Choose what happens at each threshold—auto‑queue to next cycle, pause high‑cost steps (e.g., ghosting), or request approval. Time‑zone aware resets, cap exceptions for launches, and clear logs keep spend predictable without slowing the team.

Requirements

Hierarchical Caps by Scope
"As an operations admin, I want to set and manage caps at workspace, brand, project, and client levels with clear precedence so that spend stays predictable across teams without manual tracking."
Description

Enable admins to define daily or monthly processing caps at workspace, brand, project, and client levels with clear precedence and inheritance. Lower scopes inherit defaults from higher scopes but can be overridden within allowed bounds. Provide a unified UI and API to create, edit, and visualize caps per scope, including current usage, remaining capacity, and next reset time. Ensure caps apply across PixelLift batch pipelines without disrupting in-flight jobs, and reconcile usage from all steps (retouch, background removal, ghosting, presets) into a single meter per scope.

Acceptance Criteria
Soft & Hard Caps with Threshold Actions
"As a studio manager, I want to configure soft and hard thresholds with automatic actions so that production continues safely while preventing budget overruns."
Description

Allow configuration of one or more soft thresholds (e.g., 70%, 85%, 95%) and a hard cap per scope. For each threshold, enable action rules such as auto-queue new jobs to the next cycle, pause high-cost steps (e.g., ghosting or 8K upscaling), require approval before continuing, or notify stakeholders. Ensure actions are atomic, idempotent, and recoverable, with sensible defaults and fallbacks. Provide per-scope policies and templates that can be reused across brands and projects, and guarantee that hard caps block additional spend while preserving job integrity.

Acceptance Criteria
Time‑Zone Aware Reset Schedules
"As a finance lead, I want caps to reset based on each brand’s local time zone so that reporting aligns with our accounting periods and regional operating hours."
Description

Support cap resets on daily, weekly, or monthly schedules tied to a specified time zone per scope. Handle calendar edge cases (month length, leap years) and daylight saving changes deterministically, with explicit reset timestamps. Allow administrators to set custom reset times (e.g., 6 AM local) and display countdowns to reset in UI and API. Include proration logic for mid-cycle changes and show historical cycles for context.

Acceptance Criteria
Exceptions & Temporary Overrides
"As a brand lead, I want to request temporary cap increases for launches with a clear approval trail so that critical campaigns are not blocked while spend remains controlled."
Description

Provide time-bound exceptions for launches or campaigns that temporarily increase or bypass caps. Exceptions include start/end time, affected scopes, new limit or multiplier, and justification. Require approver selection and optional attachments. Ensure exceptions auto-expire, are conflict-checked against existing policies, and clearly annotate affected jobs and dashboards. Maintain a full audit trail and summary of incremental spend attributed to each exception.

Acceptance Criteria
Approval Workflow & Notifications
"As an approver, I want actionable notifications and a simple approval queue so that I can unblock high-priority work without compromising budget policies."
Description

Implement a lightweight approval workflow triggered by thresholds, hard caps, or exception requests. Route to designated approvers based on scope with fallback delegates and SLAs. Provide in-app, email, and Slack notifications with deep links for one-click approve/deny and required rationale. Surface pending approvals in a consolidated queue, and unblock or queue jobs automatically based on decisions. Log all actions and communicate outcomes to requestors and job owners.

Acceptance Criteria
Cap Activity Logs & Reporting
"As an operations analyst, I want detailed logs and reports of cap events so that I can audit decisions, forecast spend, and optimize policies over time."
Description

Expose clear, immutable logs of usage accrual, threshold crossings, triggered actions, pauses, approvals, and exceptions. Provide filters by date range, scope, user, action type, and job ID, with CSV export and API access. Include dashboards for current burn rate, forecast to cap, and historical trendlines to help teams tune thresholds. Ensure logs are time-zone aware and reference the policy version in effect at event time.

Acceptance Criteria

Top‑Up Rules

Automate credit top‑ups with guardrails. Define amounts, max frequency, funding source, and required approvers. Enable just‑in‑time micro top‑ups to keep batches flowing, add spend locks during off‑hours, and get instant alerts if payment fails—so work never stalls and budgets stay protected.

Requirements

Rule Builder (UI & API)
"As a finance admin, I want to define automated top‑up rules with caps, schedules, approvers, and funding sources so that credits replenish safely without exceeding budget policies."
Description

Provide a configurable rule builder to define automated credit top‑ups, including triggers (current balance threshold, projected batch usage, failed payment fallback), top‑up amounts (fixed, percentage of deficit, or tiered), min/max per top‑up, frequency caps (per hour/day/week), per-time-window rate limits, funding source selection (primary/backup with priority order), required approvers (users, roles, or groups), and activation schedules. Support draft/publish states, versioning, validation with in‑product previews/dry-runs, and scoping by workspace/brand. Expose full CRUD via secure APIs with server-side evaluation, idempotency keys, and RBAC permissions. Persist rule definitions with schema that supports currency, locale, and timezone. Integrate with PixelLift usage metrics to evaluate triggers, and ensure backward compatibility for accounts without rules.

Acceptance Criteria
Just‑in‑Time Micro Top‑Ups
"As an operations manager, I want credits to top up just in time for each batch so that processing never pauses and cash isn’t over‑committed."
Description

Enable micro top‑ups that execute at job start or mid-batch when projected credits are insufficient, calculating the minimum required amount plus a configurable buffer to avoid stalls while minimizing tied-up funds. Incorporate a projection model that estimates credits needed per batch from queue size and historical cost per image/preset. Support hold/release flows (authorize then capture), combine multiple micro top‑ups within a frequency cap, and reconcile unused buffer at batch completion. Ensure concurrency safety for simultaneous batches, idempotent execution per batch, and graceful degradation to smaller increments on partial payment success.

Acceptance Criteria
Approval Workflow & Escalation
"As a controller, I want high‑value or off‑policy top‑ups to require approval and auto‑escalate if delayed so that spend stays compliant without blocking operations."
Description

Implement configurable approval gates for top‑ups triggered by amount thresholds, off‑hours windows, or policy exceptions. Support single‑ and multi‑step approvals, approver groups with quorum or sequential rules, SLAs with auto‑escalation, and fallback actions (e.g., reduce amount or split into micro top‑ups) if approvals time out. Deliver approval actions via email, in‑app, and mobile push with one‑tap approve/deny and reason codes. Enforce RBAC, track decision timelines, and block or queue the top‑up until approval is resolved. Record all actions for auditability.

Acceptance Criteria
Spend Locks & Schedules
"As a budget owner, I want to restrict when and how much we can top up during off‑hours so that we avoid unintended spend while maintaining controlled exceptions."
Description

Allow admins to define lock windows that prevent or restrict top‑ups during specified times (e.g., weekends, holidays, or after hours) and to set active spend schedules with per‑window caps. Support organization and workspace timezones, calendar-based exceptions, and temporary overrides with documented approval. When a lock is active, queue non‑urgent top‑ups and notify stakeholders; allow emergency overrides with elevated approval and smaller capped amounts. Provide clear UI indicators and API fields reflecting current lock state and next eligible window.

Acceptance Criteria
Payment Resilience & Failover
"As a billing admin, I want top‑ups to succeed reliably with automatic retries and backup funding so that batches don’t fail due to payment hiccups."
Description

Integrate with payment providers to execute top‑ups with robust retry and failover: tokenize funding sources, pre‑validate availability, handle 3DS/SCA when required, classify errors (transient vs. hard), and retry with exponential backoff. Automatically fail over to backup funding sources based on rule priority and merchant preferences. Ensure idempotent charges, duplicate protection, and safe replays on webhook delays. Surface real‑time status to the rule engine to decide whether to reattempt, downshift amount, or trigger approvals. Adhere to PCI boundaries, log masked artifacts, and support multi‑currency settlement and FX rounding rules.

Acceptance Criteria
Notifications & Audit Trail
"As a team lead, I want real‑time alerts and a searchable audit history so that I can act quickly and prove compliance during reviews."
Description

Deliver instant notifications for key events—payment failure, approval required, cap reached, rule conflict, lock active, and successful top‑ups—via email, Slack, webhooks, and in‑app banners. Allow per‑user and per‑workspace preferences with quiet hours and rate limiting. Produce structured webhook events for external systems. Maintain an immutable, exportable audit trail capturing who configured rules, what changed, when approvals occurred, payment attempts, provider responses (redacted), and outcomes; support search and filters by time, rule, batch, and funding source. Provide a dashboard summarizing top‑up history, savings from micro top‑ups, failure rates, and pending approvals.

Acceptance Criteria

Usage Pools

Create shared credit pools with sub‑allocations per brand, client, or campaign. Reserve credits for scheduled drops, allow carryover or expirations, and transfer balances between pools with audit trails. Agencies and multi‑brand teams get clean cost attribution and fewer end‑of‑month scrambles.

Requirements

Pool Creation & Sub-Allocation Management
"As an agency admin, I want to create and manage credit pools with sub-allocations per brand or campaign so that my teams can consume credits from the right budget without manual tracking."
Description

Enable admins to create named credit pools with metadata (brand, client, campaign), define total pool budgets, and configure nested sub-allocations with hard/soft limits. Support pool ownership, visibility scopes, and role-based permissions for who can consume or manage each pool. Include overage rules (block, warn, allow with charge), burn order (pool vs. sub-allocations), and mapping tags to align with PixelLift’s batch upload workflows. Provide CRUD APIs and UI, validation for naming uniqueness, and safeguards to prevent double counting. This establishes the foundation for accurate credit governance and clean attribution across agencies and multi-brand teams.

Acceptance Criteria
Scheduled Drop Reservations
"As a brand manager, I want to reserve credits for my scheduled product drop so that I’m guaranteed processing capacity when my catalog goes live."
Description

Allow reserving credits from a pool (or sub-allocation) for a future time window to protect capacity for product drops. Reservations support quantity, timeframe, linked project/batch IDs, and priority. During the window, consumption preferentially draws from the reservation; unused amounts auto-release at window end. Handle conflicts with clear rules (first-come, priority override with approval), prevent over-reservation beyond pool limits, and expose availability calendars. Integrate with PixelLift batch scheduling so reservations are created/linked at upload time. Include APIs and UI, timezone handling, and audit entries for all reservations.

Acceptance Criteria
Balance Transfers with Approval & Audit Ledger
"As a finance lead, I want to transfer credits between client pools with approvals so that I can re-balance budgets mid-month while maintaining compliance and traceability."
Description

Support transferring credits between pools and sub-allocations with guardrails: configurable approval thresholds, required reason codes/notes, and optional multi-step approvals. All transfers generate immutable ledger entries (who, when, from, to, amount, before/after balances) with export capability. Enforce role-based permissions, prevent negative balances, and provide rollback only via compensating entries. Surface transfer history in pool detail views and via API webhooks for finance systems. This ensures flexibility to re-balance budgets while maintaining a complete audit trail.

Acceptance Criteria
Carryover & Expiration Policy Engine
"As an operations manager, I want to set carryover and expiration rules per pool so that unused credits are handled predictably without manual cleanups."
Description

Introduce configurable policies per pool for monthly carryover caps, expiration schedules, grace periods, and FIFO burn order across current vs. carryover balances. Policies can inherit from org defaults or be overridden at the pool level. System processes expirations automatically, records ledger entries, and notifies stakeholders ahead of deadlines. Include simulation tools to preview upcoming expirations and their impact. Ensure policies are enforced consistently across UI, API, and background jobs, and displayed transparently in pool settings and user-facing consumption dialogs.

Acceptance Criteria
Pool-Aware Processing & Default Mapping
"As a content producer, I want my batch uploads to automatically bill the correct pool so that I don’t have to choose budgets manually every time."
Description

Integrate pool selection seamlessly into PixelLift’s batch upload and API flows. Provide rule-based default mapping of uploads to pools based on brand/client/campaign tags, with user override (subject to permissions). Ensure atomic debit of credits at job submission with idempotency keys to avoid double-charging, and handle insufficient funds with clear error states and fallback options (request transfer, purchase add-on). Display current pool balance and reservation usage in upload UI. Log consumption with references to job IDs for end-to-end traceability.

Acceptance Criteria
Cost Attribution Reporting & Exports
"As an agency owner, I want detailed usage reports by client and campaign so that I can attribute costs accurately and reconcile billing."
Description

Provide reporting that breaks down credit usage and remaining balances by pool, sub-allocation, brand, client, campaign, user, and time period. Include filters, pivot views, and downloadable CSV exports, plus scheduled delivery to email/S3 and integration endpoints for BI tools. Reports tie each consumption entry back to job IDs and style-presets to support ROI analysis. Support multi-entity roll-ups for agencies and per-client sharing links with scoped visibility. This delivers the clean cost attribution promised to multi-brand teams.

Acceptance Criteria
Notifications & Threshold Alerts
"As a project coordinator, I want proactive alerts about low balances and upcoming expirations so that I can take action before my scheduled edits are at risk."
Description

Implement configurable alerts for low balances, impending expirations, reservation conflicts, and failed debits. Support channel preferences (email, Slack, in-app, webhooks) and per-pool thresholds. Provide daily digests to reduce noise and immediate alerts for critical events. Expose alert settings via UI and API, include actionable links (top up, request transfer, edit reservation), and log notification history for auditing. This reduces end-of-month scrambles by proactively surfacing issues before they block processing.

Acceptance Criteria

Forecast Planner

Predict upcoming spend using scheduled releases, historical volumes, and feature choices. Run “what‑if” scenarios (volume, channels, effects) to see cost impact, get alerts if plans will exceed caps, and accept auto suggestions to split batches or switch to lighter presets to fit the budget.

Requirements

Unified Forecast Data Ingestion
"As a store owner, I want PixelLift to automatically pull my release calendar and past image volumes so that my forecasts reflect real activity and I don’t have to manually assemble data."
Description

Implements automated ingestion and normalization of all inputs required for forecasting, including scheduled batch releases from the Upload Scheduler, historical processed image volumes by channel, and preset/style usage history. Constructs a forecasting-ready time series with breakdowns by channel, preset, and image type, covering at least the past 12 months with configurable backfill. Includes data quality checks (deduplication, missing data interpolation, timezone alignment), seasonality markers (holidays, promotions), and catalog metadata linkage to ensure forecasts reflect PixelLift’s real activity patterns for each workspace. Exposes the curated dataset to the Forecast Planner via internal APIs for consistent, accurate modeling.

Acceptance Criteria
Pricing & Cost Engine with Preset Sensitivity
"As an operations manager, I want forecasted costs to reflect our tiers and preset mix so that budget planning aligns with what we’ll actually be billed."
Description

Builds a deterministic cost calculation engine that translates forecasted volumes into spend, accounting for tiered pricing, channel-specific rates, preset complexity (e.g., background removal, retouch strength), and discounts. Supports stepwise volume tiers per billing period, effective-date pricing catalogs, and region-specific taxes/fees. Provides an API to evaluate baseline and what-if scenarios and returns totals plus per-dimension breakdowns (by channel, preset, period). Ensures parity with the Billing service and maintains a versioned price catalog so forecasts match actual invoices.

Acceptance Criteria
Scenario Builder & Comparison
"As a marketing lead, I want to run and compare multiple what-if scenarios so that I can choose the most cost-effective plan for upcoming launches."
Description

Delivers UI and API to create, edit, and save forecast scenarios with adjustable inputs: volume overrides by channel, preset/style mix, release dates, and optional effects toggles. Computes KPIs (total spend, per-image cost, variance vs. baseline, cap utilization) and supports side-by-side comparison of up to three scenarios. Includes cloning, labeling, and persistence per workspace/user, with guardrails for valid date ranges and dependencies on scheduled releases. Presents clear visualizations (trend lines, stacked bars by preset/channel) to enable quick selection of the most cost-effective plan.

Acceptance Criteria
Budget Caps & Proactive Alerts
"As a business owner, I want proactive alerts when my planned spend will exceed budget caps so that I can adjust before incurring unexpected costs."
Description

Enables setting monthly or custom-period budget caps at workspace/account level, with soft and hard thresholds. Validates planned releases and active scenarios against caps in real time and triggers alerts at configurable thresholds (e.g., 80%, 100%, 110%). Surfaces warnings in the Planner UI and Scheduling flow, and sends notifications via in-app, email, and Slack integrations. Provides a breach impact view that shows which channels/presets drive overage and the time window at risk, supporting quick adjustments to stay within budget.

Acceptance Criteria
Auto Optimization Suggestions
"As a boutique owner, I want PixelLift to suggest batch splits or lighter presets to meet my budget so that I save time and maintain acceptable image quality."
Description

Generates automated recommendations to keep plans within budget with minimal quality impact, including splitting batches across periods, shifting channel volumes, and switching to lighter presets where allowed. Uses a constraint solver that respects deadlines, channel-specific style requirements, and minimum quality rules defined by the brand. Displays estimated savings, quality impact, and timeline changes, with one-click apply to update the active scenario. Provides explainability (what changed and why) and allows rollback of applied suggestions.

Acceptance Criteria
Assumptions Management & Versioning
"As an operations lead, I want versioned assumptions with a clear change history so that my team can audit forecasts and confidently reuse scenarios."
Description

Introduces structured management of scenario assumptions (growth rates, seasonality multipliers, channel mix, acceptance rates, price catalog version, holidays). Versions every scenario change, logging editor, timestamp, and rationale, with the ability to add notes and revert to prior versions. Displays assumption diffs and their impact on spend to improve auditability and team collaboration. Ensures consistent forecasting by tying each scenario to explicit, reviewable inputs.

Acceptance Criteria

Seat Flex

Only pay for the seats you use. Seats prorate by day, auto‑park inactive users after a chosen idle period, and offer temporary burst seats for peak weeks. Add viewer‑only or approve‑only roles at low or no cost to keep collaboration high and wasted seat spend low.

Requirements

Daily Prorated Seat Billing
"As a workspace billing admin, I want seat charges to prorate by the exact days used so that my team only pays for what we actually consume and finance reports reconcile cleanly."
Description

Implement a billing engine that calculates seat charges at daily granularity for monthly and annual plans. The service must apply immediate prorations for mid-cycle seat additions/removals and role downgrades/upgrades (e.g., editor to viewer), generate itemized invoice lines, handle multiple currencies and tax rules, and provide accurate cost previews before changes are confirmed. It integrates with the existing payment gateway, maintains an auditable, idempotent ledger of adjustments, respects the account’s time zone for day boundaries, and exposes a read API for finance reporting. Edge cases include retroactive seat backfills, plan changes mid-cycle, refunds/credits for early removals, and rounding rules consistent with finance policy.

Acceptance Criteria
Configurable Idle Auto‑Park
"As a workspace owner, I want inactive users to auto‑park after a chosen idle period so that I don’t pay for unused seats without manually auditing activity."
Description

Provide an automated mechanism that detects user inactivity based on last meaningful activity signals (login, job submission, approval action, asset download/API token usage). After a configurable idle period (e.g., 7–60 days) at the workspace level, the system moves the user to a Parked state that preserves access to view personal/profile info but disables paid editing capabilities. Auto‑park triggers notifications to the user and admins, supports one‑click unpark by admins, and optionally auto‑unparks on user return if a free seat is available. The feature must exclude viewer/approver light roles by default, log all state transitions for audit, and ensure no active batch jobs are orphaned; queued jobs from parked users are paused with a clear recovery path. All behavior is available via UI and API and is resilient to time zone differences.

Acceptance Criteria
Temporary Burst Seats Scheduling
"As an admin, I want to schedule temporary burst seats for peak weeks so that my team can scale up editing without committing to permanent seats."
Description

Enable admins to pre-schedule temporary burst seats for specified date ranges to cover peak periods (e.g., product drops, seasonal sales). Burst seats are allocated instantly during the window, billed per day at a defined burst rate, and automatically expire at the end of the window. The system supports caps, approval workflows, and cost previews, and blocks overage with clear prompts to extend or purchase additional capacity. Usage is tracked in real time; when burst seats are exhausted, new invites/concurrent editors are limited according to policy. Integrates with SSO/invite flows, honors role-based permissions, exposes utilization metrics and exports, and reconciles billing with daily prorations.

Acceptance Criteria
Low‑Cost Viewer & Approver Roles
"As a creative lead, I want low‑cost viewer/approver roles so that stakeholders can collaborate and approve work without paying for full editing seats."
Description

Introduce two light roles—Viewer (read-only access to assets, presets, and job status) and Approver (can review and approve/reject batches and leave feedback without initiating edits). These roles are free or discounted relative to full editor seats and do not consume paid editing capacity. Implement a clear permissions matrix across web and API, including gated actions, watermark or download restrictions as configured, and safe escalation paths to convert a light role to a full editor with a cost preview and proration. Ensure role assignment is available in bulk, supports SSO group mapping, and is fully auditable with reversible changes.

Acceptance Criteria
Seat Management Dashboard
"As an account admin, I want a single dashboard to manage seats, roles, and costs so that I can keep collaboration high while controlling spend."
Description

Deliver an admin dashboard to view and manage all seats across the workspace: active vs. parked users, roles, burst seat schedules, idle timers, and historical activity. Provide bulk actions (assign roles, park/unpark, invite/remove), inline cost previews before changes, filters/search, and CSV export. Include real-time utilization charts and projected end-of-cycle costs based on current allocations and scheduled bursts. Surface policy settings (idle threshold, auto‑unpark, role defaults) with guardrails and contextual help. All actions emit audit events and require appropriate admin permissions.

Acceptance Criteria
Seat Usage Notifications & Alerts
"As a billing admin, I want timely notifications about parking and burst seat changes so that I can prevent surprises on our invoice and keep the team informed."
Description

Provide configurable email and in‑app notifications for key seat events: upcoming auto‑park warnings, successful parking/unparking, burst seat start/ending reminders, seat cap approaching/reached, and mid‑cycle cost change summaries. Include daily/weekly digest options, per-admin preferences, localization, accessible templates, and secure deep links to the dashboard. Implement rate limiting and deduplication to prevent alert fatigue, and ensure all events are logged for audit and can be queried via API.

Acceptance Criteria

Spend Guard

Add approval gates and alerts for cost thresholds. Flag batches that would exceed caps or surpass per‑project limits, show clear cost diffs vs. baseline, and require one‑click approval before processing. Slack/Email notifications and API webhooks keep finance and ops aligned in real time.

Requirements

Threshold Policy Engine
"As a finance admin, I want to configure workspace-, project-, and batch-level spend caps (soft/hard) so that we prevent overruns while keeping teams productive."
Description

Provide a policy engine to configure workspace-, project-, and batch-level spend caps with soft and hard thresholds. Support absolute currency or credit units, per-period limits (monthly/weekly), and effective date windows with inheritance and overrides. Expose a settings UI and secure API to create, edit, test, and validate policies, including conflict resolution and preview of effective limits. Policies integrate with the pricing estimator and batch-processing pipeline to evaluate spend pre-execution and at run time.

Acceptance Criteria
Real-time Cost Estimation & Flagging
"As an operations manager, I want PixelLift to estimate batch processing costs in real time and flag overruns so that I can adjust scope or seek approval before processing."
Description

During batch upload and preset selection, calculate estimated processing cost using image counts, selected style-presets, and add-ons. Display current remaining budget versus estimate, highlight potential overruns, and block or warn based on policy (soft vs hard). Provide clear reason codes (e.g., "exceeds project cap by $124") and suggestions (reduce images, change preset). Must scale to hundreds of images, remain responsive, and gracefully handle missing data by falling back to safe defaults.

Acceptance Criteria
One-click Approval Gate & Overrides
"As a project owner, I want a one-click approval workflow when a batch exceeds limits so that processing is controlled without unnecessary delays."
Description

Introduce an approval step when a batch triggers a policy. Present a review dialog summarizing estimate, baseline, deltas, and policy breaches. Allow authorized approvers to approve/deny with one click, optionally adding justification and setting an override limit or expiration. Support routing rules (project owner, finance role), capture identity/time/IP, and unblock processing instantly on approval. Provide equivalent API endpoints for programmatic approvals and ensure pending batches are queued safely until resolution.

Acceptance Criteria
Baseline & Cost Diff Visualization
"As a budget owner, I want clear cost deltas versus baseline so that I can quickly understand the drivers and make the right approval decision."
Description

Compute and display a baseline cost (configured per project or derived from recent comparable batches) and surface total and per-image deltas. Attribute differences to drivers (volume, preset cost multipliers, add-ons) with color-coded indicators and concise explanations. Show this context in the upload flow, approval dialog, notifications, and reports, and expose values via API for downstream systems.

Acceptance Criteria
Slack/Email Actionable Alerts
"As a finance controller, I want actionable Slack/email alerts for thresholds and approvals so that I can approve or intervene immediately."
Description

Send real-time, configurable Slack and email notifications for key events: threshold approaching, approval required, approved, denied, cap reset. Include concise context (project, estimate, baseline, diffs, policy breached) and deep links to approve or review. Support Slack interactive actions (approve/deny) with secure verification, notification throttling to avoid spam, per-project channel mapping, templates, and delivery retries with backoff.

Acceptance Criteria
Spend Event Webhooks
"As a systems integrator, I want signed webhooks for spend events so that our ERP and procurement tools stay in sync."
Description

Provide secure webhooks for external systems to receive spend-related events (threshold_crossed, approval_required, approved, denied, cap_updated). Include signed payloads with idempotency keys, batch and project metadata, estimates, baselines, diffs, and policy details. Offer a management UI for endpoints, rotating secrets, test sends, delivery logs, and configurable retries with exponential backoff.

Acceptance Criteria
Audit Log & Spend Reports
"As a compliance lead, I want an auditable history of policies and approvals so that we can satisfy audits and investigate anomalies."
Description

Maintain an immutable audit trail for policy changes, approvals/denials, overrides, and notifications with actor, timestamp, IP, and before/after values. Provide searchable, filterable reports by project, user, date range, and policy, with CSV export and API access. Enforce role-based visibility and retention policies, and ensure logs are tamper-evident to satisfy compliance and internal review needs.

Acceptance Criteria

Product Ideas

Innovative concepts that could enhance this product's value proposition.

Preset Lockbox

Role-based preset permissions with review gates. Lock edits to approved owners, require approvals for changes, and log usage per brand to prevent off-brand processing.

Idea

Brand Preset Sprint

Guided 10-minute onboarding builds a brand style from five sample images—background, crop, lighting, and retouch levels—then validates on a test batch with instant feedback.

Idea

Compliance Sentinel

Preflight scans every image against Amazon/Etsy rules, auto-corrects background, margins, DPI, and shadow, and outputs a pass/fail report with reasons before you upload.

Idea

Ghost Mannequin Mode

Removes mannequins and reconstructs interior neck/arms for apparel, keeps fabric edges crisp, and matches true garment color to a reference swatch.

Idea

Supplier Fingerprint Router

Auto-detects supplier source from EXIF, logo hints, or lighting profile, then routes images to the correct preset bundle and folder, no manual sorting.

Idea

Style Splitter

One click generates multiple style variants per product (shadow/no-shadow, crop ratios, backgrounds) and pushes A/B assignments to Shopify meta-fields for automatic testing.

Idea

Fair-Flow Billing

Hybrid seat-plus-usage billing with image meters, monthly caps, and auto top-ups; show real-time cost estimates in the batch queue to prevent surprises.

Idea

Press Coverage

Imagined press coverage for this groundbreaking product concept.

Want More Amazing Product Ideas?

Subscribe to receive a fresh, AI-generated product idea in your inbox every day. It's completely free, and you might just discover your next big thing!

Product team collaborating

Transform ideas into products

Full.CX effortlessly brings product visions to life.

This product was entirely generated using our AI and advanced algorithms. When you upgrade, you'll gain access to detailed product requirements, user personas, and feature specifications just like what you see below.